人工股関節全置換術　改訂2版

出版社： 金芳堂
著者：
発行日： 2015-11-01
分野： 臨床医学：外科  >  整形外科学
ISBN： 9784765316552
電子書籍版： 2015-11-01 （改訂第2版第1刷）
書籍・雑誌
≪全国送料無料でお届け≫
取寄せ目安：8～14営業日

14,300 円(税込)

購入する
電子書籍
章別単位での購入はできません
ブラウザ、アプリ閲覧

14,300 円(税込)

購入する

目次

  • 人工股関節全置換術　改訂2版

    ―目次―

    第1章　人工股関節の基礎
    第2章　股関節疾患とPrimary THA
    第3章　THA手術の実際
    第4章　THAの摺動部材料およびデザイン
    第5章　コンピュータ支援手術

この書籍の参考文献

参考文献のリンクは、リンク先の都合等により正しく表示されない場合がありますので、あらかじめご了承下さい。

本参考文献は電子書籍掲載内容を元にしております。

第1章 人工股関節の基礎

P.8 掲載の参考文献
1) Wiles P : The Surgery of the osteo-arthritic hip. Br J surg 45 : 488-497, 1957.
 
2) Charnley J : Arthroplasty of the hip. A new operation. Lancet 1 (7187) : 1129-1132, 1961.
PubMed
3) Charnley J : Tissue reactions to polytetrafluorethylene. Letters to the editor. Lancet 28 : 1379, 1963.
 
4) Schmalzried TP, et al : Wear in total hip and knee replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Am 81-A : 115-136, 1999.
PubMed
5) Livermore J, et al : Effect of femoral head size on wear of the polyethylene acetabular component. J Bone Joint Surg Am 72 : 518-528, 1990.
PubMed
6) Morrey BF, et al : Size of the femoral head and acetabular revision in total hip-replacement arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 71 : 50-55, 1989.
PubMed
7) Wroblewski BM, et al : Stem fixation in the Charnley low-friction arthroplasty in young patients using an intramedullary bone block. J Bone Joint Surg Br 80 : 273-278, 1998.
 
8) Charnley J : The bonding of prostheses to bone by cement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 46 : 518-529, 1964.
PubMed
9) Stauffer RN : Ten-year follow-up study of total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 64 : 983-990, 1982.
PubMed
10) Engh CA : Hip arthroplasty with a Moore prosthesis with porous coating. A five-year study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 176 : 52-66, 1983.
 
11) Geesink RG : Hydroxyapatite-coated total hip prostheses. Two-year clinical and roentgenographic results of 100 cases. Clin Orthop Relat Res 261 : 39-58, 1990.
PubMed
12) Chandler HP, et al : Total hip replacement in patients younger than thirty years old. A fiveyear follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 63 : 1426-1434, 1981.
 
13) Fowler JL, et al : Experience with the Exeter total hip replacement since 1970. Orthop Clin North Am 19 : 477-489, 1988.
 
14) Wroblewski BM, et al : Triple taper polished cemented stem in total hip arthroplasty : rationale for the design, surgical technique, and 7 years of clinical experience. J Arthroplasty 16 (8 Suppl 1) : 37-41, 2001.
 
15) デレク・JW マクミン, 他 : バーミンガム股関節表面置換術. シュプリンガー・ジャパン, 東京, 2010.
 
16) Treacy RB, et al : Birmingham hip resurfacing : a minimum follow-up of ten years. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93 : 27-33, 2011.
PubMed
17) Liu F, Gross TP : A safe zone for acetabular component position in metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty : winner of the 2012 HAP PAUL award. J Arthroplasty 28 : 1224-1230, 2013.
PubMed
18) Sugano N, et al : Nationwide investigation into adverse tissue reactions to metal debris after metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty in Japan. J Orthop Sci 19 : 85-89, 2014.
 
19) Kendal AR, et al : Mortality rates at 10 years after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing compared with total hip replacement in England : retrospective cohort analysis of hospital episode statistics. BMJ 347 : f6549, 2013.
PubMed
20) Aqil A, et al : The gait of patients with one resurfacing and one replacement hip : a single blinded controlled study. Int Orthop 37 : 795-801, 2013.
 
21) Bierbaum BE, et al : Ceramic-on-ceramic bearings in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 405 : 158, 2002.
PubMed
22) Capello WN, et al : Ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty : update. J Arthroplasty 23 (7 Suppl) : 39-43, 2008.
 
23) Hasegawa M, et al : Alumina ceramic-on-ceramic total hip replacement with a layered acetabular component. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88 : 877-882, 2006.
PubMed
24) Park YS, et al : Ceramic failure after total hip arthroplasty with an alumina-on-alumina bearing. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88 : 780-787, 2006.
PubMed
25) Keurentjes JC, et al : High incidence of squeaking in THAs with alumina ceramic-on-ceramic bearings. Clin Orthop 466 : 1438, 2008.
PubMed
26) Sugano N, et al : Mid-term results of cementless total hip replacement using a ceramic-on-ceramic bearing with and without computer navigation. J Bone Joint Surg Br 89 : 455-460, 2007.
PubMed
27) 木下孟, 他 : 股関節における人工関節置換の経験と材料力学的検討. 中部整災 12 : 150-154, 1969.
 
28) Sugano N, et al : Analysis of a retrieved UHMWPE acetabular cup crosslinked in air with 1000 kGy of gamma radiation. J Orthop Res 22 : 828-831, 2004.
PubMed
29) 敷田卓治, 他 : 全人工股関節における耐磨耗性プラスチック臼蓋の開発に関する研究. 日整会誌 49 : 673-674, 1975.
 
30) 敷田卓治, 他 : 金属材料より非金属材料への人工関節材料の転換. 医療 32 449-456, 1978.
Medical*Online
31) McKellop H, et al : Development of an extremely wear-resistant ultra high molecular weight polyethylene for total hip replacements. J Orthop Res 17 : 157-167, 1999.
PubMed
32) Capello WN, et al : Continued improved wear with an annealed highly cross-linked polyethylene. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469 : 825-830, 2011.
PubMed
33) Dumbleton JH, et al : The basis for a second-generation highly cross-linked UHMWPE. Clin Orthop Relat Res 453 : 265-271, 2006.
PubMed
34) Oral E, et al : Wear resistance and mechanical properties of highly cross-linked, ultrahigh-molecular weight polyethylene doped with vitamin E. J Arthroplasty 21 : 580-591, 2006.
PubMed
35) Muller ME : Total hip prostheses. Clin Orthop Relat Res 72 : 46-68, 1970.
PubMed
36) Light TR, et al : Anterior approach to hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 152 : 255-260, 1980.
PubMed
37) Hardinge K : The direct lateral approach to the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br 64 : 17-19, 1982.
 
38) Dall D : Exposure of the hip by anterior osteotomy of the greater trochanter. A modified anterolateral approach. J Bone Joint Surg Br 68 : 382-386, 1986.
PubMed
39) Berry DJ, et al : Effect of femoral head diameter and operative approach on risk of dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87 : 2456-2463, 2005.
PubMed
40) Kwon MS, et al : Does surgical approach affect total hip arthroplasty dislocation rates? Clin Orthop Relat Res 447 : 34-38, 2006.
PubMed
41) Berger RA : Total hip arthroplasty using the minimally invasive two-incision approach. Clin Orthop Relat Res 417 : 232-241, 2003.
PubMed
42) Woolson ST, et al : Comparison of primary total hip replacements performed with a standard incision or a mini-incision. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A : 1353-1358, 2004.
PubMed
43) Nakamura N, et al : A comparison between robotic-assisted and manual implantation of cementless total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468 : 1072-1081, 2010.
 
P.17 掲載の参考文献
1) Black J : Biological performance of materials : Fundamentals of biocompatibility. Boca Taton : Taylor and Francis, 2005.
 
2) Gilbert JL : Metals. The Adult Hip. 2nd edition, 128-143, LWW.
 
3) Jergesen HE, et al : Clinical outcome in total hip arthroplasty using a cemented titanium femoral prosthesis. J Arthroplasty 17 : 592-599, 2002.
PubMed
4) Kishida Y, et al : Stem fracture of the cementless spongy metal Lubeck hip prosthesis. J Arthroplasty 17 : 1021-1027, 2002.
PubMed
5) Willert HG, et al : Metal-on-metal bearings and hypersensitivity in patients with artificial hip joints. A clinical and histomorphological study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87 : 28-36, 2005.
PubMed
6) Langton DJ, et al : Early failure of metal-on-metal bearings in hip resurfacing and large-diameter total hip replacement : A consequence of excess wear. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92 : 38-46, 2010.
 
7) Hamadouche M, et al : Ceramics in orthopaedics. Bone Joint Surg Br 82 : 1095-1099, 2000.
PubMed
8) Bierbaum BE, et al : Ceramic-on-ceramic bearings in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 405 : 158-163, 2002.
PubMed
9) Hannouche D, et al : Fractures of ceramic bearings : history and present status. Clin Orthop Relat Res 417 : 19-26, 2003.
 
10) Haraguchi K, et al : Phase transformation of a zirconia ceramic head after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 83 : 996-1000, 2001.
PubMed
11) Hayaishi Y, et al : Phase transformation of a new generation yttria-stabilized zirconia femoral head after total hip arthroplasty. Mod Rheumatol 18 : 647-650, 2008.
PubMed
12) Affatato S, et al : Advanced nanocomposite materials for orthopaedic applications. I. A longterm in vitro wear study of zirconia-toughened alumina. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 78 : 76-82, 2006.
 
13) Hamilton WG, et al : THA with Delta ceramic on ceramic : results of a multicenter investigational device exemption trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468 : 358-366, 2010.
PubMed
14) Geesink RG, et al : Bonding of bone to apatitecoated implants. J Bone Joint Surg Br 70 : 17-22, 1988.
PubMed
15) ten Broeke RH, et al : Bone reaction to a biomimetic third-generation hydroxyapatite coating and new surface treatment for the Symax hip stem. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93 : 760-768, 2011.
 
16) Harris WH : The problem is osteolysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 311 : 46-53, 1995.
PubMed
17) Ries MD, et al : Relationship between gravimetric wear and particle generation in hip simulators : conventional compared with cross-linked polyethylene. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83 : 116-122, 2001.
PubMed
18) Bradford L, et al : Wear and surface cracking in early retrieved highly cross-linked polyethylene acetabular liners. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86 : 1271-1282, 2004.
 
19) Reynolds SE, et al : Wear analysis of first-generation highly cross-linked polyethylene in primary total hip arthroplasty : an average 9-year follow-up. J Arthroplasty 27 : 1064-1068, 2012.
PubMed
20) Glyn-Jones S, et al : The John Charnley Award : Highly crosslinked polyethylene in total hip arthroplasty decreases long-term wear : a doubleblind randomized trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res 473 : 432-438, 2015.
 
21) 菅野伸彦 : 人工関節の成績股関節. 整形外科 60 : 739-744, 2009.
 
22) Nakahara I, et al : In vivo implant fixation of carbon fiber-reinforced PEEK hip prostheses in an ovine model. J Orthop Res 31 : 485-492, 2013.
 
23) East RH, et al : Wear of PEEK-OPTIMA(R) and PEEK-OPTIMA(R)-Wear Performance articulating against highly cross-linked polyethylene. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 229 : 187-193, 2015.
 
P.23 掲載の参考文献
1) Mai MT, et al : The contribution of frictional torque to loosening at the cement-bone interface in Tharies hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 78 : 505-511, 1996.
PubMed
2) Harris WH : The problem is osteolysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 311 : 46-53, 1995.
PubMed
3) Schmalzried TP, et al : Wear in total hip and knee replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Am 81 : 115-136, 1999.
PubMed
4) Archard JF : Contact and rubbing of flat surfaces. J Appl Physiol 24 : 981-988, 1953.
 
5) Kurtz SM, et al : Significance of in vivo degradation for polyethylene in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 453 : 47-57, 2006.
PubMed
6) Wroblewski BM, et al : Prospective clinical and joint simulator studies of a new total hip arthroplasty using alumina ceramic heads and crosslinked polyethylene cups. J Bone Joint Surg Br 78 : 280-285, 1996.
PubMed
7) Devane PA, et al : Assessment of polyethylene wear in total hip replacement. Clin Orthop 369 : 59-72, 1999.
PubMed
8) Penmetsa JR, et al : Influence of polyethylene creep behavior on wear in total hip arthroplasty. J Orthop Res 24 : 422-427, 2006.
PubMed
9) Livermore J, et al : EVect of femoral head size on wear of the polyethylene acetabular component. J Bone Joint Surg Am 72 : 518-528, 1990.
 
10) Muratoglu OK, et al : A novel method of crosslinking UHMWPE to improve wear, reduce oxidation, and retain mechanical properties. J Arthroplasty 16 : 149-160, 2001.
PubMed
11) McKellop H, et al : Development of an extremely wear-resistant ultra high molecular weight polyethylene for total hip replacements. J Orthop Res 17 : 157-167, 1999.
PubMed
12) Shen FW, et al : Wear versus thickness and other features of 5-Mrad crosslinked UHMWPE acetabular liners. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469 : 395-404, 2011.
PubMed
13) Rieker CB, et al : Influence of the clearance on in-vitro tribology of large diameter metal-onmetal articulations pertaining to resurfacing hip implants. Orthop Clin North Am 36 : 135-142, 2005.
 
14) Smith SL, et al : The effect of femoral head diameter upon lubrication and wear of metal-onmetal total hip replacements. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 215 : 161-170, 2001.
 
15) Langton DJ, et al : Accelerating failure rate of the ASR total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93 : 1011-1016, 2011.
PubMed
16) Lin ZM, et al : Deformation of press-fitted metallic resurfacing cups. Part 1 : Experimental simulation. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 220 : 299-309, 2006.
PubMed
17) Sieber HP, et al : Analysis of 118 second-generation metal-onmetal retrieved hip implants. J Bone Joint Surg Br 81 : 46-50, 1999.
 
18) Chan FW, et al : Engineering issues and wear performance of metal on metal hip implants. Clin Orthop Relat Res 333 : 96-107, 1996.
PubMed
19) Goldsmith AA, et al : A comparative joint simulator study of the wear of metal-on-metal and alternative material combinations in hip replacements. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 214 : 39-47, 2000.
PubMed
20) Boutin P, et al : The use of dense alumina-alumina ceramic combination in total hip replacement. J Biomed Mater Res 22 : 1203-1232, 1988.
PubMed
21) Clarke IC, et al : Ultra-low wear rates for rigidon-rigid bearings in total hip replacements. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 214 : 331-347, 2000.
PubMed
22) Hatton A, et al : Alumina-alumina artificial hip joints. Part I : a histological analysis and characterisation of wear debris by laser capture microdissection of tissues retrieved at revision. Biomaterials 23 : 3429-3440, 2002.
 
23) Tipper JL, et al : Alumina-alumina artificial hip joints. Part II : characterisation of the wear debris from in vitro hip joint simulations. Biomaterials 23 : 3441-3448, 2002.
PubMed
P.33 掲載の参考文献
1) Charnley J : Anchorage of the femoral head prosthesis to the shaft of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg 42-B : 28-30, 1960.
 
2) Callaghan JJ, et al : Survivorship of a Charnley total hip arthroplasty. A concise follow-up, at a minimum of thirty-five years, of previous reports. J Bone Joint Surg 91-A : 2617-2621, 2009.
 
3) Espehaug B, et al : 18 years of results with cemented primary hip prostheses in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register : concerns about some newer implants. Acta Orthop 80 : 402-412, 2009.
PubMed
4) Kim YH, et al : Comparison of total hip replacement with and without cement in patients younger than 50 years of age : the results at 18 years. J Bone Joint Surg 93-B : 449-455, 2011.
 
5) Webb JCJ, et al : The role of polymethylmethacrylate bone cement in modern orthopaedic surgery. J Bone Joint Surg 89-B : 851-857, 2007.
 
6) Espehaug B, et al : Antibiotic prophylaxis in total hip arthroplasty. Review of 10905 primary cemented total hip replacement reported to the Norwegian arthroplasty register, 1987 to 1995. J Bone Joint Surg 79-B : 590-595, 1997.
 
7) Bertazzori ME, et al : Release of antibiotics from polymethylmethacrylate cement. J Chemother 14 : 492-500, 2002.
PubMed
8) Reckling FW, et al : The bone-cement interface temperature during total joint replacement. J Bone Joint Surg 59-A : 80-82, 1977.
PubMed
9) Muller SD, et al : The dynamic volume changes of polymerising polymethylmethacrylate bone cement. Acta Orthop Scand 73 : 684-687, 2002.
PubMed
10) Draenert KD, et al : Strain adaptive bone remodelling in total joint replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 430 : 12-27, 2005.
PubMed
11) Charnley J : Low friction arthroplasty of the hip. Theory and practice. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 1979.
 
