インプラント周囲骨折を極める

出版社： 全日本病院出版会
著者：
発行日： 2023-07-01
分野： 臨床医学：外科  >  整形外科学
ISBN： 9784865198218
電子書籍版： 2023-07-01 （第1版第1刷）
書籍・雑誌
≪全国送料無料でお届け≫
取寄せ目安：約3営業日

16,500 円(税込)

購入する
電子書籍
章別単位での購入はできません
ブラウザ、アプリ閲覧

16,500 円(税込)

購入する

商品紹介

インプラント周囲骨折に悩める外傷医・関節外科医の必携書！基礎知識からケースプレゼンテーションによる実践的な手技まで徹底網羅した一冊です。

目次

  • 第1章　インプラント周囲骨折に関連する基礎知識
    　1 疫学，原因，リスクファクター
    　　A． 股関節（セメントとセメントレス人工関節），膝関節，肩関節，肘関節の骨接合術後骨折
    　2 インプラント周囲骨折の診断と評価
    　　A．骨折の評価（分類）
    　 (1)股関節（臼蓋，大腿骨，IPFF）
    　 (2)膝関節（大腿骨遠位，脛骨，膝蓋骨）
    　 (3)肩関節
    　 (4)肘関節
    　　B．患者の評価
    　　C．感染の評価
    　3 治療方針
    　　A．保存加療と手術加療

    第2章　部位別インプラント周囲骨折の治療
     下肢 
    〈股関節〉
    　 1 術中術後早期骨折（骨接合術か再置換術か？）
    　 2 寛骨臼（臼蓋）骨折（骨接合か再置換による再建か？）
    　 3 大腿骨ステム周囲骨折
    　　A．内固定：ORIF（プレートの長さ，テクニックの実際）
    　　B．内固定：MIPO（適応，テクニックの実際）
    　　C．再置換術
    　 (1)セメントレスステム（ステムの長さ，プレートとの併用の考え方，テクニックの実際）
    　 (2)セメントステム（ステムの長さ，プレートとの併用の考え方，テクニックの実際）
    　　D．特殊な治療が必要な症例
    　 (1)Impaction bone grafting（IBG）法
    　 (2)Allograft prosthesis composite（APC）
    　 (3)感染
    　 (4)非定型（有限要素も含む）
    　 (5)偽関節
    　 (69外傷後の大腿骨インプラント周囲骨折

    〈Interprosthetic（股関節と膝関節のインプラント間）〉
    　 1 近位と遠位

    〈膝関節〉
    　 1 大腿骨
    　　A．プレート（ダブルプレートも含む）
    　　B．髄内釘
    　 2 脛骨
    　 3 膝蓋骨
    　 4 再置換術
    　
    　付録(1)　使うインプラント一覧　下肢
    　付録(2)　使うインプラント一覧　上肢

    　
    第3章　Case presentation
    　寛骨臼（臼蓋）コンポーネント周囲骨折
    　　Case 1　骨接合術久
    　　Case 2　再置換術
    　
    　大腿骨ステム周囲骨折
    　　Case 3　術中もしくは術後早期の骨折（再置換術）
    　　Case 4　ステム先端より近位の骨折（骨接合術）
    　　Case 5　大腿骨骨幹部骨折（MIPO）
    　　Case 6　ステム先端より遠位の大腿骨骨幹端部骨折（骨接合術）
    　　Case 7　大転子骨折（再置換術）
    　　Case 8　ステム遠位より近位の骨折（セメントレスステムによる再置換術）
    　　Case 9　ステム遠位より近位の骨折（セメントステムによる再置換術）
    　　Case 10　セメントステム先端の骨折（ロングステムによる再置換術）
    　　Case 11　Impaction bone grafting（IBG）法
    　　Case 12　Allograft prosthesis composite（APC）
    　　Case 13　感染
    　　Case 14　非定型大腿骨ステム周囲骨折（骨接合術）
    　　Case 15　非定型大腿骨ステム周囲骨折（再置換術）
    　　Case 16　偽関節
    　
    　骨接合術後骨折（下肢）
    　　Case 17　骨接合術
    　　Case 18　インプラント間骨折（骨接合術）
    　
    　Interprosthetic
    　Case 19　IPFFの非定型大腿骨骨折（骨接合術）
    　Case 20　IPFFの大腿骨遠位骨折（骨接合術）
    　
    　人工膝関節周囲骨折
    　Case 21　大腿骨コンポーネント周囲骨折（骨接合術：plate）
    　Case 22　大腿骨コンポーネント周囲骨折（骨接合術：髄内釘）
    　Case 23　大腿骨コンポーネント周囲骨折（骨接合術：創外固定）
    　Case 24　脛骨コンポーネント周囲骨折（骨接合術）
    　Case 25　脛骨ステム周囲骨折（骨接合術）
    　Case 26　膝蓋骨骨折（骨接合術）
    　Case 27　大腿骨コンポーネント周囲骨折（再置換術）
    　
    　人工肩関節周囲骨折
    　Case 28　上腕骨ステム周囲骨折（骨接合術）
    　Case 29　上腕骨ステム周囲骨折（再置換術）
    　
    　人工肘関節周囲骨折
    　Case 30　尺骨ステム周囲骨折（骨接合術）
    　Case 31　上腕骨ステム周囲骨折（再置換術）
    　
    　骨接合術中術後骨折（上肢）
    　Case 32　上腕骨近位端骨折術中骨折（骨接合術）
    　Case 33　上腕骨遠位端骨折術後骨折（骨接合術）
    　
    　付録(2)　診断・治療に困ったときの10の対処法 Q＆A

この書籍の参考文献

参考文献のリンクは、リンク先の都合等により正しく表示されない場合がありますので、あらかじめご了承下さい。

本参考文献は電子書籍掲載内容を元にしております。

第1章 インプラント周囲骨折に関連する基礎知識

P.10 掲載の参考文献
1) Streit MR, et al : Late peri-prosthetic femoral fracture as a major mode of failure in uncemented primary hip replacement. J Bone Jt Surg Br. 93-B : 178-183, 2011.
 
2) Abdel, et al : Epidemiology of periprosthetic fractures. Katrin, et al : Causes of and risk factors for periprosthetic fractures. Schutz M, et al ed, Periprosthetic Fracture Management, 5-38, Thieme, 2013.
 
3) Sharkey PF, et al : Acetabular fracture associated with cementless acetabular component insertion : A report of 13 cases. J Arthroplasty. 14 : 426-431, 1999.
 
4) Berry DJ : Management of periprosthetic fractures : The hip. J Arthroplasty. 17 : 11-13, 2002.
 
5) Lowenhielm G, et al : Fracture of the lower extremity after total hip replacement. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg [Internet]. 108 : 141-143, 1989.
 
6) Lindahl H : Epidemiology of periprosthetic femur fracture around a total hip arthroplasty. Injury. 38 : 651-654, 2007.
 
7) Lindahl H, et al : Three hundred and twenty-one periprosthetic femoral fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 88 : 1215-1222, 2006.
 
8) Taunton MJ, et al : Early Postoperative Femur Fracture After Uncemented Collarless Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty : Characterization and Results of Treatment. J Arthroplasty [Internet]. J Arthroplasty. 30 : 2008-2011, 2015. [cited 2023 Jan 31] Available from : http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26077148
 
9) McGraw P, et al : Periprosthetic fractures of the femur after total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Traumatol. 11 : 135-141, 2010.
 
10) Alden KJ, et al : Intraoperative fracture during primary total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 468 : 90-95, 2010.
 
11) Platzer P, et al : Management and outcome of periprosthetic fractures after total knee arthroplasty. J Trauma. 68 : 1464-1470, 2010.
 
12) Vessely MB, et al : The Chitranjan Ranawat Award : Long-term survivorship and failure modes of 1000 cemented condylar total knee arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 452 : 28-34, 2006.
 
13) Schroder HM, et al : Cementless porous-coated total knee arthroplasty : 10-Year results in a consecutive series. J Arthroplasty. 16 : 559-567, 2001.
 
14) Chalidis BE, et al : Management of periprosthetic patellar fractures. A systematic review of literature. Injury. 38 : 714-724, 2007.
 
15) Steinmann SP, et al : Treatment of periprosthetic humerus fractures associated with shoulder arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg [Internet]. 16 : 199-207, 2008. [cited 2023 Feb 1]
 
16) Dolci A, et al : Complications and Intraoperative Fractures in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty : A Systematic Review. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 12 : 1-14, 2021.
 
17) Brusalis CM, et al : Periprosthetic Fractures in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty : Current Concepts and Advances in Management. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 13 : 509-519, 2020.
 
18) Prkic A, et al : Why does total elbow arthroplasty fail today? A systematic review of recent literature. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 137 : 761-769, 2017.
 
19) Foruria AM, et al : The surgical treatment of periprosthetic elbow fractures around the ulnar stem following semiconstrained total elbow arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg. 93 : 1399-1407, 2011.
 
20) Kwak JM, et al : Total elbow arthroplasty : Clinical outcomes, complications, and revision surgery. CiOS Clin Orthop Surg. 11 : 369-379, 2019.
 
21) Andrews P, et al : Stress fracture of the medial wall of the acetabulum adjacent to a cementless acetabular component. J Arthroplasty. 17 : 117-120, 2002.
 
