遠位橈骨動脈アプローチ　dRA2020

出版社： 中外医学社
著者：
発行日： 2020-07-10
分野： 臨床医学：内科  >  循環器一般
ISBN： 9784498136625
電子書籍版： 2020-07-10 （初版1刷）
書籍・雑誌
≪全国送料無料でお届け≫
取寄せ目安：8～14営業日

8,800 円(税込)

購入する
電子書籍
章別単位で購入
ブラウザ、アプリ閲覧

8,800 円(税込)

購入する

商品紹介

PCIの世界に彗星のように現れた遠位橈骨動脈アプローチ（distal radial artery approach：dRA）はより低侵襲で患者の負担を減らせる手技として注目を集める一方，未知の部分も多く，決定的なやり方は未だ定まっていない．本書ではdRAを積極的に行っているエキスパートたちによるTipsを集め，整理．穿刺や止血，様々な状況に応じたdRAの適応や合併症への対応など，これからdRAを始めようとする医療者のための知識が満載の一冊である．

目次

  • Chapter 1　はじめに
    　　本書で用いられる用語集　

    Chapter 2　遠位橈骨動脈アプローチとは？　TRIとdRIの歴史とこれからの展望
    　1．はじめに
    　2．TRIの歴史のおさらい　
    　3．dRAの歴史　
    　4．これからのdRAの展望

    Chapter 3　解剖と遠位橈骨動脈のバリエーション
    　1．動脈の解剖　
    　2．神経の解剖と考えられる合併症　
    　3．骨の解剖と考えられる合併症　

    Chapter 4　CTによる近位橈骨動脈および遠位橈骨動脈の観察
    　1．背景　
    　2．撮影方法　
    　3．症例　
    　4．まとめ　

    Chapter 5　エコーによる近位橈骨動脈および遠位橈骨動脈の観察
    　1．遠位橈骨動脈アプローチでよくある質問　
    　2．エコーガイド穿刺の有用性　
    　3．橈骨動脈の解剖　
    　4．遠位橈骨動脈のエコー画像　
    　5．エコー装置の性能　
    　6．長軸穿刺か短軸穿刺か　
    　7．短軸での遠位橈骨動脈穿刺の実際　
    　8．針先の向きへのこだわり　
    　9．まとめ　

    Chapter 6　触診ガイド穿刺
    　1．はじめに　
    　2．穿刺部位　
    　3．穿刺の体位とコツ　
    　4．成功率と因子　
    　5．ラーニングカーブ　
    　6．穿刺成功と手技成功　
    　7．おわりに　

    Chapter 7　エコーガイド穿刺
    　1．はじめに
    　2．エコーガイド穿刺のできる遠位橈骨動脈　
    　3．プレスキャンをしよう　
    　4．長軸よりも短軸を基本に　
    　5．おわりに　

    Chapter 8　エコーガイド穿刺と触診ガイド穿刺の比較
    　1．はじめに　
    　2．対象と方法　
    　3．結果　
    　4．考察　
    　5．エコーガイド穿刺トレーニングのススメ
    　6．おわりに

    Chapter 9　解剖学的穿刺（1）
    　1．はじめに　
    　2．様々な穿刺法　
    　3．遠位橈骨動脈の解剖　
    　4．穿刺の実際　
    　5．まとめ　

    Chapter 10　解剖学的穿刺（2）「陽渓突き」と「合谷突き」
    　1．はじめに
    　2．解剖学的嗅ぎタバコ入れから前腕橈骨動脈へ貫く方法　
    　3．第二中手骨の母指側の延線から大菱形骨の上を浅い角度で穿刺する方法　
    　4．おわりに　

    Chapter 11　止血プロトコール（1）止血時間短縮のこだわり〜看護師として〜　

    Chapter 12　止血プロトコール（2）dRA専用止血デバイスコントロール作成
    　1．はじめに　
    　2．当院の止血プロトコール　
    　3．専用デバイスおよびdRA止血プロトコールの成績　
    　4．止血プロトコールの評価　
    　5．まとめ　

    Chapter 13　止血プロトコール（3）dRA止血方法―バンデージ法
    　1．圧迫のコンセプト
    　2．止血手順
    　3．利点/欠点
    　4．当院の止血時間/成績

    Chapter 14　みんなの手技をみてみよう
    　1．日本中の先生方にアンケート
    　2．各施設のdRA：穿刺と止血方法，止血時間，合併症

    Chapter 15　3Fr診断カテーテルにおけるdRA
    　1．はじめに
    　2．今，なぜ3Frカテーテルなのか
    　3．3Fr診断カテーテルとは
    　4．3Frカテーテルを使うための基礎知識
    　5．3Frカテーテルの具体的な使用方法　
    　6．4Frカテーテルと3Frカテーテルの差はなにか　
    　7．遠位橈骨動脈アプローチとなることで何が変わるか？
    　8．さらなる細径化

    Chapter 16　日常待機症例におけるdRA症例と実際：5Fr GC
    　1．なぜdRAなのか
    　2．なぜ5Frなのか
    　3．適応と実際　
    　4．おわりに　

