消化器ダヴィンチ手術のすべて　改訂第2版

出版社： 医学図書出版
著者：
発行日： 2021-11-30
分野： 臨床医学：外科  >  消化器外科学
ISBN： 9784865174458
電子書籍版： 2021-11-30 （第2版第1刷）
書籍・雑誌
≪全国送料無料でお届け≫
取寄せ目安：約3営業日

8,800 円(税込)

購入する
電子書籍
章別単位で購入
ブラウザ、アプリ閲覧

6,160 円(税込)

購入する

商品紹介

消化器領域におけるダヴィンチ手術のすべてを網羅。ロボット支援手術の現状と未来などを紹介するとともに、食道・胃・大腸・肝胆膵といった各部の手術を写真や図を交えて解説する。

目次

  • 総論
    　1．ロボット支援下手術の現状と未来（海外）
    　2．ロボット支援下手術の現状と未来（日本）
    　3．ダビンチの開発の経緯と機器の進歩
    　4．ダビンチトレーニングプログラムについて
    　5．ロボット支援下消化器外科手術の保険収載と導入
    　6．ロボット支援下内視鏡手術の導入に関する指針、術前登録制度、
    　　　プロクター認定制度（日本内視鏡外科学会）
    　7．専門医制度 Robo Doc certificate
    　8．ロボット支援下手術における看護師教育と周術期看護

    I. 食道
    　9．ロボット支援下食道癌手術の現状と今後の展望
    　10．胸部食道癌に対する右胸腔アプローチによるロボット支援下食道切除術の縦隔郭清の手術手技
    　11．ロボット支援下食道亜全摘における上縦隔郭清
    　12．食道疾患に対するロボット支援胸腔鏡・腹腔鏡下手術の実際：秋田大学
    　13．食道癌に対するロボット食道切除
    　14．ロボット支援下食道切除術

    II. 胃
    　15．胃外科領域の現状と今後の方向性
    　16．ロボット支援幽門側胃切除術の手技
    　17．ロボット支援腹腔鏡下幽門側胃切除術：ロールインからその手術手技
    　18．胃の手術手技
    　19．ロボット支援腹腔鏡下胃切除術
    　20．ロボット支援下胃切除の短期、長期成績

    III. 大腸
    　21．大腸領域の現状と今後の方向性
    　22．直腸癌に対するhybrid robotic surgery
    　23．低位前方切除での直腸授動～吻合と解剖に基づいた側方リンパ節郭清
    　24．術前化学放射線療法後の直腸癌に対するロボット支援下手術
    　25．大腸領域のロボット手術の手術手技：開腹手術、内視鏡手術
    　26．手術手技（短期成績、長期成績）

    IV. 肝臓
    　27．ロボット支援下肝切除術の現状と今後の展望
    　28．肝臓疾患における手術成績
    　29．ロボット支援下肝切除術の手術手技
    　30．ロボット支援下肝切除の初期成績：導入の注意点と今後の展望
    　31．腹腔鏡下肝切除術がロボット支援下肝切除術か？―エキスパートオピニオン―
    　32．腹腔鏡下肝切除術かロボット支援下肝切除術か？ロボット支援下手術に対する期待と不安

    V．胆道
    　33．胆道領域におけるロボット支援手術の現況と展望
    　34．胆道癌に着目した成人疾患の手術成績
    　35．小児外科領域のロボット支援手術
    　36．先天性胆道拡張症成人例におけるロボット支援腹腔鏡下肝外胆管切除術
    　37．ロボット支援下先天性胆道拡張症手術（小児外科）
    　38．胆道癌におけるロボット支援下手術の将来：エキスパートオピニオン

    VI. 膵臓
    　39．膵臓領域の現状と今後の方向性
    　40．膵疾患における手術成績
    　41．手術手法（膵頭十二指腸切除術）
    　42．手術手技（膵頭十二指腸切除術）
    　43．藤田医科大学におけるロボット支援腹腔鏡下膵頭十二指腸切除術
    　44．膵腫瘍に対するロボット支援下膵体尾部切除術
    　45．ロボット支援下尾側膵切除術における手術手技

    VII. 麻酔
    　46．ロボット支援下食道手術の麻酔・周術期管理
    　47．ロボット支援下胃手術の麻酔・周術期管理
    　48．ロボット支援下大腸手術の麻酔・周術期管理
    　49．ロボット支援下肝臓手術の麻酔・周術期管理
    　50．小児外科におけるロボット支援下胆道手術の麻酔管理
    　51．ロボット支援下膵臓手術の麻酔・周術期管理

この書籍の参考文献

参考文献のリンクは、リンク先の都合等により正しく表示されない場合がありますので、あらかじめご了承下さい。

本参考文献は電子書籍掲載内容を元にしております。

総論

P.13 掲載の参考文献
1) Lin CC, Huang SC, Lin HH, et al : An early experience with the Senhance surgical robotic system in colorectal surgery : a single-institute study. Int J Med Robot 2021 ; 17 : e2206.
PubMed
2) Bergholz R, Botden S, Verweij J, et al : Evaluation of a new robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgical system for procedures in small cavities. J Robot Surg 2020 ; 14 : 191-197.
PubMed
3) Collins D, Paterson HM, Skipworth RJE, et al : Implementation of the Versius robotic surgical system for colorectal cancer surgery : First clinical experience. Colorectal Dis 2021 ; 23 : 1233-1238.
PubMed
4) Hares L, Roberts P, Marshall K, et al : Using end-user feedback to optimize the design of the Versius Surgical System, a new robot-assisted device for use in minimal access surgery. BMJ Surgery, Interventions, & Health Technologies 2019 ; 1 : e000019.
PubMed
5) https://www.avatera.eu/en/avatera-system (2021年5月11日確認)
 
6) https://www.distalmotion.com/ (2021年5月11日確認)
 
7) Form 8-K Medtronic Public Limited Company, 2019. https://www.sec.gov/ix?doc=/Archives/edgar/data/1613103/000161310319000042/item701ras8k.htm (2021年5月11日確認)
 
8) MD+DI : J & J has tapped an all-star team to develop its general surgical robotics platform, Ottava, which the company unveiled Thursday, 2020. https://www.mddionline.com/robotics/moment-weve-allbeen-waiting-jjs-surgical-robotics-platform-reveal (2021年5月11日確認)
 
9) Chang KD, Abdel Raheem A, Choi YD, et al : Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy using the Revo-i robotic surgical system : surgical technique and results of the first human trial. BJU Int 2018 ; 122 : 441-448.
 
10) Kaouk JH, Haber GP, Autorino R, et al : A novel robotic system for single-port urologic surgery : first clinical investigation. Eur Urol 2014 ; 66 : 1033-1043.
PubMed
11) Lowenstein L, Matanes E, Weiner Z, et al : Robotic transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery for bilateral salpingo oophorectomy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X 2020 ; 7 : 100113.
PubMed
12) https://titanmedicalinc.com/ (2021年5月11日確認)
 
13) https://www.vicarioussurgical.com/ (2021年5月11日確認)
 
14) https://virtualincision.com/ (2021年5月11日確認)
 
15) Turiani Hourneaux de Moura D, Aihara H, Jirapinyo P, et al : Robot-assisted endoscopic submucosal dissection versus conventional ESD for colorectal lesions : outcomes of a randomized pilot study in endoscopists without prior ESD experience (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2019 ; 90 : 290-298.
PubMed
16) Chiu PWY, Ho KY, Phee SJ : Colonic endoscopic submucosal dissection using a novel robotic system (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2021 ; 93 : 1172-1177.
PubMed
17) Hwang M, Kwon DS : K-FLEX : A flexible robotic platform for scar-free endoscopic surgery. Int J Med Robot 2020 ; 16 : e2078.
 
18) Nakadate R, Nakamura S, Moriyama T, et al : Gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection using novel 2.6-mm articulating devices : an ex vivo comparative and in vivo feasibility study. Endoscopy 2015 ; 47 : 820-824.
 
19) Meershoek P, KleinJan GH, van Willigen DM, et al : Multi-wavelength fluorescence imaging with a da Vinci Firefly-a technical look behind the scenes. J Robot Surg 2021 ; 15 : 751-760.
 
20) Kobayashi S, Cho B, Mutaguchi J, et al : Surgical Navigation Improves Renal Parenchyma Volume Preservation in Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy : A Propensity Score Matched Comparative Analysis. J Urol 2020 ; 204 : 149-156.
PubMed
21) Shademan A, Decker RS, Opfermann JD, et al : Supervised autonomous robotic soft tissue surgery. Sci Transl Med 2016 ; 8 : 337ra64.
PubMed
22) Maier-Hein L, Vedula SS, Speidel S, et al : Surgical data science for next-generation interventions. Nat Biomed Eng 2017 ; 1 : 691-696.
PubMed
23) 橋爪誠 : 多元計算解剖学の基礎と臨床への応用. 誠文堂新光社, 2018.
 
24) Faust RA : Robotics in surgery : history, current and future applications. Nova Science Publishers, 2007.
 
25) Marescaux J, Leroy J, Gagner M, et al : Transatlantic robot-assisted telesurgery. Nature 2001 ; 413 : 379-380.
PubMed
26) 荒田純平, 高橋弘樹, 割澤伸一, ほか : 低侵襲手術支援システムによる日本-韓国間遠隔手術実験. 日コンピュータ外会誌 2007 ; 8 : 401-407.
 
27) 荒田純平, 高橋弘樹, 割澤伸一, ほか : 高速ネットワークを用いた日本-タイ遠隔手術実験. 日コンピュータ外会誌 2008 ; 10 : 139-146.
 
28) Borner Valdez L, Datta RR, Babic B, et al : 5G mobile communication applications for surgery : An overview of the latest literature. Artif Intell Gastrointest Endosc 2021 ; 2 : 1-11.
 
P.23 掲載の参考文献
1) Shibasaki S, Suda K, Obama K, et al : Should robotic gastrectomy become a standard surgical treatment option for gastric cancer? Surg Today 2020 ; 50 : 955-965.
PubMed
2) Suda K, Ishida Y, Kawamura Y, et al : Robot-assisted thoracoscopic lymphadenectomy along the left recurrent laryngeal nerve for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in the prone position : technical report and short-term outcomes. World J Surg 2012 ; 36 : 1608-1616.
PubMed
3) Suda K, Man-I M, Ishida Y, et al : Potential advantages of robotic radical gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma in comparison with conventional laparoscopic approach : a single institutional retrospective comparative cohort study. Surg Endosc 2015 ; 29 : 673-685.
PubMed
4) Suda K, Nakauchi M, Inaba K, et al : Robotic Surgery for Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer : Current Status and Future Perspectives. Dig Endosc 2016 ; 28 : 701-713.
PubMed
5) Hashizume M, Shimada M, Tomikawa M, et al : Early experiences of endoscopic procedures in general surgery assisted by a computer-enhanced surgical system. Surg Endosc 2002 ; 16 : 1187-1191.
PubMed
6) Suda K, Nakauchi M, Inaba K, et al : Minimally invasive surgery for upper gastrointestinal cancer : Our experience and review of the literature. World J Gastroenterol 2016 ; 22 : 4626-4637.
PubMed
7) Shinohara T, Satoh S, Kanaya S, et al : Laparoscopic versus open D2 gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer : a retrospective cohort study. Surg Endosc 2013 ; 27 : 286-294.
PubMed
8) Nakauchi M, Suda K, Shibasaki S, et al : Comparison of the long-term outcomes of robotic radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer and conventional laparoscopic approach : a single institutional retrospective cohort study. Surg Endosc 2016 ; 30 : 5444-5452.
 