22) Cohen EM, et al : Intraoperative Femur Fracture Risk During Primary Direct Anterior Approach Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty With and Without a Fracture Table. J Arthroplasty [Internet]. 32 : 2847-2851, 2017.
 
23) Broden C, et al : High risk of early periprosthetic fractures after primary hip arthroplasty in elderly patients using a cemented, tapered, polished stem : An observational, prospective cohort study on 1,403 hips with 47 fractures after mean follow-up time of 4 years. Acta Orthop. 86 : 169-174, 2015.
 
24) McDonough EB, et al : Periprosthetic fractures of the humerus. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) [Internet]. 34 : 586-591, 2005. [cited 2023 Feb 19].
 
25) Berry DJ : EPIDEMIOLOGY. Orthop Clin North Am. 30 : 183-190, 1999.
 
26) Lamb JN, et al : Risk Factors for Intraoperative Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures During Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty. An Analysis From the National Joint Registry for England and Wales and the Isle of Man. J Arthroplasty. 34 : 3065-3073.e1, 2019.
 
27) Lesh ML, et al : The Consequences of Anterior Femoral Notching in Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 82 : 1096-1101, 2000.
 
28) Tharani R, et al : Periprosthetic fractures after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 20 : 27-32, 2005.
 
29) Reuben JD, et al : Effect of Patella Thickness on Patella Strain Following Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 6 : 251-258, 1991.
 
P.27 掲載の参考文献
1) Peterson CA, et al : Periprosthetic fracture of the acetabulum after total hip arthroplasty. JBJS. 78 (8) : 1206-1213, 1996.
 
2) Callaghan JJ : Periprosthetic fracture of the acetabulum during and following total hip arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect. 47 : 231-235, 1997.
 
3) Della Valle CJ, et al : Periprosthetic fractures of the acetabulum associated with a total hip arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect. 52 : 281-290, 2003.
 
4) Davidson D, et al : Intraoperative periprosthetic fractures during total hip arthroplasty. JBJS Am. 90 (9) : 2000-2012, 2008.
 
5) Duncan CP, et al : The unified classification system (UCS) : improving our understanding of periprosthetic fractures. Bone Joint J. 96 (6) : 713-716, 2014.
 
6) Simon P, et al : Treatment algorithm of acetabular periprosthetic fractures. Int Orthop. 39 (10) : 1995-2003, 2015.
 
7) Pascarella R, et al : Periprosthetic acetabular fractures : a new classification proposal. Injury. 49 Suppl 3 : S65-S73, 2018.
 
8) Hasegawa K, et al : Periprosthetic occult fractures of the acetabulum occur frequently during primary THA. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 475 (2) : 484-494, 2017.
 
9) Johansson JE, et al : Fracture of the ipsilateral femur in patients with total hip replacement. JBJS. 63 (9) : 1435-1442, 1981.
 
10) Roffman M, et al : Fracture of the femur after total hip arthroplasty. Orthopedics. 12 (8) : 1067-1070, 1989.
 
11) Duncan CP, et al : Fracture of the femur after hip replacement. Instr Course Lect. 44 : 293-304, 1995.
 
12) Bardy OH, et al : The reliability and validation of the Vancouver classification of femoral fractures after hip replacement. J Arthroplasty. 15 (1) : 59-62, 2000.
 
13) Rayan F, et al : European validation of the Vancouver classification of periprosthetic proximal femoral fractures. JBJS. 90 (12) : 1576-1579, 2008.
 
14) Naqvi GA, et al : Interobserver and intraobserver reliability and validity of the Vancouver classification system of periprosthetic femoral fractures after hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 27 (6) : 1047-1050, 2012.
 
15) Corten K, et al : An algorithm for the surgical treatment of periprosthetic fractures of the femur around a well-fixed femoral component. JBJS. 91 (11) : 1424-1430, 2009.
 
16) Laurer HL, et al : Outcome after operative treatment of Vancouver type B1 and C periprosthetic femoral fractures ; open reduction and internal fixation versus revision arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 131 (7) : 983-989, 2011.
 
17) Huang JF, et al : Modification of the Unified Classification System for periprosthetic femoral fractures after hip arthroplasty. J Orthop Sci. 23 (6) : 982-986, 2018.
 
18) Baba T, et al : New classification focusing on implant design useful for setting therapeutic strategy for periprosthetic femoral fractures. Int Orthop. 39 (1) : 1-5, 2015.
 
19) Baba T, et al : Higher reliability and validity of Baba classification with computerized tomography imaging and implant information for periprosthetic femoral fractures. Int Orthop. 39 (9) : 1695-1699, 2015.
 
20) 馬場智規 : 改訂Baba分類-大腿骨ステム周囲骨折の治療に有効な分類法-. Bone Joint Nerve. 9 (3) : 347-352, 2019.
 
21) Frank MA, et al : General consideration and workup of periprosthetic fractures. Liporace FA, et al ed, Periprosthetic Fractures of the Hip and Knee, 3-18, Springer, 2019.
 
22) Stoffel K, et al : Periprosthetic fractures of the proximal femur : beyond the Vancouver classification. EFORT Open Rev. 5 (7) : 449-456, 2020.
 
23) Mamczak CN, et al : Interprosthetic femoral fractures J Orthop Trauma. 24 (12) : 740-744, 2010.
 
24) Rorabeck CH, et al : Periprosthetic fractures of the knee complicating total knee arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am. 30 (2) : 265-277, 1999.
 
25) Hou Z, et al : Treatment of interprosthetic fractures of the femur. J Trauma. 71 (6) : 1715-1719, 2011.
 
26) Su ET, et al : Periprosthetic femoral fractures above total knee replacement. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 12 (1) : 12-20, 2004.
 
27) Fink B, et al : Periprosthetic fractures of the femur associated with hip arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 125 (7) : 433-442, 2005.
 
28) Platzer P, et al : Management and outcome of interprosthetic femoral fractures. Injury. 42 (11) : 1219-1225, 2011.
 
29) Soenen M, et al : Interprosthetic femoral fractures : Analysis of 14 cases. Proposal for additional grade in the Vancouver and SoFCOT classifications. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 97 (7) : 693-698, 2011.
 
30) Pires RES, et al : Interprosthetic femoral fractures : proposed new classification system and treatment algorithm. Injury. 45 Suppl 5 : S2-S6, 2014.
 
31) Pires RES, et al : Validation of a new classification system for interprosthetic femoral fractures. Injury. 48 (7) : 1388-1392, 2017.
 
32) Scolaro JA, et al : Management of interprosthetic femur fractures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 25 (4) : e63-e69, 2017.
 
33) Rozell JC, et al : Interprosthetic femoral fractures : management challenges. Orthop Res Rev. 11 : 119-128, 2021.
 
34) Baba T, et al : The Baba classification focused on implant design is useful in setting the therapeutic strategy for interprosthetic femoral fracture. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 28 (2) : 247-254, 2018.
 
35) Rosenbaum JS, et al : Distal locking in short hip nails : Cause or prevention of peri-implant fractures? Injury. 47 (4) : 887-892, 2016.
 
36) Muller F, et al : Peri-implant femoral fractures : The risk is more than three times higher within PFN compared with DHS. Injury. 47 (10) : 2189-2194, 2016.
 
37) Chan LWM, et al : Non-prosthetic peri-implant fractures : classification, management and outcomes. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 138 (6) : 791-802, 2018.
 
38) Egol KA, et al : Previous implant fractures : A new descriptive classification system. J Orthop Trauma. 33 (9) : 423-427, 2019.
 
39) Videla-Ces M, et al : Proposal for the classification of peri-implant femoral fractures : Retrospective cohort study. Injury. 50 (3) : 758-763, 2019.
 
40) Videla-Ces M, et al : A pilot agreement study of a new classification system for peri-implant femoral fractures. Injury. 52 (7) : 1908-1917, 2021.
 
41) Toro G, et al : Fractures around trochanteric nails : The "Vergilius Classification System". Adv Orthop. 2021 : 7532583, 2021.
 
P.37 掲載の参考文献
1) (株) 矢野経済研究所「2021年版メディカルバイオニクス (人工臓器) 市場の中期予測と参入企業の徹底分析」. 2022.
 
2) Agarwal S, et al : Periprosthetic fractures after total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 22 (1) : 24-29, 2014.
 
3) Dennis DA : Periprosthetic fractures following total knee arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect. 50 : 379-389, 2001.
 
4) Bezwada HP, et al : Periprosthetic supracondylar femur fractures following total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 19 (4) : 453-458, 2004.
 
5) Meek RMD, et al : The risk of peri-prosthetic fracture after primary and revision total hip and knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 93 (1) : 96-101, 2011.
 
6) Hoffmann MF, et al : Outcome of periprosthetic distal femoral fractures following knee arthroplasty. Injury. 43 : 1084-1089, 2012.
 
7) Ayers DC, et al : Common complication of total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg. 79-A : 278-311, 1997.
 
8) Parvizi J, et al : Periprosthetic knee fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 22 (9) : 663-671, 2008.
 
9) Shah JK, et al : Equivalent union rates between intramedullary nail and locked plate fixation for distal femur periprosthetic fractures-a systematic review. Injury. 51 (4) : 1062-1068, 2020.
 
10) Streubel PN, et al : Mortality after distal femur fractures in elderly patients. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 469 (4) : 1188-1196, 2011.
 