12) Jasty M, et al : The initiation of failure in cemented femoral components of hip arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg 73-B : 551-558, 1991.
 
13) Herberts P, et al : How outcome studies have changed total hip arthroplasty practices in Sweden. Clin Orthop Relat Res 344 : 44-60, 1997.
PubMed
14) Hodgkinson JP, et al : The correlation between the roentgenographic appearance and operative findings at the bone-cement junction of the socket in Charnley low friction arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res 228 : 105-109, 1988.
PubMed
15) Barrack RL, et al : Improved cementing techniques and femoral component loosening in young patients with hip arthroplasty. A 12-year radiographic review. J Bone Joint Surg 74-B : 385-389, 1992.
 
16) Oonishi H, et al : THA with hydroxyapatite granules at cement-bone interface : 15- to 20-year results. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466 : 373-379, 2008.
PubMed
17) Iesaka K, et al : Effects of preheating of hip prostheses on the stem-cement interface. J Bone Joint Surg 85-A : 421-427, 2003.
PubMed
P.39 掲載の参考文献
1) Moore AT : A metal hip joint : a new self-locking vitallium prosthesis. South Med J 45 : 1015-1019, 1952.
PubMed
2) Judet R, et al : A noncemented total hip prosthesis. Clin Orthop 137 : 76-84, 1978.
PubMed
3) Lord GA, et al : An uncemented total hip replacement : experimental study and review of 300 Madreporique arthroplasties. Clin Orthop 141 : 2-16, 1979.
PubMed
4) Manning DW, et al : The proximally ingrown stem. Adult hip the second edition : 1014-1024,
 
5) Hennessy DW, et al : Second-generation extensively porous-coated THA stems at minimum 10-year followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467 : 2290-2296, 2009.
PubMed
6) Paleochorlidis IS, et al : Clinical outcome study and radiological findings of Zweymuller metal on metal total hip arthroplasty. a follow-up of 6 to 15 years. Hip Int 19 : 301-308, 2009.
 
7) Anseth SD, et al : Fifteen-year to twenty-year results of cementless Harris-Galante porous femoral and Harris-Galante porous I and II acetabular components. J Arthroplasty 25 : 687-691, 2010.
PubMed
8) McLaughlin JR, et al : Cementless total hip replacement using second-generation components : a 12- to 16-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92 : 1636-1641, 2010.
PubMed
9) Bobyn JD, et al : Characteristics of bone ingrowth and interface mechanics of a new porous tantalum biomaterial. J Bone Joint Surg Br 81 : 907-914, 1999.
PubMed
10) Osborn JF : Biomaterials and their application to implantation. SSO Schwalz Monstsechr Zahnheikd 89 : 1138-1139, 1979.
 
11) Bobyn JD, et al : The optimum pore size for the fixation of porous-surfaced metal implants by the ingrowth of bone. Clin Orthop Relat Res 150 : 263-270, 1980.
PubMed
12) Crowninshield RD, et al : Cemented femoral component surface finish mechanics. Clin Orthop Relat Res 355 : 90-102, 1998.
PubMed
13) Burke DW, et al : Dynamic measurement of interface mechanics in vivo and the effect of micromotion on bone ingrowth into a porous surface device under controlled loads in vivo. Trans Orthop Res Soc 16 : 103, 1991.
 
14) Justy M, et al : In vivo skeletal responses to porous-surfaced implants subjected to small induced motions. J Bone Joint Surg Am 79 : 707-714, 1997.
 
15) Dalton JE, et al : The effect of operative fit and hydroxyapetite coating on the mechanical and biological response to porous implants. J Bone Joint Surg Am 77 : 97-110, 1995.
 
16) Furlong RJ, et al : Fixation of hip prostheses by hydroxyapatite ceramic coatings. J Bone Joint Surg Br 73 : 741-745, 1991.
PubMed
17) Geesink RG : Experimental and clinical experience with hydroxyapatite-coated hip implants. Orthopedics 12 : 1239-1242, 1989.
PubMed
18) Cook SD, et al : Hydroxyapatite-coated titanium for orthopedic implant applications. Clin Orthop Relat Res 232 : 225-243, 1988.
PubMed
19) Geesink RG, et al : Bonding of bone to apatitecoated implants. J Bone Joint Surg Br 70 : 17-22, 1988.
PubMed
20) Soballe K, et al : Hydroxyapatite coating converts fibrous tissue to bone around loaded implants. J Bone Joint Surg Br 75 : 270-278, 1993.
PubMed
21) Wang BC, et al : The shear strength and the failure mode of plasma-sprayed hydroxyapatite coating to bone : the effect of coating thickness. J Biomed Mater Res 27 : 1315-1327, 1993.
PubMed
22) Yang CY, et al : Intramedullary implant of plasma-sprayed hydroxyapatite coating : an interface study. J Biomed Mater Res 36 : 39-48, 1997.
PubMed
23) Capello WN, et al : Hydroxyapatite-coated femoral components : 15-year minimum followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res 453 : 75-80, 2006.
PubMed
P.52 掲載の参考文献
1) Konttinen YT, et al : The microenvironment around total hip replacement prostheses. Clinical Orthop 430 : 28-38,2005.
 
2) 高木理彰, 他 : 人工関節周囲の微小環境. -骨インプラント境界面の生体反応-. バイオマテリアル-生体材料- 23 : 422-430, 2005.
 
3) Goodman SB, et al : Biocompatibility of total hip replacement : A review. J Biomed Mater Res, Part A 91 : 894-902, 2009.
 
4) Cooper HJ, et al : Corrosion at the head neck taper as a cause for adverse local tissue reactions in total hip arthropasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 94 : 1655-1661, 2012.
 
5) Macnair RD, et al : Metal ion levels not sufficient as a screening measure for adverse reactions in metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 28 : 78-83, 2013.
 
6) Willert HG, et al : Wear behavior and histopathology classic cemented metal on metal hip endoprosthesis. Clinic Orthop Supple 329 : S160-168, 1996.
 
7) Boardman DR, et al : A benign psoas mass following metal-on-metal resurfacing of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg 88B : 402-404, 2006.
 
8) Gruber FW, et al : Cystic lesion of the groin due to metallosis : A rare long-term complication of metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 22 : 923-927, 2007.
PubMed
9) Pandit H, et al : Pseudotumors associated with metal-on-metal hip resurfacings. J Bone Joint Surg 90B : 847-851, 2008.
 
10) Cooper HJ : The local effect of metal corrosion in total hip arthroplasty. Orthop Clin N Am 45 : 9-18, 2014.
 
11) Meftah M, et al : Metal allergy response to femoral head-neck corrosion after total hip replacement. Current Orthop Practice 21 : 530, 2010.
 
12) 高木理彰 : 人工関節素材の摩耗による生体反応. 整形外科 (別冊) 60 : 908-914, 2009.
 
13) Tribology : Definition, Terminology, Testing. Moers, Germany. German Society of Tribology ; 2002, GfT Arbeitsblatt 7.
 
14) Wimmer MA, et al : Tribology. In The Adult Hip, volume 1, Eds. Callaghan JJ et al, 2nd edition, pp 215-226, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2006.
 
15) Gilbert JL, et al : Direct in vivo inflammatory celloinduced corrosion of CoCrMo alloy orthopaedic implant surfaces. J Biomed Mater Res A 130A, 211-223, 2015.
 
16) Schmarzried TP : Mechanical failure-loosening and wear. In : Orthopaedic Knowledge Update, hip and knee reconstruction 2, Pellicci PM, ed. AAOS, pp167-174, 1999.
 
17) Takagi M : Bone-implant interface biology. -Foreign body reaction and periprosthetic osteolysis in artificial hip joints -(review). J Clin Exp Haematol 41 : 81-87, 2001.
 
18) 高木理彰 : 人工股関節素材と生体反応. -ポリエチレン摩耗粉と細胞組織反応を中心に-. 関節外科 22 : 565-576, 2003.
 
19) Takagi M, et al : Toll-like receptors in the interface membrane around loosening total hip replacement implants. J Biomed Mater Res 81A : 1017-1026, 2007.
 
20) 高木理彰, 他 : 人工関節感染症と生体反応, Monthly Book Orthopedics 24 : 7-16, 2010.
 
21) Urban RM, et al : Dissemination of wear particles to the liver, spleen, and abdominal lymph nodes of patients with hip or knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg 82A : 457-477, 2000.
 
22) Konttinen YT, et al : Cytokines in aseptic loosening of total hip replacement. Current Orthop 11 : 40-47, 1997.
 
23) Takagi M, et al : Matrix metalloproteinases and tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases in loose artificial hip joints (review). Clin Orthop 352 : 35-45, 1998.
PubMed
24) Konttinen YT, et al : Acid attack and cathepsin K in bone resorption around total hip replacement prosthesis. J Bone Miner Res 16 : 1780-1786, 2001.
PubMed
25) Takagi M, et al : High turnover periprosthetic bone remodeling and immature bone formation around loose cemented total hip joints. J Bone Mine Res 16 : 79-88, 2001.
 
26) Schmarzlied TP, et al : Periprosthetic bone loss in total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Res 74A : 849-863, 1992.
 
27) Schmarzlied TP, et al : Current review. Wear in total hip and knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg 81A : 115-136, 1999.
 
28) Van der Vis HM, et al : Fluid pressure causes bone resorption in a rabbit model of prosthetic loosening. Clin Orthop 350 : 201-208, 1998.
 
29) Lindgren J, et al : Adverse reaction to metal release from a modular metal-on-polyethylene uncemented total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93 : 1427-1430, 2011.
PubMed
30) Donaldson FE, et al : Total hip arthroplasty headneck contact mechanics : a stochastic investigation of key parameters. J Biomech 47 : 1634-1644, 2014.
PubMed
31) Davis AP, et al : An usual lymphocytic perivascular infiltration in tissues around contemporary metal-on-metal joint replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87 : 18-27, 2005.
 
32) Willert HG, et al : Metal-on-metal bearings and hypersensitivity in patients with artificial hip joints. A clinical and histomorphological study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87 : 28-36, 2005.
PubMed
33) Perino G, et al : Implant based differences in adverse local tissue reaction in failed total hip arthroplasties : a morphological and immunohistochemical study. BMC Clinical Pathology 14 : 39 (http://www.biomedical.com/1472-6890/14/39), 2014.
 
34) Kolatat K, et al : Adverse local tissue reaction (ALTR) associated with corrosion products in metal-on-metal and dual modular neck total hip replacements is associated with upregulation of interferon gamma-mediated chemokine signaling. J Orthop Res 2015 (DOI 10.2012/jor.22916)
 
35) Campbell P, et al : Histological features of pseudotumor-like tissues from metal-on-metal hips. Clin Orthop 468 : 2321-2327, 2010.
PubMed
36) Ebramzadeh E, et al : Can wear explain the histological variation around metal-on-metal total hips? Clin Orthop 473 : 487-494, 2015.
PubMed
37) Krenn V, et al : Revised histopathological consensus classification of joint related pathology. Pathology-Research and Parctice 2010 : 779-786, 2014.
 
38) Ogunwale B, et al : Investing the immunologic effects of CoCr nanoparticles. Clin Orthop 467 : 3010-3016, 2012.
 
39) Nawabi BH, et al : Pesudotumor formation and serum ions after head metal-on-metal stemmed total hip replacement. Risk factors, time course and revision in 706 hips. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 135 : 417-425, 2015.
 
40) DeLee JG, et al : Radiological demarcation of cemented socket in total hip replacement. Clin Orthop 121 : 20-32, 1976.
PubMed
41) Harris WH, et al : Femoral component loosening using contemporary techniques of femoral cement fixation. J Bone Joint Surg 64A : 1063-1067, 1982.
 
42) Sloof TJ, et al : Bone grafting in total hip replacement for acetabular protrusio. Acta Orthop Scand 55 : 593-596, 1984.
 
43) Gie GA, et al : Impacted cancellous allografts and cement for revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg 75B : 14-21, 1993.
 
44) Prietro-Alhambra DP, et al : Association between bisphosphonate use and implant survival after total arthroplasty of the knee or hip : population based retrospective cohort study. Br Med J 343 : d7222 doi : 10.1136/bmj.d7222, 2011.
 
45) Prietro-Alhambra DP, et al : Oral bisphosphonate use and total/knee implant survival. Validation of results in an external population-based cohort. Arthritis Rheum 66 : 3223-3240, 2014.
 
46) Khatod M, et al : Association with bisphosphonate use and risk of revision after THA : Outocomes from a US total joint replacement registry. Clin Orthop, DOI 10.1007/s11999-015-4263-4, 2015.
 
47) Thilleman TM, et al : Postoperative use of bisphosphonate and risk of revision after primary total hip arthroplasty : a nationwide population-based study. Bone 46 : 946-951, 2010.
 
48) Linda R : Osteoporosis and orthopaedic surgery : Effect of bone health on total joint arthroplasty outcome. Curr Rheumatol Rep 15 : 371, 2015.
 
P.61 掲載の参考文献
1) Woolson ST, et al : Risk factors for dislocation during the first 3 months after primary total hip replacement. J Arthroplasty 14 : 662-668, 1999.
PubMed
2) Hedlundh U, et al : Muscular and neurologic function in patients with recurrent dislocation after total hip arthroplasty : a matched controlled study of 65 patients using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and postural stability tests. J Arthroplasty 14 : 319-325, 1999.
PubMed
3) Krenzel BA, et al : High preoperative range of motion is a significant risk factor for dislocation in primary total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 25 (6 Suppl) : 31-35, 2010.
 
4) Lewinnek GE, et al : Dislocations after total hipreplacement arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Am 60 : 217-220, 1978.
PubMed
5) Ali Khan MA, et al : Dislocation following total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 63-B : 214-218, 1981.
 
6) Woo RY, et al : Dislocations after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 64 : 1295-1306, 1982.
PubMed
7) Hedlundh U, et al : Dislocations and the femoral head size in primary total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 333 : 226-233, 1996.
PubMed
8) Bourne RB, et al : Soft tissue balancing of the hip. J Arthroplasty 17 (4 Suppl 1) : 17-22, 2002.
 
9) Miki H, et al : Detecting cause of dislocation after total hip arthroplasty by patient-specific four-dimensional motion analysis. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 28 : 182-186, 2013.
PubMed
10) Shon WY, et al : Impingement in total hip arthroplasty a study of retrieved acetabular components. J Arthroplasty 20 : 427-435, 2005.
PubMed
11) Pellicci PM, et al : Posterior approach to total hip replacement using enhanced posterior soft tissue repair. Clin Orthop Relat Res 355 : 224-228, 1998.
PubMed
12) Huddleston HD : An accurate method for measuring leg length and hip offset in hip arthroplasty. Orthopedics 20 : 331-332, 1997.
PubMed
13) Charles MN, et al : Soft-tissue balancing of the hip : the role of femoral offset restoration. Instr Course Lect 54 : 131-141, 2005.
PubMed
14) Noble PC, et al : Three-dimensional shape of the dysplastic femur : implications for THR. Clin Orthop Relat Res 417 : 27-40, 2003.
PubMed
15) Widmer KH, et al : The impact of the CCD-angle on range of motion and cup positioning in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 20 : 723-728, 2005.
PubMed
16) Jameson SS, et al : Lower rates of dislocation with increased femoral head size after primary total hip replacement : a five-year analysis of NHS patients in England. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93 : 876-880, 2011.
 
17) Barrack RL, et al : Stem design and dislocation after revision total hip arthroplasty : clinical results and computer modeling. J Arthroplasty 16 (8 Suppl 1) : 8-12, 2001.
 
