脳卒中患者に対する課題指向型トレーニング

出版社: 文光堂
著者:
発行日: 2015-04-16
分野: 臨床医学:外科  >  リハビリ医学
ISBN: 9784830645211
電子書籍版: 2015-04-16 (第1版第3刷)
書籍・雑誌
≪全国送料無料でお届け≫
発送目安:8~14営業日

6,600 円(税込)

電子書籍
章別単位での購入はできません
ブラウザ、アプリ閲覧

6,600 円(税込)

商品紹介

脳卒中患者に対する課題指向型トレーニングについては,既に国際的にその有効性が検証されており,近年,本邦でも導入されつつある.本書はその手引き書(トレーニングガイド)として本邦では初めて刊行されるもので,将来の脳卒中リハビリテーションの方向性を示す指針となり得るものである.『脳卒中に対する標準的理学療法介入』(2007年刊行)に続く,新しい概念に基づく脳卒中リハビリテーションの治療モデルの実践書.

目次

  • 脳卒中患者に対する課題指向型トレーニング

    ―目次―

    理論編
     1章 脳卒中患者における回復と機能的再組織化
     2章 課題指向型トレーニングの神経科学的基礎
     3章 課題指向型トレーニングと運動制御および
        運動学習の理論的背景
     4章 脳卒中患者に対する課題指向型トレーニングにおける測定
     5章 トレーニング課題の設定