11) Quinzi DA, et al : Early complications and reoperation rates are similar amongst open reduction internal fixation, intramedullary nail, and distal femoral replacement for periprosthetic distal femur fractures : a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 141 (6) : 997-1006, 2021.
 
12) Aebischer, AS, et al : Distal Femoral Replacement for Periprosthetic Fractures After TKA : Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry Review. J Arthroplasty. 37 (7) : 1354-1358, 2022.
 
13) Neer CS, et al : Supracondylar fracture of the adult femur. A study of one hundred and ten cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 49 (4) : 591-613, 1967.
 
14) Rorabeck CH, et al : Fractures of the femur, tibia, and patella after total knee arthroplasty : decision making and principles of management. Instr Course Lect. 47 : 449-458, 1998.
 
15) Meinberg EG, et al : Fracture and dislocation classification compendium 2018. J Orthop Trauma. 32 suppl : S40-S41, 2018.
 
16) Su ET, et al : Periprosthetic femoral fractures above total knee replacements. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 12 (1) : 12-20, 2004.
 
17) Kim KI, et al : Periprosthetic fractures after total knee arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 446 : 167-175, 2006.
PubMed
18) Backstein D, et al : Periprosthetic fractures of the knee. J Arthroplasty 22 (4 Suppl 1) : 45-49, 2007.
 
19) Fakler JKM, et al : A new classification of TKA periprosthetic femur fractures considering the implant type. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 18 (1) : 490, 2017.
 
20) Rhee SJ, et al : Femoral Periprosthetic Fractures after Total Knee Arthroplasty : New Surgically Oriented Classification with a Review of Current Treatments. Knee Surg Relat Res. 30 (4) : 284-292, 2018.
 
21) Felix NA, et al : Periprosthetic fractures of the tibia associated with total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. (345) : 113-124, 1997.
 
22) Goldberg VM, et al : Patellar fracture type and prognosis in condylar total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. (236) : 115-122, 1988.
 
23) Ortiguera CJ, et al : Patellar fracture after total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 84 (4) : 532-540, 2002.
 
24) Duncan CP, et al : The Unified Classification System (UCS) : improving our understanding of periprosthetic fractures. Bone Joint J. 96-B (6) : 713-716, 2014.
 
25) Frenzel S, et al : Periprosthetic femoral fractures : incidence, classification problems and the proposal of a modified classification scheme. Int Orthop. 39 (10) : 1909-1920, 2015.
 
26) Makaram NS, et al : Reliability of current classification systems for periprosthetic distal femur fractures. Injury. 53 (10) : 3430-3437, 2022.
 
P.40 掲載の参考文献
1) 日本人工関節学会 日本人工関節登録制度事務局 : 人工関節登録調査 2015年度報告書. 2015.
 
2) 日本人工関節学会 日本人工関節登録制度事務局 : リバース型TSAレジストリー 2020年度症例統計. 2020.
 
3) 三好直樹ほか : 人工肩関節周囲骨折の診断と治療. 関節外科. 32 (8) : 16-26, 2013.
 
4) Singh JA, et al : Periprosthetic fractures associated with primary total shoulder arthroplasty and primary humeral head replacement : a thirty-three-year study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 94 : 1777-1785, 2012.
 
5) Steinmann SP, et al : Treatment of periprosthetic humerus fractures associated with shoulder arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 16 : 199-207, 2008.
 
6) Fram B, et al : Periprosthetic Humeral Fractures in Shoulder Arthroplasty. JBJS Rev. 7 (11) : e6, 2019.
 
7) Wright TW, et al : Humeral fractures after shoulder arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 77 (9) : 1340-1346, 1995.
 
8) Campbell JT, et al : Periprosthetic humeral fractures : mechanisms of fracture and treatment options. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 7 (4) : 406-413, 1998.
 
9) Worland RL, et al : Periprosthetic humeral fractures : management and classification. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 8 (6) : 590-594, 1999.
 
10) Kuhn MZ, et al : Periprosthetic humerus fractures after shoulder arthroplasty : an evaluation of available classification systems. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. (31) : 2034-2042, 2022.
 
P.43 掲載の参考文献
1) Sanchez-Sotelo J, et al : Periprosthetic humeral fractures after total elbow arthroplasty : treatment with implant revision and strut allograft augmentation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 84 (9) : 1642-1650, 2002.
 
2) Yoshida Y, et al : A case of a periprosthetic humeral fracture in which early bone union was achieved through concomitant use of teriparatide, Modern Rheumatology Case Reports. 2 (1) : 113-117, 2018.
 
P.48 掲載の参考文献
1) Mills WJ, et al : The value of the ankle-brachial index for diagnosing arterial injury after knee dislocation : a prospective study. J Trauma. 56 (6) : 1261-1265, 2004.
 
2) Fukunishi S, et al : Significance of preoperative 3D-CT angiography for localization of the femoral artery in complicated THA. J Orthop Sci. 19 (3) : 457-464, 2014.
 
3) 山本豪明 : THAと解剖-神経血管損傷の回避策-. J MIOS. 105 : 68-79, 2022.
 
4) Scolaro JA, et al : Venous thromboembolism in orthopaedic trauma. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 23 (1) : 1-6, 2015.
 
5) 田中正ほか編 : AO法骨折治療. 第3版, 411, 2020.
 
6) Geerts WH, et al : A prospective study of venous thromboembolism after major trauma. N Engl J Med. 331 (24) : 1601-1606, 1994.
 
7) Wells PS, et al : Graduated compression stockings in the prevention of postoperative venous thromboembolism. A meta-analysis. Meta-Analysis Arch Intern Med. 154 (1) : 67-72, 1994.
 
8) Berrios-Torres SI, et al : Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Guideline for the Prevention of Surgical Site Infection. JAMA Surg. 152 (8) : 784-791, 2017.
 
9) 八木敏雄ほか : CONUT法およびCONUT変法による大腿骨近位部骨折患者の入院時栄養評価と周術期合併症との関係. 整・災外. 64 : 909-914, 2021.
 
10) 林博志ほか : 栄養状態および服薬状況からみた大腿骨転子部骨折症例について. 骨折. 40 : 189-192, 2018.
 
11) de Ulibarri JI, et al : CONUT : A tool for controlling nutritional status. First validation in a hospital population. Nutr Hosp. 20 : 38-45, 2005.
 
12) 脇坂典子ほか : 高齢患者における入院時CONUT値算出の有用性. JSPEN. 1 (4) : 297-303, 2019.
 
13) 久保祐介ほか : 大腿骨近位部骨折における退院時歩行能力に影響する因子の検討. 整形外科と災害外科. 61 (1) : 21-25, 2012.
 
P.54 掲載の参考文献
1) Lee QJ, et al : Risk factors for periprosthetic joint infection in total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Surg. 23 (3) : 282-286, 2015.
 
2) Ren X, et al : Patients' risk factors for periprosthetic joint infection in primary total hip arthroplasty : a meta-analysis of 40 studies. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 22 (1) : 776, 2021.
 
3) Berrios-Torres SI, et al : Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Guideline for the Prevention of Surgical Site Infection. JAMA Surg. 152 (8) : 784-791, 2017.
 
4) 内山勝文ほか : PJI診断における新しい分子生物学的手法の試み-PCRラテラルフロー法による迅速遺伝子細菌検査法-. 関節外科. 34 : 852-858, 2015.
 
5) Kobayashi N, et al : Rapid and sensitive detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus periprosthetic infections using real-time polymerase chainreaction. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 64 (2) : 172-176, 2009.
 
6) van den Kieboom MJ, et al : Concomitant Hip and Knee Periprosthetic Joint Infection in Periprosthetic Fracture : Diagnostic Utility of Serum and Synovial Fluid. J Arthroplasty. 36 (2) : 722-727, 2021.
 
7) Ward PC : Interpretation of synovial fluiddata. Postgrad Med. 68 : 175-184, 1980.
 
8) Shmerling RH : Synovial fluid analysis, a critical reappraisal. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 20 : 503-512, 1994.
 
9) Kwiecien G, et al : Intraoperative Frozen Section Histology : Matched for Musculoskeletal Infection Society Criteria. J Arthroplasty. 32 (1) : 223-227, 2017.
 
10) Inagaki Y, et al : Correlation of histological and microbiological findings in septic and aseptic knee implant failure. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 139 (5) : 717-722, 2019.
 
11) Douglas R, et al : Diagnosis and management of prosthetic joint infection : clinical practice guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 56 (1) : e1-e25, 2013.
 
12) 内山勝文ほか : 人工骨頭・人工股関節ステム周囲骨折 (Vancouver分類type-B3) に対するallograft-prosthesis compositeを用いた再置換術. 整・災外. 54 (13) ; 1597-1602, 2011-2012.
 
13) Uchiyama K : Revision total hip replacement using a cementless interlocking distal femoral stem with allograft-cemented composite and the application of intramedullary and onlay cortical strut allografts : two case reports. J Orthop Sci. 17 (3) : 323-327, 2012.
 
P.64 掲載の参考文献
1) Baba T, et al : Atypical periprosthetic femoral fractures after arthroplasty for fracture are at high risk of complications. Sci Rep. 11 (1) : 14378, 2021. doi : 10.1038/s41598-021-93574-1.
 