18) Sariali E, et al : Mathematical evaluation of jumping distance in total hip arthroplasty : influence of abduction angle, femoral head offset, and head diameter. Acta Orthop 80 : 277-282, 2009.
PubMed
19) Murray DW : The definition and measurement of acetabular orientation. J Bone Joint Surg Br 75 : 228-232, 1993.
PubMed
20) Charnley J : Total hip replacement by low-friction arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 72 : 7-21, 1970.
PubMed
21) Harris WH : Advances in surgical technique for total hip replacement : without and with osteotomy of the greater trochanter. Clin Orthop Relat Res 146 : 188-204, 1980.
PubMed
22) Widmer KH, et al : Compliant positioning of total hip components for optimal range of motion. J Orthop Res 22 : 815-821, 2004.
PubMed
23) Sugano N, et al : Mid-term results of cementless total hip replacement using a ceramic-on-ceramic bearing with and without computer navigation. J Bone Joint Surg Br 89 : 455-460, 2007.
PubMed
24) Nishihara S, et al : Measurements of pelvic flexion angle using three-dimensional computed tomography. Clin Orthop Relat Res 411 : 140-151, 2003.
PubMed
25) Minoda Y, et al : Acetabular component orientation in 834 total hip arthroplasties using a manual technique. Clin Orthop Relat Res 445 : 186-191, 2006.
PubMed
26) Gross TP, et al : Intraoperative radiographs for placing acetabular components in hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469 : 1554-1559, 2011.
PubMed
27) 西久保芳樹, 他 : THA においてカップ設置精度を向上させるための簡便な方法. 第38回日本股関節学会学術集会, 2011.
 
28) 岩名正樹, 他 : THAのCup設置におけるCT based Navigation Systemの三次元的計測精度. 第40回日本人工関節学会, 2010.
 
29) Hedlundh U, et al : The prognosis and treatment of dislocated total hip arthroplasties with a 22 mm head. J Bone Joint Surg Br 79 : 374-378, 1997.
 
30) Shrader MW, et al : The use of a constrained acetabular component to treat instability after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A : 2179-2183, 2003.
PubMed
P.69 掲載の参考文献
1) Skinner HB, et al : Correlation of computed finite element stresses to bone density after remodeling around cementless femoral implants. Clin Orthop Relat Res 305 : 178-189, 1994.
PubMed
2) Kerner J, et al : Correlation between pre-operative periprosthetic bone density and post-operative bone loss in THA can be explained by strain-adaptive remodelling. J Biomech 32 : 695-703, 1999.
PubMed
3) Lerch M, et al : Numeric simulation of bone remodelling patterns after implantation of a cementless straight stem. Int Orthop 37 : 2351-2356, 2013.
PubMed
4) Engh CA, et al : Porous-coated hip replacement. The factors governing bone ingrowth, stress shielding, and clinical results. J Bone Joint Surg Br 69 : 45-55, 1987.
PubMed
5) Engh CA, et al : The influence of stem size and extent of porous coating on femoral bone resorption after primary cementless hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 231 : 7-28, 1988.
PubMed
6) Ardran GM : Bone destruction not demonstrable by radiography. Br J Radiol 24 : 107-109, 1951.
 
7) Engh CA Jr, et al : The accuracy and reproducibility of radiographic assessment of stressshielding. A postmortem analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 82-A : 1414-1420, 2000.
PubMed
8) Gruen TA, et al : "Modes of failure" of cemented stem-type femoral components. A radiographic analysis of loosening. Clin Orthop Relat Res 141 : 17-27, 1979.
PubMed
9) Kiratli BJ, et al : Determination of bone mineral density by dual x-ray absorptiometry in patients with uncemented total hip arthroplasty. J Orthop Res 10 : 836-844, 1992.
PubMed
10) Cohen B, et al : A comparative study of periprosthetic bone mineral density measurement using two different dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry systems. J Bone Joint Surg Br 77 : 479-483, 1995.
 
11) Nishii T, et al : Longitudinal evaluation of time related bone remodeling after cementless total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 339 : 121-131, 1997.
PubMed
12) Aldinger PR, et al : Pattern of periprosthetic bone remodeling around stable uncemented tapered hip stems : a prospective 84-month follow-up study and a median 156-month cross-sectional study with DXA. Calcif Tissue Int 73 : 115-121, 2003.
 
13) Kilgus DJ, et al : Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measurement of bone mineral density around porous-coated cementless femoral implants. Methods and preliminary results. J Bone Joint Surg Br 75 : 279-287, 1993.
PubMed
14) Yamaguchi K, et al : Evaluation of periprosthetic bone-remodeling after cementless total hip arthroplasty. The influence of the extent of porous coating. J Bone Joint Surg Am 82-A : 1426-1431, 2000.
PubMed
15) Tanzer M, et al : Femoral remodeling after porous-coated total hip arthroplasty with and with-out hydroxyapatite-tricalcium phosphate coating : a prospective randomized trial. J Arthroplasty 16 : 552-558, 2001.
 
16) Karrholm J, et al : Evaluation of a femoral stem with reduced stiffness. A randomized study with use of radiostereometry and bone densitometry. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84-A : 1651-1658, 2002.
PubMed
17) Kim YH : Titanium and cobalt-chrome cementless femoral stems of identical shape produce equal results. Clin Orthop Relat Res 427 : 148-156, 2004.
PubMed
18) Grochola LF, et al : Comparison of periprosthetic bone remodelling after implantation of anatomic and straight stem prostheses in total hip arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 128 : 383-392, 2008.
PubMed
19) Rahmy AI, et al : Periprosthetic bone remodelling of two types of uncemented femoral implant with proximal hydroxyapatite coating : a 3-year follow-up study addressing the influence of prosthesis design and preoperative bone density on periprosthetic bone loss. Osteoporos Int 15 : 281-289, 2004.
PubMed
20) Nishino T, et al : Follow-up results of 10-12 years after total hip arthroplasty using cementless tapered stem -- frequency of severe stress shielding with synergy stem in Japanese patients. Arthroplasty 28 : 1736-1740, 2013.
PubMed
21) Bobyn JD, et al : Producing and avoiding stress shielding. Laboratory and clinical observations of noncemented total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 274 : 79-96, 1992.
PubMed
22) Sumner DR, et al : Experimental studies of bone remodeling in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 276 : 83-90, 1992.
PubMed
23) Engh CA, et al : Roentgenographic densitometry of bone adjacent to a femoral prosthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 292 : 177-190, 1993.
PubMed
24) Yamauchi Y, et al : Comparison of different distal designs of femoral components and their effects on bone remodeling in 1-stage bilateral total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 27 : 1538-1543, 2012.
 
25) Engh CA, et al : Quantification of implant micromotion, strain shielding, and bone resorption with porous-coated anatomic medullary locking femoral prostheses. Clin Orthop Relat Res 285 : 13-29, 1992.
PubMed
26) Brodner W, et al : Changes in bone mineral density in the proximal femur after cementless total hip arthroplasty. A five-year longitudinal study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86 : 20-26, 2004.
PubMed
27) Kwon DG, et al : Correlation between stress shielding and clinical outcomes after total hip arthroplasty with extensively porous coated stems. J Arthroplasty 28 : 1728-1730, 2013.
PubMed
28) Radl R, et al : Proximal femoral bone loss and increased rate of fracture with a proximally hydroxyapatite-coated femoral component. J Bone Joint Surg Br 82 : 1151-1155, 2000.
PubMed
29) Haddad FS, et al : Structural proximal femoral allografts for failed total hip replacements : a minimum review of five years. J Bone Joint Surg Br 82 : 830-836, 2000.
PubMed
30) Widmer KH, et al : Load transfer and fixation mode of press-fit acetabular sockets. J Arthroplasty 17 : 926-935, 2002.
PubMed
31) Mueller LA, et al : Modes of periacetabular load transfer to cortical and cancellous bone after cemented versus uncemented total hip arthroplasty : a prospective study using computed tomography-assisted osteodensitometry. J Orthop Res 27 : 176-182, 2009.
PubMed
32) Huang Q, et al : Changes in bone mineral density of the acetabulum and proximal femur after total hip resurfacing arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 28 : 1811-1815, 2013.
PubMed
33) Yamasaki S, et al : Risedronate reduces postoperative bone resorption after cementless total hip arthroplasty. Osteoporos Int 18 : 1009-1015, 2007.
PubMed
34) Trevisan C, et al : Decreased periprosthetic bone loss in patients treated with clodronate : a 1-year randomized controlled study. Calcif Tissue Int 86 : 436-446, 2010.
PubMed
35) Wilkinson JM, et al : Effect of pamidronate in preventing local bone loss after total hip arthroplasty : a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial. J Bone Miner Res 16 : 556-564, 2001.
 
36) Shetty N, et al : Clinical and radiological outcome of total hip replacement five years after pamidronate therapy. A trial extension. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88 : 1309-1315, 2006.
PubMed
37) Arabmotlagh M, et al : Alendronate prevents femoral periprosthetic bone loss following total hip arthroplasty : prospective randomized double-blind study. Orthop Res 24 : 1336-1341, 2006.
PubMed
38) Arabmotlagh M, et al : Changes of femoral periprosthetic bone mineral density 6 years after treatment with alendronate following total hip arthroplasty. J Orthop Res 27 : 183-188, 2009.
PubMed
39) Iwamoto N, et al : A comparison of the effects of alendronate and alfacalcidol on bone mineral density around the femoral implant and in the lumbar spine after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 93 : 1203-1209, 2011.
 
40) Mochida Y, et al : Alendronate does not inhibit early bone apposition to hydroxyapatite-coated total joint implants : a preliminary study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84-A : 226-235, 2002.
 
41) Thillemann TM, et al : Postoperative use of bisphosphonates and risk of revision after primary total hip arthroplasty : a nationwide population-based study. Bone 46 : 946-951, 2010.
PubMed
42) Huiskes R : Biomechanics of artificial-joint fixation. In Basic Orthopaedic Biomechanics, edited by Mow VC and Hayes WC, 375-442, New York, Raeven Press, 1991.
 

第2章 股関節疾患とPrimary THA

P.81 掲載の参考文献
1) Kellgren JH, et al : Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis. Ann Rheum Dis 16 : 494-502, 1957.
PubMed
2) Inoue K, et al : Prevalence of hip osteoarthritis and acetabular dysplasia in French and Japanese adults. Rheumatology (Oxford) 39 : 745-748, 2000.
PubMed
3) Croft P, et al : Osteoarthritis of the hip and acetabular dysplasia. Ann Rheum Dis 50 : 308-310, 1991.
PubMed
4) Smith RW, et al : Osteoarthritis of the hip joint and acetabular dysplasia in women. Ann Rheum Dis 54 : 179-181, 1995.
PubMed
5) Ohta H : Prevalence of osteoarthrosis of the hip and other joints in Japanese population. J Jpn Orthop Assoc 53 : 165-180, 1979.
 
6) Yoshimura N, et al : Acetabular dysplasia and hip osteoarthritis in Britain and Japan. Br J Rheumatol 37 : 1193-1197, 1998.
PubMed
7) Hoaglund FT, et al : Diseases of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am 67 : 1376-1383, 1985.
PubMed
8) Crowe JF, et al : Total hip replacement in congenital dislocation and dysplasia of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am 61 : 15-23, 1979.
PubMed
9) Ito H, et al : Three-dimensional computed tomography analysis of non-osteoarthritic adult acetabular dysplasia. Skeletal Radiol 38 : 131-139, 2009.
PubMed
10) Tonnis D, et al : Acetabular and femoral anteversion : relationship with osteoarthritis of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am 81 : 1747-1770, 1999.
PubMed
11) Sugano N, et al : The morphology of the femur in developmental dysplasia of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br 80 : 711-719, 1998.
PubMed
12) Kobayashi S, et al : Total hip arthroplasty with bulk femoral head autograft for acetabular reconstruction in developmental dysplasia of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A : 615-621, 2003.
PubMed
13) Chougle A, et al : Severity of hip dysplasia and loosening of the socket in cemented total hip replacement. A long-term follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87 : 16-20, 2005.
PubMed
14) Sugano N, et al : Polyethylene sockets and alumina ceramic heads in cemented total hip arthroplasty. A ten-year study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 77 : 548-556, 1995.
 
15) Iida H, et al : Cemented total hip arthroplasty with acetabular bone graft for developmental dysplasia. Long-term results and survivorship analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 82 : 176-184, 2000.
PubMed
16) Eskelinen A, et al : Cementless total hip arthroplasty in patients with high congenital hip dislocation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88 : 80-91, 2006.
PubMed
17) Spangehl MJ, et al : Uncemented acetabular components with bulk femoral head autograft for acetabular reconstruction in developmental dysplasia of the hip : results at five to twelve years. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83-A : 1484-1489, 2001.
PubMed
18) Dorr LD, et al : Medial protrusio technique for placement of a porous-coated, hemispherical acetabular component without cement in a total hip arthroplasty in patients who have acetabular dysplasia. J Bone Joint Surg Am 81 : 83-92, 1999.
 
19) Kaneuji A, et al : Minimum ten-year results of a porous acetabular component for Crowe I to III hip dysplasia using an elevated hip center. J Arthroplasty 24 : 187-194, 2009.
 
20) Takao M, et al : The results of a press-fit-only technique for acetabular fixation in hip dysplasia. J Arthroplasty 26 : 562-568, 2011.
PubMed
21) Kishida Y, et al : Stem fracture of the cementless spongy metal Lu ¨beck hip prosthesis. J Arthroplasty 17 : 1021-1027, 2002.
 
22) Zadeh HG, et al : Uncemented total hip arthroplasty with subtrochanteric derotational osteotomy for severe femoral anteversion. J Arthroplasty 14 : 682-688, 1999.
PubMed
23) Sakai T, et al : A modular femoral neck and head system works well in cementless total hip replacement for patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92 : 770-776, 2010.
PubMed
24) Nakamura S, et al : Long-term outcome of rotational acetabular osteotomy : 145 hips followed for 10-23 years. Acta Orthop Scand 69 : 259-265, 1998.
PubMed
25) Hasegawa Y, et al : Eccentric rotational acetabular osteotomy for acetabular dysplasia and osteoarthritis : follow-up at a mean duration of twenty years. J Bone Joint Surg Am 96 : 1975-1982, 2014.
 
26) Yasunaga Y, et al : Rotational acetabular osteotomy in patients forty-six years of age or older : comparison with younger patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A : 266-272, 2003.
PubMed
27) Okano K, et al : Joint congruency as an indication for rotational acetabular osteotomy. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467 : 894-900, 2009.
PubMed
28) Ito H, et al : The Chiari pelvic osteotomy for patients with dysplastic hips and poor joint congruency : long-term follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93 : 726-731, 2011.
PubMed
29) Sakai T, et al : High survival of dome pelvic osteotomy in patients with early osteoarthritis from hip dysplasia. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470 : 2573-2582, 2012.
PubMed
30) Berry DJ, et al : The cumulative long-term risk of dislocation after primary Charnley total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A : 9-14, 2004.
PubMed
31) Johannson HR, et al : Osteonecrosis is not a predictor of poor outcomes in primary total hip arthroplasty : a systematic literature review. Int Orthop 35 : 465-473, 2011.
 
32) Kim YH, et al : Cementless total hip arthroplasty with alumina-on-highly cross-linked polyethylene bearing in young patients with femoral head osteonecrosis. J Arthroplasty 26 : 218-223, 2011.
PubMed
33) Baek SH, et al : Cementless total hip arthroplasty with alumina bearings in patients younger than fifty with femoral head osteonecrosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90 : 1314-1320, 2008.
PubMed
34) Min BW, et al : Highly cross-linked polyethylene in total hip arthroplasty for osteonecrosis of the femoral head : a minimum 5-year follow-up study. J Arthroplasty 28 : 526-530, 2013.
PubMed
35) Miyanishi K, et al : Prediction of the outcome of transtrochanteric rotational osteotomy for osteonecrosis of the femoral head. J Bone Joint Surg Br 82 : 512-516, 2000.
PubMed
36) Joshi AB, et al : Total hip arthroplasty in ankylosing spondylitis : an analysis of 181 hips. J Arthroplasty 17 : 427-433, 2002.
PubMed
37) Bhan S, et al : Primary cementless total hip arthroplasty for bony ankylosis in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. J Arthroplasty 23 : 859-866, 2008.
PubMed
38) Weng HK, et al : Total hip arthroplasty for patients who have ankylosing spondylitis : is postoperative irradiation required for prophylaxis of heterotopic ossification? J Arthroplasty (in press).
 
P.87 掲載の参考文献
1) Jasty M, et al : The initiation of failure in cemented femoral components of hip arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Br 73 : 551-558, 1991.
PubMed
2) Klapach AS, et al : Charnley total hip arthroplasty with use of improved cementing techniques : a minimum twenty-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83 : 1840-1848, 2001.
PubMed
3) Carrington NC, et al : The Exeter Universal cemented femoral component at 15 to 17 years : an update on the first 325 hips. J Bone Joint Surg Br 91 : 730-737, 2009.
PubMed
4) Chandler HP, et al : Total hip replacement in patients younger than thirty years old. A five-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 63 : 1426-1434, 1981.
 