    実践編
     6章 課題指向型トレーニングの実践例
     7章 課題特異的トレーニングの実践例

おすすめ商品

この書籍の参考文献

参考文献のリンクは、リンク先の都合等により正しく表示されない場合がありますので、あらかじめご了承下さい。

本参考文献は電子書籍掲載内容を元にしております。

理論編

P.9 掲載の参考文献
1) Merzenich MM, Nelson RJ, Stryker MP et al : Somatosensory cortical map changes following digit amputation in adult monkeys. J Comp Neurol 224 (4) : 591-605, 1984.
2) Nudo RJ, Milliken GW, Jenkins WM et al : Use-dependent alternations of movement representations in primary motor cortex of adult squirrel monkeys. J Neurosci 16 (2) : 785-807, 1996.
3) Plautz EJ, Milliken GW, Nudo RJ : Effects of repetitive motor training on movement representations in adult squirrel monkeys : Role of use versus learning. Neurobiol Learning Memory 74 : 27-55, 2000.
4) Nudo RJ, Wise BM, SiFuentes F et al : Neural substrates for the effects of rehabilitative training or motor recovery after ischemic infarct. Science 272 : 1791-1794, 1996.
5) Nudo RJ : Postinfarct cortical plasticity and behavioral recovery. Stroke 38 : 840-845, 2007.
6) Nudo RJ : Remodeling of cortical motor representations after stroke : implications for recovery from brain damage. Mol Psychiatry 2 : 188-191, 1997.
7) Conner JM, Culberson A, Packowski AA et al : Lesions of the basal forebrain cholinergic system impair task acquisition and abolish cortical plasticity associated with motor skill learning. Neuron 38 : 819-829, 2003.
8) Conner JM, Chiba AA, Tuszynski MH : The basal forebrain cholinergic system is essential for cortical plasticity and functional recovery following brain injury. Neuron 46 : 173-179, 2005.
9) Kato H, Izumiyama M, Koizumi H et al : Near-infrared spectroscopic topography as a tool to monitor motor reorganization after hemiparetic stroke. A comparison with functional MRI. Stroke 33 : 2032-2036, 2002.
10) Tombari D, Loubinoux I, Pariente J et al : A longitudinal fMRI study : in recovering and then in clinically stable sub-cortical stroke patients. Neuroimage 23 (3) : 827-839, 2004.
11) Takeda K, Gomi Y, Imai I et al : Shift of motor activation areas during recovery from hemiparesis after cerebral infarction : a longitudinal study with near-infrared spectroscopy. Neurosci Res 59 (2) : 136-144, 2007.
12) Ridding MC, Rothwell JC : Is there a future for therapeutic use of transcranial magnetic stimulation? Nat Rev Neurosci 8 : 559-567, 2007.
P.26 掲載の参考文献
1) Levin MF, Kleim JA, Wolf SL : What do motor "recovery" and "compensation" mean in patients following stroke? Neurorehabil Neural Repair 23 (4) : 313-319, 2009.
2) Jorgensen HS, Nakayama H, Raaschou HO et al : Recovery of walking function in stroke patients : the Copenhagen Stroke Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 76 (1) : 27-32, 1995.
3) Jorgensen HS, Nakayama H, Raaschou HO et al : Outcome and time course of recovery in stroke. Part I : Outcome. The Copenhagen Stroke Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 76 (5) : 399-405, 1995.
4) Jorgensen HS, Nakayama H, Raaschou HO et al : Outcome and time course of recovery in stroke. Part II : Time course of recovery. The Copenhagen Stroke Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 76 (5) : 406-412, 1995.
5) Dombovy ML : Stroke ; Clinical course and neurophysiologic mechanisms of recovery. Critical Reviews in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine 2 (17) : 171-188, 1991.
6) Teasell R : Evidence-Based Review of Stroke Rehabilitation 16 edition. 3. Background concepts in stroke rehabilitation. p9, 2013.
7) Inoue Y, Takemoto K, Miyamoto T et al : Sequential computed tomography scans in acute cerebral infarction. Radiology 135 : 655-662, 1980.
8) Seitz RJ, Azari NP, Knorr U et al : The role of diaschisis in stroke recovery. Stroke 30 (9) : 1844-1850, 1999.
9) Carrera E, Tononi G : Diaschisis : past, present, future. Brain. 2014 May 28. [Epub ahead of print]
10) Nudo RJ : Adaptive plasticity in motor cortex : implications for rehabilitation after brain injury. J Rehabil Med 41 Suppl : 7-10, 2003.
11) 黒川幸雄ほか : 理学療法 MOOK16 脳科学と理学療法. 三輪書店. p41, 2009.
12) Hebb DO : The Organization of Behavior : A Neuropsychological Theory. New York, Wiley & Sons, 1949.
13) Bliss TV, Lomo T : Long-lasting potentiation of synaptic transmission in the dentate area of the anaes-thetized rabbit following stimulation of the perforant path. J Physiol 232 (2) : 331-356, 1973.
14) Nudo RJ, Plautz EJ, Frost SB : Role of adaptive plasticity in recovery of function after damage to motor cortex. Muscle Nerve 24 (8) : 1000-1019, 2001.
15) Kleim JA, Lussnig E, Schwarz ER et al : Synaptogenesis and Fos expression in the motor cortex of the adult rat after motor skill learning. J Neurosci 16 (14) : 4529-4535, 1996.
16) Turrigiano GG, Nelson SB : Homeostatic plasticity in the developing nervous system. Nat Rev Neurosci 5 (2) : 97-107, 2004.
17) Taub E, Uswatte G, Elbert T : New treatments in neurorehabilitation founded on basic research. Nat Rev Neurosci 3 (3) : 228-236, 2002.
18) Ward NS, Brown MM, Thompson AJ et al : Neural correlates of motor recovery after stroke : a longitudinal fMRI study. Brain 126 (Pt 11) : 2476-2496, 2003.
19) 吉尾雅春, 森岡周編 : 神経理学療法学. 医学書院, p26, 2013.
20) Raisman G : Neuronal plasticity in the septal nuclei of the adult rat. Brain Res 14 (1) : 25-48, 1969.
21) 原寛美, 吉尾雅春編 : 脳卒中理学療法の理論と技術. メディカルビュー社. p397, 2013.
22) 鍋倉淳一 : 発達期における脳機能回路の再編成. ベビーサイエンス 8 : 26-32, 2008.
23) Murphy TH, Corbett D : Plasticity during stroke recovery : from synapse to behaviour. Nat Rev Neurosci 10 (12) : 861-872, 2009.
24) Dancause N : Vicarious function of remote cortex following stroke : recent evidence from human and animal studies. Neuroscientist 12 (6) : 489-499, 2006.
25) Grefkes C, Fink GR : Reorganization of cerebral networks after stroke : new insights from neuroimaging with connectivity approaches. Brain 134 (Pt 5) : 1264-1276, 2011.
26) Ansari D : Culture and education : new frontiers in brain plasticity. Trends Cogn Sci 16 (2) : 93-95, 2012.
P.33 掲載の参考文献
1) Camer SC : Repairing the human brain after stroke : I. Mechanisms of spontaneous recovery. Ann Neurol 63 : 272-287, 2008.
2) Elbert T et al : Increased cortical representation of the fingers of the left hand in string players. Science 270 : 305-307, 1995.