2) Pritchett JW : Fracture of the great trochanter after hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 390 : 221-226, 2001.
 
3) Wang JW, et al : Surgical treatment of fractures of the greater trochanter associated with osteolysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 87 (12) : 2724-2728, 2005.
 
4) Dennis DA : Periprosthetic fractures following total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 83 : 12, 2001.
 
5) Ristevski B, et al : Systematic review of the treatment of periprosthetic distal femur fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 28 (5) : 307-312, 2014.
 
6) Mourkus H, et al : Management of periprosthetic fractures of the humerus : a systematic review. Bone Joint J. 104-B (4) : 416-423, 2022.
 
7) Dehghan N, et al : Current perspectives in the treatment of periprosthetic upper extremity fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 25 (2) : S71-S76, 2011.
 
8) 馬場智規 : 卒後研修講座 大腿骨ステム周囲骨折に対する治療戦略. 整形外科. 73 : 1273-1281, 2022.
 
9) Rupp M, et al : Computed tomography for managing periprosthetic femoral fractures. A retrospective analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 20 (1) : 258, 2019. doi : 10.1186/s12891-019-2632-y.
 
10) Baba T, et al : New classification focusing on implant designs useful for setting therapeutic strategy for periprosthetic femoral fracture. Int Orthop. 39 : 1-5, 2015.
PubMed
11) Baba T, et al : Higher reliability and validity of Baba classification with CT imaging and implant information for the periprosthetic femoral fractures. Int Orthop. 39 : 1695-1699, 2015.
 
12) Baba T, et al : The Baba classification focused on implant designs is useful in setting the therapeutic strategy for interprosthetic femoral fracture. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 28 : 247-254, 2018.
 
13) 馬場智規 : 改訂Baba分類-大腿骨ステム周囲骨折の治療に有効な分類法-. Bone Joint Nerve. 9 (3) : 347-352, 2019.
 

第2章 部位別インプラント周囲骨折の治療

P.73 掲載の参考文献
1) Springer BD, et al : Perioperative Periprosthetic Femur Fractures are Strongly Correlated With Fixation Method : an Analysis From the American Joint Replacement Registry. J Arthroplasty. 34 (7S) : S352-S354, 2019.
 
2) Heckmann ND, et al : Cemented Vs Cementless Femoral Fixation for Total Hip Arthroplasty After Displaced Femoral Neck Fracture : A Nationwide Analysis of Short-Term Complications and Readmission Rates. J Arthroplasty. 36 (11) : 3667-3675, 2021.
 
3) Lindberg-Larsen M, et al : "Increased risk of intraoperative and early postoperative periprosthetic femoral fracture with uncemented stems" : 7,169 total hip arthroplasties from 8 Danish centers. Acta Orthop. 88 (4) : 390-394, 2017.
 
4) Yun HH, et al : Occult periprosthetic femoral fractures occur frequently during a long, trapezoidal, double-tapered cementless femoral stem fixation in primary THA. PLoS One. 14 (9) : e0221731, 2019.
 
5) Davidson D, et al : Intraoperative periprosthetic fractures during total hip arthroplasty. Evaluation and management. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 90 (9) : 2000-2012, 2008.
 
6) 高江洲美香ほか : 大腿骨ステム周囲骨折に対して超高分子量ポリエチレン繊維テープによる骨接合術を行なった2例. 日人工関節会誌. 51 : 445-446, 2021.
 
7) Demey G, et al : Does a collar improve the immediate stability of uncemented femoral hip stems in total hip arthroplasty? A bilateral comparative cadaver study. J Arthroplasty. 26 (8) : 1549-1555, 2011.
 
8) Johnson AJ, et al : A Calcar Collar Is Protective Against Early Torsional/Spiral Periprosthetic Femoral Fracture : A Paired Cadaveric Biomechanical Analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 102 (16) : 1427-1433, 2020.
 
9) Lamb JN, et al : A calcar collar is protective against early periprosthetic femoral fracture around cementless femoral components in primary total hip arthroplasty : a registry study with biomechanical validation. Bone Joint J. 101-B (7) : 779-786, 2019.
 
10) Sershon RA, et al : Periprosthetic Femur Fracture Risk : Influenced by Stem Choice, Not Surgical Approach. J Arthroplasty. 36 (7S) : S363-S366, 2021.
 
P.80 掲載の参考文献
1) Berry DJ : Epidemiology : hip and knee. Orthop Clin North Am. 30 (2) : 183-190, 1999.
 
2) Peterson CA, et al : Periprosthetic fracture of the acetabulum after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 78 (8) : 1206-1213, 1996.
 
3) Haidukewych GJ, et al : Intraoperative fractures of the acetabulum during primary total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 88 (9) : 1952-1956, 2006.
 
4) Hasegawa K, et al : Periprosthetic Occult Fractures of the Acetabulum Occur Frequently During Primary THA. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 475 (2) : 484-494, 2017.
 
5) Davidson D, et al : Intraoperative periprosthetic fractures during total hip arthroplasty. Evaluation and Management. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 90 (9) : 2000-2012, 2008.
 
6) Della Valle CJ, et al : Periprosthetic fractures of the acetabulum associated with a total hip arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect. 52 : 281-290, 2003.
 
7) Pascarella R, et al : Periprosthetic acetabular fractures : A new classification proposal. Injury. 49 Suppl 3 : S65-S73, 2018.
 
8) Callaghan JJ : Periprosthetic fractures of the acetabulum during and following total hip arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect. 47 : 231-235, 1998.
 
9) Masri BA, et al : Periprosthetic fractures evaluation and treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 420 : 80-95, 2004.
 
10) Benazzo F, et al : Periprosthetic acetabular fractures. Int Orthop. 39 (10) : 1959-1963, 2015.
 
11) Simon P, et al : Treatment algorithm of acetabular periprosthetic fractures. Int Orthop. 39 (10) : 1995-2003, 2015.
 
12) Hickerson LE, et al : Outcomes of Surgical Treatment of Periprosthetic Acetabular Fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 33 Suppl 2 : S49-S54, 2019.
 
13) Sharkey PF, et al : Acetabular fracture associated with cementless acetabular component insertion : a report of 13cases. J Arthroplasty. 14 (4) : 426-431, 1999.
 
14) Li J, et al : Management of intraoperative acetabular fracture in primary total hip arthroplasty. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 21 (1) : 383, 2020.
 
15) Yamamuro Y, et al : Does intraoperative periprosthetic occult fracture of the acetabulum affect clinical outcomes after primary total hip arthroplasty? Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 142 (11) : 3497-3504, 2022.
 
16) 佐藤龍一ほか : 骨盤内の人工臼蓋摘出における臓器損傷回避の工夫. Hip Joint. 43 : 593-597, 2017.
 
17) Dammerer D, et al : Occult intra-operative fractures of the acetabulum may affect implant survival. Int Orthop. 43 (7) : 1583-1590, 2019.
 
18) Hasenauer MD, et al : Treatment options for chronic pelvic discontinuity. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 9 (1) : 58-62, 2018.
 
19) Beckers G, et al : Acetabular Peri-Prosthetic Fractures-A Narrative Review. Medicina. 58 (5) : 630, 2022.
 
20) Siddiqi A, et al : Management of Periprosthetic Acetabular Fractures : A Critical Analysis and Review of the Literature. JBJS Rev. 10 (8), 2022.
 
21) Rogers BA, et al : The reconstruction of periprosthetic pelvic discontinuity. J Arthroplasty. 27 (8) : 1499-1506, 2012.
 
22) Patsiogiannis N, et al : Periprosthetic hip fractures : an update into their management and clinical outcomes. EFORT Open Rev. 6 (1) : 75-92, 2021.
 
23) Amenabar T, et al : Promising Mid-term Results With a Cup-cage Construct for Large Acetabular Defects and Pelvic Discontinuity. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 474 (2) : 408-414, 2016.
 
24) Sheth NP, et al : Acetabular distraction. an alternative for severe acetabular bone loss and chronic pelvic discontinuity. Bone Joint J. 96-B (11 Suppl A) : 36-42, 2014.
 
25) Winther SS, et al : Custom-made triflanged implants in reconstruction of severe acetabular bone loss with pelvic discontinuity after total hip arthroplasty consecutive cohort study : two to 11 years of follow-up. Bone Jt Open. 3 (11) : 867-876, 2022.
 
P.92 掲載の参考文献
1) Lenz M, et al : A biomechanical study on proximal plate fixation techniques in periprosthetic femur fractures. Injury. 45 : S71-S75, 2014.
 
2) 馬場智規ほか : 大腿骨ステム周辺骨折の治療戦略-locking plateの適応と治療を中心に-. MB Orthop. 27 (3) : 17-25, 2014.
 
3) Wakayama T, et al : Pathological Relationship of Osteomalacia at the Site of Atypical Periprosthetic Femoral Shaft Fracture after Typical Femoral Neck Fracture Occurred in the Patient with Rheumatoid Arthritis. J Rheumatic Diseases Treatment. doi : 10.23937/2469-5726/1510017, 2015.
 
4) MacKenzie SA, et al : Periprosthetic atypical femoral fractures exist and are associated with duration of bisphosphonate therapy. Bone Joint J. 101-B : 1285-1291, 2019.
 