5) Lewthwaite SC, et al : The Exeter Universal hip in patients 50 years or younger at 10-17 years' followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466 : 324-331, 2008.
PubMed
6) Halliday BR, et al : Femoral impaction grafting with cement in revision total hip replacement. Evolution of the technique and results. J Bone Joint Surg Br 85 : 809-817, 2003.
PubMed
7) Ogino D, et al : Total hip replacement in patients eighty years of age and older. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90 : 1884-1890, 2008.
 
8) Espehaug B, et al : Antibiotic prophylaxis in total hip arthroplasty. Review of 10,905 primary cemented total hip replacements reported to the Norwegian arthroplasty register, 1987 to 1995. J Bone Joint Surg Br 79 : 590-595, 1997.
 
9) Sierra RJ, et al : Contemporary cementing technique and mortality during and after Exeter total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 24 : 325-332, 2009.
PubMed
10) Snorrason F, et al : Primary migration of fullythreaded acetabular prostheses. A roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 72 : 647-652, 1990.
PubMed
11) Morscher EW : Current status of acetabular fixation in primary total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 274 : 172-193, 1992.
PubMed
12) Gonzalez della Valle A, et al : Dislodgment of polyethylene liners in first and second-generation Harris-Galante acetabular components. A report of eighteen cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83-A : 553-559, 2001.
 
13) Furmanski J, et al : Clinical fracture of crosslinked UHMWPE acetabular liners. Biomaterials 30 : 5572-5582, 2009.
PubMed
14) Epinette JA, et al : Uncemented stems in hip replacement--hydroxyapatite or plain porous : does it matter? Based on a prospective study of HA Omnifit stems at 15-years minimum follow-up. Hip Int 18 : 69-74, 2008.
PubMed
15) Ries MD : Review of the evolution of the cementless acetabular cup. Orthopedics 31 (12 Suppl 2), 2008.
 
16) National Joint Registry for England and Wales 7th Annual Report. 2010.
 
17) Takao M, et al : The results of a press-fit-only technique for acetabular fixation in hip dysplasia. J Arthroplasty 26 : 562-568, 2011.
PubMed
18) Takao M, et al : Cementless modular total hip arthroplasty with subtrochanteric shortening osteotomy for hips with developmental dysplasia. J Bone Joint Surg Am 16 ; 93 : 548-555, 2011.
PubMed
19) McCombe P, et al : A comparison of polyethylene wear rates between cemented and cementless cups. A prospective, randomised trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86 : 344-349, 2004.
 
20) Digas G, et al : 5-year experience of highly crosslinked polyethylene in cemented and uncemented sockets : two randomized studies using radiostereometric analysis. Acta Orthop 78 : 746-754, 2007.
PubMed
21) Corten K, et al : Comparison of total hip arthroplasty performed with and without cement : A randomized trial : A concise follow-up, at twenty years, of previous reports. J Bone Joint Surg Am 20 ; 93 : 1335-1338, 2011.
 
22) Clohisy JC, et al : Matched-pair analysis of cemented and cementless acetabular reconstruction in primary total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 16 : 697-705, 2001.
PubMed
23) Kim YH, et al : Total hip arthroplasty for the treatment of osseous ankylosed hips. Clin Orthop Relat Res 414 : 136-148, 2003.
PubMed
24) Gaffey JL, et al : Cementless acetabular fixation at fifteen years. A comparison with the same surgeon's results following acetabular fixation with cement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A : 257-261, 2004.
 
25) Pospula W, et al : Cemented and cementless total hip replacement. Critical analysis and comparison of clinical and radiological results of 182 cases operated in Al Razi Hospital, Kuwait. Med Princ Pract 17 : 239-243, 2008.
 
26) Makela KT, et al : Total hip arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis in patients fifty-five years of age or older. An analysis of the Finnish arthroplasty registry. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90 : 2160-2170, 2008.
PubMed
27) Makela KT, et al : Cemented versus cementless total hip replacements in patients fifty-five years of age or older with rheumatoid arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 19 ; 93 : 178-186, 2011.
PubMed
28) Hooper GJ, et al : Revision following cemented and uncemented primary total hip replacement : a seven-year analysis from the New Zealand Joint Registry. J Bone Joint Surg Br 91 : 451-458, 2009.
PubMed
29) Hailer NP, et al : Uncemented and cemented primary total hip arthroplasty in the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop 81 : 34-41, 2010.
PubMed
30) Aldinger PR, et al : Uncemented grit-blasted straight tapered titanium stems in patients younger than fifty-five years of age. Fifteen to twenty-year results. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91 : 1432-1439, 2009.
PubMed
31) Al Muderis M, et al : Cementless total hip arthroplasty using the spongiosa-i fully coated cancellous metal surface : A minimum twenty-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 93 : 1039-1044, 2011.
PubMed
32) Sugano N, et al : 11- to 14-year follow-up results of cementless total hip arthroplasty using a third generation alumina ceramic-on-ceramic bearing. J Arthroplasty (in press).
 
33) Nakahara I, et al : Eight-year wear analysis in Longevity highly cross-linked polyethylene liners comparing 26- and 32-mm heads. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg (in press).
 
34) Unnanuntana A, et al : Cementless femoral prostheses cost more to implant than cemented femoral prostheses. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467 : 1546-1551, 2009.
PubMed

第3章 THA手術の実際

P.96 掲載の参考文献
1) Hooper GJ, et al : The relationship between the American Society Of Anesthesiologists physical rating and outcome following total hip and knee arthroplasty : an analysis of the New Zealand Joint Registry. J Bone Joint Surg Am 94 : 1065-1070, 2012.
PubMed
2) Strehle J, et al : The outcome of revision hip arthroplasty in patients older than age 80 years : complications and social outcome of different risk groups. J Arthroplasty 15 : 690-697, 2000.
PubMed
3) Swanson KC, et al : Perioperative morbidity after single-stage bilateral total hip arthroplasty : a matched control study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 451 : 140-145, 2006.
PubMed
4) Goldman L, et al : Multifactorial index of cardiac risk in noncardiac surgical procedures. N Engl J Med 297 : 845-850, 1977.
PubMed
5) Malinzak RA, et al : Morbidly obese, diabetic, younger, and unilateral joint arthroplasty patients have elevated total joint arthroplasty infection rates. J Arthroplasty 24 (6 Suppl) : 84-88, 2009.
 
6) Mraovic B, et al : Preadmission hyperglycemia is an independent risk factor for in-hospital symptomatic pulmonary embolism after major orthopedic surgery. J Arthroplasty 25 : 64-70, 2010.
PubMed
7) Marchant MH Jr, et al : The impact of glycemic control and diabetes mellitus on perioperative outcomes after total joint arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91 : 1621-1629, 2009.
PubMed
8) Iorio R, et al : Diabetes mellitus, hemoglobin A1C, and the incidence of total joint arthroplasty infection. J Arthroplasty 27 : 726-729, 2012.
PubMed
9) Harris AH, et al : Hemoglobin A1C as a marker for surgical risk in diabetic patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 28 (8 Suppl) : 25-29, 2013.
 
10) Moran M, et al : Does body mass index affect the early outcome of primary total hip arthroplasty? J Arthroplasty 20 : 866-869, 2005.
PubMed
11) McLaughlin JR, et al : The outcome of total hip replacement in obese and non-obese patients at 10- to 18-years. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88 : 1286-1292, 2006.
PubMed
12) Wallace G, et al : The effect of body mass index on the risk of post-operative complications during the 6 months following total hip replacement or total knee replacement surgery. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 22 : 918-927, 2014.
PubMed
13) Haverkamp D, et al : Obesity in total hip arthroplasty-does it really matter? Acta Orthop 82 : 417-422, 2011.
PubMed
14) Busato A, et al : Influence of high BMI on functional outcome after total hip arthroplasty. Obes Surg 18 : 595-600, 2008.
PubMed
15) Beksac, B, et al : Thromboembolic disease after total hip arthroplasty : who is at risk? Clin Orthop Relat Res 453 : 211-224, 2006.
PubMed
16) Lubbeke A, et al : Differences in outcomes of obese women and men undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty. Arthritis Rheum 15 ; 57 : 327-334, 2007.
 
17) Inacio MC, et al : The impact of pre-operative weight loss on incidence of surgical site infection and readmission rates after total joint arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 29 : 458-464, 2014.
PubMed
18) 西井孝, 他 : 肥満患者の人工股関節全置換術. 第81回日本整形外科学会学術集会, 札幌, 2008.
 
19) Popa AS, et al : Predictors of ischemic stroke after hip operation : a population-based study. J Hosp Med 4 : 298-303, 2009.
PubMed
20) Riding G, et al : Paradoxical cerebral embolisation. An explanation for fat embolism syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86 : 95-98, 2004.
PubMed
21) Della Valle CJ, et al : Paradoxical cerebral embolism complicating a major orthopaedic operation. A report of two cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am 81 : 108-110, 1999.
 
22) Ammon JT, et al : Fatal cerebral emboli in the absence of a cardiac arterial-venous shunt : case report. J Arthroplasty 22 : 477-479, 2007.
PubMed
23) Patel RV, et al : Cerebral microembolization during primary total hip arthroplasty and neuropsychologic outcome : a pilot study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468 : 1621-1629, 2010.
PubMed
24) 坂井孝司, 他 : 人工股関節全置換術後に発生した脳卒中症例の検討. Jpn J Rehabil Med 46 : 793-798, 2009.
Medical*Online
25) Bartzokas CA, et al : Relation between mouth and haematogenous infection in total joint replacements. BMJ 309 : 506-508, 1994.
PubMed
26) LaPorte DM, et al : Infections associated with dental procedures in total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 81 : 56-59, 1999.
PubMed
27) Skaar DD, et al : Dental procedures and subsequent prosthetic joint infections : findings from the Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey. J Am Dent Assoc 142 : 1343-1351, 2011.
PubMed
28) Tokarski AT, et al : Dental clearance prior to elective arthroplasty may not be needed for everyone. J Arthroplasty 29 : 1729-1732, 2014.
 
29) Uckay I, et al : Antibiotic prophylaxis before invasive dental procedures in patients with arthroplasties of the hip and knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br 90 : 833-838, 2008.
 
30) Jevsevar DS, et al : The new AAOS-ADA clinical practice guideline on Prevention of Orthopaedic Implant Infection in Patients Undergoing Dental Procedures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 21 : 195-197, 2013.
PubMed
31) Young H, et al : Dental disease and periprosthetic joint infection. J Bone Joint Surg Am 96 : 162-168, 2014.
PubMed
P.101 掲載の参考文献
1) Crooijmans HJ, et al : A new digital preoperative planning method for total hip arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467 : 909-916, 2009.
PubMed
2) Davila JA, et al : Surgical planning of total hip arthroplasty : accuracy of computer-assisted EndoMap software in predicting component size. Skeletal Radiol 35 : 390-393, 2006.
PubMed
3) Gamble P, et al : The accuracy of digital templating in uncemented total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 25 : 529-532, 2010.
PubMed
4) Gonzalez Della Valle A, et al : The utility and precision of analogue and digital preoperative planning for total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop 32 : 289-294, 2008.
PubMed
5) Iorio R, et al : A comparison of acetate vs digital templating for preoperative planning of total hip arthroplasty : is digital templating accurate and safe? J Arthroplasty 24 : 175-179, 2009.
 
6) Kosashvili Y, et al : Digital versus conventional templating techniques in preoperative planning for total hip arthroplasty. Can J Surg 52 : 6-11, 2009.
PubMed
7) The B, et al : Comparison of analog and digital preoperative planning in total hip and knee arthroplasties. A prospective study of 173 hips and 65 total knees. Acta Orthop 76 : 78-84, 2005.
PubMed
8) Zhao X, et al : The utility of digital templating in Total Hip Arthroplasty with Crowe type II and III dysplastic hips. Int Orthop 35 : 631-638, 2011.
PubMed
9) Petretta R, et al : Acetate Templating on Digital Images Is More Accurate Than Computer-based Templating for Total Hip Arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2015.
PubMed
10) Lattanzi R, et al : Accuracy and repeatability of cementless total hip replacement surgery in patients with deformed anatomies. Med Inform Internet Med 28 : 59-71, 2003.
PubMed
11) Sariali E, et al : Accuracy of reconstruction of the hip using computerised three-dimensional pre-operative planning and a cementless modular neck. J Bone Joint Surg Br 91 : 333-340, 2009.
 
12) Sugano N, et al : Computed-tomography-based computer preoperative planning for total hip arthroplasty. Comput Aided Surg 3 : 320-324, 1998.
PubMed
13) Viceconti M, et al : CT-based surgical planning software improves the accuracy of total hip replacement preoperative planning. Med Eng Phys 25 : 371-377, 2003.
PubMed
14) Bayne CO, et al : Evaluation of the accuracy and use of x-ray markers in digital templating for total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 24 : 407-413, 2009.
PubMed
15) Takao M, et al : The results of a press-fit-only technique for acetabular fixation in hip dysplasia. J Arthroplasty 26 : 562-568, 2011.
PubMed
16) Sugano N, et al : Polyethylene sockets and alumina ceramic heads in cemented total hip arthroplasty. A ten-year study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 77 : 548-556, 1995.
 
17) Doehring TC, et al : Effect of superior and superolateral relocations of the hip center on hip joint forces. An experimental and analytical analysis. J Arthroplasty 11 : 693-703, 1996.
PubMed
18) Delp SL, et al : How superior placement of the joint center in hip arthroplasty affects the abductor muscles. Clin Orthop Relat Res 328 : 137-146, 1996.
PubMed
19) Sugano N, et al : Predicting the position of the femoral head center. J Arthroplasty 14 : 102-107, 1999.
 
20) Franken M, et al : A comparison of four systems for calibration when templating for total hip replacement with digital radiography. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92 : 136-141, 2010.
 
21) Heinert G, et al : Digital templating in hip replacement with and without radiological markers. J Bone Joint Surg Br 91 : 459-462, 2009.
PubMed
22) Brew CJ, et al : Scaling digital radiographs for templating in total hip arthroplasty using conventional acetate templates independent of calibration markers. J Arthroplasty 27 : 643-647, 2012.
PubMed
23) Sugano N, et al : The morphology of the femur in developmental dysplasia of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br 80 : 711-719, 1998.
PubMed
24) Hananouchi T, et al : Preoperative templating of femoral components on plain X-rays. Rotational evaluation with synthetic X-rays on ORTHODOC. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 127 : 381-385, 2007.
PubMed
25) Sariali E, et al : Three-dimensional hip anatomy in osteoarthritis. Analysis of the femoral offset. J Arthroplasty 24 : 990-997, 2009.
PubMed
P.108 掲載の参考文献
1) Hutson MM, et al : Patients' recall of preoperative instruction for informed consent for an operation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 73 : 160-162, 1991.
PubMed
2) 石井孝子 : 人工股関節全置換術におけるクリニカルパスと術前インフォームド・コンセント. 別冊整形外科 40 : 204-211, 2001.
 
3) 吉岡秀夫 : 整形外科手術におけるインフォームド・コンセントの問題点. 日整会誌 67 : 40-48, 1993.
Medical*Online
4) Bhattacharyya T, et al : The medical-legal aspects of informed consent in orthopaedic surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87 : 2395-2400, 2005.
PubMed
5) Leflar RB : The regulation of medical malpractice in Japan. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467 : 443-449, 2009.
PubMed
6) Brenner LH, et al : Beyond informed consent : educating the patient. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467 : 348-351, 2009.
PubMed
7) Lemaire R : Informed consent-a contemporary myth? J Bone Joint Surg Br 88 : 2-7, 2006.
PubMed
8) Graw BP, et al : Minimal incision surgery as a risk factor for early failure of total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468 : 2372-2376, 2010.
PubMed
9) 梁瀬義章 : 整形外科SSIと病院の患者対応. 日整会誌 84 : 857-860, 2010.
Medical*Online
10) Soohoo NF, et al : Factors that predict shortterm complication rates after total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468 : 2363-2371, 2010.
PubMed
11) 園畑素樹 : 感染人工関節の治療における主治医としての責務. MB Orthop 23 : 1-6, 2010.
 
P.116 掲載の参考文献
1) Smith-Petersen MN : Approach to and exposure of the hip joint for mold arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 31 : 40-46,1949.
 
2) Judet J, et al : The use of an artificial femoral head for arthroplasty of the hip joint. J Bone Joint Surg Br 32 : 166-173, 1950.
PubMed
3) Light TR, et al : Anterior approach to hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 152 : 255-260, 1980.
PubMed
4) Siguier T, et al : Mini-incision anterior approach does not increase dislocation rate : a study of 1037 total hip replacements. Clin Orthop Relat Res 426 : 164-173, 2004.
PubMed
5) Matta JM, et al : Single-incision anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty on an orthopaedic table. Clin Orthop Relat Res 441 : 115-124, 2005.
 