3) Li S, Han Y, Wang D et al : Mapping surface variability of the central sulcus in musicians. Cereb Cortex 20 (1) : 25-33, 2010.
4) Maguire EA, Gadian DG, Johnsrude IS et al : Navigation-related structural change in the hippocampi of taxi drivers. PNAS 97 (8) : 4398-4403, 2000.
5) Draganski B, Gaser C, Busch V et al : Changes in grey matter induced by training. Nature 427 : 311-312, 2004.
6) Birkenmeier RL, Prager EM, Lang CE : Translating animal doses of task-specific training to people with chronic stroke in one hour therapy sessions : a proof-of-concept study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 27 (7) : 620-635, 2010.
7) Lang CE, MacDonald JR, Reisman DS et al : Observation of amounts of movement practice provided during stroke rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 90 : 1692-1698, 2009.
8) Bernhardt J, Chan J, Nicola I et al : Little therapy, little physical activity : Rehabilitation within the first 14 days of organized stroke unit care. J Rehabil Med 39 : 43-48, 2007.
9) Scheidtmann K, Fries W, Muller F et al : Effect of levodopa in combination with physiotherapy on functional motor recovery after stroke : a prospective, randomised, double-blind study. Lancet 358 : 787-790, 2001.
10) Fiorillo CD, Tobler PN, Schultz W : Discrete coding of reward probability and uncertainly by dopamine neurons. Science 299 : 1898-1902, 2003.
11) Karen P : Don't Shoot the Dog! : The New Art of Teaching and Training. Ringpress Books, 2006.
12) Izuma K, Saito DN, Sadato N : Processing of social and monetary rewards in the human striatum. Neuron 58 (2) : 284-294, 2008.
13) Dobkin BH, Plummer-D'Amato Prudence, Elashoff Robert et al : International randomized clinical trial, stroke inpatient rehabilitation with reinforcement of walking speed (SIRROWS), improves outcomes. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 24 (3) : 235-242, 2010.
14) Shidara M, Richmond BJ : Anterior cingulate : single neuronal signals related to degree of reward expectancy. Science 296 : 1709-1711, 2002.
P.35 掲載の参考文献
1) Ohlsson AL, Johansson BB : Environment influences functional outcome of cerebral infarction in rats. Stroke 26 (4) : 644-649, 1995.
2) Biernaskie J, Corbett D : Enriched rehabilitative training promotes improved forelimb motor function and enhanced dendritic growth after focal ischemic injury. J Neurosci 21 (14) : 5272-5280, 2001.
3) Gelfo F, Cutuli D et al : Enriched environment improve motor function and increases neurotrophins in hemicerebellar lesioned rats. Neurohabil Neural Repair 25 : 243-252, 2011.
4) 才藤栄一, 園田茂編 : FITプログラム 統合的高密度リハビリ病棟の実現に向けて. 医学書院, 東京, 2003.
P.61 掲載の参考文献
1) Harvey RL : Improving poststroke recovery : neuroplasticity and task-oriented training. Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med 11 (3) : 251-259, 2009.
2) Bayona NA et al : The role of task-specific training in rehabilitation therapies. Top Stroke Rehabil 12 (3) : 58-65, 2005.
3) Kilgard MP, Merzenich MM : Cortical map reorganization enabled by nucleus basalis activity. Science 279 (5357) : 1714-1718, 1998.
4) Biernaskie J, Corbett D : Enriched rehabilitative training promotes improved forelimb motor function and enhanced dendritic growth after focal ischemic injury. J Neurosci 21 (14) : 5272-5280, 2001.
5) Nudo RJ, Milliken GW, Jenkins WM et al : Use-dependent alterations of movement representations in primary motor cortex of adult squirrel monkeys. J Neurosci 16 (2) : 785-807, 1996.
6) Nudo RJ : Adaptive plasticity in motor cortex : implications for rehabilitation after brain injury. J Rehabil Med 41 : 7-10, 2003.
7) Nishimura Y, Onoe H, Onoe K et al : Neural substrates for the motivational regulation of motor recovery after spinal-cord injury. PLoS One 6 (9) : e24854, 2011.
8) Molina-Luna K, Hertler B, Buitrago MM et al : Motor learning transiently changes cortical somatotopy. Neuroimage 40 (4) : 1748-1754, 2008.
9) Remple MS et al : Sensitivity of cortical movement representations to motor experience : evidence that skill learning but not strength training induces cortical reorganization. Behav Brain Res 123 (2) : 133-141, 2001.
10) Kleim JA et al : Motor learning-dependent synaptogenesis is localized to functionally reorganized motor cortex. Neurobiol Learn Mem 77 (1) : 63-77, 2002.
11) Levin PG : Stronger after stroke : your roadmap to recovery. Demos Health, 2012.
12) Schultz W : Predictive reward signal of dopamine neurons. J Neurophysiol 80 (1) : 1-27, 1998.
13) Dawson AS et al : Chapter 5 Stroke rehabilitation. Canadian Best Practice Recommendations for Stroke Care Fourth Edition, Canadian Stroke Best Practices and Standards Working Group, p37-42, 2013.
14) Timmermans AA et al : Influence of task-oriented training content on skilled arm-hand performance in stroke : a systematic review. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 24 (9) : 858-870, 2010.
15) Jang SH et al : Cortical reorganization induced by task-oriented training in chronic hemiplegic stroke patients. Neuro Report 14 (1) : 137-141, 2003.
16) Nelles G et al : Arm training induced brain plasticity in stroke studied with serial positron emission tomography. Neuroimage 13 (6 Pt 1) : 1146-1154, 2001.
17) Pascual-Leone A et al : The role of reading activity on the modulation of motor cortical outputs to the reading hand in Braille readers. Ann Neurol 38 (6) : 910-915, 1995.
18) Classen J et al : Rapid plasticity of human cortical movement representation induced by practice. J Neurophysiol 79 (2) : 1117-1123, 1998.
19) Karni A et al : Functional MRI evidence for adult motor cortex plasticity during motor skill learning. Nature 377 (6545) : 155-158, 1995.
20) Page SJ : Intensity versus task-specificity after stroke : How important is intensity? Am J Phys Med Rehabil 82 (9) : 730-732, 2003.
21) Gauthier LV et al : Remodeling the brain : plastic structural brain changes produced by different motor therapies after stroke. Stroke 39 (5) : 1520-1525, 2008.
22) Teasell et al : Mobility and the lower extremity. Evidence-Based Review of Stroke Rehabilitation 16th, p33-54, 2013.