5) Baba T, et al : Atypical periprosthetic femoral fractures after arthroplasty for fracture are at high risk of complications. Sci Rep. 11 (1) : 14378, 2021. doi : 10.1038/s41598-021-93574-1.
 
6) Banno S, et al : Valgus osteotomy for atypical interprosthetic femoral fracture with lateral bowing of the femur. Trauma Case Rep. 31 : 100381, 2020. doi : 10.1016/j.tcr.2020.100381.
 
7) 馬場智規 : インプラント周囲骨折アップデート. 日整会誌. 95 (4) : 255-263, 2021.
 
8) Stoffel K, et al : Internal fixation. Ed : Schutz M, et al, Periprosthetic Fracture Management, 105-119, Geog Thime Verlag, 2013.
 
9) Lenz M, et al : A biomechanical study on proximal plate fixation techniques in periprosthetic femur fractures. Injury. 45 : S71-S75, 2014.
 
10) 馬場智規ほか : LCPを使用した大腿骨ステム周囲骨折の術後成績と問題点. 東日整災外誌. 25 : 99-102, 2013.
 
11) 馬場智規 : 卒後研修講座 大腿骨ステム周囲骨折に対する治療戦略. 整形外科. 73 : 1273-1281, 2022.
 
12) Moloney GB, et al : Treatment of periprosthetic femur fractures around a well-fixed hip arthroplasty implant : span the whole bone. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 134 (1) : 9-14, 2014.
 
13) Walcher MG, et al : Plate positioning in periprosthetic or interprosthetic femur fractures with stable implants. A biomechanical study. J Arthroplasty. 31 : 2894-2899, 2016.
 
P.98 掲載の参考文献
1) Duncan CP, et al : Fractures of the femur after hip replacement. Instr Course Lect. 44 : 293-304, 1995.
 
2) Baba T, et al : Higher reliability and validity of Baba classification with computerised tomography imaging and implant information for periprosthetic femoral fractures. Int Orthop. 39 (9) : 1695-1699, 2015.
 
3) Meinberg EG, et al : Fracture and Dislocation Classification Compendium-2018. J Orthop Trauma. 32 Suppl 1 : S1-S170, 2018.
 
4) 塩田直史 : MIPO法の適応と限界. 整外Surg Tech. 9 (1) : 25-31, 2019.
 
P.118 掲載の参考文献
1) Duncan CP, et al : Fracture of the femur after hip replacement. Instr Course Lect. 44 : 293-304, 1995.
 
2) Baba T, et al : Higher reliability and validity of Baba classification with computerized tomography imaging and implant information for periprosthetic fractures. Int Orthop. 39 : 1695-1699, 2015.
 
3) Corten K, et al : An algorithm for the surgical treatment of periprosthetic fractures of the femur around a well-fixed femoral component. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 91 (11) : 1424-1430, 2009.
 
4) Dehghan N, et al : Surgical fixation of Vancouver type B1 periprosthetic femur fractures : a systematic review. J Orthop Trauma. 28 (12) : 721-727, 2014.
 
5) 伊藤雅之 : Cementless revisionと骨接合併用Revisionを主軸として考えた場合. 整外Surg Tech. 9 : 32-41, 2019.
 
6) Munro JT, et al : Tapered fluted titanium stems in the management of Vancouver B2 and B3 periprosthetic femoral fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 472 (2) : 590-598, 2014.
 
7) Schneider AJ, et al : Hip revision arthroplasty of periprosthetic fractures Vancouver B2 and B3 with a modular revision stem : short-term results and review of literature. Z Orhtop Unfall. 160 (1) : 40-48, 2022.
 
8) Hardinge K : Direct lateral approach to the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 64 : 17-19, 1982.
 
P.127 掲載の参考文献
1) Patsiogiannis N, et al : Periprosthetic hip fractures : an update into their management and clinical outcomes. EFORT Open Rev. 6 (1) : 75-92, 2021.
 
2) Duncan CP, et al : Fractures of the femur after hip replacement. Instr Course Lect. 45 : 293-304, 1995.
 
3) Masri BA, et al : Periprosthetic fractures evaluation and treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 420 : 80-95, 2004.
 
4) Fox TP, et al : Lesser trochanter fracture : the presenting feature of a more sinister pathology. BMJ Case Rep. 2014 : bcr2013202590, 2014.
 
5) Pritchett JW : Fracture of the greater trochanter after hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. (390) : 221-226, 2001.
 
6) Hsieh PH, et al : Periprosthetic fractures of the greater trochanter through osteolytic cysts with uncemented Micro Structured Omnifit prosthesis : retrospective analyses pf 23 fractures in 887 hips after 5-14 years. Acta Orthop. 76 (4) : 538-543, 2005.
 
7) Moazen M, et al : Periprosthetic femoral fracture--a biomechanical comparison between Vancouver type B1 and B2 fixation methods. J Arthroplasty. 29 (3) : 495-500, 2014.
 
8) Tsiridis E, et al : Impaction femoral allografting and cemented revision for periprosthetic femoral fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 86 (8) : 1124-1132, 2004.
 
9) Canbora K, et al : Management of Vancouver type B2 and B3 femoral periprosthetic fractures using an uncemented extensively porous-coated long femoral stem prosthesis. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 23 (5) : 545-552, 2013.
 
10) Munro JT, et al : Tapered fluted titanium stems in the management of Vancouver B2 and B3 periprosthetic femoral fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 472 (2) : 590-598, 2014.
 
11) Mertl P, et al : Distal locking stem for revision femoral loosening and peri-prosthetic fractures. Int Orthop. 35 (2) : 275-282, 2011.
 
12) Niikura T, et al : Treatment results of a periprosthetic femoral fracture case series : treatment method for Vancouver type b2 fractures can be customized. Clin Orthop Surg. 6 (2) : 138-145, 2014.
 
13) Cross MB, et al : Managing femoral bone loss in revision total hip replacement : fluted tapered modular stems. Bone Joint J. 95-B (11 Suppl A) : 95-97, 2013.
 
14) Mulay S, et al : Management of types B2 and B3 femoral periprosthetic fractures by a tapered, fluted, and distally fixed stem. J Arthroplasty. 20 (6) : 751-756, 2005.
 
15) Briant-Evans TW, et al : Cement-in-cement stem revision for Vancouver type B periprosthetic femoral fractures after total hip arthroplasty. A 3-year follow-up of 23 cases. Acta Orthop. 80 (5) : 548-552, 2009.
 
16) Richards CJ, et al : Cement-in-cement femoral revision for the treatment of highly selected vancouver B2 periprosthetic fractures. J Arthroplasty. 26 (2) : 335-337, 2011.
 
17) Grammatopoulos G, et al : A unique peri-prosthetic fracture pattern in well fixed femoral stems with polished, tapered, collarless design of total hip replacement. Injury. 42 (11) : 1271-1276, 2011.
 
18) 坂越大悟ほか : 大腿骨ステム周辺骨折の治療経験. 骨折. 36 (4) : 947-952, 2014.
 
19) Garcia-Cimbrelo E, et al : Femoral shaft fractures after cemented total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop. 16 (1) : 97-100, 1992.
 
20) Tsiridis E, et al : Dynamic compression plates for Vancouver type B periprosthetic femoral fractures : a 3-year follow-up of 18 cases. Acta Orthop. 76 (4) : 531-537, 2005.
 
21) Chakravarthy J, et al : Locking plate osteosynthesis for Vancouver Type B1 and Type C periprosthetic fractures of femur : a report on 12 patients. Injury. 38 (6) : 725-733, 2007.
 
22) Haddad FS, et al : Periprosthetic femoral fractures around well-fixed implants : use of cortical onlay allografts with or without a plate. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 84-A (6) : 945-950, 2002.
 
23) Khashan M, et al : Superior outcome of strut allograft-augmented plate fixation for the treatment of periprosthetic fractures around a stable femoral stem. Injury. 44 (11) : 1556-1560, 2013.
 
24) Pavlou G, et al : A review of 202 periprosthetic fractures--stem revision and allograft improves outcome for type B fractures. Hip Int. 21 (1) : 21-29, 2011.
 
25) Dehghan N, et al : Surgical fixation of Vancouver type B1 periprosthetic femur fractures : a systematic review. J Orthop Trauma. 28 (12) : 721-727, 2014.
 
26) Yasen AT, et al : Periprosthetic fractures : bespoke solutions. Bone Joint J. 96-B (11 Supple A) : 48-55, 2014.
 
27) Graham SM, et al : Periprosthetic femoral fracture fixation : a biomechanical comparison between proximal locking screws and cables. J Orthop Sci. 20 (5) : 875-880, 2015.
 
28) Pavlou G, et al : A review of 202 periprosthetic fractures--stem revision and allograft improves outcome for type B fractures. Hip Int. 21 (1) : 21-29, 2011.
 
29) Graham SM, et al : Locking plate fixation for Vancouver B1 periprosthetic femoral fractures : a critical analysis of 135 cases. J Orthop Sci. 18 (3) : 426-436, 2013.
 
30) McDonald TC, et al : Chapter 9 Principles of Internal Fixation, Browner BD, et al ed, Skeletal Trauma : Basic Science, Management, and Reconstruction Sixth Edition, 256-338, Elsevier, 2020.
 
31) Kim Y, et al : Treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures after femoral revision using a long stem. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 16 : 113, 2015.
 