6) Oinuma K, et al : Total hip arthroplasty by a minimally invasive, direct anterior approach. Oper Orthop Traumatol 19 : 310-326, 2007.
 
7) Lovell TP : Single-incision direct anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty using a standard operating table. J Arthroplasty 23 (7 Suppl) : 64-68, 2008.
 
8) Bender B, et al : Direct anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am 40 : 321-328, 2009.
PubMed
9) Nogler M, et al : A double offset broach handle for preparation of the femoral cavity in minimally invasive direct anterior total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 21 : 1206-1208, 2006.
PubMed
10) Kennon R, et al : Anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty : beyond the minimally invasive technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86 Suppl 2 : 91-97, 2004.
 
11) Mast NH, et al : Revision total hip arthroplasty performed through the Hueter interval. J Bone Joint Surg Am 93 Suppl 2 : 143-148, 2011.
 
12) Matta JM : Hip joint arthrodesis utilizing anterior compression plate fixation. J Arthroplasty 9 : 665, 1994.
PubMed
13) Laude F, et al : Femoroacetabular impingement treatment using arthroscopy and anterior approach. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467 : 747-752, 2009.
PubMed
14) Malik AK, et al : Anterior approaches to the hip for the treatment of femoro-acetabular impingement : a cadaveric study. Hip Int 20 : 482-488, 2010.
 
15) Kennon RE, et al : Total hip arthroplasty through a minimally invasive anterior surgical approach. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85 Suppl 4 : 39-48, 2003.
 
16) Sariali E, et al : Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty using Hueter anterior approach. J Arthroplasty 23 : 266-272, 2008.
PubMed
17) Nakata K, et al : A clinical comparative study of the direct anterior with miniposterior approach : two consecutive series. J Arthroplasty 24 : 698-704, 2009.
 
18) Nogler M, et al : Reduced variability in cup positioning : the direct anterior surgical approach using navigation. Acta Orthop 79 : 789-793, 2008.
PubMed
19) Sugano N, et al : Comparison of mini-incision total hip arthroplasty through an anterior approach and a posterior approach using navigation. Orthop Clin North Am 40 : 365-370, 2009.
 
20) Restrepo C, et al : Prospective randomized study of 2 surgical approaches in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 25 : 671-679, 2010.
PubMed
21) Jewett BA, et al : High complication rate with anterior total hip arthroplasties on a fracture table. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469 : 503-507, 2011.
PubMed
22) Yi C, et al : Early complications of anterior supine intermuscular total hip arthroplasty. Orthopedics 36 : 276-281, 2013.
 
23) Christensen CP, et al : Greater prevalence of wound complications requiring reoperation with direct anterior approach total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 29 : 1839-1841, 2014.
PubMed
24) Mayr E, et al : A prospective randomized assessment of earlier functional recovery in THA patients treated by minimally invasive direct anterior approach : a gait analysis study. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 24 : 812-818, 2009.
PubMed
P.130 掲載の参考文献
1) Bertin KC, et al : Anterolateral mini-incision hip replacement surgery : a modified Watson-Jones approach. Clinical Orthop Relat Research 429 : 248-255, 2004.
 
2) Graf R, et al : Minimally invasive total hip replacement with the patient in the supine position and the contralateral leg elevated. Oper Orthop Traumatol 18 : 317-329, 2006.
PubMed
3) Pfluger G, et al : Minimally invasive total hip replacement via the anterolateral approach in the supine position. Int Orthop 31 : (Suppl 1) : S7-11, 2007.
 
4) Lequesne M, et al : Conflict between psoas and total hip prosthesis. Rev Rhum Mal Osteoarctic 58 : 559-564, 1991.
PubMed
5) 加瀬雅士, 他 : 人工股関節全置換術後に発症した腸腰筋インピンジの検討. Hip Joint 40 : 843-845, 2014.
 
P.141 掲載の参考文献
1) Dall D : Exposure of the hip by anterior osteotomy of the greater trochanter. A modified anterolateral approach. J Bone Joint Surg 68-B : 382-386, 1986.
 
2) 飯田寛和, 他 : 人工股関節置換術におけるModified Transgluteal Approach (Dall) について. 臨床整形外科 30 : 137-145, 1995.
 
3) Crowe JF, et al : Total hip replacement in congenital dislocation and dysplasia of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg 61-A : 15-23, 1979.
PubMed
4) Wagner H : Revision prosthesis for the hip joint in severe bone loss [in German]. Orthopade 16 : 295-300, 1987.
PubMed
5) Younger TI, et al : Extended proximal femoral osteotomy. A new technique for femoral revision arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 10 : 329-338, 1995.
PubMed
6) Michael JA, et al : Trochanteric osteotomy and fixation during total hip arthroplasty. J American Academy Orthop Surgeons 11 : 163-173, 2003.
 
7) 岡本尚史, 他 : Modified transgluteal approach (Dall) における大転子周囲合併症発生の検討. 中部整災誌 53 : 767-768, 2010.
 
8) Hardinge K : The direct lateral approach to the hip. J Bone Joint Surg 64-B : 17-19, 1982.
 
9) 高原智洋, 他 : 人工股関節置換術における前側方アプローチ (Hardinge法とDall法) の有用性と問題点. 整形外科と災害外科 53 : 101-106, 2004.
Medical*Online
P.148 掲載の参考文献
1) Moore AT : The self-locking metal prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg 39A : 811-827, 1957.
 
2) Gibson A : Posterior exposure of the hip joint. J Bone Joint Surg 32B : 183-186, 1950.
 
3) Hunt LP, et al : 90-day mortality after 409,096 total hip replacements for osteoarthritis, from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales : a retrospective analysis. Lancet 382 : 1097-1104, 2013.
 
4) Masonis JL, et al : Surgical approach, abductor function, and total hip arthroplasty dislocation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 405 : 46-53, 2002.
PubMed
5) Kwon MS, et al : Does surgical approach affect total hip arthroplasty dislocation rates? Clin Orthop Relat Res 447 : 34-38, 2006.
PubMed
6) Edwards BN, et al : Contributory factors and etiology of sciatic nerve palsy in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 218 : 136-141, 1987.
PubMed
7) Schoenfeld NA, et al : The management of vascular injuries associated with total hip arthroplasty. J Vasc Surg 11 : 549-555, 1990.
 
8) Kishida Y, et al : Full weight-bearing after cementless total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop 25 : 25-28, 2001.
PubMed
P.154 掲載の参考文献
1) Anwar MM, et al : Total hip arthroplasty in the neglected congenital dislocation of the hip. A five- to 14-year follow-up study. Clin Orthop Relat Res : 127-134, 1993.
PubMed
2) Takao M, et al : Cementless modular total hip arthroplasty with subtrochanteric shortening osteotomy for hips with developmental dysplasia. J Bone Joint Surg Am 93 : 548-555, 2011.
PubMed
3) Sugano N, et al : Polyethylene sockets and alumina ceramic heads in cemented total hip arthroplasty. A ten-year study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 77 : 548-556, 1995.
 
4) Takao M, et al : The results of a press-fit-only technique for acetabular fixation in hip dysplasia. J Arthroplasty 26 : 562-568, 2011.
PubMed
5) Sugano N, et al : Predicting the position of the femoral head center. J Arthroplasty 14 : 102-107, 1999.
 
6) Masonis JL, et al : Subtrochanteric shortening and derotational osteotomy in primary total hip arthroplasty for patients with severe hip dysplasia : 5-year follow-up. J Arthroplasty 18 : 68-73, 2003.
PubMed
7) Onodera S, et al : Cementless total hip arthroplasty using the modular S-ROM prosthesis combined with corrective proximal femoral osteotomy. J Arthroplasty 21 : 664-669, 2006.
PubMed
8) Bernasek TL, et al : Total hip arthroplasty requiring subtrochanteric osteotomy for developmental hip dysplasia : 5- to 14-year results. J Arthroplasty 22 : 145-150, 2007.
PubMed
9) Park MS, et al : Transverse subtrochanteric shortening osteotomy in primary total hip arthroplasty for patients with severe hip developmental dysplasia. J Arthroplasty 22 : 1031-1036, 2007.
PubMed
10) Biant LC, et al : Primary total hip arthroplasty in severe developmental dysplasia of the hip. Tenyear results using a cementless modular stem. J Arthroplasty 24 : 27-32, 2009.
 
11) Davidson D, et al : Intraoperative periprosthetic fractures during total hip arthroplasty. Evaluation and management. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90 : 2000-2012, 2008.
PubMed
12) Li C, et al : Comparison of transverse and modified subtrochanteric femoral shortening osteotomy in total hip arthroplasty for developmental dysplasia of hip : a meta-analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 15 : 331, 2014.
PubMed
13) Farrell CM, et al : Motor nerve palsy following primary total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87 : 2619-2625, 2005.
PubMed
P.160 掲載の参考文献
1) Moser KM, et al : Is embolic risk conditioned by location of deep venous thrombosis? Ann Intern Med 94 : 439-444, 1981.
PubMed
2) Lieberman JR, et al : Prevention of venous thromboembolism after total hip and knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 76 : 1239-1250, 1994.
PubMed
3) Eikelboom JW, et al : American association of orthopaedic surgeons and American college of chest physicians guidelines for venous thromboembolism prevention in hip and knee arthroplasty differ : what are the implications for clinicians and patients? Chest 135 : 513-520, 2009.
 
4) Virchow R : Gesammelte Abhandlungen zur wissenschaftlichen medizin. Meidinger Sohn, Frankfurt, 1856.
 
5) 宮田敏行 : 本邦に潜在的な凝固異常はどのくらいいるのか-遺伝子調査の経験から-. 最新医学 8 : 1683-1688, 2006.
Medical*Online
6) 津田晃佑, 他 : 機械的予防法単独による静脈血栓塞栓症予防の有効性の検討. 日本人工関節学会誌 39 : 252-253, 2009.
 
7) Geerts WH, et al : Prevention of venous thromboembolism : the Seventh ACCP conference on antithrombotic and thrombolytic therapy. Chest 126 : 338S-400S, 2004.
PubMed
8) Geerts WH, et al : American college of chest physicians. Prevention of venous thromboembolism : American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition). Chest 133 : 381S-453S, 2008.
PubMed
9) Tsuda K, et al : Natural course of asymptomatic deep venous thrombosis in hip surgery without pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis in an Asian population. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468 : 2430-2436, 2010.
 
10) Johanson NA, et al : American academy of orthopaedic surgeons clinical practice guideline on prevention of symptomatic pulmonary embolism in patients undergoing total hip or knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91 : 1756-1757, 2009.
PubMed
11) Prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism. International consensus statement (guidelines according to scientific evidence). Cardiovascular disease educational and research trust ; Cyprus cardiovascular disease educational and research trust ; european venous forum ; International surgical thrombosis forum ; International union of angiology ; Union internationale de phlebologie. Int Angiol 25 : 101-161, 2006.
PubMed
12) National institute for health and clinical excellence. Venous thromboembolism : reducing the risk of venous thromboembolism (deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism) in inpatients undergoing surgery. NICE Clinical Guideline 2007. Available at : http://www.nice.org.uk/CG046fullguideline. Accessed November 11, 2009.
 
13) Parry M, et al : Ninety-day mortality after elective total hip replacement : 1549 patients using aspirin as a thromboprophylactic agent. J Bone Joint Surg Br 90 : 306-307, 2008.
PubMed
14) 肺血栓塞栓症 : 深部静脈血栓症 (静脈血栓塞栓症) 予防ガイドライン 作成委員会. 肺血栓塞栓症/深部静脈血栓症 (静脈血栓塞栓症) 予防ガイドラインメディカルフロントインターナショナルリミテッド, 2004.
 
15) 日本整形外科学会 : 静脈血栓塞栓症予防ガイドライン. 南江堂, 2008.
 
16) Salvati EA, et al : The 2007 ABJS Nicolas Andry Award. Three decades of clinical, basic, and applied research on thromboembolic disease after THA : rationale and clinical results of a multimodal prophylaxis protocol. Clin Orthop Relat Res 459 : 246-254, 2007.
PubMed
17) Hagio K, et al : Embolic events during total hip arthroplasty : an echocardiographic study. J Arthroplasty 18 : 186-192, 2003.
PubMed
18) Sugano N, et al : Clinical efficacy of mechanical thromboprophylaxis without anticoagulant drugs for elective hip surgery in an Asian population. J Arthroplasty 24 : 1254-1257, 2009.
 
19) Fordyce MJ, et al : A venous foot pump reduces thrombosis after total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 74 : 45-49, 1992.
PubMed
20) Woolson ST : Intermittent pneumatic compression prophylaxis for proximal deep venous thrombosis after total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 78 : 1735-1740, 1996.
PubMed
21) Warwick D, et al : Comparison of the use of a foot pump with the use of low-molecular-weight heparin for the prevention of deep-vein thrombosis after total hip replacement : a prospective, randomized trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 80 : 1158-1166, 1998.
 
22) Hooker JA, et al : Efficacy of prophylaxis against thromboembolism with intermittent pneumatic compression after primary and revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 81 : 690-696, 1999.
PubMed
23) Ryan MG, et al : Effect of mechanical compression on the prevalence of proximal deep venous thrombosis as assessed by magnetic resonance venography. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84 : 1998-2004, 2002.
PubMed
24) Pitto RP, et al : Mechanical prophylaxis of deepvein thrombosis after total hip replacement : a randomised clinical trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86 : 639-642, 2004.
PubMed
25) Lachiewicz PF, et al : Multimodal prophylaxis for THA with mechanical compression. Clin Orthop Relat Res 453 : 225-230, 2006.
PubMed
26) Dorr LD, et al : Multimodal thromboprophylaxis for total hip and knee arthroplasty based on risk assessment. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89 : 2648-2657, 2007.
PubMed
27) Tsuda K, et al : Thrombophy laxis with low-dose, short-term fondapar inux after elective hip surgery. J Thromb Thrombolysis 2015 [Epub ahead of print] .
 
P.166 掲載の参考文献
1) Mangram, AJ et al : Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection, 1999. Centers for disease control and prevention (CDC) hospital infection control practices advisory committee. Am J Infect Control 27 : 97-132 ; quiz 133-4 ; discussion 96, 1999.
 
2) 骨関節術後感染予防ガイドライン策定委員会 : 日本整形外科学会骨・関節術後感染予防ガイドライン. 日本整形外科学会診療ガイドライン委員会, 南江堂, 東京, 2006.
 
3) Parvizi J, et al : AAOS Clinical practice guideline : diagnosis and treatment of periprosthetic joint infections of the hip and knee. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 18 : 771-772, 2010.
 
4) Gaynes RP, et al : Surgical site infection (SSI) rates in the United States, 1992-1998 : the National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System basic SSI risk index. Clin Infect Dis 33 Suppl 2 : S69-77, 2001.
 
5) Prokuski L : Prophylactic antibiotics in orthopaedic surgery. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 16 : 283-293, 2008.
PubMed
6) AAOS Guideline Work Group : Guideline on the Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infections of the Hip and Knee. http://www.aaos.org/research/guidelines/PJIguideline.asp,2010.
 
7) Cui Q, et al : Antibiotic-impregnated cement spacers for the treatment of infection associated with total hip or knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89 : 871-882, 2007.
PubMed
P.170 掲載の参考文献
1) Brander VA, et al : Rehabilitation following hip and knee arthroplasty. Phys Med Rehabil Clin North Am 5 : 815-836, 1994.
 
2) Spaulding NJ, et al : A comparative study of the effectiveness of a preoperative education program for total hip arthroplasty patients. Br J Occup Ther 58 : 526-531, 1995.
 
3) Whitney JA, et al : Preoperative physical activity, anesthesia and analgesia : effects on early postoperative walking after total hip replacement. Appl Nurs Res 15 : 19-27, 2002.
 
4) Gilbey HJ, et al : Exercise improves early functional recovery after total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 408 : 193-200, 2003.
PubMed
5) Gogia PP, et al : Total hip replacement in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip : improvement in pain and functional status. Orthopaedics 17 : 145-150, 1994.
PubMed
6) Haddad RJ, et al : Biological fixation of porous coated implants. J Bone Joint Surg Am 69 : 1459-1466, 1987.
PubMed
7) Rao RR, et al : Immediate weight bearing after uncemented total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 349 : 156-162, 1998.
PubMed
8) Kishida Y, et al : Full weight bearing after cementles total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop 25 : 25-28, 2001.
 