    Chapter 17　日常待機症例におけるdRA症例と実際：6Fr GC
    　1．はじめに
    　2．新たなaccess siteとしてdistal radial arteryの可能性
    　3．穿刺法と患者の肢位
    　4．日常待機症例におけるdRAとcRAの比較
    　5．症例提示
    　6．止血方法と止血時間
    　7．おわりに

    Chapter 18　日常待機症例におけるdRA症例と実際：7Fr GC

    Chapter 19　ACSへのdRA
    　1．はじめに
    　2．当院での現状
    　3．穿刺
    　4．臨床成績
    　5．まとめ

    Chapter 20　Complex PCIにおけるdRA
    　1．はじめに
    　2．Complex PCIにおけるdRAの意義・適応　
    　3．シースサイズによる制限
    　4．dRAの適応拡大
    　5．dRAでの留意点―止血・合併症の観点から―
    　6．自験例
    　7．症例提示　
    　8．止血方法　
    　9．おわりに

    Chapter 21　シースレスPCIとdRA：小口径カテーテルこそシースレス
    　1．はじめに
    　2．シースレスPCIの真価は？
    　3．遠位橈骨動脈は前腕橈骨動脈より細いため事前評価が重要
    　4．シースレスPCI
    　5．7FrシースレスPCI
    　6．8FrシースレスPCI
    　7．止血プロトコール
    　8．当院でのシースレスPCIの実績
    　9．シースレスPCIにおけるTips

    Chapter 22　看護からみる遠位橈骨動脈アプローチ
    　1．はじめに
    　2．dRA導入に伴う看護師への影響
    　3．dRA導入に伴う患者への影響
    　4．今後の課題

    Chapter 23　dRAの欠点〜cRAと比較して
    　1．dRAだから困ること，注意すべきこと，起こっている問題点
    　2．求められるデバイスについて
    　3．穿刺針の違い
    　4．求められる「シース」：役割とその歴史，そして現在
    　5．現在使用しているシースの比較
    　6．将来にむけての提言

    Chapter 24　遠位橈骨動脈の閉塞
    　1．はじめに
    　2．閉塞率とその因子
    　3．遠位橈骨動脈閉塞に対する考察　
    　4．遠位橈骨動脈が閉塞した場合
    　5．急性虚血
    　6．おわりに

    Chapter 25　dRAの合併症
    　1．はじめに
    　2．橈骨動脈閉塞
    　3．仮性瘤　
    　4．動静脈廔
    　5．出血性合併症
    　6．神経障害
    　7．狭窄性腱鞘炎（ドゥケルバン病）
    　8．舟状骨壊死

    Chapter 26　みんながdRAをやらない理由・私はdRAをやる理由
    　1．はじめに　
    　2．同施設内でdRAに移行したがらない先生方の理由，私がdRAをやる理由　
    　3．病棟にとってはダブスタで困るのでは？　
    　4．今後どうなるのかの見通
    　5．dRAでよかった症例
    　6．おわりに

    　Chapter 27　dRA：今後の展望
    　1．はじめに―昔話から
    　2．dRAはcRAを超えて一般的になるか？　
    　　 そして既にcRAが安全に広く普及している現状でdRAの普及は必要か？
    　3．Radialistとして今後目指すべき道は何か？

    Chapter 28　まとめと謝辞

この書籍の参考文献

参考文献のリンクは、リンク先の都合等により正しく表示されない場合がありますので、あらかじめご了承下さい。

本参考文献は電子書籍掲載内容を元にしております。

Chapter 1 はじめに

P.2 掲載の参考文献
1) Chase AJ, et al. Association of the arterial access site at angioplasty with transfusion and mortality : the M. O. R. T. A. L study (Mortality benefit Of Reduced Transfusion after percutaneous coronary intervention via the Arm or Leg). Heart. 2008 ; 94 : 1019-25.
PubMed
2) Valgimigli M, et al. Radial versus femoral access in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing invasive management : a randomised multicentre trial. Lancet. 2015 ; 385 : 2465-76.
PubMed

Chapter 2 遠位橈骨動脈アプローチとは ? TRIとdRIの歴史とこれからの展望

P.13 掲載の参考文献
1) Kiemeneij F, Laarman GJ. Percutaneous transradial artery approach for coronary stent implantation. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1993 ; 30 : 173-8. Erratum in : Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1993 ; 30 : 358.
 
2) Kiemeneij F, et al. Cost comparison between two modes of Palmaz Schatz coronary stent implantation : transradial bare stent technique vs. transfemoral sheath-protected stent technique. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1995 ; 35 : 301-8, discussion 309.
PubMed
3) Benit E, et al. Brachial, radial, or femoral approach for elective Palmaz-Schatz stent implantation : a randomized comparison. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1997 ; 41 : 124-30.
 