9) Uyama I, Suda K, Nakauchi M, et al : Clinical advantages of robotic gastrectomy for clinical stage I/II gastric cancer : A multi-institutional prospective single-arm study. Gastric Cancer 2019 ; 22 : 377-385.
 
10) Shibasaki S, Suda K, Nakauchi M, et al : Non-robotic minimally invasive gastrectomy as an independent risk factor for postoperative intra-abdominal infectious complications : A single-center, retrospective and propensity score-matched analysis. World J Gastroenterol 2020 ; 26 : 1172-1184.
PubMed
11) Kikuchi K, Suda K, Shibasaki S, et al : Challenges in improving the minimal invasiveness of the surgical treatment for gastric cancer using robotic technology. Ann Gastroenterol Surg 2021 ; 5 : 604-613.
PubMed
12) Hikage M, Fujiya K, Kamiya S, et al : Robotic Gastrectomy Compared with Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Clinical Stage I/II Gastric Cancer Patients : A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis. World J Surg 2021 ; 45 : 1483-1494.
 
P.69 掲載の参考文献
1) Tewari A, Sooriakumaran P, Bloch DA, et al : Positive surgical margin and perioperative complication rates of primary surgical treatments for prostate cancer : a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing retropubic, laparoscopic, and robotic prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2012 ; 62 : 1-15.
PubMed
2) Trinh QD, Sammon J, Sun M, et al : Perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy compared with open radical prostatectomy : results from the nationwide inpatient sample. Eur Urol 2012 ; 61 : 679-685.
PubMed
3) Uyama I, Suda K, Nakauchi M, et al : Clinical advantages of robotic gastrectomy for clinical stage I/II gastric cancer : a multi-institutional prospective single-arm study. Gastric Cancer 2019 ; 22 : 377-385.
 
4) ロボット支援下内視鏡手術導入に関する指針. https://www.jses.or.jp/uploads/files/robot/shishin/robot_assisted_endoscopic_surgery.pdf
 
5) 消化器外科領域ロボット支援下内視鏡手術導入に関する指針. https://www.jses.or.jp/uploads/files/robot/shishin/guidelines_for_introduction_robot_assisted_endoscopic_surgery202109.pdf
 
6) ロボット支援手術による学会指針に関して. https://www.jses.or.jp/uploads/files/robot/shishin/robot_support_20200708.pdf
 
7) ロボット支援下膵切除術導入に関する指針. https://www.jses.or.jp/uploads/files/robot/shishin/introduction_of_robot_assisted_pancreatectomy.pdf
 
8) ロボット支援下膵切除術プロクター基準. https://www.jses.or.jp/uploads/files/robot/shishin/kantansui_proctor_kijyun_20210906kaitei.pdf
 
9) 高難度新規医療技術について厚生労働大臣が定める基準 (厚生労働省告示246号). https://www.mhlw.go.jp/file/06-Seisakujouhou-10800000-Iseikyoku/0000137795.pdf
 
10) 厚生労働省ホームページ, 令和2年度診療報酬改定について. https://www.mhlw.go.jp/stf/seisakunitsuite/bunya/0000188411_00027.html
 
11) 特掲診療料の施設基準等及びその届出に関する手続きの取扱いについて. https://www.mhlw.go.jp/content/12400000/000666311.pdf
 
12) 大木岳志, 井上雄志, 小川真平, ほか : ロボット支援下直腸手術の保険収載とその導入. 日本大腸肛門病会誌 2019 ; 72 : 575-582.
 
13) Yamaguchi T, Kinugasa Y, Shiomi A, et al : Learning curve for robotic-assisted surgery for rectal cancer : use of the cumulative sum method. Surg Endosc 2015 ; 29 : 1679-1685.
PubMed
P.77 掲載の参考文献
1) Melich G, Hong YK, Kim J, et al : Simultaneous development of laparoscopy and robotics provides acceptable perioperative outcomes and shows robotics to have a faster learning curve and to be overall faster in rectal cancer surgery : analysis of novice MIS surgeon learning curves. Surg Endosc 2015 ; 29 : 558-568.
PubMed
2) Willuth E, Hardon SF, Lang F, et al : Robotic-assisted cholecystectomy is superior to laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the initial training for surgical novices in an ex vivo porcine model : a randomized crossover study. Surg Endosc 2021. Feb 26. doi : 10.1007/s00464-021-08373-6. Online ahead of print.
 
3) Hoffman AB, Myneni AA, Towle-Miller LM, et al : The Early (2009-2017) Experience With Robot-assisted Cholecystectomy in New York State. Ann Surg 2021 ; 274 : e245-e252.
PubMed
4) Uyama I, Suda K, Nakauchi M, et al : Clinical advantages of robotic gastrectomy for clinical stage I/II gastric cancer : a multi-institutional prospective single-arm study. Gastric Cancer 2019 ; 22 : 377-385.
 
5) Jayne D, Pigazzi A, Marshall H, et al : Effect of Robotic-Assisted vs Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery on Risk of Conversion to Open Laparotomy Among Patients Undergoing Resection for Rectal Cancer : The ROLARR Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 2017 ; 318 : 1569-1580.
PubMed
6) Suda K, Yamamoto H, Nishigori T, et al : Safe implementation of robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer under requirements for universal health insurance coverage : a retrospective cohort study using a nationwide registry database in Japan. Gastric Cancer 2021. Oct 12 ; 1-12. doi : 10.1007/s10120-021-01257-7. Online ahead of print.
 
7) Matsuyama T, Endo H, Yamamoto H, et al : Outcomes of robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic low anterior resection in patients with rectal cancer : propensity-matched analysis of the National Clinical Database in Japan. BJS Open 2021 ; 5 : zrab083.
PubMed
8) Kim MS, Kim WJ, Hyung WJ, et al : Comprehensive Learning Curve of Robotic Surgery : Discovery From a Multicenter Prospective Trial of Robotic Gastrectomy. Ann Surg 2021 ; 273 : 949-956.
PubMed
9) Park EJ, Kim CW, Cho MS, et al : Multidimensional analyses of the learning curve of robotic low anterior resection for rectal cancer : 3-phase learning process comparison. Surg Endosc 2014 ; 28 : 2821-2831.
PubMed
10) Yamaguchi T, Kinugasa Y, Shiomi A, et al : Learning curve for robotic-assisted surgery for rectal cancer : use of the cumulative sum method. Surg Endosc 2015 ; 29 : 1679-1685.
PubMed
11) Odermatt M, Ahmed J, Panteleimonitis S, et al : Prior experience in laparoscopic rectal surgery can minimize the learning curve for robotic rectal resections : a cumulative sum analysis. Surg Endosc 2017 ; 31 : 4067-4076.
 
P.93 掲載の参考文献
1) 武中篤 : 第1章 内視鏡外科手術の総論 D : ロボット支援手術. オペナーシング 2021 ; 春季増刊 : 48-55.
 
2) 尾崎眞 : 麻酔による体温変化 (1) 全身麻酔. 鈴木陽子, 細川深美編集, 手術患者の体温管理. メディカ出版, 2003 ; 37-45.
 
3) 岩田奈津代 : 第2章 手術体位 手術体位の基本と看護師の役割. 草柳かほる, 久保田由美子, 峯川美弥子編著, 手術室看護 術前術後をつなげる術中看護. 医歯薬出版, 2011 ; 61-64.
 

I. 食道

P.105 掲載の参考文献
1) 日本内視鏡外科学会学術委員会 : 内視鏡外科手術に関するアンケート調査-第15回集計結果報告-. 一般社団法人日本内視鏡外科学会, 2021 ; 33-35.
 
2) Suda K, Ishida Y, Kawamura Y, et al : Robot assisted thoracoscopic lymphadenectomy along the left recurrent laryngeal nerve for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in the prone position : Technical report and short-term outcomes. World J Surg 2012 ; 36 : 1608-1616.
PubMed
3) Mori K, Yamagata Y, Wada I, et al : Robotic-assisted totally transhiatal lymphadenectomy in the middle mediastinum for esophageal cancer. J Robot Surg 2013 ; 7 : 385-387.
PubMed
4) 本山悟, 佐藤雄亮 : 手術のtips and pitfalls : 側臥位の立場から. 日外会誌 2020 ; 121 : 639-642.
 
5) Koyanagi K, Ozawa S, Tachimori Y : Minimally invasive esophagectomy performed with the patient in a prone position : a systematic review. Surg Today 2016 ; 46 : 275-284.
 
6) 須田康一, 宇山一朗 : 手術のtips and pitfalls : 腹臥位の立場から. 日外会誌 2020 ; 121 : 630-638.
 
7) Yoshimura S, Mori K, Yamagata Y, et al : Quality of life after robot-assisted transmediastinal radical surgery for esophageal cancer. Surg Endosc 2018 ; 32 : 2249-2254.
PubMed
8) 小澤壯治, 小熊潤也, 数野曉人, ほか : 食道癌根治術 (腹臥位アプローチ) における左反回神経周囲リンパ節郭清のための術野展開-ダブルテープ食道牽引法. 手術 2017 ; 71 : 359-366.
 
9) Nakauchi M, Uyama I, Suda K, et al : Robotic surgery for the upper gastrointestinal tract : current status and future perspectives. Asian J Endosc Surg 2017 ; 10 : 354-363.
PubMed
10) van der Sluis PC, van der Horst S, May AM, et al : Robot-assisted Minimally Invasive Thoracolaparoscopic Esophagectomy Versus Open Transthoracic Esophagectomy for Resectable Esophageal Cancer : A Randomized Controlled Trial. Ann Surg 2019 ; 269 : 621-630.
PubMed
11) de Groot EM, van der Horst S, Kingma BF, et al : Robot-assisted minimally invasive thoracolaparoscopic esophagectomy versus open esophagectomy : long-term follow-up of a randomized clinical trial. Dis Esophagus 2020 ; 33 (Supplement 2) : doaa079.
 
P.115 掲載の参考文献
1) Suda K, Ishida Y, Kawamura Y, et al : Robot-assisted thoracoscopic lymphadenectomy along the left recurrent laryngeal nerve for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in the prone position : technical report and short-term outcomes. World J Surg 2012 ; 36 : 1608-1616.
PubMed
2) van Hillegersberg R, Boone J, Draaisma WA, et al : First experience with robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagolymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer. Surg Endosc 2006 ; 20 : 1435-1439.
PubMed
3) 能城浩和, 梶原脩平, 與田幸恵 : 食道癌・胃癌に対するロボット支援下手術の展望. 癌と化療 2020 ; 47 : 1314-1317.
 
4) 能城浩和, 池田貯, 河野博 : 胸部食道癌に対する腹臥位ロボット支援手術. 消外 2014 ; 37 : 23-30.
 
5) 能城浩和, 與田幸恵, 岩崎寛智 : 手術支援ロボットを用いた食道癌根治術. 手術 2017 ; 71 : 735-741.
 
6) 能城浩和 : 胸腔鏡食道癌根治術 ダビンチ. 腹腔鏡下消化器外科手術 標準手技シリーズ 上部消化管. メジカルビュー社, 2015 ; 64-75.
 