23) Miyai I et al : Effect of body weight support on cortical activation during gait in patients with stroke. Exp Brain Res 169 : 85-91, 2006.
24) Mihara M et al : Sustained prefrontal activation during ataxic gait : A compensatory mechanism for ataxic stroke? NeuroImage 37 : 1338-1345, 2007.
25) Yen CL et al : Gait training-induced change in corticomotor excitability in patients with chronic stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 22 : 22-30, 2008.
26) Yang YR et al : Cortical reorganization induced by body weight-supported treadmill training in patients with hemiparesis of different stroke durations. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 91 : 513-518, 2010.
27) Enzinger C et al : Brain activity changes associated with treadmill training after stroke. Stroke 40 : 2460-2467, 2009.
28) Luft AR et al : Brain activation of lower extremity movement in chronically impaired stroke survivors. NeuroImage 26 : 184-194, 2005.
29) Kim YH et al : Longitudinal fMRI study for locomotor recovery in patients with stroke. Neurology 67 : 330-333, 2006.
30) Teasell et al : Upper Extremity Interventions. Evidence-Based Review of Stroke Rehabilitation 16th, p23-27, 2013.
31) McIntyre A, Viana R, Janzen S et al : Systematic review and meta-analysis of constraint-induced movement therapy in the hemiparetic upper extremity more than six months post stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil 19 (6) : 499-513, 2012.
32) Peurala SH et al : Effectiveness of constraint-induced movement therapy on activity and participation after stroke : a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clin Rehabil 26 (3) : 209-223, 2012.
33) Corbetta D et al : Constraint-induced movement therapy in stroke patients : systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 46 (4) : 537-544, 2010.
34) Nijland R et al : Constraint-induced movement therapy for the upper paretic limb in acute or sub-acute stroke : a systematic review. Int J Stroke 6 (5) : 425-433, 2011.
35) Wolf SL, Winstein CJ, Miller JP et al ; EXCITE Investigators : Effect of constraint-induced movement therapy on upper extremity function 3 to 9 months after stroke : the EXCITE randomized clinical trial. JAMA 296 (17) : 2095-2104, 2006.
36) Wolf SL, Thompson PA, Winstein CJ et al : The EXCITE stroke trial ; comparing early and delayed constraint-induced movement therapy. Stroke 41 (10) : 2309-2315, 2010.
37) Morris DM1, Taub E, Mark VW : Constraint-induced movement therapy : characterizing the intervention protocol. Eura Medicophys 42 (3) : 257-268, 2006.
38) Takebayashi T, Koyama T, Amano S et al : A 6-month follow-up after constraint-induced movement therapy with and without transfer package for patients with hemiparesis after stroke : a pilot quasi-randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil 27 (5) : 418-426, 2013.
39) Taub E, Uswatte G, Mark VW et al : Method for enhancing real-world use of a more affected arm in chronic stroke : transfer package of constraint-induced movement therapy. Stroke 44 (5) : 1383-1388, 2013.
40) Arya KN, Verma R, Garg RK et al : Meaningful task-specific training (MTST) for stroke rehabilitation : a randomized controlled trial. Top Stroke Rehabil 19 (3) : 193-211, 2012.
41) Birkenmeier RL, Prager EM, Lang CE : Translating animal doses of task-specific training to people with chronic stroke in 1-hour therapy sessions : a proof-of-concept study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 24 (7) : 620-635, 2010.
42) Winstein CJ, Wolf SL, Dromerick AW et al ; ICARE Investigative Team : Interdisciplinary Comprehensive Arm Rehabilitation Evaluation (ICARE) : a randomized controlled trial protocol. BMC Neurol 13 : 5, 2013.
43) Timmermans AA, Lemmens RJ, Monfrance M et al : Effects of task-oriented robot training on arm function, activity, and quality of life in chronic stroke patients : a randomized controlled trial. J Neuroeng Rehabil 11 : 45, 2014.
44) Teasell et al : Mobility and the lower extremity. Evidence-Based Review of Stroke Rehabilitation 16th, p34-41, 2013.
45) Teasell et al : Mobility and the lower extremity. Evidence-Based Review of Stroke Rehabilitation 16th, p46-53, 2013.
46) Visintin M, Barbeau H, Korner-Bitensky N et al : A new approach to retrain gait in stroke patients through body weight support and treadmill stimulation. Stroke 29 : 1122-1128, 1998.
47) Duncan PW, Sullivan KJ, Behrman AL et al ; LEAPS Investigative Team : Body-weight-supported treadmill rehabilitation after stroke. N Eng J Med 364 (21) : 2026-2036, 2011.
48) Wevers L, van de Port I, Vermue M et al : Effects of task-oriented circuit class training on walking competency after stroke : a systematic review. Stroke 40 (7) : 2450-2459, 2009.
49) van de Port IG, Wood-Dauphinee S, Lindeman E et al : Effects of exercise training programs on walking competency after stroke : a systematic review. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 86 (11) : 935-951, 2007.
50) English C, Hillier S : Circuit class therapy for improving mobility after stroke : a systematic review. J Rehabil Med 43 (7) : 565-571, 2011.
51) Outermans JC, van Peppen RP, Wittink H et al : Effects of a high-intensity task-oriented training on gait performance early after stroke : a pilot study. Clin Rehabil 24 (11) : 979-987, 2010.
52) Rose D, Paris T, Crews E et al : Feasibility and effectiveness of circuit training in acute stroke rehabilitation. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 25 (2) : 140-148, 2011.
53) Canadian Best Practice Recommendations for Stroke Care : http://www.strokebestpractices.ca/index.php/stroke-rehabilitation/The Intercollegiate Stroke Working Party. Royal College of hysicians. National Clinical Guideline for Stroke (4th edition), 2012.
54) Grefkes C, Fink GR : Connectivity-based approaches in stroke and recovery of function. Lancet Neurol 13 (2) : 206-216, 2014.
55) Manganotti P, Patuzzo S, Cortese F et al : Motor disinhibition in affected and unaffected hemisphere in the early period of recovery after stroke. Clin Neurophysiol 113 (6) : 936-943, 2002.