9) Woolson ST, et al : The effect of partial or full weight bearing ambulation after cementless total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 17 : 820-825, 2002.
PubMed
10) Yamamura M, et al : Open-configuration MRI study of femoro-acetabular impingement. J Orthop Res 25 : 1582-1588, 2007.
PubMed
11) Sugano N, et al : Dynamic measurements of hip movement in deep bending activities after total hip arthroplasty using a 4-dimensional motion analysis system. J Arthroplasty 27 : 1562-1568, 2012.
PubMed
12) Koyanagi J, et al : In vivo kinematic analysis of squatting after total hip arthroplasty. Clin Biomech 26 : 477-483, 2011.
PubMed
13) Healy WL, et al : Athletic activity after joint replacement. Am J Sports Med 29 : 377-388, 2001.
PubMed
14) Klein GR, et al : Return to athletic activity after total hip arthroplasty. Consensus guideline based on a survey of the hip society and American association of hip and knee surgeons. J Arthroplasty 22 : 171-175, 2007.
 
15) Abe H, et al : Jogging after total hip arthroplasty. Am J Sports Med 42 : 131-137, 2014.
PubMed
16) 相川和久, 他 : 平泳ぎ動作に関する股関節可動域. 日本股関節学会, 2003.
 
17) Macdonald W, et al : The effect of total hip replacement on driving reactions. J Bone Joint Surg Br 70 : 202-205, 1988.
PubMed
18) Todd RC, et al : Low friction arthroplaty of the hip joint and sexual activity. Acta Orthop Scand 44 : 690-693, 1973.
 
19) Stern SH, et al : Sexual function after total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 269 : 228-235, 1991.
PubMed
20) Yoslow W, et al : Hip replacement rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 57 : 275-278, 1976.
PubMed
21) Nunley RM, et al : The impact of total joint arthroplasty on sexual function in young, active patients. J Arthroplasty 30 : 335-340, 2015.
PubMed
22) 相川和久, 他 : THA 術後患者の性生活動作における脱臼の危険性-三次元骨格モデルによる解析-. Hip Joint 29 Suppl : 42-46, 2003.
 
23) Charbonnier C, et al : Sexual activity after total hip arthroplasty : a motion capture study. J Arthroplasty 29 : 640-647, 2014.
PubMed
24) Sierra RJ, et al : Pregnancy and childbirth after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87 : 21-25, 2005.
PubMed
25) Stucki G, et al : The short form-36 is preferable to the S11 as a generic health status measure in patients undergoing elective total hip arthroplasty. Arthritis Care Res 8 : 174-181, 1995.
 
26) Ware JF Jr, et al : The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). 1. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 30 : 473-481, 1992.
 
27) Laupacis A, et al : The effect of elective total hip replacement on health-related quality of life. J Bone Joint Surg Am 75 : 1619-1626, 1993.
PubMed
28) Dawson J, et al : Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 78 : 185-190, 1996.
PubMed
29) Matsumoto T, et al : Japanese Orthopaedic Association Hip Disease Evaluation Questionnaire (JHEQ) : a patient-based evaluation tool for hipjoint disease. The subcommittee on hip disease evaluation of the clinical outcome committee of the Japanese orthopaedic association. J Orthop Sci 17 : 25-38, 2012.
PubMed
30) Nilsdotter AK, et al : Hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score (HOOS) - validity and responsiveness in total hip replacement. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 4 : 1-8, 2003.
PubMed
31) Marsh J, et al : Older patients can accurately recall their preoperative health status six weeks following total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91 : 2827-2837, 2009.
PubMed
32) Garbuz DS, et al : Patients' outcome after total hip arthroplasty : a comparison between the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities index and the Oxford 12-item hip score. J Arthroplasty 21 : 998-1004, 2006.
 
33) Amstutz HC, et al : Treatment of primary osteoarthritis of the hip. A comparison of total joint and surface replacement arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 66 : 228-241, 1984.
PubMed
34) Talbot S, et al : Use of a new high-activity arthroplasty score to assess function of young patients with total hip or knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 25 : 268-273, 2010
PubMed
35) Domzalski T, et al : Activity scale for arthroplasty patients after total hip arthroplasty. J Arthropalsty 25 : 152-157, 2010.
 

第4章 THAの摺動部材料およびデザイン

P.180 掲載の参考文献
1) Nizard R, et al : Alumina pairing in total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87 : 755-758, 2005.
PubMed
2) Hamilton WG, et al : THA with Delta ceramic on ceramic : results of a multicenter investigational device exemption trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468 : 358-66, 2010.
PubMed
3) Lombardi AV Jr, et al : Delta ceramic-on-alumina ceramic articulation in primary THA : prospective, randomized FDA-IDE study and retrieval analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468 : 367-374, 2010.
PubMed
4) Baek SH, et al : Do alumina matrix composite bearings decrease hip noises and bearing fractures at a minimum of 5 years after THA? Clin Orthop Relat Res. (in press)
 
5) Aoude AA, et al : Midterm outcomes of the recently FDA approved ceramic on ceramic bearing in total hip arthroplasty patients under 65 years of age. J Arthroplasty. (in press)
 
6) Boehler M, et al : Long-term results of uncemented alumina acetabular implants. J Bone Joint Surg Br 76 : 53-59, 1994.
PubMed
7) Nevelos JE, et al : Comparative analysis of two different types of alumina-alumina hip prosthesis retrieved for aseptic loosening. J Bone Joint Surg Br 83 : 598-603, 2001.
PubMed
8) Hernigou P, et al : Ceramic-ceramic bearing decreases osteolysis : a 20-year study versus ceramic-polyethylene on the contralateral hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467 : 2274-2280, 2009.
PubMed
9) Lusty PJ, et al : Wear and acetabular component orientation in third generation alumina-on-alumina ceramic bearings : an analysis of 33 retrievals. J Bone Joint Surg Br 89 : 1158-1164, 2007.
PubMed
10) Walter WL, et al : Edge loading in third generation alumina ceramic-on-ceramic bearings : stripe wear. J Arthroplasty 19 : 402-413, 2004.
 
11) Bal BS, et al : The significance of metal staining on alumina femoral heads in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 22 : 14-19, 2007.
PubMed
12) Nizard RS, et al : Ten-year survivorship of cemented ceramic-ceramic total hip prosthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 282 : 53-63, 1992.
PubMed
13) Hamadouche M, et al : Alumina-on-alumina total hip arthroplasty : a minimum 18.5-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84-A : 69-77, 2002.
PubMed
14) Petsatodis GE, et al : Primary cementless total hip arthroplasty with an alumina ceramic-on-ceramic bearing : results after a minimum of twenty years of follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92 : 639-644, 2010.
PubMed
15) D'Antonio JA, et al : High survivorship with a titanium-encased alumina ceramic bearing for total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 472 : 611-616, 2014.
PubMed
16) Sugano N, et al : Eleven- to 14-year follow-up results of cementless total hip arthroplasty using a third-generation alumina ceramic-on-ceramic bearing. J Arthroplasty 27 : 736-741, 2012.
PubMed
17) Yeung E, et al : Mid-term results of third-generation alumina-on-alumina ceramic bearings in cementless total hip arthroplasty : a ten-year minimum follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 94 : 138-144, 2012.
 
18) Lee YK, et al : Alumina-on-alumina total hip arthroplasty : a concise follow-up, at a minimum of ten years, of a previous report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92 : 1715-1719, 2010.
 
19) Willmann G : Ceramic femoral head retrieval data. Clin Orthop Relat Res 379 : 22-28, 2000.
PubMed
20) Fritsch EW, et al : Ceramic femoral head fractures in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 328 : 129-136, 1996.
PubMed
21) Hannouche D, et al : Fractures of ceramic bearings : history and present status. Clin Orthop Relat Res 417 : 19-26, 2003.
 
22) Bizot P, et al : Press-fit metal-backed alumina sockets : a minimum 5-year followup study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 379 : 134-142, 2000.
PubMed
23) Tony A, et al : Fracture of ceramic components in total hip arthroplasty. Hip International 10 : 49-56, 2000.
 
24) Koo KH, et al : Isolated fracture of the ceramic head after third-generation alumina-on-alumina total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90 : 329-336, 2008.
PubMed
25) Park KS, et al : The survival analysis in thirdgeneration ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. (in press)
 
26) Park YS, et al : Ceramic failure after total hip arthroplasty with an alumina-on-alumina bearing. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88 : 780-787, 2006.
PubMed
27) Poggie RA, et al : Failure analysis of a ceramic bearing acetabular component. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89 : 367-375, 2007.
PubMed
28) Hasegawa M, et al : Alumina ceramic-on-ceramic total hip replacement with a layered acetabular component. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88 : 877-882, 2006.
PubMed
29) Allain J, et al : Revision total hip arthroplasty performed after fracture of a ceramic femoral head. A multicenter survivorship study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A : 825-830, 2003.
PubMed
30) Hasegawa M, et al : Cobalt-chromium head wear following revision hip arthroplasty performed after ceramic fracture-a case report. Acta Orthop 77 : 833-835, 2006.
PubMed
31) Lusty PJ, et al : Third-generation alumina-on-alumina ceramic bearings in cementless total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89 : 2676-2683, 2007.
PubMed
32) Jarrett CA, et al : The squeaking hip : a phenomenon of ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91 : 1344-1349, 2009.
 
33) Keurentjes JC, et al : High incidence of squeaking in THAs with alumina ceramic-on-ceramic bearings. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466 : 1438-1443, 2008.
PubMed
34) Restrepo C, et al : The effect of stem design on the prevalence of squeaking following ceramicon-ceramic bearing total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92 : 550-557, 2010.
 
35) Schroder D, et al : Ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty : incidence of instability and noise. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469 : 437-442, 2011.
PubMed
36) Sexton SA, et al : The role of patient factors and implant position in squeaking of ceramic-on-ceramic total hip replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93 : 439-442, 2011.
PubMed
37) Owen DH, et al : An estimation of the incidence of squeaking and revision surgery for squeaking in ceramic-on-ceramic total hip replacement : a meta-analysis and report from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Registry. Bone Joint J 96-B : 181-187, 2014.
 
38) Stanat SJ, et al : Squeaking in third- and fourthgeneration ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty : meta-analysis and systematic review. J Arthroplasty 27 : 445-453, 2012.
PubMed
39) Colwell CW Jr, et al : Ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty early dislocation rate. Clin Orthop Relat Res 465 : 155-158, 2007.
PubMed
40) Sexton SA, et al : Ceramic-on-ceramic bearing surface and risk of revision due to dislocation after primary total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 91 : 1448-1453, 2009.
PubMed
P.189 掲載の参考文献
1) Langton DJ, et al : Adverse reaction to metal debris following hip resurfacing : the influence of component type, orientation and volumetric wear. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93 : 164-171, 2011.
 
2) Haddad FS, et al : Metal-on-metal bearings : the evidence so far. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93 : 572-579, 2011.
 
3) Kwon YM, et al : Analysis of wear of retrieved metal-on-metal hip resurfacing implants revised due to pseudotumours. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92 : 356-361, 2010.
PubMed
4) Langton DJ, et al : Blood metal ion concentrations after hip resurfacing arthroplasty : a comparative study of articular surface replacement and Birmingham Hip Resurfacing arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Br 91 : 1287-1295, 2009.
PubMed
5) Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency, Medical device alert : all metal-on-metal (MoM) hip replacements (MDA/2012/008). Available at : https://www.gov.uk/drug-devicealerts/medical-device-alert-metal-on-metal-mom-hip-replacements-updated-advice-with-patientfollow-ups.2012.
 
6) U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Medical devices : recalls. Available at : http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ProductsandMedicalProcedures/ImplantsandProsthetics/MetalonMetal-HipImplants/ucm241770.htm.2011.
 
7) Esposito CI, et al : What is the trouble with trunnions? Clin Orthop Relat Res 472 : 3652-3658, 2014.
PubMed
8) Willert HG, et al : Metal-on-metal bearings and hypersensitivity in patients with artificial hip joints. A clinical and histomorphological study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87 : 28-36, 2005.
PubMed
9) Campbell P, et al : Histological features of pseudotumor-like tissues from metal-on-metal hips. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468 : 2321-2327, 2010.
PubMed
10) Hart AJ, et al : Surveillance of Patients with Metal-on-Metal Hip Resurfacing and Total Hip Prostheses : A Prospective Cohort Study to Investigate the Relationship Between Blood Metal Ion Levels and Implant Failure. J Bone Joint Surg Am 96 : 1091-1099, 2014.
PubMed
11) Cooper HJ, et al : Corrosion at the head-neck taper as a cause for adverse local tissue reactions after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 94 : 1655-1661, 2012.
PubMed
12) Cooper HJ, et al : Adverse local tissue reaction arising from corrosion at the femoral neck-body junction in a dual-taper stem with a cobalt-chromium modular neck. J Bone Joint Surg Am 95 : 865-872, 2013.
 
13) Kwon YM, et al : Risk stratification algorithm for management of patients with dual modular taper total hip arthroplasty : consensus statement of the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons, the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and the Hip Society. J Arthroplasty 29 : 2060-2064, 2014.
 
14) Squire M, et al : Acetabular component deformation with press-fit fixation. J Arthroplasty 21 : 72-77, 2006.
PubMed
15) Lin ZM, et al : Deformation of press-fitted metallic resurfacing cups. Part 1 : Experimental simulation. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 220 : 299-309, 2006.
PubMed
16) Daniel J, et al : Ten-year results of a double-heat-treated metal-on-metal hip resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92 : 20-27, 2010.
PubMed
17) Rieker CB, et al : Influence of the clearance on in-vitro tribology of large diameter metal-onmetal articulations pertaining to resurfacing hip implants. Orthop Clin North Am 36 : 135-142, vii, 2005.
 
18) Brock TM, et al : Shorter, rough trunnion surfaces are associated with higher taper wear rates than longer, smooth trunnion surfaces in a contemporary large head metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty system. J Orthop Res 2015 (in press).
 
19) Kwon YM, et al : Risk stratification algorithm for management of patients with metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty : consensus statement of the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons, the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, and the Hip Society. J Bone Joint Surg Am 96 : e4, 2014.
 
20) AAOS. Information Statement. Corrent Concerns with Metal-on-Metal Hip Arthroplasty. Available at : www.aaos.org/about/papers/advistmt/1035.asp.
 
21) Nishii T, et al : Is ultrasound screening reliable for adverse local tissue reaction after hip arthroplasty? J Arthroplasty 29 : 2239-2244, 2014.
PubMed
22) Hart AJ, et al : Sensitivity and specificity of blood cobalt and chromium metal ions for predicting failure of metal-on-metal hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93 : 1308-1313, 2011.
PubMed
23) Ziaee H, et al : Transplacental transfer of cobalt and chromium in patients with metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty : a controlled study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 89 : 301-305, 2007.
PubMed
24) Tower SS. Arthroprosthetic cobaltism : neurological and cardiac manifestations in two patients with metal-on-metal arthroplasty : a case report. J Bone Jo int Surg Am 92 : 2847-2851, 2010.
 
P.194 掲載の参考文献
1) McKellop H, et al : Development of an extremely wear-resistant ultra high molecular weight polyethylene for total hip replacements. J Orthop Res 17 : 157-167, 1999.
PubMed
2) Kurtz SM, et al : History and systematic review of wear and osteolysis outcomes for first-generation highly crosslinked polyethylene. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469 : 2262-2277, 2011.
PubMed
3) Leung SB, et al : Incidence and volume of pelvic osteolysis at early follow-up with highly cross-linked and noncross-linked polyethylene. J Arthroplasty 22 (6 Suppl 2) : 134-139, 2007.
 
4) Capello WN, et al : Continued improved wear with an annealed highly cross-linked polyethylene. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469 : 825-830, 2011.
PubMed
5) Kurtz SM, et al : Otto Aufranc Award Paper : significance of in vivo degradation for polyethylene in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 453 : 47-57, 2006.
 
6) Bradford L, et al : Wear and surface cracking in early retrieved highly cross-linked polyethylene acetabular liners. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A : 1271-1282, 2004.
 
7) Tower SS, et al : Rim cracking of the cross-linked longevity polyethylene acetabular liner after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89 : 2212-2217, 2007.
PubMed
8) Duffy GP, et al : Fracture of a cross-linked polyethylene liner due to impingement. J Arthroplasty 24 : 158.e15-19, 2009.
 