P.133 掲載の参考文献
1) Gie GA, et al : Impacted cancellous allografts and cement for revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg. 75-B : 14-21, 1993.
 
2) Iwase T, et al : Impaction bone grafting for femoral revision hip arthroplasty with Exeter Universal stem in Japan. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 132 : 1487-1494, 2012.
 
3) Schreurs BW, et al : Femoral component revision with use of impaction bone-grafting and a cemented polished stem. Surgical technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 88-A : 259-274, 2006.
 
4) Iwase T, et al : Complete bone remodeling after calcar reconstruction with metal wire mesh and impaction bone grafting : A case report. Nagoya J Med Sci. 75 : 287-293, 2013.
 
5) Duncan CP, et al : Fractures of the femur after hip replacement. Instr Course Lect. 44 : 293-304, 1995.
 
6) Tsiridis E, et al : Impaction femoral allografting and cemented revision for periprosthetic femoral fractures. J Bone Joint Surg. 86-B : 1124-1132, 2004.
 
7) Lee GC, et al : Management of periprosthetic femur fractures with severe bone loss using impaction bone grafting technique. J Arthroplasty. 25 : 405-409, 2010.
 
8) 岩瀬敏樹ほか : Vancouver Type B3ステム周辺骨折に対するImpaction Bone Grafting法を利用した再建術の実際. Hip Joint. 39 : 40-44, 2013.
 
9) Diaz-Dilernia F, et al : Impaction bone grafting or uncemented modular stems for the treatment of type B3 periprosthetic femoral fractures? A complication rate analysis. J Arthroplasty. 34 : 2051-2057, 2019.
 
10) Buttaro MA, et al : Proximal femoral reconstructions with bone impaction grafting and metal mesh. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 467 : 2325-2334, 2009.
 
11) Takigami I, et al : Proximal femoral reconstruction with impaction bone grafting and circumferential metal mesh. J Orthop Sci. 20 : 331-339, 2015.
 
P.136 掲載の参考文献
1) 内山勝文ほか : 人工骨頭・人工股関節ステム周囲骨折Vancouver分類type-B3に対するallograft-prosthesis compositeを用いた再置換術. 整・災外. 54 (13) : 1597-1602, 2011-2012.
 
2) Safir O, et al : Revision of the deficient proximal femur with a proximal femoral allograft. Clin Orthop. 467 (1) : 206-212, 2008.
 
3) Uchiyama K, et al : Revision total hip arthroplasty using an interlocking stem with an allograft-prosthesis composite. Acta Orthop Belg. 79 (4) : 398-405, 2013.
 
4) 内山勝文ほか : 大腿骨ステム周囲骨折に対する人工股関節再置換術 巨大骨欠損を伴うステム周囲骨折に対する同種骨を用いた再置換術. MB Orthop. 31 (13) : 71-79, 2018.
 
5) Kellett CF, et al : Proximal femoral allograft treatment of Vancouver type-B3 periprosthetic femoral fractures after total hip arthroplasty. Surgical technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 89 Suppl 2 Pt 1 : 68-79, 2007.
 
6) Uchiyama K, et al : Revision total hip replacement using a cementless interlocking distal femoral stem with allograft-cemented composite and the application of intramedullary and onlay cortical strut allografts : two case reports. J Orthop Sci. 17 (3) : 323-327, 2012.
 
P.142 掲載の参考文献
1) 正岡利紀ほか : 整形外科術後感染の実態と予防対策-整形外科領域における術後感染の疫学-日本整形外科学会学術研究プロジェクト調査より. 臨整外. 44 : 975-980, 2009.
 
2) Dale H, et al : Increasing risk of prosthetic joint infection after total hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop. 83 : 449-458, 2012.
 
3) Gundtoft PH, et al : The"true"incidence of surgically treated deep prosthetic joint infection after 32,896 primary total hip arthroplasties : a prospective cohort study. Acta Orthop. 86 : 326-334, 2015.
 
4) おおえ賢一ほか稾 : 感染人工股関節に対する人工股関節の治療成績. 整・災外. 52 : 75-81, 2009.
 
5) おおえ賢一ほか : 感染人工股関節に対する治療戦略 : 一期的・二期的再置換術. 整・災外. 53 : 555-562, 2010.
 
6) Oe K, et al : Pre-operative scoring system to determine the surgical strategy for periprosthetic hip infection. Int Orthop. 39 : 19-25, 2015.
 
7) おおえ賢一ほか : PJI治療 (一期的または二期的再置換術) (2) THA. 関節外科. 34 : 885-892, 2015.
 
8) おおえ賢一ほか : 感染人工股関節に対する治療法の選択. 臨整外. 51 : 327-335, 2016.
 
9) おおえ賢一ほか : 感染した人工股関節に対する治療法の工夫. MB Orthop. 29 (6) : 59-68, 2016.
 
10) おおえ賢一ほか : 人工股関節周囲感染の治療. 関節外科. 37 : 404-413, 2018.
 
11) おおえ賢一ほか : 感染人工股関節に対する治療法. MB Orthop. 31 (10) : 101-111, 2018.
 
12) おおえ賢一 : 感染性人工股関節の治療選択 一期的置換の立場から. Loco Cure. 6 : 161-171, 2020.
 
13) おおえ賢一ほか : インプラント周囲感染の治療における抗菌薬の使い方. 関節外科. 40 : 66-73, 2021.
 
14) おおえ賢一ほか : 多数回手術・難治例への対応 : 一期的・二期的再置換術. 臨整外. 57 : 249-259, 2022.
 
15) おおえ賢一 : 感染の診断と対処. 中島康晴編. 整形外科手術Knack & Pitfalls Primary THAの要点と盲点, 201-213, 文光堂, 2022.
 
16) Parvizi J, et al : Proceedings of the International Consensus Meeting on Periprosthetic Joint Infection. J Orthop Res. 32 : S60-S80, 2014.
 
17) Ueda N, et al : Sonication of Extracted Implants Improves Microbial Detection in Patients With Orthopedic Implant-Associated infections. J Arthroplasty. 34 : 1189-1196, 2019.
 
18) Tsukayama DT, et al : Infection after total hip arthroplasty. A study of the treatment of one hundred and six infections. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 78 : 512-523, 1996.
 
19) Costerton JW, et al : Bacterial biofilms : a common cause of persistent infections. Science. 284 : 1318-1322, 1999.
 
20) Osmon DR, et al : Diagnosis and management of prosthetic joint infection : clinical practice guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 56 : e1-e25, 2013.
 
21) Buchholz HW, et al : Uber die Depotwirkung einiger Antibiotica bei Vermischung mit dem Kunstharz Palacos. Chirurg. 41 : 511-515, 1970.
 
22) Jiranek WA, et al : Antibiotic-loaded bone cement for infection prophylaxis in total joint replacement. J Bone Joint Surg. 88 : 2487-2500, 2006.
 
23) Buchholz HW, et al : Management of deep infection of total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 63 : 342-353, 1981.
 
24) Gehrke T, et al : One-stage exchange : it all began here. Bone Joint J. 95 : 77-83, 2013.
 
25) Zahar A, et al : Ten-Year Results Following One-Stage Septic Hip Exchange in the Management of Periprosthetic Joint Infection. J Arthroplasty. 34 : 1221-1226, 2019.
 
26) Carlsson AS, et al : Revision with gentamicin-impregnated cement for deep infections in total hip arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 60 : 1059-1064, 1978.
 
27) 日本整形外科学会診療ガイドライン委員会ほか編 : 骨・関節術後感染予防ガイドライン, 21-22, 南江堂, 2006.
 
28) Chohfi M, et al : Pharmacokinetics, uses, and limitations of vancomycin-loaded bone cement. Int Orthop. 22 : 171-177, 1998.
 
29) おおえ賢一ほか : 人工股関節に対する一期的再置換術. 中村茂編. OS NEXUS 12, 股関節の再建法 成功への準備とコツ, 120-135, メジカルビュー社, 2017.
 
30) Morley JR, et al : Preservation of the original femoral cement mantle during the management of infected cemented total hip replacement by two-stage revision. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 94 : 322-327, 2012.
 
31) Vielgut I, et al : Two-stage revision of prosthetic hip joint infections using antibiotic-loaded cement spacers : When is the best time to perform the second stage? Int Orthop. 39 : 1731-1736, 2015.
 
32) Oe K, et al : In vivo serum concentration of vancomycin in antibiotic-loaded acrylic cement for the treatment and prevention of periprosthetic hip infection. J Orthop Sci. 22 : 710-714, 2017.
 
33) Moojen DJ, et al : In vitro release of antibiotics from commercial PMMA beads and articulating hip spacers. J Arthroplasty. 23 : 1152-1156, 2008.
 
34) Anagnostakos K, et al : Elution of gentamicin and vancomycin from polymethylmethacrylate beads and hip spacers in vivo. Acta Orthop. 80 : 193-197, 2009.
 
P.151 掲載の参考文献
1) Shane E, et al : Atypical Subtrochanteric and Diaphyseal Femoral Fractures : Second Report of a Task Force of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research Journal of Bone and Mineral Research. J Bone Miner Res. 29 (1) : 1-23, 2014.
 
2) Odvina CV, et al : Severely Suppressed Bone Turnover : A Potential Complication of Alendronate Therapy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 90 (3) : 1294-1301, 2005.
 