4) Brewster S, et al. Impact of a dedicated "radial lounge" for percutaneous coronary procedures on same-day discharge rates and bed utilization. Am Heart J. 2013 ; 165 : 299-302.
PubMed
5) Kiemeneij F, et al. Percutaneous transradial artery approach for coronary Palmaz-Schatz stent implantation. Am Heart J. 1994 ; 128 : 167-74.
PubMed
6) Saito S, et al. Influence of the ratio between radial artery inner diameter and sheath outer diameter on radial artery flow after transradial coronary intervention. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 1999 ; 46 : 173-8.
PubMed
7) Saito S, et al. Comparative study on transradial approach vs. transfemoral approach in primary stent implantation for patients with acute myocardial infarction : results of the test for myocardial infarction by prospective unicenter randomization for access sites (TEMPURA) trial. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2003 ; 59 : 26-33.
PubMed
8) Yoshimachi F, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention without use of guiding catheters for extreme downsizing : the Emperor's new clothes technique. Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2013 ; 28 : 213-5.
PubMed
9) Yoshimachi F, et al. A novel method of PercuSurge distal protection in a five French guiding catheter without an export aspiration catheter. J Invasive Cardiol. 2008 ; 20 : 168-72.
 
10) Yoshimachi F, et al. Kissing balloon technique within a 5 Fr guiding catheter using 0.010 inch guidewires and 0.010 inch guidewire-compatible balloons. J Invasive Cardiol. 2007 ; 19 : 519-24.
 
11) Matsukage T, et al. A new 0.010-inch guidewire and compatible balloon catheter system : the IKATEN registry. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 ; 73 : 605-10.
 
12) Masutani M, et al. Use of slender catheters for transradial angiography and interventions. Indian Heart J. 2008 ; 60 (1 Suppl A) : A22-6.
 
13) Ikari Y, et al. Transradial and slender percutaneous coronary intervention : less invasive strategy in PCI. Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2010 ; 25 : 60-4.
PubMed
14) Valgimigli M, et al. Radial versus femoral access in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing invasive management : a randomised multicentre trial. Lancet. 2015 ; 385 : 2465-76.
PubMed
15) Chase AJ, et al. Association of the arterial access site at angioplasty with transfusion and mortality : the M. O. R. T. A. L study (Mortality benefit Of Reduced Transfusion after percutaneous coronary intervention via the Arm or Leg). Heart. 2008 ; 94 : 1019-25.
PubMed
16) Aminian A, et al. Initial experience with the Glidesheath Slender for transradial coronary angiography and intervention : a feasibility study with prospective radial ultrasound follow-up. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 ; 84 : 436-42.
PubMed
17) Yoshimachi F, et al. Safety and feasibility of the new 5 Fr Glidesheath Slender. Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2016 ; 31 : 38-41.
PubMed
18) Aminian A, et al. First prospective multicenter experience with the 7 french Glidesheath Slender for complex transradial coronary interventions. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 ; 89 : 1014-20.
PubMed
19) Aminian A, et al. Impact of sheath size and hemostasis time on radial artery patency after transradial coronary angiography and intervention in Japanese and non-Japanese patients : A substudy from RAP and BEAT (Radial Artery Patency and Bleeding, Efficacy, Adverse evenT) randomized multi-center trial. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 ; 92 : 844-51. Heart. 2008 ; 94 : 1019-25.
 
20) Kiemeneij F. Left distal transradial access in the anatomical snuffbox for coronary angiography (ldTRA) and interventions (ldTRI). EuroIntervention. 2017 ; 13 : 851-7.
PubMed
21) Sgueglia G, et al. Anatomic basis and physiological rationale of distal radial artery access for percutaneous coronary and endovascular procedures. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 ; 11 : 2113-9.
PubMed
22) Valsecchi O, et al. Early clinical experience with right and left distal transradial access in the anatomical snuffbox in 52 Consecutive Patients. J Invasive Cardiol. 2018 ; 30 : 218-23.
PubMed
23) Lee JW, et al. Real-world experience of the left distal transradial approach for coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention : a prospective observational study (LeDRA). EuroIntervention. 2018 ; 14 : e995-e1003.
PubMed
24) Kim Y, et al. Successful percutaneous coronary intervention with two-stent technique for unprotected true left main bifurcation lesion via left snuffbox approach. J Invasive Cardiol. 2019 ; 31 : E55.
PubMed
25) Koutouzis M. et al. Distal versus traditional radial approach for coronary angiography. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2019 ; 20 : 678-80.
PubMed
26) Naito T, et al. Evaluation of the diameter of the distal radial artery at the anatomical snuff box using ultrasound in Japanese patients. Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2019 ; 34 : 312-6.
PubMed
27) Kim Y, et al. Gender differences in the distal radial artery diameter for the snuffbox approach. Cardiol J. 2018 ; 25 : 639-41.
PubMed
28) Gao YB, et al. Effects of ultrasound-guided radial artery catheterization : an updated meta-analysis. Am J Emerg Med. 2015 ; 33 : 50-5.
PubMed
29) Seto AH, et al. Real-time ultrasound guidance facilitates transradial access : RAUST (Radial Artery access with Ultrasound Trial). JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 ; 8 : 283-91.
PubMed

Chapter 3 解剖と遠位橈骨動脈のバリエーション

P.23 掲載の参考文献
1) Platzer W. 平田幸男 (訳). 運動器. In : 分冊解剖学アトラス. 第6版. 東京 : 文光堂 ; 2011. p.386-444.
 