56) Swayne OB, Rothwell JC, Ward NS et al : Stages of motor output reorganization after hemispheric stroke suggested by longitudinal studies of cortical physiology. Cereb Cortex 18 (8) : 1909-1922, 2008.
57) 原寛美 : 脳卒中運動麻痺回復可塑性理論とステージ理論に依拠したリハビリテーション. 脳外誌 21 (7) : 516-526, 2012.
58) Langhorne P : Motor recovery after stroke : a systematic review. Lancet Neurology 8 : 741-754, 2009.
59) Hamilton R, Messing S, Chatterjee A : Rethinking the thinking cap : ethics of neural enhancement using noninvasive brain stimulation. Neurology 76 (2) : 187-193, 2011.
60) Fregni F, Pascual-Leone A : Technology insight : noninvasive brain stimulation in neurology-perspectives on the therapeutic potential of rTMS and tDCS. Nat Clin Pract Neurol 3 (7) : 383-393, 2007.
P.72 掲載の参考文献
1) Shumway-Cook A, Woollacott MN (著), 田中繁, 高橋明 (監訳) : モーターコントロール-運動制御の理論と臨床応用 (原著第2版). 医歯薬出版, 2004.
2) Carr JH, Shepherd RB : Movement science-Foundation for physical therapy in rehabilitation (2nd eds). Aspen Publishers, 2000.
3) Carr JH, Shepherd RB (著), 潮見泰蔵 (監訳) : ニューロロジカルリハビリテーション-運動パフォーマンスの最適化に向けた臨床実践. 医歯薬出版, 2012.
P.83 掲載の参考文献
1) Schmidt RA (著), 調枝孝治 (翻訳) : 運動学習とパフォーマンス-理論から実践へ. 大修館書店, 1994.
2) 大橋ゆかり : セラピストのための運動学習ABC. 文光堂, 2004.
P.92 掲載の参考文献
1) Schmidt RA : Motor control and learning : A behavioral emphasis. Champaign, IL : Human Kinetics, 1982.
2) Wulf G, Shea CH : Principles derived from the study of simple skills do not generalize to complex skill learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 9 : 185-211, 2002.
3) Guadagnoli MA, Lee TD : Challenge point : A framework for conceptualizing the effects of various practice conditions in motor learning. Journal of Motor Behavior 36 : 212-224, 2004.
4) Salmoni AW, Schmidt RA, Walter CB : Knowledge of results and motor learning : A review and critical reappraisal. Psychological Bulletin 95 : 355-386, 1984.
P.120 掲載の参考文献
1) 篠原幸人ほか編集 : 脳卒中治療ガイドライン 2009, 協和企画, 2010.
6) Shumway-Cook A, Woollacott MH著, 高橋明, 田中繁監訳 : モーターコントロール原著 第4版. 医歯薬出版, 2013.
7) Gentile A : Skill acquisition : action movement, and neuromotor processes. In : Carr J, Shepherd R et al eds. Movement science : foundations for physical therapy in rehabilitation. Rockville, MD, Aspen, 1987.
8) Foerster O : The motor cortex in man in the light of Hughling Jackson's Doctringes. In : Payton OD et al eds. Scientific bases for neurophysiologic approaches to therapeutic exercise. FA Davis, Philadelphia, 1977.
9) Bernstein N : The coordination and regulation of movement. Pergamon, London, 1967.
10) Thelen E, Spencer JP : Postural control during reaching in young infants : a dynamic systems approach. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 22 : 507-514, 1998.
11) Gibson JJ : The senses considered as perceptual systems. Houghton Mifflin, Boston, 1966.
12) Brunnstrom S : Movement therapy in hemiplegia : a neurophysiological approach, Harper & Row, New York, 1970. 120
13) Fugl-Meyer AR, Jaasko L et al : The post-stroke hemiplegic patient, I : a method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med 7 : 13-31, 1975.
14) Duncan PW, Weiner DK et al : Functional reach : a new clinical measure of balance. J Gerontol 45 (6) : M192-197, 1990.
15) Berg K, Wood-Dauphinee S et al : Measuring balance in the elderly : preliminary development of an instrument. Physiotherapy Canada 41 : 304-311, 1989.
16) Podsiadlo D, Richardson S : The timed" Up & Go" : a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. J Am Geriatr Soc 39 (2) : 142-148, 1991.
17) Pollock AS, Durward BR et al : What is balance? Clinical Rehabilitation 14 : 402-406, 2000.
18) Huxham FE, Goldie PA et al : Theoretical considerations in balance assessment. Australian Journal of Physiotherapy 47 : 89-100, 2001.
19) Horak FB, Wrisley DM et al : The Balance Evaluation Systems Test (BESTest) to differentiate balance deficits. Physical Therapy 89 (5) : 484-498, 2009.
20) Refshauge K, Ada Lほか著, 潮見泰藏監訳 : 科学的根拠に基づく理学療法. エルゼビア・ジャパン, 東京, 2008.
21) Quinn L, Gordon J : Documentation for rehabilitation. Saunders, 2013.
22) 内山靖, 島田裕之編集 : 理学療法研究法. 医学書院, 東京, 2013.
23) Collen FM, Wade DT et al : The Rivermead mobility index : a further development of the Rivermead motor assessment. Int Disabil Stud 13 : 50-54, 1991.
24) 前島伸一郎, 柚木脩ほか : Rivermead Mobility Index 日本語版の作成とその試用について. 総合リハ 33 : 875-879, 2005.
25) Lennon S, Johnson L : The modified Rivermead mobility index : validity and reliability. Disabil Rehabil 22 : 833-839, 2000.
26) Newell AM, VanSwearingen JM et al : The modified gait efficacy scale : establishing the pshychometric properties in older adults. Phys Ther 92 : 318-328. 2012.
27) 牧迫飛雄馬, 島田裕之ほか : 日本語版-改訂Gait Efficacy Scaleの信頼性および妥当性. 理学療法学 40 : 87-95, 2013.
28) Tinetti ME, Richman D et al : Falls efficacy as a measure of fear of falling. J Gerontol Pshychol Sci 45 : 239-243, 1990.
29) Hill KD, Schwarz JA et al : Fear of falling revisited. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 77 : 1025-1029, 1996.
30) Hellstrom K, Lindmark B : Fear of falling in patients with stroke : a reliability study. Clin Rehabil 13 : 509-517, 1999.
31) Yardley L, Beyer N et al : Development and initial validation of the falls efficacy scale-international. Age Ageing 34 : 614-619, 2005.
32) 上出直人, 柴喜崇ほか : 日本の地域在住高齢女性における国際版転倒関連自己効力感尺度 (the Falls Efficacy Scale-International) の信頼性と妥当性. 総合リハ 38 : 1063-1069, 2010.
33) Kempen GI, Yardley L et al : The short FES-I : a shortened version of the falls efficacy scale-international to assess fear of falling. Age Ageing 37 : 45-50, 2008.
34) Powell LE, Myers AM : The Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC) Scale. J Gerontol Med Sci 50 : M28-34, 1995.
35) Katz-Leurer M, Fisher I et al : Reliability and validity of the modified functional reach test at the sub-acute stage post-stroke. Disabil Rehabil 31 : 243-248, 2009.
36) Franchignoni F, Horak F et al : Using psychometric techniques to improve the Balance Evaluation Systems Test : the mini-BES Test. J Rehabil Med 42 : 323-331, 2010.
37) Padgett PK, Jacobs JV et al : Is the BESTest at its best? A suggested brief version based on interrater reliability, validity, internal consistency, and theoretical construct. Phys Ther 92 : 1197-1207, 2012.