7) Noshiro H, Miyake S : Thoracoscopic esophagectomy using prone positioning. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013 ; 19 : 399-408.
 
P.122 掲載の参考文献
1) Akagawa S, Hosogi H, Yoshimura F, et al : Mesenteric excision for esophageal cancer surgery : based on the concept of mesotracheoesophagus. Int Cancer Conf J 2018 ; 7 : 117-120.
PubMed
2) Yagi D, Hosogi H, Akagawa S, et al : Is complete right cervical paraesophageal lymph node dissection possible in the prone position during thoracoscopic esophagectomy? Esophagus 2019 ; 16 : 324-329.
PubMed
3) Hosogi H, Yagi D, Sakaguchi M, et al : Upper mediastinal lymph node dissection based on mesenteric excision in esophageal cancer surgery : confirmation by near-infrared image-guided lymphatic mapping and the impact on locoregional control. Esophagus 2021 ; 18 : 219-227.
PubMed
4) Tsunoda S, Obama K, Hisamori S, et al : Lower Incidence of Postoperative Pulmonary Complications Following Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer : Propensity Score-Matched Comparison to Conventional Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 2021 ; 28 : 639-647.
PubMed
P.135 掲載の参考文献
1) Motoyama S, Sato Y, Wakita A, et al : Extensive lymph node dissection around the left laryngeal nerve achieved with robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy. Anticancer Res 2019 ; 39 : 1337-1342.
PubMed
2) Motoyama S, Sato Y, Wakita A, et al : Lower local recurrence rate after robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy than conventional thoracoscopic surgery for esophageal cancer. Sci Rep 2021 ; 11 : 6774.
PubMed
P.142 掲載の参考文献
1) Daiko H, Oguma J, Fujiwara H, et al : Robotic esophagectomy with total mediastinal lymphadenectomy using four robotic arms alone in esophageal and esophagogastric cancer (RETML-4) : a prospective feasibility study. Esophagus 2021 ; 18 : 203-210.
PubMed
P.153 掲載の参考文献
1) Tsunoda S, Obama K, Hisamori S, et al : Simple technique of azygos arch division and retraction for minimally invasive esophagectomy. Esophagus 2021 ; 18 : 169-172.
PubMed
2) Tsunoda S, Shinohara H, Kanaya S, et al : Mesenteric excision of upper esophagus : a concept for rational anatomical lymphadenectomy of the recurrent laryngeal nodes in thoracoscopic esophagectomy. Surg Endosc 2020 ; 34 : 133-141.
PubMed
3) Tsunoda S, Obama K, Nishigori T, et al : Robotic gastric mobilization in robotic minimally invasive esophagectomy. J Thorac Dis 2020 ; 12 : 3457-3459.
PubMed
4) Tsunoda S, Obama K, Hisamori S, et al : Lower Incidence of Postoperative Pulmonary Complications Following Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer : Propensity Score-Matched Comparison to Conventional Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 2021 ; 28 : 639-647.
PubMed
5) Shimizu H, Okada M, Toh Y, et al : Thoracic and cardiovascular surgeries in Japan during 2018 : Annual report by the Japanese Association for Thoracic Surgery. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2021 ; 69 : 179-212.
PubMed
6) 日本内視鏡外科学会学術委員会 : 内視鏡外科手術に関するアンケート調査-第15回集計結果報告-. 腹部外科領域 (その1). 2021.
 

II. 胃

P.164 掲載の参考文献
1) Hashizume M, Sugimachi K : Robot-assisted gastric surgery. Surg Clin North Am 2003 ; 83 : 1429-1444.
PubMed
2) Hyun MH, Lee CH, Kim HJ, et al : Systematic review and meta-analysis of robotic surgery compared with conventional laparoscopic and open resections for gastric carcinoma. Br J Surg 2013 ; 100 : 1566-1578.
PubMed
3) Marano A, Choi YY, Hyung WJ, et al : Robotic versus Laparoscopic versus Open Gastrectomy : A Meta-Analysis. J Gastric Cancer 2013 ; 13 : 136-148.
PubMed
4) Liao G, Chen J, Ren C, et al : Robotic versus open gastrectomy for gastric cancer : a meta-analysis. PLoS One 2013 ; 8 : e81946.
PubMed
5) Zong L, Seto Y, Aikou S, et al : Efficacy evaluation of subtotal and total gastrectomies in robotic surgery for gastric cancer compared with that in open and laparoscopic resections : a meta-analysis. PLoS One 2014 ; 9 : e103312.
PubMed
6) Yang Y, Wang G, He J, et al : Robotic gastrectomy versus open gastrectomy in the treatment of gastric cancer. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2017 ; 143 : 105-114.
 
7) Kostakis ID, Alexandrou A, Armeni E, et al : Comparison Between Minimally Invasive and Open Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer in Europe : A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Scand J Surg 2017 ; 106 : 3-20.
PubMed
8) Guerra F, Giuliani G, Iacobone M, et al : Pancreas-related complications following gastrectomy : systematic review and meta-analysis of open versus minimally invasive surgery. Surg Endosc 2017 ; 31 : 4346-4356.
PubMed
9) Solaini L, Avanzolini A, Pacilio CA, et al : Robotic surgery for gastric cancer in the west : A systematic review and meta-analyses of short-and long-term outcomes. Int J Surg 2020 ; 83 : 170-175.
 
10) Aiolfi A, Lombardo F, Matsushima K, et al : Systematic review and updated network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing open, laparoscopic-assisted, and robotic distal gastrectomy for early and locally advanced gastric cancer. Surgery 2021 ; 170 : 942-951.
PubMed
11) Xiong B, Ma L, Zhang C : Robotic versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer : a meta-analysis of short outcomes. Surg Oncol 2012 ; 21 : 274-280.
PubMed
12) Xiong J, Nunes QM, Tan C, et al : Comparison of short-term clinical outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer : a meta-analysis of 2495 patients. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2013 ; 23 : 965-976.
PubMed
13) Liao GX, Xie GZ, Li R, et al : Meta-analysis of outcomes compared between robotic and laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2013 ; 14 : 4871-4875.
PubMed
14) Shen WS, Xi HQ, Chen L, et al : A meta-analysis of robotic versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Surg Endosc 2014 ; 28 : 2795-2802.
 
15) Chuan L, Yan S, Pei-Wu Y : Meta-analysis of the short-term outcomes of robotic-assisted compared to laparoscopic gastrectomy. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 2015 ; 24 : 127-134.
PubMed
16) Hu LD, Li XF, Wang XY, et al : Robotic versus Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Gastric Carcinoma : a Meta-Analysis of Efficacy and Safety. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2016 ; 17 : 4327-4333.
PubMed
17) Chen K, Pan Y, Zhang B, et al : Robotic versus laparoscopic Gastrectomy for gastric cancer : a systematic review and updated meta-analysis. BMC Surg 2017 ; 17 : 93.
PubMed
18) Pan JH, Zhou H, Zhao XX, et al : Long-term oncological outcomes in robotic gastrectomy versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer : a meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 2017 ; 31 : 4244-4251.
PubMed
19) Wang Z, Wang Y, Liu Y : Comparison of short outcomes between laparoscopic and experienced robotic gastrectomy : A meta-analysis and systematic review. J Minim Access Surg 2017 ; 13 : 1-6.
PubMed
20) Guerra F, Giuliani G, Formisano G, et al : Pancreatic Complications After Conventional Laparoscopic Radical Gastrectomy Versus Robotic Radical Gastrectomy : Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2018 ; 28 : 1207-1215.
PubMed
21) Bobo Z, Xin W, Jiang L, et al : Robotic gastrectomy versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer : meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of prospective observational studies. Surg Endosc 2019 ; 33 : 1033-1048.
PubMed
22) Liao G, Zhao Z, Khan M, et al : Comparative analysis of robotic gastrectomy and laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer in terms of their long-term oncological outcomes : a meta-analysis of 3410 gastric cancer patients. World J Surg Oncol 2019 ; 17 : 86.
PubMed
23) Qiu H, Ai JH, Shi J, et al : Effectiveness and safety of robotic versus traditional laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer : An updated systematic review and meta-analysis. J Cancer Res Ther 2019 ; 15 : 1450-1463.
PubMed
24) Wu HY, Lin XF, Yang P, et al : Pooled analysis of the oncological outcomes in robotic gastrectomy versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer. J Minim Access Surg 2021 ; 17 : 287-293.
PubMed
25) Ma J, Li X, Zhao S, et al : Robotic versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer : a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Surg Oncol 2020 ; 18 : 306.
PubMed
26) Guerrini GP, Esposito G, Magistri P, et al : Robotic versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer : The largest meta-analysis. Int J Surg 2020 ; 82 : 210-228.
PubMed
27) Katai H, Mizusawa J, Katayama H, et al : Short-term surgical outcomes from a phase III study of laparoscopy-assisted versus open distal gastrectomy with nodal dissection for clinical stage IA/IB gastric cancer : Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG0912. Gastric Cancer 2017 ; 20 : 699-708.
 
28) Tokunaga M, Sugisawa N, Kondo J, et al : Early phase II study of robot-assisted distal gastrectomy with nodal dissection for clinical stage IA gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer 2014 ; 17 : 542-547.
PubMed
29) Tokunaga M, Makuuchi R, Miki Y, et al : Late phase II study of robot-assisted gastrectomy with nodal dissection for clinical stage I gastric cancer. Surg Endosc 2016 ; 30 : 3362-3367.
 
30) Uyama I, Suda K, Nakauchi M, et al : Clinical advantages of robotic gastrectomy for clinical stage I/II gastric cancer : a multi-institutional prospective single-arm study. Gastric Cancer 2019 ; 22 : 377-385.
 
31) Kim HI, Han SU, Yang HK, et al : Multicenter Prospective Comparative Study of Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Gastric Adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg 2016 ; 263 : 103-109.
 
32) Lu J, Zheng CH, Xu BB, et al : Assessment of Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer : A Randomized Controlled Trial. Ann Surg 2021 ; 273 : 858-867.
PubMed
33) https://www.med-amc.com/jcs_society/images/guideline/2i2019.pdf
 
34) 日本胃癌学会編 : 胃癌治療ガイドライン 第6版. 金原出版, 2021.
 
35) Alhossaini RM, Altamran AA, Cho M, et al : Lower rate of conversion using robotic-assisted surgery compared to laparoscopy in completion total gastrectomy for remnant gastric cancer. Surg Endosc 2020 ; 34 : 847-852.
PubMed
36) Pan HF, Wang G, Liu J, et al : Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2017 ; 27 : 428-433.
PubMed
37) Ye SP, Shi J, Liu DN, et al : Robotic- versus laparoscopic-assisted distal gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy for advanced gastric cancer based on propensity score matching : short-term outcomes at a high-capacity center. Sci Rep 2020 ; 10 : 6502.
 
38) Ye SP, Shi J, Liu DN, et al : Robotic-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic-assisted total gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy for advanced gastric cancer : short-term outcomes at a mono-institution. BMC Surg 2019 ; 19 : 86.
 