2) Agur AMR, et al, 坂井建雄 (監訳). In : グラント解剖学図譜. 第5版. 東京 : 医学書院 ; 2011. p.458-585.
 
3) McMinn RMH, et al. 佐藤達夫 (訳). 人体解剖カラーアトラス. 原書第3版. 東京 : 南江堂 ; p.99-154.
 
4) Iida Y, et al. Hemodynamics in hand following elevation of a radial forearm flap. Journal of Japan Society for Head and Neck Surgery. 1997 ; 7 : 19-23.
 
5) Joshi SB, et al. Variation in formation of superficial palmar arches with clinical implications, J Clin Diagn Res. 2014 ; 8 : AC06-9.
PubMed
6) Sgueglia GA, et al. Anatomic basis and physiological rationale of distal radial artery access for percutaneous coronary and endovascular procedures. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 ; 11 : 2113-9.
PubMed
7) Ruengsakulrach P, et al. Surgical implications of variations in hand collateral circulation : Anatomy revisited. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2001 ; 122 : 682-6.
PubMed

Chapter 4 CTによる近位橈骨動脈および遠位橈骨動脈の観察

P.32 掲載の参考文献
1) Tamaoki H, et al. Simultaneous computed tomographic angiography of the coronary and radial artery. Cardiovasc Interv Ther. DOI 10.1007/s12928-019-00598-6.
 
2) 山本晃久, 他. 橈骨動脈拍動部 (脈診部位) における双管脈の出現頻度と橈骨動脈の分枝との関係-超音波による観察-. 明治鍼灸医学. 2001 ; 28 : 45-53.
 
3) Kayano S. The fundamental examination of the accurate volume measurement of cerebral aneurysms by 3D-CT angiography (3D-CTA) : The relations between the threshold and the volume of the three-dimensional image. RSNA abstract. 2004 ; 786.
 
4) Naito T, et al. Evaluation of the diameter of the distal radial artery at the anatomical snuff box using ultrasound in Japanese patients. Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2019 ; 34 : 312-6.
PubMed

Chapter 5 エコーによる近位橈骨動脈および遠位橈骨動脈の観察

P.44 掲載の参考文献
1) Koutouzis M, et al. Distal versus traditional radial approach for coronary angiography. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2019 ; 20 : 678-80.
PubMed
2) Tang L, et al. Ultrasound guidance for radial artery cathetelization : an update meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PLoS One. 2014 ; 9 : e111527.
 
3) Ferdinand Kiemeneij@ferdikiem (2019, June 9). Consensus discussion on dTRA-p versus d-TRA-d that I had with Drs. Babunashivili and Kaledin in St. Petersburg, January 2019 [Twitter post]. Retrieved from https://twitter.com/ferdikiem/status/1137647798264967169
 
4) Wretowski D, et al. Very distal transradial approach (VITRO) for coronary interventions. Adv Interv Cardiol. 2019 ; 15, 1 : 42-5.
 
5) Sgueglia GA, et al. Anatomic basis and physiological rationale of distal radial artery access for percutaneous coronary and endovascular procedures. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 ; 11 : 2113-9.
PubMed
6) Min S-W, et al. Efect of bebel direction on the success rate of ultrasound-guided radial arterial cathetelization. BMC Anesthesiology. 2016 ; 16 : 34.
 

Chapter 6 触診ガイド穿刺

P.50 掲載の参考文献
1) Kaledin A, et al. Distal radial artery in endovascular intervention. Research. 2017. DOI : 10.13140/RG.2.2.13406.33600.
 
2) Kiemeneij F. Left distal transradial access in the anatomical snuff box for coronary angiography (ldTRAA) and interventions (ldTRAI). EuroIntervention. 2017 ; 13 : 851-7.
 
3) Naito T, et al. Evaluation of the diameter of the distal radial artery at the anatomical snuff box using ultrasound in Japanese patients. Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2019 ; 34 : 312-6.
PubMed

Chapter 7 エコーガイド穿刺

P.54 掲載の参考文献
1) Naito T, et al. Evaluation of the diameter of the distal radial artery at the anatomical snuff box using ultrasound in Japanese patients. Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2019 ; 34 : 312-6.
PubMed
2) McGee DC, et al. Preventing complications of central venous catheterization. N Engl J Med. 2003 ; 348 : 1123-33.
PubMed
3) Sobolev M, et al. Ultrasound-guided catheterization of the femoral artery : a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Invasive Cardiol. 2015 ; 27 : 316-23.
 