3) Oh Y, et al : Potential pathogenic mechanism for stress fractures of the bowed femoral shaft in the elderly : Mechanical analysis by the CT-based finite element method. Injury. 45 : 1764-1771, 2014.
PubMed
4) Dehghan N, et al : Surgical Fixation of Vancouver Type B1 Periprosthetic Femur Fractures : A Systematic Review. J Orthop Trauma. 28 (12) : 721-727, 2014.
 
5) Sayed-Noor AS, et al : Case reports : two femoral insufficiency fractures after long-term alendronate therapy. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 467 (7) : 1921-1926, 2009.
 
6) Cross MB, et al : A rare case of a bisphosphonate-induced peri-prosthetic femoral fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 94 (7) : 994-997, 2012.
 
7) Chen F, et al : Periprosthetic Fracture of the Femur After Long-Term Bisphosphonate Use : A Case Report. JBJS Case Connector. 2 (2) : e21, 2012.
 
8) Bhattacharyya R, et al : Bisphosphonate-induced periprosthetic fracture : a cause of painful total hip arthroplasty. Case Rep Surg. 2014 : 631709, 2014.
 
9) Niikura T, et al : Rare non-traumatic periprosthetic femoral fracture with features of an atypical femoral fracture : a case report. J Med Case Rep. 9 : 103, 2015.
 
10) Lee KJ, et al : Periprosthetic Atypical Femoral Fracture-like Fracture after Hip Arthroplasty : A Report of Three Cases. Hip Pelvis. 27 (3) : 187-191, 2015.
 
11) Woo SB, et al : Atypical periprosthetic femoral fracture : a case report. J Orthop Surg. 24 (2) : 269-272, 2016.
 
12) Robinson JD, et al : Periprosthetic atypical femoral fractures in patients on long-term bisphosphonates : A multicenter retrospective review. J Orthop Trauma. 30 : 170-176, 2016.
 
13) Lee YK, et al : Frequency and associated factor of atypical periprosthetic femoral fracture after hip arthroplasty. Injury. 49 : 2264-2268, 2018.
 
14) Leclerc JT, et al : Prevalence and characteristics of atypical periprosthetic femoral fractures. J Bone Miner Res. 34 : 83-92, 2019.
 
15) MacKenzie SA, et al : Periprosthetic atypical femoral fractures exist and are associated with duration of bisphosphonate therapy. Bone Joint J. 101-B (10) : 1285-1291, 2019.
 
16) Baba T, et al : Atypical periprosthetic femoral fractures after arthroplasty for fracture are at high risk of complications. Sci Rep. 11 (1) : 14378, 2021. doi : 10.1038/s41598-021-93574-1.
 
17) Yasen AT, et al : Periprosthetic fractures. Bone Joint J. 96-B (11 Supple A) : 48-55, 2014.
 
18) Kim Y, et al : Treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures after femoral revision using a long stem. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 16 : 113, 2015.
 
P.160 掲載の参考文献
1) Della Rocca GJ, et al : Periprosthetic fractures : epidemiology and future projections. J Orthop Trauma. 25 Suppl 2 : S66-S70, 2011.
 
2) Zuurmond RG, et al : High incidence of complications and poor clinical outcome in the operative treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures : An analysis of 71 cases. Injury. 41 (6) : 629-633, 2010.
 
3) Corten K, et al : An algorithm for the surgical treatment of periprosthetic fractures of the femur around a well-fixed femoral component. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 91 (11) : 1424-1430, 2009.
 
4) Holder N, et al : Outcomes following surgical treatment of periprosthetic femur fractures : a single centre series. Can J Surg. 57 (3) : 209-213, 2014.
 
5) Einhorn TA : Enhancement of fracture-healing. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 77 (6) : 940-956, 1995.
 
6) Mills LA, et al : The risk of non-union per fracture : current myths and revised figures from a population of over 4 million adults. Acta Orthop. 88 (4) : 434-439, 2017.
 
7) 渡部欣忍 : 白熱講義 骨折合併症 Nonunion, Malunion, FRI, PTOA-骨折治療の物理学と生物学, メジカルビュー社, 2023, in press.
 
8) Hetel R, et al : Chapter 7, Basic principles and techniques of internal fixation in osteoporotic bone. Yuehuei HA ed, Internal Fixation in Osteoporotic Bone, Thieme, 2002.
 
9) 渡部欣忍 : 髄内釘固定のバイオメカニクス. 渡部欣忍ほか編, 髄内釘による骨接合術-全テクニック公開, 初心者からエキスパートまで-, 7-16, 全日本病院出版会, 2017.
 
10) 渡部欣忍ほか : 整形外科医に必要なバイオメカニクス基礎知識と最近の話題. 基礎知識編, 骨折のバイオメカニクス必須知識, 関節外科. 21 : 24-33, 2002.
 
11) 渡部欣忍 : III インプラント周囲骨折, インプラント周囲骨折後偽関節 (THA後のステム周囲骨折), 渡部欣忍編, スタンダード骨折手術治療 下肢, 172-179, メジカルビュー社, 2020.
 
12) 渡部欣忍ほか : 巨大骨欠損再建における人工骨の意義と可能性. 臨整外. 53 : 1077-1085, 2018.
 
P.170 掲載の参考文献
1) Chan LWM, et al : Non-prosthetic peri-implant fractures : classification, management and outcomes. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg [Internet]. 138 : 791-802, 2018.
 
2) Shannon SF, et al : Short Versus Long Cephalomedullary Nails for Pertrochanteric Hip Fractures? : A Randomized Prospective Study. J Orthop Trauma. 33 : 480-486, 2019.
 
3) Breceda A, et al : Biomechanical analysis of peri-implant fractures in short versus long cephalomedullary implants following pertrochanteric fracture consolidation. Injury [Internet]. 52 : 60-65, 2021.
 
4) Kruse M, et al : Peri-implant femoral fractures in hip fracture patients treated with osteosynthesis : a retrospective cohort study of 1965 patients. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg [Internet]. 48 : 293-298, 2022.
 
P.175 掲載の参考文献
1) Kenny P, et al : Interprosthetic fracture of the femoral shaft. J Arthroplasty. 13 (3) : 361-364, 1998.
 
2) Valle Cruz JA, et al : Incidence of and risk factors for femoral fractures in the gap between hip and knee implants. Int Orthop. 40 (8) : 1697-1702, 2016.
 
3) Baba T, et al : The Baba classification focused on implant designs is useful in setting the therapeutic strategy for interprosthetic femoral fracture. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 28 (2) : 247-254, 2018.
 
4) Lipof JS, et al : Radiographic Risk Factors For Interprosthetic Femur Fractures. Iowa Orthop J. 37 : 35-39, 2017.
 
5) Soenen M, et al : Stemmed TKA in a femur with a total hip arthroplasty : is there a safe distance between the stem tips? J Arthroplasty. 28 (8) : 1437-1445, 2013.
 
6) Duncan CP, et al : The Unified Classification System (UCS) : improving our understanding of periprosthetic fractures. Bone Joint J. 96-B (6) : 713-716, 2014.
 
7) Walcher MG, et al : Plate Positioning in Periprosthetic or Interprosthetic Femur Fractures With Stable Implants-A Biomechanical Study. J Arthroplasty. 31 (12) : 2894-2899, 2016.
 
8) 越智宏徳ほか : 人工膝関節全置換術後の大腿骨骨折における治療経験. 骨折. 35 (2) : 399-402, 2013.
 
P.180 掲載の参考文献
1) 野田知之ほか : 大腿骨遠位部骨折-ロッキングプレートの適応と問題点-. 関節外科. 29 (4) : 49-57, 2010.
 
2) Wallace SS, et al : Periprosthetic fractures of the distal femur after total knee arthroplasty : Plate versus nail fixation. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 103 (2) : 257-262, 2017.
 
3) Rorabeck CH, et al : Classification of periprosthetic fractures complicating total knee arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am. 30 : 209-214, 1999.
 
4) Su ET, et al : Periprosthetic femoral fractures above total knee replacements. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 12 : 12-20, 2004.
 
5) 安樂喜久 : 大腿骨遠位部骨折 (ロッキングプレート). 最上敦彦編. 骨折治療基本手技アトラス, 325-340, 全日本病院出版会, 2019.
 
P.194 掲載の参考文献
1) Hoffmann MF, et al : Outcome of periprosthetic distal femoral fractures following knee arthroplasty. Injury. 43 : 1084-1089, 2012.
 
2) Ebraheim NA, et al : High complication rate in locking plate fixation of lower periprosthetic distal femur fractures in patients with total knee arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty. 27 : 809-813, 2012.
 
3) Rorabeck CH, et al : Classification of periprosthetic fractures complicating total knee arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am. 30 : 209-214, 1999.
 
4) Su ET, et al : Periprosthetic femoral fractures above total knee replacements. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 12 (1) : 12-20, 2004.
 
5) 最上敦彦 : (2) 髄内釘固定「インプラント周囲大腿骨骨折 (TKA後のインプラント周囲骨折) 」. 渡部欣忍編. スタンダード骨折手術治療 下肢, 190-199, メジカルビュー社, 2020.
 
6) 堀内博志ほか : 人工膝関節置換術後骨折-大腿骨顆上骨折と脛骨骨折の治療方法-. OS NOW Instruction. 3 : 186-198, 2007.
 