39) Dalsgaard T, Jensen MD, Hartwell D, et al : Robotic Surgery Is Less Physically Demanding Than Laparoscopic Surgery : Paired Cross Sectional Study. Ann Surg 2020 ; 271 : 106-113.
PubMed
40) Kim MS, Kim WJ, Hyung WJ, et al : Comprehensive Learning Curve of Robotic Surgery : Discovery From a Multicenter Prospective Trial of Robotic Gastrectomy. Ann Surg 2021 ; 273 : 949-956.
PubMed
41) Zhou J, Shi Y, Qian F, et al : Cumulative summation analysis of learning curve for robot-assisted gastrectomy in gastric cancer. J Surg Oncol 2015 ; 111 : 760-767.
 
42) Son T, Hyung WJ : Robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer. J Surg Oncol 2015 ; 112 : 271-278.
PubMed
P.180 掲載の参考文献
1) Okabe H, Tsunoda S, Obama K, et al : Feasibility of Laparoscopic Radical Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer of Clinical Stage II or Higher : Early Outcomes in a Phase II Study (KUGC04). Ann Surg Oncol 2016 ; 23 (Suppl 4) : 516-523.
PubMed
2) Okabe H, Obama K, Tanaka E, et al : Laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with a hand-sewn esophagogastric anastomosis using a knifeless endoscopic linear stapler. Gastric Cancer 2013 ; 16 : 268-274.
 
3) Obama K, Sakai Y : Current status of robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Surg Today 2016 ; 46 : 528-534.
PubMed
4) Okabe H, Obama K, Tsunoda S, et al : Feasibility of robotic radical gastrectomy using a monopolar device for gastric cancer. Surg Today 2019 ; 49 : 820-827.
PubMed
5) Uyama I, Suda K, Nakauchi M, et al : Clinical advantages of robotic gastrectomy for clinical stage I/II gastric cancer : a multi-institutional prospective single-arm study. Gastric Cancer 2019 ; 22 : 377-385.
 
6) Lu J, Zheng CH, Xu BB, et al : Assessment of Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer : A Randomized Controlled Trial. Ann Surg 2021 ; 273 : 858-867.
PubMed
7) Ojima T, Nakamura M, Hayata K, et al : Short-term Outcomes of Robotic Gastrectomy vs Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Patients With Gastric Cancer : A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Surg 2021 ; 156 : 954-963.
PubMed
8) Kim HI, Han SU, Yang HK, et al : Multicenter Prospective Comparative Study of Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Gastric Adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg 2016 ; 263 : 103-109.
 
9) Obama K, Kim YM, Kang DR, et al : Long-term oncologic outcomes of robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer compared with laparoscopic gastrectomy. Gastric Cancer 2018 ; 21 : 285-295.
PubMed
10) Nakauchi M, Suda K, Susumu S, et al : Comparison of the long-term outcomes of robotic radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer and conventional laparoscopic approach : a single institutional retrospective cohort study. Surg Endosc 2016 ; 30 : 5444-5452.
 
P.198 掲載の参考文献
1) 日本胃癌学会 : 胃癌治療ガイドライン医師用 (第6版), 金原出版, 2021.
 
2) Katai H, Mizusawa J, Katayama H, et al : Survival outcomes after laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy versus open distal gastrectomy with nodal dissection for clinical stage IA or IB gastric cancer (JCOG0912) : a multicentre, non-inferiority, phase 3 randomised controlled trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020 ; 5 : 142-151.
PubMed
3) Kim HH, Han SU, Kim MC, et al : Effect of Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy vs Open Distal Gastrectomy on Long-term Survival Among Patients With Stage I Gastric Cancer : The KLASS-01 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol 2019 ; 5 : 506-513.
 
4) Inaki N, Etoh T, Ohyama T, et al : A Multi-institutional, Prospective, Phase II Feasibility Study of Laparoscopy-Assisted Distal Gastrectomy with D2 Lymph Node Dissection for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer (JLSSG0901). World J Surg 2015 ; 39 : 2734-2741.
PubMed
5) Hyung WJ, Yang HK, Park YK, et al : Long-Term Outcomes of Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer : The KLASS-02-RCT Randomized Clinical Trial. Clin Oncol 2020 ; 38 : 3304-3313.
PubMed
6) Hu Y, Huang C, Sun Y, et al : Morbidity and Mortality of Laparoscopic Versus Open D2 Distal Gastrectomy for Advanced Gastric Cancer : A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Clin Oncol 2016 ; 34 : 1350-1357.
PubMed
7) Yu J, Huang C, Sun Y, et al : Effect of Laparoscopic vs Open Distal Gastrectomy on 3-Year Disease-Free Survival in Patients With Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer : The CLASS-01 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 2019 ; 321 : 1983-1992.
PubMed
8) Xiong B, Ma L, Zhang C : Robotic versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer : a meta-analysis of short outcomes. Surg Oncol 2012 ; 21 : 274-280.
PubMed
9) Uyama I, Suda K, Nakauchi M, et al : Clinical advantages of robotic gastrectomy for clinical stage I/II gastric cancer : a multi-institutional prospective single-arm study. Gastric Cancer 2019 ; 22 : 377-385.
 
10) Hikage M, Tokunaga M, Makuuchi R, et al : Comparision of Surgical Outcomes Between Robotic and Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy for cT1 Gastric Cancer. World J Surg 2018 ; 42 : 1803-1810.
 
11) Uyama I, Suda K, Satoh S : Laparoscopic Surgery for Advanced Gastric Cancer : Current Status and Future Perspectives. J Gastric Cancer 2013 ; 13 : 19-25.
 
P.217 掲載の参考文献
1) Omori T, Yamamoto K, Hara H, et al : A randomized controlled trial of single-port versus multi-port laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Surg Endosc 2021 ; 35 : 4485-4493.
PubMed
2) Omori T, Oyama T, Mizutani S, et al : A simple and safe technique for esophagojejunostomy using the hemidouble stapling technique in laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy. Am J Surg 2009 ; 197 : e13-e17.
PubMed
3) Omori T, Oyama T, Akamatsu H, et al : A Simple and Safe Method for Gastrojejunostomy in Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy Using the Hemidouble-Stapling Technique : Efficient Purse-String Stapling Technique. Dig Surg 2009 ; 26 : 441-445.
PubMed
4) Omori T, Tanaka K, Tori M, et al : Intracorporeal circular-stapled Billroth I anastomosis in single-incision laparoscopic distal gastrectomy. Surg Endosc 2012 ; 26 : 1490-1494.
PubMed
P.232 掲載の参考文献
1) Uyama I, Suda K, Nakauchi M, et al : Clinical advantages of robotic gastrectomy for clinical stage I/II gastric cancer : a multi-institutional prospective single-arm study. Gastric Cancer 2019 ; 22 : 377-385.
 
2) Suda K, Man-I M, Ishida Y, et al : Potential advantages of robotic radical gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma in comparison with conventional laparoscopic approach : a single institutional retrospective comparative cohort study. Surg Endosc 2015 ; 29 : 673-685.
PubMed
3) Shibasaki S, Suda K, Nakauchi M, et al : Non-robotic minimally invasive gastrectomy as an independent risk factor for postoperative intra-abdominal infectious complications : A single-center, retrospective and propensity score-matched analysis. World J Gastroenterol 2020 ; 26 : 1172-1184.
PubMed
4) Shibasaki S, Suda K, Kadoya S, et al : The safe performance of robotic gastrectomy by second-generation surgeons meeting the operating surgeon's criteria in the Japan Society for Endoscopic Surgery guidelines. Asian J Endosc Surg 2021 Jul 14. doi : 10.1111/ases.12967. Online ahead of print.
 
5) 宇山一朗, 柴崎 晋, 須田康一, ほか : FUJITA'S TEXT2 ロボット支援下幽門側胃切除D1+ -セットアップの基本から実際の手術手技のコツまで-. 金原出版, 2019 ; 1-121.
 
6) 宇山一朗, 須田康一, 佐藤誠二 : 藤田保健衛生大学内視鏡外科手術テキスト-ロボットから従来型鏡視下手術へのフィードバック. 南江堂, 2015 ; 1-144.
 
7) Shibasaki S, Suda K, Nakauchi M, et al : Outermost layer-oriented medial approach for infrapyloric nodal dissection in laparoscopic distal gastrectomy. Surg Endosc 2018 ; 32 : 2137-2148.
PubMed
8) Uyama I, Kanaya S, Ishida Y, et al : Novel integrated robotic approach for suprapancreatic D2 nodal dissection for treating gastric cancer : technique and initial experience. World J Surg 2012 ; 36 : 331-337.
PubMed
9) Shibasaki S, Suda K, Nakauchi M, et al : Robotic valvuloplastic esophagogastrostomy using double flap technique following proximal gastrectomy : technical aspects and short-term outcomes. Surg Endosc 2017 ; 31 : 4283-4297.
PubMed
10) Nakauchi M, Suda K, Kadoya S, et al : Technical aspects and short- and long-term outcomes of totally laparoscopic total gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer : a single-institution retrospective study. Surg Endosc 2016 ; 30 : 4632-4639.
 
11) Nakamura K, Suda K, Suzuki A, et al : Intracorporeal Isosceles Right Triangle-shaped Anastomosis in Totally Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2018 ; 28 : 193-201.
PubMed
12) Nakauchi M, Suda K, Shibasaki S, et al : Comparison of the long-term outcomes of robotic radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer and conventional laparoscopic approach : a single institutional retrospective cohort study. Surg Endosc 2016 ; 30 : 5444-5452.
 
13) Shibasaki S, Suda K, Obama K, et al : Should robotic gastrectomy become a standard surgical treatment option for gastric cancer? Surg Today 2020 ; 50 : 955-965.
PubMed
14) Kim HI, Han SU, Yang HK, et al : Multicenter Prospective Comparative Study of Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Gastric Adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg 2016 ; 263 : 103-109.
 
15) Hikage M, Fujiya K, Kamiya S, et al : Robotic Gastrectomy Compared with Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Clinical Stage I/II Gastric Cancer Patients : A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis. World J Surg 2021 ; 45 : 1483-1494.
 
16) Wang WJ, Li HT, Yu JP, et al : Severity and incidence of complications assessed by the Clavien-Dindo classification following robotic and laparoscopic gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer : a retrospective and propensity score-matched study. Surg Endosc 2019 ; 33 : 3341-3354.
PubMed
17) Kikuchi K, Suda K, Shibasaki S, et al : Challenges in improving the minimal invasiveness of the surgical treatment for gastric cancer using robotic technology. Ann Gastroenterol Surg 2021 ; 5 : 604-613.
PubMed

III. 大腸

P.241 掲載の参考文献
1) Weber PA, Merola S, Wasielewski A, et al : Telerobotic-assisted laparoscopic right and sigmoid colectomies for benign disease. Dis Colon Rectum 2002 ; 45 : 1689-1694, discussion 1695-1696.
 
2) Pigazzi A, Ellenhorn JD, Ballantyne GH, et al : Robotic-assisted laparoscopic low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 2006 ; 20 : 1521-1525.
PubMed
3) 勝野秀稔, 前田耕太郎, 花井恒一, ほか : 大腸癌に対するロボット手術導入. 日消外会誌 2010 ; 43 : 1002-1006.
 
4) 日本内視鏡外科学会. 消化器外科領域ロボット支援下内視鏡手術導入に関する指針. Available from : https://www.jses.or.jp/uploads/files/robot/shishin/guidelines_for_introduction_robot_assisted_endoscopic_surgery202109.pdf.
 