38) Charlotte SL, Tsang LRL et al : Psychometric properties of the Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test (Mini-BES Test) in community-dwelling individuals with chronic stroke. Phys Ther 93 : 1102-1115, 2013.
39) Dahl SSH, Jorgensen L : Intra-and inter-rater reliability of the Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test in individuals with stroke. Int J Phys Med Rehabil 2 : 177, 2014.
40) Lundin-Olsson L, Nyberg L et al : "Stops walking when talking" as a predictor of falls in elderly people. Lancet 349 (9052) : 617, 1997.
41) Holden MK, Gill KM et al : Clinical gait assessment in the neurologically impaired. Reliability and meaningfulness. Phys Ther 64 : 35-40, 1984.
42) Viosca E, Martinez JL et al : Proposal and validation of a new functional ambulation classification scale for clinical use. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 86 : 1234-1238, 2005.
43) Heineman KR, Bos AF, Hadders-Algra M : The Infant Motor Profile : a standardized and qualitative method to assess motor behaviour in infancy. Dev Med Child Neurol 50 : 275-282, 2008.
44) Neumann KG著, 月城慶一, 山本澄子ほか訳 : 観察による歩行分析. 医学書院, 東京, 2005.
45) Olsson EC : Methods of studying gait. In : Smidt GL (ed) : Gait in rehabilitation, Churchill Living-Stone, New York, 1990.
46) Wolfson L, Whipple R et al : Gait assessment in the elderly : a gait abnormality rating scale and its relation to falls. J Gerontol 45 : M12-19, 1990.
47) Collen FM, Wade DT et al : The Rivermead Mobility Index : a further development of the Rivermead Motor Assessment. Int Disabil Studies 13 : 50-54, 1991.
48) Janssen WGM, Bussmann HBJ et al : Determinants of the sit-to-stand movement : a review. Phys Ther 82 : 866-879, 2002.
49) Dion L, Malouin F et al : Assessing mobility and locomotor coordination after stroke with the rise-to-walk task. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 17 : 83-92, 2003.
50) Shumway-Cook A, Woollacott MH et al : The effects of two types of cognitive tasks on postural stability in older adults with and without a history of falls. J Gerontol Med Sci 52A : M232-240, 1997.
51) Shumway-Cook A, Horak FB : Assessing the influence of sensory interaction on balance : suggestion from the field. Phys Ther 66 : 1548-1550, 1986.
52) Wrisley DM, Whitney SL : The effect of foot position on the modified clinical test of sensory interaction and balance. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 85 : 335-338, 2004.
53) Demeurisse G, Demol O et al : Motor evaluation in vascular hemiplegia. J Eur Neurol 19 : 381-389, 1980.
54) 千野直一, 椿原彰夫ほか編集 : 脳卒中の機能評価-SIASとFIM. 金原出版, 東京, 2012.
55) Rikli RE, Jones CJ : Functional fitness normative scores for community residing older adults ages 60-94. Journal of Aging and Physical Activity 7 : 160-179, 1999.
56) Guralnik JM, Ferrucci L et al : Lower extremity function and subsequent disability : consistency across studies, predictive models, and value of gait speed alone compared with the short physical performance battery. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 55 : M221-231, 2000.
57) 竹内伸行, 田中栄里ほか : Modified Tardieu Scaleの臨床的有用性の検討. 理学療法学 33 : 53-61, 2006.
58) Boyd RN, Graham HK : Objective measurement of clinical findings in the use of botulinum toxin A in the management of children with cerebral palsy. Eur J Neurol 6 (Suppl. 4) : S23-S35, 1999.
59) Semmes J, Weinstein S et al : Somatosensory changes after penetrating brain wounds in man. Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press ; 1960.
60) Whitton TL, Johnson RW et al : Use of the Rydel-Seiffer graduated tuning fork in the assessment of vibration threshold in postherpetic neuralgia patients and healthy controls. European Journal of Pain 9 : 167-171, 2005.
61) Wilson B, Cockburn J et al : Development of a behavioral test of visuospatial neglect. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 68 : 98-102, 1987.
62) Reitan RM : Validity of the Trail Making test as an indicator of organic brain damage. Percept Mot Skills 8 : 271-276, 1958.
63) Folstein MF, Folstein SE et al : Mini-mental state : A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 12 : 189-198, 1975.
64) 加藤伸司, 長谷川和夫ほか : 改訂長谷川式簡易知能評価スケール (HDS-R) の作成. 老年精神医学雑誌 2 : 1339-1347, 1991.
65) Malouin F, Pichard L et al : Evaluating motor recovery early after stroke : comparison of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment and the Motor Assessment Scale. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 75 : 1206-1212, 1994.
66) 星文彦, 新小田幸一ほか編集 : 病態運動学. 医学書院, 東京, 2014.
P.140 掲載の参考文献
1) 中村隆一ほか編 : 基礎運動学 (第5版). 医歯薬出版, 東京, 2011.
2) Liepert J et al : Treatment-induced cortical reorganization after stroke in humans. Stroke 31 : 1210-1216, 2000.
3) Carr J, Shepherd R : Movement Science. An Aspen Publication, p124-134, 2000.
4) Dennis JK, McKeough DM : Mobility. In May BJ (ed), Home Health and Rehabilitation : Concepts of Care, 2ed, FA Davis, Philadelphia, p109, 1999.
5) Buccino G et al : Action observation activates premotor and parietal areas in a somatotopic manner : an fMRI study. European Journal of Neuroscience 13 : 400-404, 2001.
6) Brain briefings Society for Neuroscience, 2008.
7) Ertelt D et al : Action observation has a positive impact on rehabilitation of motor deficits after stroke. Neuroimage 36 : T164-173, 2007.
8) Kahneman D : Attention and effort, Englewood Cliff, NJ, Prentice-Hall, 1973.
9) 臼田滋 : 脳卒中片麻痺患者における機能的動作尺度Functional Movement Scale (FMS) の信頼性と妥当性の検討. 理学療法学 31 (6) : 375-382, 2004.
10) Horak FB, Wrisley DM et al : The Balance Evaluation Systems Test (BESTest) to differentiate balance deficits. Phys Ther 89 (5) : 484-498, 2009.
11) Shea JB, Titzer RC : The influence of reminder trials on contextual interference effects. J Mot Behav 25 (4) : 264-274. 1993.
12) Winstein CJ : Knowledge of results and motor learning. Phys Ther 71 (2) : 140-149, 1991.
13) 大畑光司 : 神経障害理学療法学 I. 中山書店, 東京, p96, 2011.
14) 道免和久 : CI療法-脳卒中リハビリテーションの新たなアプローチ. 中山書店, 東京, p196-215, 2008.
15) 東洋ほか編 : 新・教育の事典. 平凡社, 東京, p720, 1979.
16) Waller SM, Prettyman MG : Arm training in standing also improves postural control in participants with chronic stroke. Gait Posture 36 (3) : 419-424, 2012.