4) Shiloh AL, et al. Ultrasound-guided catheterization of the radial artery : a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Chest. 2011 ; 139 : 524-9.
PubMed
5) Gao YB, et al. Effects of ultrasound-guided radial artery catheterization : an updated meta-analysis. Am J Emerg Med. 2015 ; 33 : 50-5.
PubMed
6) Seto AH, et al. Real-time ultrasound guidance facilitates transradial access. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 ; 8 : 283-91.
PubMed
7) Saito S, et al. Influence of the ratio between radial artery inner diameter and sheath outer diameter on radial artery flow after transradial coronary intervention. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 1999 ; 46 : 173-8.
PubMed

Chapter 8 エコーガイド穿刺と触診ガイド穿刺の比較

P.60 掲載の参考文献
1) Kiemeneiji F. Left distal transradial access in the anatomical snuffbox for coronary angipgraphy (ldTRA) and interventions (ldTRI). EuroIntervention. 2017 ; 13 : 851-7.
 

Chapter 12 止血プロトコール ( 2 ) dRA専用止血デバイスコントロール作成

P.78 掲載の参考文献
1) Cambron BA, et al. Images in cardiovascular medicine ; demonstration of unilateral absence of the palmar arch without collateral circulation. Circulation. 2006 ; 113 : e6-7.
PubMed
2) Cubero JM, et al. Radial compression guided by mean artery pressure versus standard compression with a pneumatic device (RACOMAP). Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 ; 73 : 467-72.
PubMed
3) Saito S, et al. Influence of the ratio between radial artery inner diameter and sheath outer diameter on radial artery flow after transradial coronary intervention. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 1999 ; 46 : 173-8.
PubMed
4) Naito T, et al. Evaluation of the diameter of the distal radial artery at the anatomical snuff box using ultrasound in Japanese patients. Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2019 ; 34 : 312-6.
PubMed
5) Jolly SS, et al ; RIVAL trial group. Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography and intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes (RIVAL) : a randomised, parallel group, multicentre trial. Lancet. 2011 ; 377 : 1409-20.
 

Chapter 14 みんなの手技をみてみよう

P.111 掲載の参考文献
1) Mizuguchi Y, et al. Pseudoaneurysm formation after cardiac catheterization using the distal transradial approach. J Invasive Cardiol. 2019 ; 31 : E257.
PubMed
2) Mizuguchi Y, et al. Efficacy and safety of the distal transradial approach in coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention : a Japanese multicenter experience. Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2020 ; 35 : 162?7.
PubMed
P.118 掲載の参考文献
1) Naito T, et al. Evaluation of the diameter of the distal radial artery at the anatomical snuff box using ultrasound in Japanese patients. Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2019 ; 34 : 312-6.
PubMed
2) Fujii T, et al. Analysis of right radial artery for transradial catheterization by quantitative angiography--anatomical consideration of optimal radial puncture point. J Invasive Cardiol. 2010 ; 22 : 372-6.
 
P.138 掲載の参考文献
1) Kiemeneij F. Left distal transradial access in the anatomical snuffbox for coronary angiography (ldTRA) and interventions (ldTRI). EuroIntervention. 2017 ; 13 : 851-7.
PubMed
2) Naito T, et al. Evaluation of the diameter of the distal radial artery at the anatomical snuff box using ultrasound in Japanese patients. Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2019 ; 34 : 312-6.
PubMed
P.146 掲載の参考文献
1) Kiemeneij F. Left distal transradial access in the anatomical snuffbox for coronary angiography (ldTRA) and interventions (ldTRI). EuroIntervention. 2017 ; 13 : 851-7.
PubMed
2) Valsecchi O, et al. Early clinical experience with right and left distal transradial access in the anatomical snuffbox in 52 consecutive patients. J Invasive Cardiol. 2018 ; 30 : 218-22.
PubMed
3) Naito T. Evaluation of the diameter radial artery at the anatomical snuff box using ultrasound in Japanese patients. Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2019 ; 34 : 312-6.
PubMed

Chapter 15 3Fr診断カテーテルにおけるdRA

P.160 掲載の参考文献
1) Saito S, et al. Influence of the ratio between radial artery inner diameter and sheath outer diameter on radial artery flow after transradial coronary intervention. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 1999 ; 46 : 173-8.
PubMed
2) Naito T, et al. Evaluation of the diameter of the distal radial artery at the anatomical snuff box using ultrasound in Japanese patients. Cardiovasc interv ther. 2019 ; 34 : 312-6.
PubMed
3) 片平美明, 他. 冠動脈および左室造影用 3 Frカテーテルの開発と臨床評価. Jpn J Interv Cardiol. 2004 ; 19 Suppl I : 226.
 
4) 片平美明, 他. Development and evaluation of coronary angiography system using 3-Fr catheters. Jpn J Interv Cardiol. 2005 ; 20 Suppl I : 173.
 

Chapter 16 日常待機症例におけるdRA症例と実際 : 5Fr GC

P.167 掲載の参考文献
1) Kado H, et al. Operator radiation exposure and physical discomfort during a right versus left radial approach for coronary interventions : A randomized evaluation. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 ; 7 : 810-6.
 