5) Yamaguchi T, Kinugasa Y, Shiomi A, et al : Robotic-assisted vs. conventional laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer : short-term outcomes at a single center. Surg Today 2016 ; 46 : 957-962.
 
6) Jayne D, Pigazzi A, Marshall H, et al : Effect of Robotic-Assisted vs Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery on Risk of Conversion to Open Laparotomy Among Patients Undergoing Resection for Rectal Cancer : The ROLARR Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 2017 ; 318 : 1569-1580.
PubMed
7) Prete FP, Pezzolla A, Prete F, et al : Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Minimally Invasive Surgery for Rectal Cancer : A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Ann Surg 2018 ; 267 : 1034-1046.
PubMed
8) Gomez Ruiz M, Lainez Escribano M, Cagigas Fernandez C, et al : Robotic surgery for colorectal cancer. Ann Gastroenterol Surg 2020 ; 4 : 646-651.
PubMed
9) Kim J, Baek SJ, Kang DW, et al : Robotic Resection is a Good Prognostic Factor in Rectal Cancer Compared with Laparoscopic Resection : Long-term Survival Analysis Using Propensity Score Matching. Dis Colon Rectum 2017 ; 60 : 266-273.
PubMed
10) Simillis C, Lal N, Thoukididou SN, et al : Open Versus Laparoscopic Versus Robotic Versus Transanal Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer : A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis. Ann Surg 2019 ; 270 : 59-68.
PubMed
11) Zelhart M, Kaiser AM : Robotic versus laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery : towards defining criteria to the right choice. Surg Endosc 2018 ; 32 : 24-38.
 
P.251 掲載の参考文献
1) Wasmuth HH, Faerden AE, Myklebust TA, et al : Transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer has been suspended in Norway. Br J Surg 2000 ; 107 : 121-130.
 
2) de Lacy AM, Rattner DW, Adelsdorfer C, et al : Transanal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) rectal resection : "down-to-up" total mesorectal excision (TME) --short-term outcomes in the first 20 cases. Surg Endosc 2013 ; 27 : 3165-3172.
PubMed
3) Sylla P, Rattner DW, Delgado S, et al : NOTES transanal rectal cancer resection using transanal endoscopic microsurgery and laparoscopic assistance. Surg Endosc 2010 ; 24 : 1205-1210.
PubMed
4) Atallah S, Sylla P, Wexner SD : Norway versus The Netherlands : will taTME stand the test of time? Tech Coloproctol 2019 ; 23 : 803-806.
PubMed
P.261 掲載の参考文献
1) 大腸癌研究会編 : 大腸癌治療ガイドライン 医師用 2019年版. 金原出版, 2019 ; 58-59.
 
2) 絹笠祐介 : 絹笠式 静岡がんセンター大腸癌手術. 南江堂, 2017 ; 97-109.
 
3) Kagawa H, Kinugasa Y : Pelvic Autonomic Nerve Preservation and Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection : Techniques and Oncologic Benefits. Kim N, Sugihara K, Liang JT, Surgical Treatment of Colorectal Cancer. Springer, Singapore, 2018 ; 131-138.
 
4) 花岡まりえ, 賀川弘康, 絹笠祐介 : 見直そう! 大腸癌に対する腹腔鏡・ロボット手術の基本手技 解剖に基づいたロボット支援下側方リンパ節郭清の手術手技 (解説/特集). 消外 2020 ; 43 : 1795-1806.
 
5) Liang JT : Technical Feasibility of Laparoscopic Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection for Patients with Low Rectal Cancer after Concurrent Chemoradiation Therapy. Ann Surg Oncol 2011 ; 18 : 153-159.
PubMed
6) Yamaguchi T, Kinugasa Y, Shiomi A, et al : Robotic-assisted laparoscopic versus open lateral lymph node dissection for advanced lower rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 2016 ; 30 : 721-728.
PubMed
7) Kim HJ, Choi GS, Park JS, et al : Selective lateral pelvic lymph node dissection : a comparative study of the robotic versus laparoscopic approach. Surg Endosc 2018 ; 32 : 2466-2473.
PubMed
8) Yamaguchi T, Kinugasa Y, Shiomi A, et al : Oncological outcomes of robotic-assisted laparoscopic versus open lateral lymph node dissection for locally advanced low rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 2018 ; 32 : 4498-4505.
PubMed
9) Hottenrott C : Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer and cost-effectiveness analysis. Surg Endosc 2011 ; 25 : 3954-3956.
PubMed
P.274 掲載の参考文献
1) Ishihara S, Otani K, Yasuda K, et al : Recent advances in robotic surgery for rectal cancer. Int J Clin Oncol 2015 ; 20 : 633-640.
PubMed
2) Corrigan N, Marshall H, Croft J, et al : Exploring and adjusting for potential learning effects in ROLARR : a randomised controlled trial comparing robotic-assisted vs. standard laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer resection. Trials 2018 ; 19 : 339.
 
3) Fujita S, Mizusawa J, Kanemitsu Y, et al : Mesorectal Excision With or Without Lateral Lymph Node Dissection for Clinical Stage II/III Lower Rectal Cancer (JCOG0212) : A Multicenter, Randomized Controlled, Noninferiority Trial. Ann Surg 2017 ; 266 : 201-207.
 
4) Bosset JF, Collette L, Calais G, et al : Chemotherapy with preoperative radiotherapy in rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 2006 ; 355 : 1114-1123.
PubMed
5) Rodel C, Liersch T, Becker H, et al : Preoperative chemoradiotherapy and postoperative chemotherapy with fluorouracil and oxaliplatin versus fluorouracil alone in locally advanced rectal cancer : initial results of the German CAO/ARO/AIO-04 randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2012 ; 13 : 679-687.
PubMed
6) 大腸癌研究会編 : 大腸癌治療ガイドライン 医師用 2019年版. 金原出版, 2019.
 
7) 石原聡一郎 : 局所進行直腸癌の治療方針. 外科 2020 ; 82 : 703-708.
 
8) National Comprehensive Cancer Network : NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. Rectal Cancer : Version 2.2021. 2021.
 
9) Kusters M, Beets GL, van de Velde CJ, et al : A comparison between the treatment of low rectal cancer in Japan and the Netherlands, focusing on the patterns of local recurrence. Ann Surg 2009 ; 249 : 229-235.
PubMed
10) Nagawa H, Muto T, Sunouchi K, et al : Randomized, controlled trial of lateral node dissection vs. nervepreserving resection in patients with rectal cancer after preoperative radiotherapy. Dis Colon Rectum 2001 ; 44 : 1274-1280.
 
11) Sauer R, Becker H, Hohenberger W, et al : Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 2004 ; 351 : 1731-1740.
PubMed
12) Kawai K, Sunami E, Hata K, et al : Phase I/II Study of Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy With TEGAFIRI for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer. Clin Colorectal Cancer 2018 ; 17 : 240-246.
PubMed
13) 川合一茂 : ロボット手術導入に際する注意点 直腸切除術をはじめるにあたって. 臨外 2019 ; 74 : 324-328.
 
P.287 掲載の参考文献
1) Stevenson ARL, Solomon MJ, Lumley JW, et al : Effect of Laparoscopic-Assisted Resection vs Open Resection on Pathological Outcomes in Rectal Cancer : The ALaCaRT Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 2015 ; 314 : 1356-1363.
 
2) Fleshman J, Branda M, Sargent DJ, et al : Effect of laparoscopic-assisted resection vs open resection of stage II or III rectal cancer on pathologic outcomes : the ACOSOG Z6051 randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2015 ; 314 : 1346-1355.
PubMed
3) Katsuno H, Hanai T, Masumori K, et al : Robotic Surgery for Rectal Cancer : Operative Technique and Review of the Literature. J Anus Rectum Colon 2020 ; 4 : 14-24.
PubMed
4) Jayne D, Pigazzi A, Marshall H, et al : Effect of Robotic-Assisted vs Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery on Risk of Conversion to Open Laparotomy Among Patients Undergoing Resection for Rectal Cancer : The ROLARR Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 2017 ; 318 : 1569-1580.
PubMed
5) Yamaguchi T, Kinugasa Y, Shiomi A, et al : Learning curve for robotic-assisted surgery for rectal cancer : use of the cumulative sum method. Surg Endosc 2015 ; 29 : 1679-1685.
PubMed
6) Odermatt M, Ahmed J, Panteleimonitis S, et al : Prior experience in laparoscopic rectal surgery can minimize the learning curve for robotic rectal resections : a cumulative sum analysis. Surg Endosc 2017 ; 31 : 4067-4076.
 
7) Foley KE, Izquierdo KM, von Muchow MG, et al : Colon and Rectal Surgery Robotic Training Programs : An Evaluation of Gender Disparities. Dis Colon Rectum 2020 Jul ; 63 : 974-979.
PubMed
8) Morgan MS, Shakir NA, Garcia-Gil M, et al : Single- versus dual-console robot-assisted radical prostatectomy : impact on intraoperative and postoperative outcomes in a teaching institution. World J Urol 2015 ; 33 : 781-786.
 
9) Miles WE : A method of performing abdomino-perineal excision for carcinoma of the rectum and of the terminal portion of the pelvic colon. Lancet 1908 ; 2 : 1812-1813.
 
10) Heald RJ, Husband EM, Ryall RD : The mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery-the clue to pelvic recurrence? Br J Surg 1982 ; 69 : 613-616.
PubMed
11) Enker WE, Thaler HT, Cranor ML, et al : Total mesorectal excision in the operative treatment of carcinoma of the rectum. J Am Coll Surg 1995 ; 181 : 335-346.
PubMed
12) 土屋周二, 池秀之, 大木繁男, ほか : 大腸癌の手術 自律神経を温存する直腸癌手術. 手術 1983 ; 37 : 1367-1373.
 
13) Hojo K, Vernava AM 3rd, Sugihara K, et al : Preservation of urine voiding and sexual function after rectal cancer surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 1991 ; 34 : 532-539.
PubMed
14) Parks AG, Percy JP : Resection and sutured colo-anal anastomosis for rectal carcinoma. Br J Surg 1982 ; 69 : 301-304.
PubMed
15) Schiessel R, Karner-Hanusch J, Herbst F, et al : Intersphincteric resection for low rectal tumours. Br J Surg 1994 ; 81 : 1376-1378.
PubMed
16) Knight CD, Griffen FD : An improved technique for low anterior resection of the rectum using the EEA stapler. Surgery 1980 ; 88 : 710-714.
PubMed
17) Redmond HP, Austin OM, Clery AP, et al : Safety of double-stapled anastomosis in low anterior resection. Br J Surg 1993 ; 80 : 924-927.
PubMed
18) Jacobs M, Verdeja JC, Goldstein HS : Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy). Surg Laprosc Endosc 1991 ; 1 : 144-150.
PubMed
19) 渡邊昌彦, 大上正裕, 寺本龍生, ほか : 早期大腸癌に対する低侵襲手術の適応. 日消外会誌 1993 ; 26 : 2548-2551.
 
20) Pigazzi A, Ellenhorn JD, Ballantyne GH, et al : Robotic-assisted laparoscopic low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 2006 ; 20 : 1521-1525.
PubMed
21) 花井恒一, 宇山一朗, 勝野秀稔, ほか : 直腸癌に対するロボット手術. 消外 2018 ; 41 : 27-39.
 