実践編

P.153 掲載の参考文献
1) 篠原幸人ほか編 : 脳卒中治療ガイドライン 2009. 脳卒中合同ガイドライン委員会.
2) Mastos M, Miller K, Eliasson AC et al : Goal-directed training : linking theories of treatment to clinical practice for improved functional activities in daily life. Clin Rehabil 21 (1) : 47-55, 2007.
3) Timmermans AA, Spooren AI, Kingma H et al : Influence of task-oriented training content on skilled arm-hand performance in stroke : a systematic review. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 24 (9) : 858-870, 2010.
4) Timmermans AA, Seelen HA, Willmann RD et al : Technology-assisted training of arm-hand skills in stroke : concepts on reacquisition of motor control and therapist guidelines for rehabilitation technology design. J Neuroeng Rehabil 6 : 1, 2009.
5) McCombe Waller S, Prettyman MG : Arm training in standing also improves postural control in participants with chronic stroke. Gait Posture 36 (3) : 419-424, 2012.
P.162 掲載の参考文献
1) Wolf SL et al : Forced use of hemiplegic upper extremities to reverse the effect of learned non-use among chronic stroke and head-injured patients. Exp Neurol 104 : 125-132, 1989.
2) Wolf SL et al : Effect of constraint-induced movement therapy on upper extremity function 3 to 9 months after stroke : the EXCITE randomized clinical trial. JAMA 296 : 2095-2104, 2006.
3) 佐野恭子ほか : Constraint-induced movement therapy (CI療法) -当院での実践-. OTジャーナル 40 : 979-984, 2006.
4) 佐野恭子ほか : Constraint-induced Movement Therapy (CI療法) の紹介-その効果と課題-. 第23回近畿作業療法学会, 2003.
5) 佐野恭子ほか : 脳卒中患者の麻痺側上肢に対する集中訓練プログラム (CI療法) の実際. 理学療法 24 : 1541-1547, 2007.
6) Tetsuo Koyama et al : Effective targets for constraint-induced movement therapy for patients with upper-extremity impairment after stroke. Neuro Rehabil 22 : 287-293, 2007.
7) 脳卒中合同ガイドライン委員会 : 脳卒中治療ガイドライン 2009. 協和企画, 2009.
8) van der Lee JH et al : Forced use of the upper extremity in chronic stroke patients : results from a single-blind randomized clinical trial. Stroke 30 : 2369-2375, 1999.
9) Lin KC et al : Effects of modified constraint-induced movement therapy on reach-to-grasp movements and functional performance after chronic stroke : a randomized controlled study. Clin Rehabil 21 : 1075-1086, 2007.
10) Page SJ et al : Modified constraint-induced therapy in acute stroke : a randomized controlled pilot study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 19 : 27-32, 2005.
11) 倉山太一ほか : 通所リハビリテーションにおけるCI療法の効果. 理学療法科学 24 : 929-933, 2009.
12) Taub E et al : Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 74 : 347-354, 1993.
13) Taub E et al : Improved motor recovery after stroke and cortical reorganization following constraint-induced movement therapy. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 14 : 77-91, 2003.
14) 道免和久 (編) : CI療法-脳卒中リハビリテーションの新たなアプローチ-. 中山書店, 2008.
15) 高橋香代子ほか : 新しい上肢運動機能評価法・日本語版Wolf Motor Function Testの信頼性と妥当性の検討. 総合リハ 36 : 797-803, 2008.
16) 高橋香代子ほか : 新しい上肢運動機能評価法・日本語版Motor Activity Logの信頼性と妥当性の検討. 作業療法 28 : 628-636, 2009.
17) Plautz J et al : Effects of repetitive motor training on movement representations in adult squirrel monkeys : Role of use versus learning. Neurobiol of Learning and Memory 74 : 27-55, 2000.
18) Lotze M et al : Motor learning elicited by voluntary drive. Brain 126 : 866-872, 2003.
19) 麓信義 (編) : 運動行動の学習と制御-運動制御へのインターディシプリナリー・アプローチ-. 杏林書院, 2006.
20) Wulf G et al : Learning phenomena : future challenges for the dynamical systems approach to understanding the learning of complex motor skills. Int J Psychol 30 : 531-537, 1999.
21) 谷浩明 : 運動学習理論の臨床応用. 理学療法 24 : 299-304, 2007.
22) 池田由美 : 運動遂行結果のフィードバックの仕方. 理学療法 24 : 342-350, 2007.
23) Small SL et al : Cerebellar hemispheric activation ipsilateral to the paretic hand correlates with functional recovery after stroke. Brain 125 : 1544-1557, 2002.
24) Liepert J : Motor Cortex excitability in stroke before and after constraint-induced movement therapy. Cogn Behav Neurol 19 : 41-47, 2006.
25) Gauthier LV et al : Remodeling the brain : plastic structural brain changes produced by different motor therapies after stroke. Stroke 29 : 1520-1525, 2008.
P.167 掲載の参考文献
1) Collin C, Wada D : Assessing motor impairment after stroke : a pilot reliability study. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry 53 : 576-579, 1990.
1) 木村美子 : 脳卒中の起居動作障害に対する課題指向型アプローチ. 理学療法27 (12) : 1415-1420, 2010.
2) 対馬栄輝ほか : 起き上がり動作の生体力学的特性と臨床への応用. 理学療法 27 (2) : 304-311, 2010.
3) 藤澤宏幸 : 起居動作における動作支援のバイオメカニクス. 理学療法 27 (1) : 33-42, 2010.
4) 高見彰淑 : 脳卒中片麻痺の動作障害に対する理学療法アプローチ. 理学療法 27 (1) : 79-84, 2010.
5) 田上光男 : ADL に必要な関節可動域&援助のワザとコツ ベッドまわり動作. 整形外科看護 14 : 18-23, 2009.
P.175 掲載の参考文献
1) 西田宗幹ほか : 脳卒中片麻痺の基本動作能力の難易度順位について. 理学療法科学 13 (2) : 73-78, 1998
2) 潮見泰藏 : 疾患別セミナー 基本動作障害に対する理学療法. 理学療法学 40 (4) : 244-247, 2013.
P.187 掲載の参考文献
1) 脳卒中ガイドライン : 日本脳卒中学会HP : http://www.jsts.gr.jp/jss08.html.
2) 鵜飼正二ほか : 脳卒中の日常生活活動における動作障害に対する課題指向アプローチ. 理学療法 27 : 1412-1418, 2010.
3) 大橋ゆかり : 運動学習の臨床応用. 理学療法学 35 : 202-205, 2008.
4) 臼田滋, 内山靖 : 卒前教育からみた動作分析の困難さ. PTジャーナル 34 : 44-45, 2000.
5) 潮見泰藏, 齋藤昭彦訳 : 脳卒中の運動療法-エビデンスに基づく機能回復トレーニング-. 医学書院, 東京, 2004.
6) 藤田博曉, 高倉保幸, 山谷あずみ : 上肢課題の相違による立ち上がり動作の分析. 埼玉県包括的リハビリテーション研究会雑誌, 8 (1) : 44-46, 2008.
7) 潮見泰藏 : 脳卒中による運動障害に対する評価と理学療法の効果. 理学療法科学, 16 : 17-23, 2001.
P.196 掲載の参考文献
1) 潮見泰藏 : Task-oriented approach. Journal of Clinical Rehabilitation 18 (3) : 259-262, 2009.
2) 鵜飼正二ほか : 脳卒中の日常生活活動における動作障害に対する課題指向型アプローチ. 理学療法 27 (12) : 1421-1428, 2010.
P.210 掲載の参考文献
1) 才藤栄一 : リハビリテーション医学・医療エッセンス. 才藤栄一, 園田茂 (編) : FITプログラム 総合的高密度リハビリ病棟の実現に向けて. 医学書院, 東京, p73-87, 2003.
2) Schmidt RA, Wrisberg CA : Motor Learning and Performance, 4th ed. Human Kinetics, IL, 2008.
3) Kottke FJ : Therapeutic exercise to develop neuromuscular coordination. In : Kottke FJ, Lehmann JF (Eds) : Kruzen's Handbook of Physical Medicine = & Rehabilitation. 4th ed, WB Saunders, Philadelphia, p234-269, 1990.
4) 池上久美子ほか : 教示とパフォーマンス 大腿四頭筋Settingにおける検討. 日本私立医科大学理学療法学会誌 21 : 24-25, 2004.
5) 佐々木正人 : アフォーダンス 新しい認知の理論. 岩波出版, 東京, 2013.
6) 才藤栄一ほか : 運動学習からみた装具-麻痺疾患の歩行練習において-. 総合リハ 38 : 545-550, 2010.
7) 才藤栄一ほか : 脳卒中リハビリテーションにおける装具再考. MB Med Reha 97 : 1-6, 2008.
8) 才藤栄一 : 運動学習エッセンス. 才藤栄一, 園田茂 (編) : FITプログラム 総合的高密度リハビリ病棟の実現に向けて. 医学書院, 東京, p89-100, 2003.
P.217 掲載の参考文献
1) 日本リハビリテーション医学会 : ADL 評価について. リハ医学 13 : 315, 1976.
2) Wagenaar RC et al : Effect of stroke rehabilitation. J Reha Science 4 : 61-108, 1991.
3) Mahoney FI et al : Functional evaluation : The Barthel Index. Md State J 14 : 61-65, 1965.