9) Furmanski J, et al : Clinical fracture of cross-linked UHMWPE acetabular liners. Biomaterials 30 : 5572-5582, 2009.
PubMed
10) Nakahara I, et al : Eight-year wear analysis in Longevity highly cross-linked polyethylene liners comparing 26- and 32-mm heads. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg (in press)
 
11) Glyn-Jones S, et al : The John Charnley Award : Highly crosslinked polyethylene in total hip arthroplasty decreases long-term wear : a doubleblind randomized trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res 473 : 432-438, 2015.
 
12) Lachiewicz PF, et al : Wear and osteolysis of highly crosslinked polyethylene at 10 to 14 years : the effect of femoral head size. Clin Orthop Relat Res (in press).
 
13) Ries MD, et al : Relationship between gravimetric wear and particle generation in hip simulators : conventional compared with cross-linked polyethylene. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83-A (Suppl 2) : 116-122, 2001.
 
14) Dumbleton JH, et al : The basis for a second-generation highly cross-linked UHMWPE. Clin Orthop Relat Res 453 : 265-271, 2006.
PubMed
15) Kelly NH, et al : High stress conditions do not increase wear of thin highly crosslinked UHMWPE. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468 : 418-423, 2010 .
 
16) Kurtz SM, et al : The role of backside polishing, cup angle, and polyethylene thickness on the contact stresses in metal-backed acetabular components. J Biomech 30 : 639-642, 1997.
PubMed
17) Kurtz SM, et al : Retrieval analysis of sequentially annealed highly crosslinked polyethylene used in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 473 : 962-971, 2015.
PubMed
18) Oral E, et al : The effects of high dose irradiation on the cross-linking of vitamin E-blended ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene. Biomaterials 29 : 3557-3560, 2008.
PubMed
19) Oral E, et al : Migration stability of alpha-tocopherol in irradiated UHMWPE. Biomaterials 27 : 2434-2439, 2006.
PubMed
20) Oral E, et al : A surface crosslinked UHMWPE stabilized by vitamin E with low wear and high fatigue strength. Biomaterials 31 : 7051-7060, 2010.
 
21) Salemyr M, et al : Vitamin-E diffused highly cross-linked polyethylene liner compared to standard liners in total hip arthroplasty. A randomized, controlled trial. Int Orthop (in press).
 
22) Moro T, et al : 2006 Frank Stinchfield Award : grafting of biocompatible polymer for longevity of artificial hip joints. Clin Orthop Relat Res 453 : 58-63, 2006.
 
23) Kyomoto M, et al : Multidirectional wear and impact-to-wear tests of phospholipid-polymergrafted and vitamin E-blended crosslinked polyethylene : a pilot study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 473 : 942-951, 2015.
 
P.199 掲載の参考文献
1) Georgiades G, et al : Effect of cementless acetabular component orientation, position, and containment in total hip arthroplasty for congenital hip disease. J Arthroplasty 25 : 1143-1150, 2010.
 
2) Bjerkholt H, et al : Direct comparison of polyethylene wear in cemented and uncemented acetabular cups. J Orthop Traumatol 11 : 155-158, 2010.
PubMed
3) Fenollosa J, et al : Ceramic hip prostheses in young patients : a retrospective study of 74 patients. Clin Orthop Relat Res 379 : 55-67, 2000.
PubMed
4) Yoo JJ, et al : Alumina-on-alumina total hip arthroplasty. A five-year minimum follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87 : 530-535, 2005.
PubMed
5) Magnissalis EA, et al : Wear of retrieved ceramic THA components--four matched pairs retrieved after 5-13 years in service. J Biomed Mater Res 58 : 593-598, 2001.
 
6) Lusty PJ, et al : Wear and acetabular component orientation in third generation alumina-on-alumina ceramic bearings : an analysis of 33 retrievals [corrected] . J Bone Joint Surg Br 89 : 1158-1164, 2007.
PubMed
7) Elkins JM, et al : Hard-on-hard total hip impingement causes extreme contact stress concentrations. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469 : 454-463, 2011.
PubMed
8) Walter WL, et al : Squeaking in ceramic-on-ceramic hips : the importance of acetabular component orientation. J Arthroplasty 22 : 496-503, 2007.
PubMed
9) Sexton SA, et al : The role of patient factors and implant position in squeaking of ceramic-on-ceramic total hip replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93 : 439-442, 2011.
PubMed
10) Sariali E, et al : In vitro investigation of friction under edge-loading conditions for ceramic-onceramic total hip prosthesis. J Orthop Res 28 : 979-985, 2010.
 
11) Restrepo C, et al : The noisy ceramic hip : is component malpositioning the cause? J Arthroplasty 23 : 643-649, 2008.
 
12) Baker RP, et al : A medium-term comparison of hybrid hip replacement and Birmingham hip resurfacing in active young patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93 : 158-163, 2011.
PubMed
13) Yang J, et al : Changes in cobalt and chromium levels after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing in young, active Chinese patients. J Arthroplasty 26 : 65-70, 2011.
PubMed
14) Prosser GH, et al : Outcome of primary resurfacing hip replacement : evaluation of risk factors for early revision. Acta Orthop 81 : 66-71, 2010.
PubMed
15) Shimmin AJ, et al : The influence of the size of the component on the outcome of resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip : a review of the literature. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92 : 469-476, 2010.
PubMed
16) Morlock MM, et al : Modes of implant failure after hip resurfacing : morphological and wear analysis of 267 retrieval specimens. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90 (Suppl 3) : 89-95, 2008.
 
17) Kwon YM, et al : Analysis of wear of retrieved metal-on-metal hip resurfacing implants revised due to pseudotumours. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92 : 356-361, 2010.
PubMed
18) De Haan R et al : Correlation between inclination of the acetabular component and metal ion levels in metal-on-metal hip resurfacing replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 90 : 1291-1297, 2008.
PubMed
19) Grammatopoulos G, et al : Optimal acetabular orientation for hip resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92 : 1072-1078, 2010.
PubMed
20) Bolland BJ, et al : High failure rates with a largediameter hybrid metal-on-metal total hip replacement : clinical, radiological and retrieval analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93 : 608-615, 2011.
PubMed
21) Sugano N, et al : Nationwide investigation into adverse tissue reactions to metal debris after metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty in Japan. J Orthop Sci 19 : 85-89, 2014.
 
22) Bragdon CR, et al : Minimum 6-year followup of highly cross-linked polyethylene in THA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 465 : 122-127, 2007.
PubMed
23) Lachiewicz PF, et al : Femoral head size and wear of highly cross-linked polyethylene at 5 to 8 years. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467 : 3290-3296, 2009.
PubMed
24) Hammerberg EM, et al : Wear and range of motion of different femoral head sizes. J Arthroplasty 25 : 839-843, 2010.
PubMed
25) Bradford L, et al : Early failure due to osteolysis associated with contemporary highly crosslinked ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene. A case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 5 : 1051-1056, 2004.
 
26) Tower SS, et al : Rim cracking of the crosslinked longevity polyethylene acetabular liner after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89 : 2212-2217, 2007.
PubMed
27) Onda K, et al : Cup-neck impingement due to the malposition of the implant as a possible mechanism for metallosis in metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty Orthopedics 31 : 396, 2008.
 
28) Nishihara S, et al : Measurements of pelvic flexion angle using three-dimensional computed tomography. Clin Orthop Relat Res 411 : 140-151, 2003.
PubMed
29) Sebastien Parratte MD, et al : Variation in postoperative pelvic tilt may confound the accuracy of hip navigation systems. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467 : 43-49, 2009.
 
P.206 掲載の参考文献
1) Sugano N, et al : The morphology of the femur in developmental dysplasia of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br 80 : 711-719, 1998.
PubMed
2) Noble PC, et al : Three-dimensional shape of the dysplastic femur implications for THR. Clin Orthop Relat Res 417 : 27-40, 2003.
PubMed
3) Crowe JF, et al : Total hip replacement in congenital dislocation and dysplasia of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am 61 : 15-23, 1979.
PubMed
4) Dunn HK, et al : Total hip reconstruction in chronically dislocated hips. J Bone Joint Surg Am 58 : 838-845, 1976.
PubMed
5) Holtgrewe JL, et al : Primary and revision total hip replacement without cement and with associated femoral osteotomy. J Bone Joint Surg Am 71 : 1487-1495, 1989.
PubMed
6) Traina F, et al : Sex differences in hip morphology : Is stem modularity effective for total hip replacement? J Bone Joint Surg Am 91 Suppl : 121-128, 2009.
 
7) Sakai T, et al : Modular femoral neck and head system works well in cementless THA for developmental dysplasia of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92 : 770-776, 2010.
 
8) McGrory BJ, et al : Effect of femoral offset on range of motion and abductor muscle strength after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 77 : 865-869, 1995.
PubMed
9) Asayama I, et al : Reconstructed hip joint position and abductor muscle strength after total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 20 : 414-420, 2005.
PubMed
10) Sakalkale DP, et al : Effect of femoral component offset on polyethylene wear in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 388 : 125-134, 2001.
PubMed
11) Kleemann RU, et al : THA loading arising from increased femoral anteversion and offset may lead to critical cement stresses. J Orthop Res 21 : 767-774, 2003.
PubMed
12) Davey JR : Femoral component offset. Its effect on strain in bone-cement. J Arthroplasty 8 : 23-26, 1993.
PubMed
13) Sakai T, et al : Optimizing femoral anteversion and offset after total hip arthroplasty using a modular femoral neck system. An experimental study. J Orthop Sci 5 : 489-494, 2000.
PubMed
14) Sakai T, et al : Femoral anteversion, femoral offset and abductor lever arm after total hip arthroplasty using a modular femoral neck system. J Orthop Sci 7 : 62-67, 2002.
PubMed
15) Wilson DA, et al : Early failure of an modular femoral neck total hip arthroplasty component : a case reort. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92 : 1514-1517, 2010.
 
16) Wright G, et al : Fracture of a modular femoral neck after total hip arthroplasty : a case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92 : 1518-1521, 2010.
PubMed
17) Sporer SM, et al : A case of disassociation of a modular femoral neck trunion after total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 21 : 918-921, 2006.
PubMed
18) Viceconti M, et al : Design-related fretting wear in modular neck hip prosthesis. J Biomed Mater Res 30 : 181-186, 1996.
PubMed
19) Viceconti M, et al : Fretting wear in a modular neck hip prosthesis. J Biomed Mater Res 35 : 207-216, 1997.
 
20) Atwood SA, et al : Corrosion-induced fracture of a double-modular hip prosthesis : a case repport. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92 : 1522-1525, 2010.
 
21) Kop AM, et al : Proximal component modularity in THA -At what cost? An implant retrieval study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470 : 1885-1894, 2012.
PubMed
22) Chun SW, et al : A new highly modular stem system : Impingement and range of motion. 55th of annual meeting of Orthopaedic Research Society : 2026, 2009.
 
23) Goldeberg JR, et al : A multicenter retrieval study of the taper interfaces of modular hip prostheses. Clin Orthop Relat Res 401 : 149-161, 2002.
 
24) Molloy DO, et al : Fretting and corrosion in modular-neck total hip arthroplasty femoral stems. J Bone Joint Surg Am 96 : 488-493, 2014.
PubMed
25) Vundelinckx BJ, et al : Taper corrosion in modular hip prostheses analysis of serum metal ions in 19 patients. J Arthroplasty 28 : 1218-1223, 2013.
 
26) Pivec R, et al : Modular taper junction corrosion and failure : how to approach a recalled total hip arthroplasty implant. J Arthroplasty 29 : 1-6, 2014.
PubMed
27) Hsu AR, et al : Pseudotumor from modular neck corrosion after ceramic-on-polyethylene total hip arthroplasty. Am J Orthop 41 : 422-442, 2012.
PubMed
28) Cooper HJ, et al : Adverse local tissue reaction arising from corrosion at the femoral neck-body junction in a dual-taper stem with a cobalt-chromium modular neck. J Bone Joint Surg Am 95 : 865-872, 2013.
 
29) Meftah M, et al : Early corrosion-related failure of the Rejuvenate modular total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 96 : 481-487, 2014.
PubMed
30) Nganbe M, et al : Retrieval analysis and in vitro assessment of strength, durability, and distraction of a modular total hip replacement. J Biomed Mater Res A 95 : 819-827, 2010.
PubMed
P.213 掲載の参考文献
1) Feyen H, et al : Is the length of the femoral component important in primary total hip replacement? Bone Joint J 96 : 442-448, 2014.
PubMed
2) Khanuja HS, et al : Short bone-conserving stems in cementless hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 96 : 1742-1752, 2014.
PubMed
3) Khanuja HS, et al : Cementless femoral fixation in total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 93 : 500-509, 2011.
PubMed
4) McMinn DJ, et al : Is mid-head resection a durable conservative option in the presence of poor femoral bone quality and distorted anatomy? Clin Orthop Relat Res 469 : 1589-1597, 2011.
PubMed
5) Morrey BF, et al : A cpnservative femoral replacement for total hip arthroplasty. A prospective study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 82 : 952-958, 2000.
PubMed
6) Decking R, et al : Maintenance of bone mineral density after implantation of a femoral neck hip prosthesis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 9 : 17, 2008.
PubMed
7) Ender SA, et al : Cementless CUT femoral neck prosthesis : increased rate of aseptic loosening after 5 years. Acta Orthop 78 : 616-621, 2007.
PubMed
8) Nieuwenhujise MJ, et al : 5-year clinical and radiostereometric analysis (RSA) follow-up of 39 CUT femoral neck total hip prostheses in young osteoarthritis patients. Acta Orthop 83 : 334-341, 2012.
PubMed
9) Floerkemeier T, et al : Cementless short stem hip arthroplasty METHA as an encouraging option in adults with osteonectosis of the femoral head. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 132 : 1125-1131, 2012.
PubMed
10) Lerch M, et al : Bone remodeling around the Metha short stem in total hip arthroplasty : a prospective dual-energy X-ray absorptionmetry study. Int Orthop 36 : 533-538, 2012.
 
11) Schmidutz F, et al : Migration analysis of a metaphyseal anchored short-stem hip prosthesis. Acta Orthop 83 : 360-365, 2012.
PubMed
12) Schmidutz F, et al : Sports activity after shortstem hip arthroplasty. Am J Sports Med 40 : 425-432, 2012.
PubMed
13) Kendoff DO, et al : Eleven-year results of the anatomic coated CFP stem in primary total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 28 : 1047-1051, 2013.
PubMed
14) Nowak M, et al : Prospective study of a cementless total hip arthroplasty with a collum femoris preserving stem and a trabeculae oriented pressfit cup : minimum 6-year follow-up. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 131 : 549-555, 2011.
 
15) Carlsson LV, et al : Stepwise introduction of a bone conserving osseointegrated hip arthroplasty using RSA and a randomized study. 1. Preliminary investigations-52 patients followed for 3 years. Acta Orthop 77 : 549-558, 2006.
 
16) Chen HH, et al : Bone remodeling characteristics of a short-stemmed total hip replacement. J Arthroplasty 24 : 945-950, 2009.
 
17) Decking R, et al : Changes in strain distribution of loaded proximal femora caused by different types of cementless femoral stems. Clin Biomech 21 : 495-501, 2006.
PubMed
18) Buergi ML, et al : Radiological findings and clinical results of 102 thrust-plate femoral hip prosthesis : a follow-up of 2 to 8 years. J Arthroplasty 20 : 108-117, 2005.
PubMed
19) Fink B, et al : Midterm results of 'thrust plate' prosthesis. J Arthroplasty 22 : 703-710, 2007.
PubMed
20) Steens W, et al : Clinical and radiological midterm results of the thrust plate prosthesis. Int Orthop 33 : 1519-1524, 2009.
PubMed
21) Yasunaga Y, et al : Clinical and radiological results of 179 thrust plate prostheses : 5-14 years follow-up study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 132 : 547-554, 2012.
 
22) Santori FS, et al : Mid-term results of a custommade short proximal loading femoral component. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92-B : 1231-1237, 2010.
 
23) Kim YH, et al : Total hip replacement with a short metaphyseal-fitting anatomical cementless femoral component in patients aged 70 years or older. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93 : 587-592, 2011.
 
24) Westphal FM, et al : Migration and cyclic motion of a new short-stemmed hip prosthesis - a biomechanical in vitro study. Clin Biomech 21 : 834-840, 2006.
PubMed
25) Albanese CV, et al : Periprosthetic DXA after total hip arthroplasty with short vs. ultra-short custom-made femoral stems : 37 patients followed for 3 years. Acta Orthop 80 : 291-297, 2009.
PubMed
26) Patel RM, et al : Stable fixation of short-term femoral implants in patients 70 years and older. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470 : 442-449, 2012.
 