2) Naito T, et al. Evaluation of the diameter of the distal radial artery at the anatomical snuff box using ultrasound in Japanese patients. Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2019 ; 34 : 312-6.
PubMed
3) Norimatsu K, et al. Importance of measurement of the diameter of the distal radial artery in a distal radial approach from the anatomical snuffbox before coronary catheterization. Heart Vessels. 2019 ; 34 : 1615-20.
 
4) Tamaoki H, et al. Simultaneous computed tomographic angiography of the coronary and radial arteries. Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2019 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12928-019-00598-6
 
5) Kiemeneij F, et al. Focus on maximal miniaturisation of transradial coronary access materials and techniques by the Slender Club Japan and Europe : An overview and classification. EuroIntervention. 2015 ; 10 : 1178-86.
PubMed
6) Otsuka Y, et al. Prolonged inflation technique using a scoring balloon for severe calcified lesion : Creep phenomenon. Int Heart J. 2017 ; 58 : 982-7.
 
7) Clinical case presentation in Euro PCR 2019. https://www.pcronline.com/Cases-resources-images/Resources/Course-videos-slides/2019/Management-of-in-stent-restenosis-importance-of-imaging?fbclid=IwAR3NvQ1rCEavySxmrGvanckm9b7xc7U7l18yqc9lPU3mwmhuKig-2u85F_U&auth=true Accessed Nov 18 2019.
 
8) Sadamatsu K, et al. Retrograde balloon crossing to overcome antegrade delivery failure for a heavily calcified chronic total occlusion. J Cardiol Cases. 2019 ; 19 : 121-4.
 

Chapter 18 日常待機症例におけるdRA 症例と実際 : 7Fr GC

P.178 掲載の参考文献
1) Lee JW, et al. Real-world experience of the left distal transradial approach for coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention : a prospective observational study (LeDRA). EuroIntervention. 2018 ; 14 : e995-e1003.
PubMed
2) Naito T, et al. Evaluation of the diameter of the distal radial artery at the anatomical snuff box using ultrasound in Japanese patients. Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2019 ; 34 : 312-6.
PubMed
3) Norimatsu K, et al. Importance of measurement of the diameter of the distal radial artery in a distal radial approach from the anatomical snuffbox before coronary catheterization. Heart Vessels. 2019 ; 34 : 1615-20.
 
4) Saito S, et al. Influence of the ratio between radial artery inner diameter and sheath outer diameter on radial artery flow after transradial coronary intervention. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 1999 ; 46 : 173-8.
PubMed
5) Dahm JB, et al. A randomized trial of 5 vs. 6 french transradial percutaneous coronary interventions. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2002 ; 57 : 172-6.
PubMed
6) Aminian A, et al. First prospective multicenter experience with the 7 French glidesheath slender for complex transradial coronary interventions. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 ; 89 : 1014-20.
PubMed
7) Mason PJ, et al. An update on radial artery access and best practices for transradial coronary angiography and intervention in acute coronary syndrome : A scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 ; 11 : e000035.
PubMed
8) Rashid M, et al. Radial artery occlusion after transradial interventions : A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Heart Assoc. 2016 ; 5 : pii : e002686.
 
9) Gasparini GL, et al. First prospective multicentre experience with left distal transradial approach for coronary chronic total occlusion interventions using a 7 Fr Glidesheath Slender. EuroIntervention. 2019 ; 15 : 126-8.
PubMed

Chapter 19 ACS へのdRA

P.182 掲載の参考文献
1) Saito S, et al. Comparative study on transradial approach vs. transfemoral approach in primary stent implantation for patients with acute myocardial infarction : results of the test for myocardial infarction by prospective unicenter randomization for access sites (TEMPURA) trial. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2003 ; 59 : 26-33.
PubMed
2) Valgimigli M, et al. Radial versus femoral access in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing invasive management : A randomised multicentre trial. Lancet. 2015 ; 385 : 2465-76.
PubMed
3) Roffi M, et al. 2015 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation. Eur Heart J. 2015 ; 32 : 2999-3054.
 
4) Ibanez B, et al. 2017 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation. Eur Heart J. 2018 ; 39 : 119-77.
PubMed
5) Kiemeneij F. Left distal transradial access in the anatomical snuffbox for coronary angiography (ldTRA) and interventions (ldTRI). EuroIntervention. 2017 ; 13 : 851-7.
PubMed
6) Lee J-W, et al. Real world experience of the left distal transradial approach for coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention : A prospective observational study (LeDRA). EuroIntervention. 2018 ; 14 : e995-e1003.
PubMed
7) Kim Y, et al. Feasibility of coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention via left snuffbox approach. Korean Circ J. 2018 ; 48 : 1120-30.
PubMed
8) Soydan E, et al. Coronary angiography using the left distal radial approach-An alternative site to conventional radial coronary angiography. Anatol J Cardiol. 2018 ; 19 : 243-8.
 
9) Koutouzis M, et al. Distal versus traditional radial approach for coronary angiography. Cardiovasc Revascularization Med. 2019 ; 20 : 678-80.
 