22) Adam IJ, Mohamdee MO, Martin IG, et al : Role of circumferential margin involvement in the local recurrence of rectal cancer. Lancet 1994 ; 344 : 707-711.
PubMed
P.301 掲載の参考文献
1) Yamaguchi T, Kinugasa Y, Shiomi A, et al : Short- and long-term outcomes of robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer : results of a single high-volume center in Japan. Int J Colorectal Dis 2018 ; 33 : 1755-1762.
 
2) Yamaoka Y, Kagawa H, Shiomi A, et al : Robotic-assisted surgery may be a useful approach to protect urinary function in the modern era of diverse surgical approaches for rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 2021 ; 35 : 1317-1323.
PubMed
3) Jayne D, Pigazzi A, Marshall H, et al : Effect of Robotic-Assisted vs Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery on Risk of Conversion to Open Laparotomy Among Patients Undergoing Resection for Rectal Cancer : The ROLARR Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 2017 ; 318 : 1569-1580.
PubMed
4) Yamaoka Y, Shiomi A, Kagawa H, et al : Robotic surgery for clinical T4 rectal cancer : short- and longterm outcomes. Surg Endosc 2021 Jan 6. doi : 10.1007/s00464-020-08241-9. Online ahead of print.
 
5) Shiomi A, Kinugasa Y, Yamaguchi T, et al : Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic surgery for lower rectal cancer : the impact of visceral obesity on surgical outcomes. Int J Colorectal Dis 2016 ; 31 : 1701-1710.
PubMed
6) Hino H, Yamaguchi T, Kinugasa Y, et al : Robotic-assisted multivisceral resection for rectal cancer : short-term outcomes at a single center. Tech Coloproctol 2017 ; 21 : 879-886.
 
7) Yamaguchi T, Kinugasa Y, Shiomi A, et al : Oncological outcomes of robotic-assisted laparoscopic versus open lateral lymph node dissection for locally advanced low rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 2018 ; 32 : 4498-4505.
PubMed
8) Sackier JM, Wang Y : Robotically assisted laparoscopic surgery. From concept to development. Surg Endosc 1994 ; 8 : 63-66.
PubMed
9) Palep JH : Robotic assisted minimally invasive surgery. J Minim Access Surg 2009 ; 5 : 1-7.
 
10) Baik SH, Kwon HY, Kim JS, et al : Robotic versus laparoscopic low anterior resection of rectal cancer : short-term outcome of a prospective comparative study. Ann Surg Oncol 2009 ; 16 : 1480-1487.
PubMed
11) Park JS, Choi GS, Lim KH, et al : S052 : a comparison of robot-assisted, laparoscopic, and open surgery in the treatment of rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 2011 ; 25 : 240-248.
PubMed
12) Kwak JM, Kim SH, Kim J, et al : Robotic vs laparoscopic resection of rectal cancer : short-term outcomes of a case-control study. Dis Colon Rectum 2011 ; 54 : 151-156.
PubMed
13) Jimenez-Rodriguez RM, Rubio-Dorado-Manzanares M, Diaz-Pavon JM, et al : Learning curve in robotic rectal cancer surgery : current state of affairs. Int J Colorectal Dis 2016 ; 31 : 1807-1815.
PubMed
14) Yamaguchi T, Kinugasa Y, Shiomi A, et al : Learning curve for robotic-assisted surgery for rectal cancer : use of the cumulative sum method. Surg Endosc 2015 ; 29 : 1679-1685.
PubMed
15) Silva-Velazco J, Dietz DW, Stocchi L, et al : Considering Value in Rectal Cancer Surgery : An Analysis of Costs and Outcomes Based on the Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Approach for Proctectomy. Ann Surg 2017 ; 265 : 960-968.
PubMed

IV. 肝臓

P.313 掲載の参考文献
1) Takahara T, Wakabayashi G, Beppu T, et al : Long-term and perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic versus open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma with propensity score matching : a multi-institutional Japanese study. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2015 ; 22 : 721-717.
PubMed
2) Giulianotti PC, Coratti A, Angelini M, et al : Robotics in general surgery : Personal experience in a large community hospital. Arch Surg 2003 ; 138 : 777-784.
 
3) 加藤悠太郎, 杉岡篤, 花井恒一, ほか : 同時性肝転移を伴う大腸癌に対するda Vinci HDSurgical Systemを用いた大腸・肝同時切除術. 手術 2011 ; 65 : 91-95.
 
4) Wakabayashi G, Sasaki A, Nishizuka S, et al : Our initial experience with robotic hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2011 ; 18 : 481-487.
PubMed
5) Ciria R, Berardi G, Alconchel F, et al : The impact of robotics in liver surgery : A worldwide systematic review and short-term outcomes meta-analysis on 2,728 cases. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2020 ; Nov 17. doi : 10.1002/jhbp.869. Online ahead of print.
 
6) 杉岡 篤, 加藤悠太郎, 棚橋義直, ほか : 肝腫瘍に対するロボット手術. 消外 2018 ; 41 : 41-56.
 
7) 加藤悠太郎, 杉岡篤, 棚橋義直, ほか : ロボット支援下肝切除術. Organ Biology 2019 ; 26 : 115-121.
Medical*Online
8) Fruscione M, Pickens R, Baker EH, et al : Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic major liver resection : analysis of outcomes from a single center. HPB (Oxford) 2019 ; 21 : 906-911.
PubMed
9) Tsung A, Geller DA, Sukato DC, et al : Robotic versus laparoscopic hepatectomy : A matched comparison. Ann Surg 2014 ; 259 : 549-555.
PubMed
10) Montalti R, Scuderi V, Patriti A, et al : Robotic versus laparoscopic resections of posterosuperior segments of the liver : a propensity score-matched comparison. Surg Endosc 2016 ; 30 : 1004-1013.
PubMed
11) Zhao Z, Yin Z, Pan L, et al : Robotic hepatic resection in postero-superior region of liver. Updates Surg 2021 ; 73 : 1007-1014.
PubMed
12) Giulianotti PC, Sbrana F, Bianco FM, et al : Robot-assisted laparoscopic extended right hepatectomy with biliary reconstruction. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2010 ; 20 : 59-163.
 
13) Xu Y, Wang H, Ji W, et al : Robotic radical resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma : perioperative and long-term outcomes of an initial series. Surg Endosc 2016 ; 30 : 3060-3070.
 
14) Li J, Tan X, Zhang X, et al : Robotic radical surgery for hilar cholangiocarcinoma : A single-centre case series. Int J Med Robot 2020 ; 16 : e2076.
PubMed
15) Giulianotti PC, Tzvetanov I, Jeon H, et al : Robot-assisted right lobe donor hepatectomy. Tansplant Int 2011 ; 25 : e5-9.
 
16) Broering DC, Elsheikh Y, Alnemary Y, et al : Robotic versus open right lobe donor hepatectomy for adult living donor liver transplantation : a propensity score-matched analysis. Liver Transpl 2020 ; 26 : 1455-1464.
PubMed
17) Giulianotti PC, Bianco FM, Daskalaski D, et al : Robotic liver surgery : technical aspects and review of the literature. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr 2016 ; 5 : 311-321.
 
18) Zhang L, Yuan Q, Xu Y, et al : Comparative clinical outcomes of robot-assisted liver resection versus laparoscopic liver resection : A meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 2020 ; 15 : e0240593.
PubMed
19) Kato Y, Sugioka A, Uyama I : Robotic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma : a focus on anatomic resection. Hepatoma Research 2021 ; 7 : 10.
 
20) Zhu P, Liao W, Ding ZY, et al : Learning curve in robotic-assisted laparoscopic liver resection. J Gastrointest Surg 2019 ; 23 : 1778-1787.
PubMed
21) Efanov M, Alikhanov R, Tsvirkun V, et al : Comparative analysis of learning curve in complex robotassisted and laparoscopic liver resection. HPB (Oxford) 2017 ; 19 : 818-824.
 
22) Lai ECH, Tang CN : Long-term survival analysis of robotic versus conventional laparoscopic hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma : a comparative study. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2016 ; 26 : 162-166.
 
23) Lim C, Salloum C, Tudisco A, et al : Short- and long-term outcomes after robotic and laparoscopic liver resection for malignancies : a propensity score-matched study. World J Surg 2019 ; 43 : 1594-1603.
 
24) Beard RE, Khan S, Troisi RI, et al : Long-term and oncologic outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic liver resection for metastatic colorectal cancer : a multicenter propensity score matching analysis. World J Surg 2020 ; 44 : 887-895.
PubMed
25) Yang HY, Rho SY, Han DH, et al : Robotic major liver resections : surgical outcomes compared with open major liver resections. Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2021 ; 25 : 8-17.
PubMed
26) Hu L, Yao L, Li X, et al : Effectiveness and safety of robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic hepatectomy for liver neoplasms : A meta-analysis of retrospective studies. Asian J Surg 2018 ; 41 : 401-416.
PubMed
27) Daskalaki D, Gonzalez-Heredia R, Brown M, et al : Financial impact of the robotic approach in liver surgery : a comparative study of clinical outcomes and costs between the robotic and open technique in a single institution. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2017 ; 27 : 375-382.
 
P.318 掲載の参考文献
1) 宇山一朗, 金谷誠一郎, 杉岡篤 : 腹腔鏡下肝切除術. 金子弘真, 若林剛編著, 腹腔鏡下肝切除術. 南山堂, 2010 ; 79-84.
 
2) 五十嵐一晴, 峯田章, 尾崎貴洋, ほか : 肝切除・膵頭十二指腸切除術をはじめるにあたって-導入の注意点と初期成績. 臨外 2019 ; 74 : 336-342.
 
3) 加藤悠太郎, 杉岡篤, 棚橋義直, ほか : ロボット支援下肝切除術. Organ Biology 2019 ; 26 : 115-121.
Medical*Online
4) Giulianotti PC, Coratti A, Angelini M, et al : Robotics in general surgery : Personal experience in a large community hospital. Arch Surg 2003 ; 138 : 777-784.
 
5) Ho CM, Wakabayashi G, Nitta H, et al : Systematic review of robotic liver resection. Surg Endosc 2013 ; 27 : 732-739.
PubMed
6) Liu R, Wakabayashi G, Kim HJ, et al : International consensus statement on robotic hepatectomy surgery in 2018. World J Gastroenterol 2019 ; 25 : 1432-1444.
PubMed
P.329 掲載の参考文献
1) 加藤悠太郎, 杉岡篤, 花井恒一, ほか : 同時性肝転移を伴う大腸癌に対するda Vinci SHD Surgical Systemを用いた大腸・肝同時切除術. 手術 2011 ; 65 : 91-95.
 
2) 杉岡篤, 加藤悠太郎, 所隆昌, ほか : ロボット支援下肝切除の現況と展望. 手術 2012 ; 66 : 1681-1688.
 
3) 杉岡篤, 加藤悠太郎, 棚橋義直, ほか : 肝腫瘍に対するロボット手術. 消外 2018 ; 41 : 41-56.
 
4) 加藤悠太郎, 杉岡篤, 棚橋義直, ほか : ロボット支援下肝切除術. Organ Biology 2019 ; 26 : 115-121.
Medical*Online
5) Zhang K, Yuan Q, Wang W : Comparative clinical outcomes of robot-assisted liver resection versus laparoscopic liver resection : A meta-analysis. PLoS One 2020 ; 15 : e0240593.
 