4) 千野直一監訳 : FIM ; 医学的リハビリテーションのための統一データセット利用の手引き. 慶應義塾大学医学部リハビリテーション科, 医学書センター, 1991.
P.225 掲載の参考文献
1) 一般社団法人日本作業療法士協会 : 作業療法ガイドライン. 2012.
2) Stacey D, Bennet C, Barry M : Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane database Syst Rev CD 001431, 1-207, 2011.
P.232 掲載の参考文献
1) 潮見泰藏, 齋藤昭彦訳 : 脳卒中の運動療法 エビデンスに基づく機能回復トレーニング. 医学書院, 東京, 2007.
2) 島田隆明 : 脳卒中片麻痺患者に対する重量負荷による歩行訓練の試み. 理学療法 22 (6) : 860-864, 2005.
P.238 掲載の参考文献
1) Perry J, Garrett M et al : Classification of walking handicap in the stroke population. Stroke 26 (6) : 982-989, 1995.
2) Dobkin, Plummer-D'Amato P et al : International randomized clinical trial, stroke inpatient rehabilitation with reinforcement of walking speed (SIRROWS), improves outcomes. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 24 : 235-342, 2010.
3) 潮見泰藏 : 基本動作障害に対する理学療法. 理学療法学 40 (4) : 244-247, 2013.
4) Chouhan S, Kumar S : Comparing the effects of rhythmic auditory cueing and visual cueing in acute hemiparetic stroke. International Journal of Therapy & Rehabilitation 19 (6) : 344, 2012.
P.249 掲載の参考文献
1) 大塚圭ほか : 脳卒中患者に対する部分免荷トレッドミル歩行訓練の実際. 理学療法 24 : 1555-1563, 2007.
2) Hesse S et al : Restoration of gait in nonambulatory hemiparetic patients by treadmill training with partial body-weight support. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 75 : 1087-1093, 1994.
3) Hesse S et al : Treadmill training with partial body weight support compared with physiotherapy in nonambulatory hemiparetic patients. Stroke 26 : 976-981, 1995.
4) Miller EW et al : Body weight support treadmill and overground ambulation training for two patients with chronic disability secondary to stroke. Phys Ther 82 : 53-61, 2002.
5) Visintin M et al : A new approach to retrain gait in stroke patients through body weight support and treadmill stimulation. Stroke 29 : 1122-1128, 1998.
6) Calamcie B et al : Involuntary stepping after chronic spinal cord injury. Evidence for a central rhythm generator for locomotion in man. Brain 117 : 1143-1159, 1994.
7) Dietz VA et al : Level of spinal cord lesion determines locomotor activity in spinal man. Exp Brain Res 128 : 405-409, 1999.
8) Dimitrijevic MR et al : Evidence for a spinal central pattern generator in humans. Ann NY Acad Sci 860 : 360-376, 1998.
9) 大塚圭ほか : 平地歩行とトレッドミル歩行における時間因子の比較. 総合リハ 29 : 549-556, 2001.
10) Schmidt RA, Wrisberg CA : Motor Learning and Performance, 4th ed. Human Kinetics, IL, 2008.
11) 寺西利生ほか : 片麻痺の臨床におけるトレッドミルの活用. 総合リハ 30 : 1161-1167, 2002.
12) 跡見順子 : トレッドミル, 医科学大辞典 35 第2版, p98, 1984.
13) 大塚圭ほか : 脳卒中に対する理学療法機器としての部分免荷トレッドミルの活用. 理学療法 26 : 513-522, 2009.
14) 久保晃 : トレッドミルの歩行速度の知覚について. 運動生理 6 : 33-38, 1991.
15) 大塚圭 : トレッドミル歩行分析. MB Med Reha 156 : 57-65, 2013.
16) 大塚圭 : トレッドミル歩行分析-リサージュ図形を用いた新しい三次元動作解析法-. 臨床脳波 48 : 541-546, 2006.
P.256 掲載の参考文献
1) 篠原幸人ほか編 : 脳卒中治療ガイドライン 2009. 協和企画, 2009.
2) Dobkin BH : Strategies for stroke rehabilitation. Lancet Neurol 3 (9) : 528-536, 2004.
3) Laufer N et al : The effect of treadmill traning on the ambulation of stroke survivors in the early stages of rehabilitation : a randomized study. J Rehabil Res Dev 38 : 69-78, 2001.
4) 中澤公孝ほか : 歩行のニューロリハビリテーション. 杏林書院, 2010.
5) Luft AR et al : Treadmill exercise activates subcortical neural networks and improves walking after stroke : a randomized controlled trial. Stroke 39 : 3341-3350, 2008.
6) 大畑光司ほか : 中枢神経疾患患者の歩行に対する課題特異的アプローチ. 理学療法京都 35 : 25-29, 2006.
7) 中澤公孝ほか : ヒト脊髄歩行パターン発生器と脊髄損傷の歩行. リハビリテーション医学 40 : 68-75, 2003.
8) 西野仁雄ほか : 運動の神経科学. ナップ, 2004.
9) Detz V et al : Locomotor activity in spinal man. Lancet 344 : 1260-1263, 1994.
10) 大畑光司ほか : 体重免荷トレッドミルによる歩行訓練の理論と実践. 運動・物理療法 19 : 251-256, 2008.
11) Visintin M et al : A new approach to retrain gait in stroke patients through body weight support and treadmill stimulation. Stroke 29 : 1122-1128, 1998.
12) Moseley AM, Stark A, Cameron ID et al : Treadmill training and body weight support for walking after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005 (4) : CD002840.
13) Hesse S et al : Treadmill training with partial body weight support : influence of body weight release on the gait of hemiparetic patients. J Neurol Rehabil 11 : 15-26, 1997.
14) 潮見泰藏 : 基本動作障害に対する理学療法. 理学療法学 40 (4), 244-247, 2013
P.266 掲載の参考文献
1) Kandel ER, Schwartz JH, et al : Principles of neural science. 4th, ed. New York Academy of Medicine, New York, 2000. 266
2) 田中繁, 高橋明監訳 : モーターコントロール-研究室から臨床実践へ- (第4版). 医歯薬出版, 東京, 2013.
3) Wulf G, Shea CH : The automaticity of complex motor skill learning as a function of attentional focus. J Exp Psychol 54A (4) : 1143-1154, 2001.
4) Schultz W, Dayan P, et al : A neural substrate of prediction and reward. Science 275 : 1593-1599, 1997.
5) 大田尾浩, 村田伸ほか : 脳卒中患者の下肢荷重力と下肢筋力および座位保持能力との関連. 理学療法科学 25 (3) : 427-430, 2010.
P.274 掲載の参考文献
1) 松尾篤 : 脳卒中片麻痺患者の上肢機能改善のためのアプローチの最近の動向. 理学療法 29-12 : 1333-1340, 2012.
2) Langhorne P et al : Stroke rehabilitation. Lancet 377 (9778) : 1693-1702, 2011.
3) Nudo RJ, Wise BM, SiFuentes F et al : Neural substrates for the effects of rehabilitation on motor recovery after ischaemic infatct. Science 272 : 1791-1794, 1996.
4) 星文彦 : バランス障害と理学療法. 理学療法 29-4 : 371-377, 2012.
5) Stoffregen TA, Pagualayan RJ, Bardy BG et al : Modulating postural control to facilitate visual performance. Hum Mov Sci 19 : 203-220, 2000.
6) Wulf G, McNiven N, Shea CH : The automaticity of complex motor skill learning as a function of attentional focus. Q J Exp Psychol 54A : 1143-1154, 2001.
P.282 掲載の参考文献
1) Carr JH : 脳卒中の運動療法 : エビデンスに基づく機能回復トレーニング. 医学書院, 2004.
2) Carr J, Shepherd R : ニューロロジカルリハビリテーション : 運動パフォーマンスの最適化に向けた臨床実践 原著第2版. 医歯薬出版, p298, 2012.
3) English C, Hillier S : Circuit class therapy for improving mobility after stroke : a systematic review. J Rehabil Med 43 (7) : 565-573, 2011.
4) van de Port, Ingrid GL et al : Effects of circuit training as alternative to usual physiotherapy after stroke : randomised controlled trial. BMJ 344 : e2672, 2012.
Carr J, Shepherd R : ニューロロジカルリハビリテーション : 運動パフォーマンスの最適化に向けた臨床実践 原著第2版. 医歯薬出版, 2012.
Carr JH : 脳卒中の運動療法 : エビデンスに基づく機能回復トレーニング. 医学書院, 2004.
English C, Hillier S : Circuit class therapy for improving mobility after stroke : a systematic review. J Rehabil Med 43 (7) : 565-573, 2011.
van de Port, Ingrid GL et al : Effects of circuit training as alternative to usual physiotherapy after stroke : randomised controlled trial. BMJ 344 : e2672, 2012.
脳卒中治療ガイドライン : 2009. 協和企画, 2009.

最近チェックした商品履歴

Loading...