10) Ziakas A, et al. Right arm distal transradial (snuffbox) access for coronary catheterization : Initial experience. Hell J Cardiol. 2018.
 
11) Roghani-Dehkordi F, et al. Distal accesses in the hand (two novel techniques) for percutaneous coronary angiography and intervention. ARYA Atheroscler. 2018 ; 14 : 95-100.
PubMed
12) Mizuguchi Y, et al. Efficacy and safety of the distal transradial approach in coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention : a Japanese multicenter experience. Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2019.
PubMed
13) Izumikawa T, et al. P1761 Distal transradial approach for primary percutaneous coronary intervention for patients with acute myocardial infarction : a multicentre study. Eur Heart J. 2019 ; 40 (Supplement_1).
 
14) Yamada T, et al. Impact of shorter door-to-balloon time on prognosis of patients with STEMI-single-center analysis with a large proportion of the patients treated within 30 min. Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2019 ; 34 : 97-104.
 

Chapter 20 Complex PCIにおけるdRA

P.187 掲載の参考文献
1) Kiemeneij F. Left distal transradial access in the anatomical snuffbox for coronary angiography (ldtra) and interventions (ldtri). EuroIntervention. 2017 ; 13 : 851-7.
PubMed
2) Fujii T, et al. Analysis of right radial artery for transradial catheterization by quantitative angiography--anatomical consideration of optimal radial puncture point. J Invasive Cardiol. 2010 ; 22 : 372-6.
 
3) Kim Y, et al. Gender differences in the distal radial artery diameter for the snuffbox approach. Cardiol J. 2018 ; 25 : 639-41.
PubMed
4) Mizuguchi Y, et al. Pseudoaneurysm formation after cardiac catheterization using the distal transradial approach. J Invasive Cardiol. 2019 ; 31 : E257.
PubMed
5) Boumezrag M, et al. Pseudoaneurysm : a rare complication of distal transradial access in the anatomical snuffbox. CVIR Endorasc. 2019 ; 2 : 21.
PubMed
6) Aoi S, et al. Distal transradial artery access in the anatomical snuffbox for coronary angiography as an alternative access site for faster hemostasis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 ; 94 : 651-7.
PubMed

Chapter 21 シースレスPCIとdRA : 小口径カテーテルこそシースレス

P.194 掲載の参考文献
1) Yoshimachi F, et al. (V3 Registry Investigators). A prospective multicenter study using a virtual 3 Fr percutaneous coronary intervention system : The V3 Registry. J Invasive Cardiol. 2017 ; 29 : 16-23.
 
2) Takagawa Y, et al. Twisting method for reducing friction during insertion of a sheath introducer and a sheathless guiding catheter. Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2018 ; 33 : 40-5.
 
3) Saito S, et al. Influence of the ratio between radial artery inner diameter and sheath outer diameter on radial artery flow after transradial coronary intervention. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 1999 ; 46 : 173-8.
PubMed
4) Naito T, et al. Evaluation of the diameter of the distal radial artery at the anatomical snuff box using ultrasound in Japanese patients. Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2019 ; 34 : 312-6.
PubMed
5) Yoshimachi F, et al. Simultaneous radial and distal radial access through a single hand in PCI for CTO- "BUSHI DO" (Bipoint Uni-lateral SHeathless catheter Insertion via Distal & prOximal radial artery) technique. PCR online, image interventional cardiology, 10 JUL 2018.
 

Chapter 23 看護からみる遠位橈骨動脈アプローチ

P.208 掲載の参考文献
1) Moriyama S, et al. Impact of the distal radial approach in nursing service. Euro PCR. 2019.
 
2) メヂカルフレンド社編集部. 特集「ベッドサイドケアに専念する時間を確保する」業務改善. 看護展望. 2016 ; 41 : 19-53.
 
3) 大津美香, 他. 身体疾患を合併する認知症高齢者の看護援助方法を検討するための基礎的調査. 保健科学研究. 2016 ; 6 : 13-28.
 

Chapter 24 dRAの欠点～cRAと比較して

P.216 掲載の参考文献
1) Valsecchi O, et al. Failure of transradial approach during coronary interventions : anatomic considerations. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2006 ; 67 : 870-8.
PubMed
2) Lo TS, et al. Radial artery anomaly and its influence on transradial coronary procedural outcome. Heart. 2009 ; 95 : 410-5.
PubMed
3) 富田英. カテーテル治療に使う医療材料のいろは. Journal of JPIC. 2018 ; 3 : 38-42.
 

Chapter 25 遠位橈骨動脈の閉塞

P.220 掲載の参考文献
1) Aminian A, et al. Impact of sheath size and hemostasis time on radial artery patency after transradial coronary angiography and intervention in Japanese and non-Japanese patients : A substudy from RAP and BEAT (Radial Artery Patency and Bleeding, Efficacy, Adverse evenT) randomized multicenter trial. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 ; 92 : 844-51.
PubMed
2) Kaledin A, et al. Research August. 2017. DOI : 10.13140/RG.2.2.13406.33600.
 