6) Zhao Z, Yin Z, Pan L, et al : Robotic hepatic resection in postero-superior region of liver. Updates Surg 2021 ; 73 : 1007-1014.
PubMed
7) Sugioka A, Kato Y, Tanahashi Y : Systematic extrahepatic Glissonean pedicle isolation for anatomical liver resection based on Laennec's capsule : proposal of a novel comprehensive surgical anatomy of the liver. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2017 ; 24 : 17-23.
 
8) Sugioka A, Kato Y, Tanahashi Y, et al : Standardization of Anatomic Liver Resection Based on Laennec's capsule. Surg Gastroenterol Oncol 2020 ; 25 : 57-66.
 
9) Giulianotti PC, Sbrana F, Bianco FM, et al : Robot-assisted laparoscopic extended right hepatectomy with biliary reconstruction. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2010 ; 20 : 159-163.
PubMed
10) Xu Y, Wang H, Ji W, et al : Robotic radical resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma : perioperative and long-term outcomes of an initial series. Surg Endosc 2016 ; 30 : 3060-3070.
 
11) Li J, Tan X, Zhang X, et al : Robotic radical surgery for hilar cholangiocarcinoma : A single-centre case series. Int J Med Robot 2020 ; 16 : e2076.
PubMed
12) Kato Y, Sugioka A, Uyama I : Robotic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma : a focus on anatomic resection. Hepatoma Res 2021 ; 7 : 10.
 
P.340 掲載の参考文献
1) Miyasaka Y, Nakamura M, Wakabayashi G : Pioneers in laparoscopic hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2018 ; 25 : 109-111.
PubMed
2) Wakabayashi G, Sasaki A, Nishizuka S, et al : Our initial experience with robotic hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2011 ; 18 : 481-487.
PubMed
3) Gagner M, Rheault M, Dubuc J : Laparoscopic partial hepatectomy for liver tumor. Surg Endosc 1992 ; 6 : 97-98.
 
4) O'Rourke N, Fielding G : Laparoscopic right hepatectomy : surgical technique. J Gastrointest Surg 2004 ; 8 : 213-216.
 
5) 中村和徳, 峯田章, 坂本承, ほか : 腹腔鏡下肝葉切除, 区域切除 (外側区域切除以外). 臨外 2015 ; 70 増刊 : 178-184.
 
6) Giulianotti PC, Sbrana F, Bianco FM, et al : Robot-assisted laparoscopic extended right hepatectomy with biliary reconstruction. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2010 ; 20 : 159-163.
PubMed
7) Wakabayashi G, Cherqui D, Geller DA, et al : Recommendations for laparoscopic liver resection : a report from the second international consensus conference held in Morioka. Ann Surg 2015 ; 261 : 619-629.
PubMed
8) Ho CM, Wakabayashi G, Nitta H, et al : Systematic review of robotic liver resection. Surg Endosc 2013 ; 27 : 732-739.
PubMed
9) Ciria R, Berardi G, Alconchel F, et al : The impact of robotics in liver surgery : A worldwide systematic review and short-term outcomes meta-analysis on 2,728 cases. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2020 Nov 17. doi : 10.1002/jhbp.869. Online ahead of print.
 
P.343 掲載の参考文献
1) Kaneko H, Takagi S, Shiba T : Laparoscopic partial hepatectomy and left lateral segmentectomy : technique and results of a clinical series. Surgery 1996 ; 120 : 468-475.
PubMed
2) Tsung A, Geller DA, Sukato DC, et al : Robotic versus laparoscopic hepatectomy : a matched comparison. Ann Surg 2014 ; 259 : 549-555.
PubMed
3) Guan R, Chen Y, Yang K, et al : Clinical efficacy of robot-assisted versus laparoscopic liver resection : a meta analysis. Asian J Surg 2019 ; 42 : 19-31.
 
4) Kamarajah SK, Bundred J, Manas D, et al : Robotic Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Liver Resections : A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Scand J Surg 2020 Aug 7 ; 1457496920925637. doi : 10.1177/1457496920925637. Online ahead of print.
 
5) Ziogas IA, Giannis D, Esagian SM, et al : Laparoscopic versus robotic major hepatectomy : a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 2021 ; 35 : 524-535.
PubMed
6) Lim C, Salloum C, Tudisco A, et al : Short- and Long-term Outcomes after Robotic and Laparoscopic Liver Resection for Malignancies : A Propensity Score-Matched Study. World J Surg 2019 ; 43 : 1594-1603.
 
7) Lai EC, Tang CN : Long-term Survival Analysis of Robotic Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Hepatectomy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma : A Comparative Study. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2016 ; 26 : 162-166.
PubMed
P.346 掲載の参考文献
1) Ban D, Tanabe M, Kumamaru H, et al : Safe Dissemination of Laparoscopic Liver Resection in 27,146 Cases Between 2011 and 2017 From the National Clinical Database of Japan. Ann Surg 2020 Mar 20. doi : 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003799. Online ahead of print.
 
2) Liu R, Wakabayashi G, Kim HJ, et al : International consensus statement on robotic hepatectomy surgery in 2018. World J Gastroenterol 2019 ; 25 : 1432-1444.
PubMed

V. 胆道

P.352 掲載の参考文献
1) 古川俊治, 小澤壯治, 若林 剛, ほか : 消化器外科領域におけるRobotic Surgery. 日内視鏡外会誌 2003 ; 8 : 12-16.
 
2) Wakabayashi G, Sasaki A, Nishizuka S, et al : Our initial experience with robotic hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2011 ; 18 : 481-487.
PubMed
3) Hashizume M, Shimada M, Tomikawa M, et al : Early experiences of endoscopic procedures in general surgery assisted by a computer-enhanced surgical system. Surg Endosc 2002 ; 16 : 1187-1191.
PubMed
4) 家入里志, 橋爪誠 : 本邦におけるロボット手術の導入と今後の展望. 日コンピュータ外会誌 2014 ; 15 : 319-322.
 
5) Himpens J, Leman G, Cadiere GB : Telesurgical laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 1998 ; 12 : 1091.
PubMed
6) Han C, Shan X, Yao L, et al : Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy for benign gallbladder diseases : a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 2018 ; 32 : 4377-4392.
PubMed
7) Gangemi A, Danilkowicz R, Elli FE, et al : Could ICG-aided robotic cholecystectomy reduce the rate of open conversion reported with laparoscopic approach? A head to head comparison of the largest single institution studies. J Robot Surg 2017 ; 11 : 77-82.
PubMed
8) Roeyen G, Chapelle T, Ysebaert D : Robot-assisted choledochotomy : feasibility. Surg Endosc 2004 ; 18 : 165-166.
PubMed
9) Alkhamesi NA, Davies WT, Pinto RF, et al : Robot-assisted common bile duct exploration as an option for complex choledocholithiasis. Surg Endosc 2013 ; 27 : 263-266.
PubMed
10) Almamar A, Alkhamesi NA, Davies WT, et al : Cost analysis of robot-assisted choledochotomy and common bile duct exploration as an option for complex choledocholithiasis. Surg Endosc 2018 ; 32 : 1223-1227.
PubMed
11) Lee KF, Fung AK, Lok HT, et al : Robot-assisted minimally invasive procedures for complicated biliary stone disease. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr 2018 ; 7 : 185-188.
PubMed
12) Naitoh T, Morikawa T, Tanaka N, et al : Early experience of robotic surgery for type I congenital dilatation of the bile duct. J Robot Surg 2015 ; 9 : 143-148.
PubMed
13) Dou C, Zhang Y, Liu J, et al : Laparoscopy versus laparotomy approach of a radical resection for gallbladder cancer : a retrospective comparative study. Surg Endosc 2020 ; 34 : 2926-2938.
PubMed
14) Hamad A, Cloyd J, Dillhoff M, et al : Comparison of lymph node evaluation and yield among patients undergoing open and minimally invasive surgery for gallbladder adenocarcinoma. Surg Endosc 2021 ; 35 : 2223-2228.
PubMed
15) Nag HH, Sachan A, Nekarakanti PK : Laparoscopic versus open extended cholecystectomy with bi-segmentectomy (s4b and s5) in patients with gallbladder cancer. J Minim Access Surg 2021 ; 17 : 21-27.
PubMed
16) Vega EA, De Aretxabala X, Qiao W, et al : Comparison of oncological outcomes after open and laparoscopic re-resection of incidental gallbladder cancer. Br J Surg 107 : 289-300, 2020.
PubMed
17) Goel M, Khobragade K, Patkar S, et al : Robotic surgery for gallbladder cancer : Operative technique and early outcomes. J Surg Oncol 2019 ; 119 : 958-963.
PubMed
18) Byun Y, Choi YJ, Kang JS, et al : Early outcomes of robotic extended cholecystectomy for the treatment of gallbladder cancer. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2020 ; 27 : 324-330.
PubMed
19) Matsuyama R, Yabushita Y, Homma Y, et al : Essential updates 2019/2020 : Surgical treatment of gallbladder cancer. Ann Gastroenterol Surg 2021 ; 5 : 152-161.
 
20) Giulianotti PC, Sbrana F, Bianco FM, et al : Robot-assisted laparoscopic extended right hepatectomy with biliary reconstruction. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2010 ; 20 : 159-163.
PubMed
21) Cipriani F, Ratti F, Fiorentini G, et al : Systematic review of perioperative and oncologic outcomes of minimally-invasive surgery for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Updates Surg 2021 ; 73 : 1-19.
 
22) 武中篤 : ロボット支援手術の利点と問題点. 日内分泌・甲状腺外会誌 2014 ; 31 : 83-86.
 
P.356 掲載の参考文献
1) Horiguchi A, Uyama I, Ito M, et al : Robot-assisted laparoscopic pancreatic surgery. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2011 ; 18 : 488-492.
PubMed
2) Horiguchi A, Uyama I, Miyakawa S : Robot-assisted laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2011 ; 18 : 287-291.
PubMed
3) 堀口明彦, 伊東昌広, 石原慎, ほか : ロボット支援膵切除術における胆管空腸吻合, 膵管空腸吻合. 胆と膵 2016 ; 37 : 297-301.
Medical*Online
4) 堀口明彦, 宇山一朗, 伊東昌広, ほか : ロボット膵切除術. 臨消内科 2018 ; 33 : 941-945.
 
5) 堀口明彦, 伊東昌広, 浅野之夫, ほか : 機能温存の観点からみたロボット支援腹腔鏡下膵頭十二指腸切除術. 外科 2019 ; 81 : 568-572.
 
6) 堀口明彦, 清水泰博 : わが国におけるロボット支援腹腔鏡下膵頭十二指腸切除術の課題は? learning curveに基づいた教育システムの構築が困難であることが最大の課題. Q&A. 日本医事新報 2019 ; 4955 : 51-52.
 
7) 堀口明彦, 宇山一朗, 伊東昌広, ほか : 胆膵領域のロボット支援下手術のための外科解剖. 胆と膵 2021 ; 42 : 179-184.
Medical*Online
8) Giulianotti PC, Sbrana F, Bianco FM, et al : Robot-assisted laparoscopic extended right hepatectomy with biliary reconstruction. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2010 ; 20 : 159-163.
PubMed
9) Xu Y, Wang H, Ji W, et al : Robotic radical resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma : perioperative and long-term outcomes of an initial series. Surg Endosc 2016 ; 30 : 3060-3070.
 