7) 栗山新一ほか : TKA後の周辺骨折に対する逆行性髄内釘による治療. 整・災外. 54 : 1563-1573, 2011.
 
8) Walcher MG, et al : Plate Positioning in Periprosthetic or Interprosthetic Femur Fractures With Stable Implants-A Biomechanical Study. J Arthroplasty. 31 : 2894-2899, 2016.
 
9) 最上敦彦 : 大腿骨遠位部 (顆部・顆上) 骨折. 骨折. 澤口毅編. 髄内固定治療マイスター, 189-211, メジカルビュー社, 2016.
 
10) Johannsen AM, et al : Radiographic landmarks for tunnel positioning in posterior cruciate ligament reconstructions. Am J Sports Med. 41 (1) : 35-42. 2013.
 
11) 寺田忠司 : 逆行性髄内釘固定 (infra-itsthmal). II 大腿骨骨幹部骨折. 渡部欣忍編, スタンダード骨折手術治療 下肢, 112-119, メジカルビュー社, 2020.
 
P.201 掲載の参考文献
1) Su ET, et al : Periprosthetic femoral fractures above total knee replacements. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 12 (1) : 12-20, 2004.
 
2) Ritter MA, et al : The effect of femoral notching during total knee arthroplasty on the prevalence of postoperative femoral fractures and on clinical outcome. JBJS Am. 87 (11) : 2411-2414, 2005.
 
3) Burnett RS, et al : Periprosthetic fractures of the tibia and patella in total knee arthroplasty. Instr Couurse Lect. 53 : 217-235, 2004.
 
4) Felix NA, et al : Periprosthetic fractures of the tibia associated with total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. (345) : 113-124, 1997.
 
5) Thompson NW, et al : Periprosthetic tibial fractures after cementless low contact stress total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 16 (8) : 984-990, 2001.
 
6) Backstein D, et al : Periprosthetic fractures of the knee. J Arthroplasty. 22 (4 Suppl 1) : 45-49, 2007.
 
7) Kim HJ, et al : Successful outcome with minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis for periprosthetic tibial fracture after total knee arthroplasty. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 103 (2) : 263-268, 2017.
 
8) Schreiner AJ, et al : Periprosthetic tibial fractures in total knee arthroplasty-an outcome analysis of a challenging and underreported surgical issue. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 19 (1) : 323, 2018.
 
P.205 掲載の参考文献
1) Paker DA, et al : Extensor mechanism failure associated with total knee arthroplasty : prevention and management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 11 : 238-247, 2003.
 
2) Chalidis BE, et al : Management of periprosthetic patellar fractures. A systematic review of literature. Injury. 38 : 714-724, 2007.
 
3) Bates MD, et al : Extensor mechanism disruption after total knee arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 23 : 95-106, 2015.
 
4) Kusuma S, et al : Lateral retinacular release during primary total knee arthroplasty : effect on outcomes and complications. J Arthroplasty. 24 : 383-390, 2009.
 
5) Hamilton WG, et al : Patellar Cut and Composite Thickness : The Influence on Postoperative Motion and Complications in Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 32 : 1803-1807, 2017.
 
6) Meding JB, et al : Predicting patellar failure after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 466 : 2769-2774, 2008.
 
7) Ortiguera CJ, et al : Patellar fracture after total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 84-A : 532-540, 2002.
 
8) Keating EM, et al : Patella fracture after post total knee replacements. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 416 : 93-97, 2003.
 
9) Melvin JS, et al : Patellar fractures in adults. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 19 : 198-207, 2011.
 
10) Matave MJ : Patellar Tendon Ruptures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 4 : 287-296, 1996.
 
P.208 掲載の参考文献
1) Lex JR, et al : Distal femoral replacement or internal fixation for management of periprosthetic distal femur fractures : A systematic review. Knee. 37 : 121-131, 2022.
 
2) Aebischer AS, et al : Distal Femoral Replacement for Periprosthetic Fractures After TKA : Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry Review. J Arthroplasty. 37 (7) : 1354-1358, 2022.
 
3) Chalmers BP, et al : Contemporary Distal Femoral Replacements for Supracondylar Femoral Fractures Around Primary and Revision Total Knee Arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty. 36 (7S) : S351-S357, 2021.
 
P.232 掲載の参考文献
1) Kumar S, et al : Periprosthetic humeral fractures after shoulder arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 86 : 680-689, 2004.
 
2) 栫博則ほか : 人工骨頭挿入後上腕骨骨幹部骨折に対しロッキングプレートとワイヤーを用いて骨接合を行った1例. 肩関節. 35 (2) : 669-671, 2011.
 
3) 玉置康之ほか : 肩人工骨頭置換術後に上腕骨骨幹部骨折を来した症例の治療経験. 中部整災誌. 46 : 25-26, 2003.
 
4) Wutzler S, et al : Periprosthetic humeral fractures after shoulder arthroplasty : operative management and functional outcome. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 129 : 237-243, 2009.
 
5) Martinez AA, et al : Internal fixation and strut allograft augmentation for periprosthetic humeral fractures. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 19 : 191-193, 2011.
 
6) Harb A, et al : Biomechanical Assessment of Three Osteosynthesis Constructs by Periprosthetic Humerus Fractures. Adv Orthop. 2020 : 8872419, 2020.
 
P.239 掲載の参考文献
1) 佐久間 悠ほか : Coonrad-Morrey型インプラントを用いた人工肘関節置換術における上腕骨顆部骨折の検討. 日人工関節会誌. 40 : 748-749, 2010.
 
2) McKee MD, et al : Effect of humeral condylar resection on strength and functional outcome after semiconstrained total elbow arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 85 (5) : 802-807, 2003. doi : 10.2106/00004623-200305000-00005.
 
3) Marra G, et al : Fracture and nonunion of the olecranon in total elbow arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 15 (4) : 486-494, 2006. doi : 10.1016/j.jse.2005.10.016.
 
4) Yoshida Y, et al : A case of a periprosthetic humeral fracture in which early bone union was achieved through concomitant use of teriparatide. Modern Rheumatology Case Reports. 2 (1) : 113-117, 2018.
 
5) Morrey BF, et al : Morrey's The Elbow and Its Disorders, 4th ed, 899-910, Elsevier, 2017.
 

第3章 Case presentation

P.320 掲載の参考文献
1) Apivatthakakul T, et al : Safe zones and a technical guide for cerclage wiring of the femur : a computed topographic angiogram (CTA) study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 138 (1) : 43-50, 2018.
 
2) Mehta V, et al : Femoral artery and vein injury after cerclage wiring of the femur : A case report. J Arthroplasty. 20 (6) : 811-814, 2005.
 
3) Won Y : Amputated limb by cerclage wire of femoral diaphyseal fractures : a case report. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 136 (12) : 1691-1694, 2016.
 
4) Walcher MG, et al : Plate positioning in periprosthetic or interprosthetic femur fractures with stable implants-A biomechanical study. J Arthroplasty. 31 (12) : 2894-2899, 2016.
 
5) Dennis MG, et al : Fixation of periprosthetic femoral shaft fractures occurring at the tip of the stem : a biomechanical study of 5 techniques. J Arthroplasty. 15 (4) : 523-528, 2000.
 
6) Lenz M, et al : A biomechanical study on proximal plate fixation techniques in periprosthetic femur fractures. Injury. 45 Suppl 1 : S71-S75, 2014.
 
7) Liporace FA, et al : Nail plate combination technique for native and periprosthetic distal femur fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 33 (2) : e64-e68, 2019.
 
P.344 掲載の参考文献
1) Nozaka K, et al : Effectiveness of Ilizarov external fixation in elderly patients with pilon fractures. J Orthop Sci. 26 : 254-260, 2021. doi : 10.1016/j.jos.2020.02.018.
 
2) Nozaka K, et al : Ilizarov external fixation for a periprosthetic tibial fracture in severe osteoporosis : a case report. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 21 (1) : 145, 2020. doi : 10.1186/s12891-020-3176-x.
 
P.347 掲載の参考文献
1) Rorabeck CH, et al : Fractures of the femur, tibia and patella after total knee arthroplasty : decision making and principles of management. Instr Course Lect. 47 : 449-458, 1998.
 
P.354 掲載の参考文献
1) Felix NA, et al : Periprosthetic fractures of the tibia associated with total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 345 : 113-124, 1997.
PubMed
2) Walcher MG, et al : Plate positioning in periprosthetic or interprosthetic femur fractures with stable implants-A biomechanical study. J Arthroplasty. 31 : 2894-2899, 2016.
 
P.395 掲載の参考文献
1) Perka C : Revision of prosthetic components. Schutz M, et al ed, Periprosthetic Fracture Management, 120-121, Thieme, 2013.
 
P.400 掲載の参考文献
1) Menard J Jr, et al : Initial tension loss in cerclage cables. J Arthroplasty. 28 (9) : 1509-1512, 2013.
 
2) 加藤誠ほか : 超高分子量ポリエチレンケーブル使用後の骨萎縮についての検討. Hip Joint. 42 : 971-973, 2016.
 
3) 酒井利奈ほか : 超高分子量ポリエチレン製ケーブルと金属製ケーブルの大腿骨骨幹部における面圧の比較. 臨床バイオメカニクス. 41 : 381-384, 2020.
 

書評

最近チェックした商品履歴

Loading...