Chapter 26 dRAの合併症

P.225 掲載の参考文献
1) Kiemeneij F. Left distal transradial access in the anatomical snuffbox for coronary angiography (ldTRA) and interventions (ldTRI). EuroIntervention. 2017 ; 13 : 851-7.
PubMed
2) Lee JW, et al. Real world experience of the left distal transradial approach for coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention : A prospective observational study (LeDRA). EuroIntervention. 2018 ; 14 : e995-e1003.
PubMed
3) Kim Y, et al. Feasibility of coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention via left snuffbox approach. Korean Circ J. 2018 ; 48 : 1120-30.
PubMed
4) Ziakas A, et al. Right arm distal transradial (snuffbox) access for coronary catheterization : Initial experience. Hellenic J Cardiol. 2018. pii : S1109-9666 (18) 30379-8.
 
5) Roghani-Dehkordi F, et al. Distal accesses in the hand (two novel techniques) for percutaneous coronary angiography and intervention. ARYA Atheroscler. 2018 ; 14 : 95-100.
PubMed
6) Koutouzis M, et al. Distal versus traditional radial approach for coronary angiography. Cardiovasc Revascularization Med. 2019 ; 20 : 678-80.
 
7) Kotowycz MA, et al. Radial artery patency after transradial catheterization. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 ; 5 : 127-33.
PubMed
8) Soydan E, et al. Coronary angiography using the left distal radial approach- An alternative site to conventional radial coronary angiography. Anatol J Cardiol. 2018 ; 19 : 243-8.
 
9) Yamada T, et al. A novel method for achieving patent hemostasis in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention through the distal radial artery. CatheLab Dig. 2018 ; 26.
 
10) Mizuguchi Y, et al. Pseudoaneurysm formation after cardiac catheterization using the distal transradial approach. J Invasive Cardiol. 2019 ; 31 : E257.
PubMed
11) Mizuguchi Y, et al. Efficacy and safety of the distal transradial approach in coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention : a Japanese multicenter experience. Cardiovasc Interv Ther. (in press)
 

Chapter 27 みんながdRAをやらない理由・私はdRAをやる理由

P.229 掲載の参考文献
1) Kiemeneij F. Left distal transradial access in the anatomical snuffbox for coronary angiography (ldTRA) and interventions (ldTRI). EuroIntervention. 2017 ; 13 : 851-7.
PubMed
2) Lee JW, et al. Real-world experience of the left distal transradial approach for coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention : a prospective observational study (Le DRA). EuroIntervention. 2018 ; 14 : e995-1003.
 
3) Roh JH, et al. Distal radial approach through the anatomical snuff box for coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention. Korean Circ J. 2018 ; 48 : 1131-4.
PubMed
4) Mizuguchi Y, et al. Efficacy and safety of the distal transradial approach in coronary angioplasty and percutaneous coronary intervention : a Japanese multicenter experience. Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2019 May 24. [Epub ahead of print]
 
5) Kotowycz MA, et al. Radial artery patency after transradial catheterization. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 ; 5 : 127-33.
PubMed
6) Naito T, et al. Evaluation of the diameter of the distal radial artery at the anatomical snuff box using ultrasound in Japanese patients. Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2019 ; 34 : 312-6.
PubMed

Chapter 28 dRA : 今後の展望

P.233 掲載の参考文献
1) Gruntzig AR, et al. Nonoperative dilatation of coronary-artery stenosis : Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. N Engl J Med. 1979 ; 301 : 61-8.
PubMed
2) Dorros G, et al. The brachial artery method to transluminal coronary angioplasty. Cathet Cardiovasc Diag. 1982 ; 8 : 233-42.
 
3) Schatz RA, et al. Balloon-expandable intracoronary stents in the adult dog. Circulation. 1987 ; 76 : 450-7.
PubMed
4) Kiemeneij F, et al. Percutaneous transradial artery approach for the coronary artery stent implnatation. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1993 ; 30 : 173-8.
 
5) Campeau L. Percutaneous radial artery approach for coronary angiography. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1989 ; 16 : 3-7.
PubMed
6) Valgimigli M, et al ; MATRIX Investigators. Radial versus femoral access in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing invasive management : a randomised multicentre trial. Lancet. 2015 ; 385 : 2465-76.
PubMed
7) Babunashvili A, et al. Recanalization and reuse of early occluded radial artery within 6 days after previous transradial diagnostic procedure. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 ; 77 : 530-6.
PubMed
8) Kaledin AL, et al. Distal radial artery in endovascular interventions. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/319162208.
 
9) Boden WE, et al. Optimal medical therapy with or without PCI for stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med. 2007 ; 356 : 1503-16.
 
10) Al-Lamee R, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention in stable angina (ORBITA) : a double-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2018 ; 391 : 31-40.
PubMed
11) Maron DJ, et al. ISCHEMIA Research Group. Initial invasive or conservative strategy for stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med. 2020 ; 382 : 1395-407.
PubMed

書評

最近チェックした商品履歴

Loading...