27) Molli RG, et al : A short tapered stem reduces intraoperative complications in primary total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470 : 450-461, 2012.
 
28) Lombardi AV, et al : A short stem solution : through small portals. Orthopaedics 32 : pii, 2009.
 
29) Kim YH, et al : Cementless total hip arthroplasty with a close proximal fit and short tapered distal stem. J Arthroplasty 17 : 841-850, 2002.
 
P.220 掲載の参考文献
1) Khanuja HS, et al : Cementless femoral fixation in total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 93 : 500-509, 2011.
PubMed
2) Sewell MD, et al : Custom cementless THA in patients with skeletal dysplasia results in lower apparent revision rates than other types of femoral fixation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469 : 1406-1412, 2011.
 
3) Bruns J, et al : Cementless fixation of megaprosthesis using a conical fluted stem in the treatment of bone tumors. J Bone Joint Surg Br 89-B : 1084-1087, 2007.
 
4) Mulier JC, et al : A new system to produce intraoperatively custom femoral prosthesis from measurements taken during the surgical procedure. Clin Orthop Relat Res 249 : 97-112, 1989.
PubMed
5) Stulberg DS, et al : The rationale, design characteristics, and preliminary results of a primary custom total hip prosthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 249 : 79-96, 1989.
 
6) Lombardi AV, et al : Failure of intraoperatively customized non-porus femoral components inserted without cement in total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 77-A : 1836-1844, 1995.
 
7) Robinson RP, et al : Uncemented press-fit total hip arthroplasty using the Identifit custom-modeling technique. A prospective minimum 2 year follow-up study. J Arthroplasty 11 : 247-254, 1996.
 
8) Barger WL : Shape the inplant to the patient : a rationale for the use of custom-fit cementless total hip implants. Clin Orthop Relat Res 249 : 73-78, 1989.
 
9) Barger WL, et al : Management of bone loss in revision total hip arhtroplasty using custom cementless femoral components. J Arthroplasty 8 : 245-242, 1993.
 
10) Bert JM : Custom total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 11 : 905-915,1996.
PubMed
11) Wettstein M, et al : Three-dimensional computed cementless custom femoral stems in young patients. Midterm followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res 437 : 169-175, 2005.
PubMed
12) Muirhead-Allwood SK, et al : Uncemented custom computer-assisted design and manufacture of hydroxyapatite- coated femoral components. Survival at 10 to 17 years. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92-B : 1079-1084, 2010.
 
13) Walker P, et al : Stability and bone preservation in custom designed revision hip stems. Clin Orthop Relat Res 373 : 164-173, 2000.
PubMed
14) McCullough CJ, et al : The use of hydroxyapatitecoated CAD-CAM femoral components in adolescents and young adults with inflammatory polyarthropathy. TEN-YEAR RESULTS. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88-B : 860-864, 2006.
 
15) Kawate K, et al : Computed tomography-based custom-made stems for dysplastic hips in Japanese patients. J Arthroplasty 24 : 65-70, 2009.
PubMed
16) Iguchi H, et al : Accuracy of using radiographs for custom hip stem design. J Arthroplasty 11 : 312-321, 1996.
PubMed
17) Santori FS, et al : Mid-term results of a custommade short proximal loading femoral component. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92-B : 1231-1237, 2010.
 
18) Kim YH, et al : Total hip replacement with a short metaphyseal-fitting anatomical cementless femoral component in patients aged 70 years or older. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93-B : 587-592, 2011.
 
19) Sakai T, et al : The custom femoral component is an effective option for congenital hip dysplasia. Clin Orthop Relat Res 451 : 146-153, 2006.
PubMed
20) Sugano N, et al : Mid-term results of cementless total hip replacement using a ceramic-on-ceramic bearing with and without computer navigation. J Bone Joint Surg Br 89 : 455-460, 2007.
PubMed
21) Bertollo N, et al : Influence of electron beam melting manufactured implants on ingrowth and shear strength in an ovine model. J Arthroplasty 27 : 1429-1436, 2012.
 
22) Li X, et al : Evaluation of biological properties of electron beam melted Ti6Al4V implant with biomimetic coating in vitro and in vivo. PLoS One 7 : e 52049, 2012.
 
P.229 掲載の参考文献
1) Espehaug B, et al : 18 years of results with cemented primary hip prostheses in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register : Concerns about some newer implants. Acta Orthop 80 : 402-412, 2009.
PubMed
2) Chen CQ, et al : Effect of metal surface topography on mechanical bonding at simulated total hip stem-cement interfaces. J Biomed Mater Res 48 : 440-446, 1999.
PubMed
3) Crowninshield RD, et al : Cemented femoral component surface finish mechanics. Clin Orthop Relat Res 355 : 90-102, 1998.
PubMed
4) Davies JP, et al : Strength of cement-metal interfaces in fatigue : comparison of smooth, porous and precoated specimens. Clin Mater 12 : 121-126, 1993.
PubMed
5) Ong A, et al : Early failure of precoated femoral components in primary total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg 84-A : 786-792, 2002.
PubMed
6) Fowler JL, et al : Experience with the Exeter total hip replacement since 1970. Orthop Clin North Am 19 : 477-489, 1988.
 
7) Howie DW, et al : Loosening of matt and polished cemented femoral stems. J Bone Joint Surg 80-B : 573-576, 1998.
 
8) Huiskes R, et al : Migration, stem shape, and surface finish in cemented total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 355 : 103-112, 1998.
PubMed
9) Scheerlinck T, et al : The design features of cemented femoral hip implants. J Bone Joint Surg 88-B : 1409-1418, 2006.
 
10) New AM, et al : Effect of hip stem taper on cement stresses. Orthopedics 28 (8 Suppl) : s857-s862, 2005.
 
11) Dowd JE, et al : Failure of total hip arthroplasty with a precoated prosthesis. 4- to 11-year results. Clin Orthop Relat Res 355 : 123-136, 1998.
PubMed
12) Karrholm J, et al : Radiostereometric evaluation of hip implant design and surface finish. Scientific Exhibition, AAOS, Orlando, USA, 2000.
 
13) Bergmann G, et al : Hip contact forces and gait patterns from routine activities. J Biomech 34 : 859-871, 2001.
PubMed
14) Alfaro-Adrian J, et al : Should total hip arthroplasty femoral components be designed to subside? A radiostereometric analysis study of the Charnley Elite and Exeter stems. J Arthroplasty 16 : 598-606, 2001.
PubMed
15) Maloney WJ, et al : Analysis of long-term cemented total hip arthroplasty retrievals. Clin Orthop Relat Res 405 : 70-78, 2002.
PubMed
16) Glyn-Jones S, et al : Influence of stem geometry on the stability of polished tapered cemented femoral stems. J Bone Joint Surg 87-B : 921-927, 2005.
 
17) Jergesen HE, et al : Clinical outcome in total hip arthroplasty using a cemented titanium femoral prosthesis. J Arthroplasty 17 : 592-599, 2002.
PubMed
18) Sugano N, et al : Polyethylene sockets and alumina ceramic heads in cemented total hip arthroplasty. A ten-year study. J Bone Joint Surg 77-B : 548-556, 1995.
 
19) Hannouche D, et al : Thirty years of experience with alumina-on-alumina bearings in total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop 35 : 207-213, 2011.
PubMed
20) Grivas TB, et al : Neck fracture of a cementless forged titanium alloy femoral stem following total hip arthroplasty : a case report and review of the literature. J Med Case Reports 1 : 174, 2007.
 
21) Meding JB. Et al : A comparison of collared and collarless femoral components in primary cemented total hip arthroplasty : a randomized clinical trial. J Arthroplasty 14 : 123-130, 1999.
PubMed
22) Settecerri JJ, et al : Collar versus collarless cemented HD-II femoral prostheses. Clin Orthop Relat Res 398 : 146-152, 2002.
PubMed
23) Davey JR, et al : Femoral component offset. Its effect on strain in bone-cement. J Arthroplasty 8 : 23-26, 1993.
PubMed
24) Kawate K, et al : Importance of a thin cement mantle. Autopsy studies of eight hips. Clin Orthop Relat Res 355 : 70-76, 1998.
PubMed
25) Maloney WJ, et al : Bone lysis in well-fixed cemented femoral components. J Bone Joint Surg 72-B : 966-970, 1990.
 
26) Joshi RP, et al : Osteolysis after Charnley primary low-friction arthroplasty. A comparison of two matched paired groups. J Bone Joint Surg 80-B : 585-590, 1998.
 
27) Aydin N, et al : Comparison of distal and proximal centralising devices in hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop 33 : 945-948, 2009.
PubMed
28) Langlais F, et al : The 'French paradox'. J Bone Joint Surg 85-B : 17-20, 2003.
 
29) El Masri F, et al : Is the so-called 'French paradox' a reality? : long-term survival and migration of the Charnley-Kerboull stem cemented line-toline. J Bone Joint Surg 92-B : 342-348, 2010.
 
30) Skinner JA, et al : Should the cement mantle around the femoral component be thick or thin? J Bone Joint Surg 85-B : 45-51, 2003.
PubMed
P.234 掲載の参考文献
1) McMinn D, et al : Metal on metal surface replacement of the hip. Experience of the Mc-Minn prothesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res (329 Suppl) : S89-98, 1996.
 
2) Kishida Y, et al : Preservation of the bone mineral density of the femur after surface replacement of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86 : 185-189, 2004.
PubMed
3) Jameson SS, et al : Articular surface replacement of the hip : a prospective single-surgeon series. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92 : 28-37, 2010.
 
4) Langton DJ, et al : Early failure of metal-on-metal bearings in hip resurfacing and large-diameter total hip replacement : A consequence of excess wear. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92 : 38-46, 2010.
 
5) Nishii T, et al : Five-year results of metal-onmetal resurfacing arthroplasty in Japanese patients. J Arthroplasty 22 : 176-183, 2007.
 
6) Berton C, et al : The durom large diameter head acetabular component : early results with a largediameter metal-on-metal bearing. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92 : 202-208, 2010.
PubMed
7) Shimmin AJ, et al : Femoral neck fractures following Birmingham hip resurfacing : a national review of 50 cases. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87 : 463-464, 2005.
 
8) Ziaee H, et al : Transplacental transfer of cobalt and chromium in patients with metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty : a controlled study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 89 : 301-305, 2007.
PubMed
9) Hananouchi T, et al : The vascular network in the femoral head and neck after hip resurfacing. J Arthroplasty 25 : 146-151, 2010.
PubMed
10) Hagio K, et al : Embolic events during total hip arthroplasty : an echocardiographic study. J Arthroplasty 18 : 186-192, 2003.
PubMed
11) Daniel J, et al : Metal-on-metal resurfacing of the hip in patients under the age of 55 years with osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86 : 177-184, 2004.
PubMed
12) Amstutz HC, et al : Clinical and radiographic results of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing with a minimum ten-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92 : 2663-2671, 2010.
PubMed
13) McMinn DJ, et al : Indications and results of hip resurfacing. Int Orthop 35 : 231-237, 2011.
PubMed
14) Treacy RB, et al : Birmingham hip resurfacing : a minimum follow-up of ten years. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93 : 27-33, 2011.
PubMed
15) van der Weegen W, et al : Survival of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty : a systematic review of the literature. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93 : 298-306, 2011.
PubMed
16) Pandit H, et al : Pseudotumours associated with metal-on-metal hip resurfacings. J Bone Joint Surg Br 90 : 847-851, 2008.
PubMed
17) Kwon YM, et al : Analysis of wear of retrieved metal-on-metal hip resurfacing implants revised due to pseudotumours. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92 : 356-361, 2010.
PubMed
18) Langton DJ, et al : Early failure of metal-on-metal bearings in hip resurfacing and large-diameter total hip replacement : A consequence of excess wear. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92 : 38-46, 2010.
 
19) Desy NM, et al : Surgical variables influence metal ion levels after hip resurfacing. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469 : 1635-1641, 2011.
PubMed
20) Schmalzried TP : The future of hip resurfacing. Orthop Clin North Am 42 : 271-273, ix-x, 2011.
 
21) Liu F, Gross TP : A safe zone for acetabular component position in metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty : winner of the 2012 HAP PAUL award. J Arthroplasty 28 : 1224-1230, 2013.
PubMed
22) Kendal AR, et al : Mortality rates at 10 years after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing compared with total hip replacement in England : retrospective cohort analysis of hospital episode statistics. BMJ 347 : f6549, 2013.
PubMed
23) Aqil A, et al : The gait of patients with one resurfacing and one replacement hip : a single blinded controlled study. Int Orthop 37 : 795-801, 2013.
 

第5章 コンピュータ支援手術

P.242 掲載の参考文献
1) Sugano N, et al : Computed-tomography-based computer preoperative planning for total hip arthroplasty. Comput Aided Surg 3 : 320-324, 1998.
PubMed
2) Munjal S, et al : CT-generated 3-dimensional models for complex acetabular reconstruction. J Arthroplasty 15 : 644-653, 2000.
PubMed
3) Takao M, et al : The results of a press-fit-only technique for acetabular fixation in hip dysplasia. J Arthroplasty 26 : 562-568, 2011.
PubMed
4) Doehring TC, et al : Effect of superior and su-perolateral relocations of the hip center on hip joint forces. An experimental and analytical analysis. J Arthroplasty 11 : 693-703, 1996.
PubMed
5) Delp SL, et al : How superior placement of the joint center in hip arthroplasty affects the abductor muscles. Clin Orthop Relat Res 328 : 137-146, 1996.
PubMed
6) 菅野伸彦, 他 : 臼蓋形成不全股に対するセメントレスカップ固定位置と骨移植. 日整会誌 84 : 197-200, 2010.
Medical*Online
7) Widmer KH, et al : Compliant positioning of total hip components for optimal range of motion. J Orthop Res 22 : 815-821, 2004.
PubMed
8) McGrory BJ, et al : Effect of femoral offset on range of motion and abductor muscle strength after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 77 : 865-889, 1995.
PubMed
9) Walsh M, et al : Leg length discrepancy-an experimental study of compensatory changes in three dimensions using gait analysis. Gait Posture 12 : 156-161, 2000.
PubMed
10) Edeen J, et al : Clinical significance of leg-length inequality after total hip arthroplasty. Am J Orthop 24 : 347-351, 1995.
PubMed
P.252 掲載の参考文献
1) Kelley, TC, et al : Role of navigation in total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91 Suppl 1 : 153-158, 2009.
 
2) Lin F : et al : Limitations of imageless computerassisted navigation for total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 26 : 596-605, 2011.
PubMed
3) Sugano N, et al : Accuracy evaluation of surfacebased registration methods in a computer navigation system for hip surgery performed through a posterolateral approach. Comput Aided Surg 6 : 195-203, 2001.
 
4) Nakamura N, et al : Application of computed tomography-based navigation for revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 28 : 1806-1810, 2013.
PubMed
5) Kitada M, et al : Validation of the femoral component placement during hip resurfacing : a comparison between the conventional jig, patient-specific template, and CT-based navigation. Int J Med Robot 9 : 223-229, 2013.
PubMed
6) Iwana D, et al : Accuracy of angle and position of the cup using computed tomography-based navigation systems in total hip arthroplasty. Comput Aided Surg 18 : 187-194, 2013.
PubMed
7) Kitada M, et al : Evaluation of the accuracy of computed tomography-based navigation for femoral stem orientation and leg length discrepancy. J Arthroplasty 26 : 674-679, 2011.
PubMed
8) Sugano N, et al : Does CT-Based Navigation Improve the Long-Term Survival in Ceramic-on-Ceramic THA? Clin Orthop Relat Res 470 : 3054-3059, 2012.
 
9) Peak EL, et al : The role of patient restrictions in reducing the prevalence of early dislocation following total hip arthroplasty. A randomized, prospective study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87 : 247-253, 2005.
PubMed
10) Otake Y, et al : Four-dimensional model of the lower extremity after total hip arthroplasty. J Biomech 38 : 2397-2405, 2005.
PubMed
11) Koyanagi J, et al : In vivo kinematic analysis of squatting after total hip arthroplasty. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 26 : 477-483, 2011.
PubMed
12) Nakamura N, et al : Activities of daily living of the patients after total hip arthroplasty using CT-based navigation system. in 10th Annual Meeting of CAOS-International (eds. Davis B, Joskowicz L & Merloz P) 174-175, Paris, France, 2010.
 

書評

最近チェックした商品履歴

Loading...