10) Liu QD, Chen JZ, Xu XY, et al : Incidence of port-site metastasis after undergoing robotic surgery for biliary malignancies. World J Gastroenterol 2012 ; 18 : 5695-5701.
PubMed
11) Li J, Tan X, Zhang X, et al : Robotic radical surgery for hilar cholangiocarcinoma : A single-centre case series. Int J Med Robot 2020 ; 16 : e2076.
PubMed
12) Cillo U, D'Amico FE, Furlanetto A, et al : Robotic hepatectomy and biliary reconstruction for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma : a pioneer western case series. Updates Surg 2021 ; 73 : 999-1006.
 
13) Tang W, Qiu JG, Deng X, et al : Minimally invasive versus open radical resection surgery for hilar cholangiocarcinoma : Comparable outcomes associated with advantages of minimal invasiveness. PLoS One 2021 ; 16 : e0248534.
PubMed
14) Giulianotti PC, Coratti A, Angelini M, et al : Robotics in general surgery : personal experience in a large community hospital. Arch Surg 2003 ; 138 : 777-784.
 
15) Bencini L, Urciuoli I, Trafeli M, et al : Robotic pancreatic surgery : minimally invasive approach to challenging operations. Minerva Surg 2021 ; 76 : 138-145.
PubMed
16) Chao YJ, Liao TK, Su PJ, et al : Impact of body mass index on the early experience of robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy. Updates Surg 2021 ; 73 : 929-937.
PubMed
17) Dong XD, Felsenreich DM, Gogna S, et al : Robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy provides better histopathological outcomes as compared to its open counterpart : a meta-analysis. Sci Rep 2021 ; 11 : 3774.
 
18) Nassour I, Tohme S, Hoehn R, et al : Safety and oncologic efficacy of robotic compared to open pancreaticoduodenectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer. Surg Endosc 2021 ; 35 : 2248-2254.
PubMed
19) Ryoo DY, Eskander MF, Hamad A, et al : Mitigation of the Robotic Pancreaticoduodenectomy Learning Curve through comprehensive training. HPB (Oxford). 2021 ; doi : 10.1016/j.hpb.2021.03.010 Online ahead of print.
 
20) Shyr BU, Shyr BS, Chen SC, et al : Propensity score-matched comparison of the oncological feasibility and survival outcomes for pancreatic adenocarcinoma with robotic and open pancreatoduodenectomy. Surg Endosc 2021 ; doi : 10.1007/s00464-021-08437-7 Online ahead of print.
 
21) Zhou Nx, Chen Jz, Liu Q, et al : Outcomes of pancreatoduodenectomy with robotic surgery versus open surgery. Int J Med Robot 2011 ; 7 : 131-137.
PubMed
22) Horiguchi A, Miyakawa S, Ishihara S, et al : Gallbladder bed resection or hepatectomy of segments 4a and 5 for pT2 gallbladder carcinoma : analysis of Japanese registration cases by the study group for biliary surgery of the Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2013 ; 20 : 518-524.
PubMed
23) Shen BY, Zhan Q, Deng XX, et al : Radical resection of gallbladder cancer : could it be robotic? Surg Endosc 2012 ; 26 : 3245-3250.
PubMed
24) Zeng G, Teo NZ, Goh BK : Short-term outcomes of minimally invasive surgery for patients presenting with suspected gallbladder cancer : report of 8 cases. J Minim Access Surg 2018 ; 15 : 109-114.
 
25) Goel M, Khobragade K, Patkar S, et al : Robotic surgery for gallbladder cancer : operative technique and early outcomes. J Surg Oncol 2019 ; 119 : 958-963.
PubMed
26) Byun Y, Choi YJ, Kang JS, et al : Early outcomes of robotic extended cholecystectomy for the treatment of gallbladder cancer. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2020 ; 27 : 324-330.
PubMed
27) Giulianotti PC, Sbrana F, Bianco FM, et al : Robot-assisted laparoscopic pancreatic surgery : single-surgeon experience. Surg Endosc 2010 ; 24 : 1646-1657.
PubMed
28) Shyr YM, Wang SE, Chen SC, et al : Robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic head cancer and periampullary lesions. Ann Gastroenterol Surg 2021 ; 5 : 589-596.
PubMed
29) Le Linn Y, Wang Z, Goh BK : Robotic transduodenal ampullectomy : Case report and review of the literature. Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2021 ; 25 : 150-154.
 
30) Lee JW, Choi SH, Chon HJ, et al : Robotic transduodenal ampullectomy : A novel minimally invasive approach for ampullary neoplasms. Int J Med Robot 2019 ; 15 : e1979.
PubMed
31) Wong FCH, Lai ECH, Chung DTM, et al : Robotic transduodenal excision of ampullary tumour. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr 2017 ; 6 : 312-316.
PubMed
P.368 掲載の参考文献
1) 土田明彦, 勝又健次, 逢坂由昭, ほか : ロボット支援手術の現状と未来. 北島政樹監修, 消化器ダヴィンチ手術のすべて. 第1版, 医学図書出版, 2013 ; 3-15.
 
2) 小島祥敬, 目黒了, 松岡優太, ほか : 小児泌尿器科疾患に対するロボット支援手術の現況と未来展望. 小児科 2019 ; 60 : 1683-1689.
 
3) Woo R, Le D, Albanese CT, et al : Robot-assisted laparoscopic resection of a type I choledochal cyst in a child. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2006 ; 16 : 179-183.
 
4) Meehan JJ, Elliott S, Sandler A : The robotic approach to complex hepatobiliary anomalies in children : preliminary report. J Pediatr Surg 2007 ; 42 : 2110-2114.
PubMed
5) Akaraviputh T, Trakarnsanga A, Suksamanapun N : Robot-assisted complete excision of choledochal cyst type I, hepaticojejunostomy and extracorporeal Roux-en-y anastomosis : a case report and review literature. World J Surg Oncol 2010 ; 8 : 87.
PubMed
6) Dawrant MJ, Najmaldin AS, Alizai NK : Robot-assisted resection of choledochal cysts and hepaticojejunostomy in children less than 10 kg. J Pediatr Surg 2010 ; 45 : 2364-2368.
PubMed
7) Alqahtani A, Albassam A, Zamakhshary M, et al : Robot-Assisted Pediatric Surgery : How Far Can We Go? World J Surg 2010 ; 34 : 975-978.
PubMed
8) Chang EY, Hong YJ, Chang HK, et al : Lessons and tips from the experience of pediatric robotic choledochal cyst resection. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2012 ; 22 : 609-614.
PubMed
9) Alizai NK, Dawrant MJ, Najmaldin AS : Robot-assisted resection of choledochal cysts and hepaticojejunostomy in children. Pediatr Surg Int 2014 ; 30 : 291-294.
PubMed
10) Kim NY, Chang EY, Hong YJ, et al : Retrospective assessment of the validity of robotic surgery in comparison to open surgery for pediatric choledochal cyst. Yonsei Med J 2015 ; 56 : 737-743.
PubMed
11) Wang XQ, Xu SJ, Wang Z, et al : Robotic-assisted surgery for pediatric choledochal cyst : Case report and literature review. World J Clin Cases 2018 ; 6 : 143-149.
PubMed
12) Pham HD, Okata Y, Vu HM, et al : Robotic-assisted surgery for choledochal cyst in children : early experience at Vietnam National Children's Hospital. Pediatr Surg Int 2019 ; 35 : 1211-1216.
 
13) Koga H, Murakami H, Ochi T, et al : Comparison of robotic versus laparoscopic hepaticojejunostomy for choledochal cyst in children : a first report. Pediatr Surg Int 2019 ; 35 : 1421-1425.
PubMed
14) Nazki S, Kanojia RP, Bawa M, et al : Robotic Excision of Choledochal Cyst with Hepaticoduodenostomy (HD) : Report of HD Technique, Initial Experience, and Early Outcome. Eur J Pediatr Surg 2021 ; 31 : 286-291.
PubMed
15) Xie X, Li K, Wang J, et al : Comparison of pediatric choledochal cyst excisions with open procedures, laparoscopic procedures and robot-assisted procedures : a retrospective study. Surg Endosc 2020 ; 34 : 3223-3231.
PubMed
16) Chi SQ, Cao GQ, Li S, et al : Outcomes in robotic versus laparoscopic-assisted choledochal cyst excision and hepaticojejunostomy in children. Surg Endosc 2021 ; 35 : 5009-5014.
PubMed
17) Xie X, Li Y, Li K, et al : Total robot-assisted choledochal cyst excision using da Vinci surgical system in pediatrics : Report of 10 cases. J Pediatr Surg 2021 ; 56 : 553-558.
 
18) Navarrete Arellano M, Garibay Gonzalez F : Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic and Thoracoscopic Surgery : Prospective Series of 186 Pediatric Surgeries. Front Pediatr 2019 ; 7 : 200.
PubMed
19) Binet A, Fourcade L, Amar S, et al : Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Fundoplications in Pediatric Surgery : Experience Review. Eur J Pediatr Surg 2019 ; 29 : 173-178.
PubMed
20) Anderberg M, Kockum CC, Arnbjornsson E : Robotic fundoplication in children. Pediatr Surg Int 2007 ; 23 : 123-127.
PubMed
21) Alqahtani A : Robotic gastric banding in children and adolescents : a comparative study. Surg Endosc 2011 ; 25 : 3647-3651.
PubMed
22) Ruiz MR, Kalfa N, Allal H : Advantages of robot-assisted surgery in anorectal malformations : Report of a case. J Minim Access Surg 2016 ; 12 : 176-178.
 
23) Albassam A, Gado A, Mallick MS, et al : Robotic-assisted anorectal pull-through for anorectal malformations. J Pediatr Surg 2011 ; 46 : 1794-1797.
PubMed
24) Chang X, Cao G, Pu J, et al : Robot-assisted anorectal pull-through for anorectal malformations with rectourethral and rectovesical fistula : feasibility and short-term outcome. Surg Endosc 2021. doi : 10.1007/s00464-021-08473-3. [online ahead of print].
 
25) Chelluri R, Daugherty M, Abouelleil M, et al : Robotic conversion of cecostomy tube to catheterizable antegrade continence enema (ACE) : Surgical technique. J Pediatr Surg 2018 ; 53 : 1871-1874.
PubMed
26) Thakre AA, Yeung CK, Peters C : Robot-assisted Mitrofanoff and Malone antegrade continence enema reconstruction using divided appendix. J Endourol 2008 ; 22 : 2393-2396, discussion 2396.
 
27) Moscardi PRM, Ballesteros N, Abd-El-Barr AE, et al : Robotic-assisted laparoscopic artificial urinary sphincter and MACE procedure on a pediatric patient. J Pediatr Urol 2017 ; 13 : 527-528.
 
28) Jones VS : Robotic-assisted single-site cholecystectomy in children. J Pediatr Surg 2015 ; 50 : 1842-1845.
 
29) Kulaylat AN, Richards H, Yada K, et al : Comparative analysis of robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy in pediatric patients. J Pediatr Surg 2021 ; 56 : 1876-1880.
PubMed
30) Nolan H, Glenn J : Minimally Invasive Pediatric Cholecystectomy : A Comparison of Robotic and Laparoscopic Single and Multiport Techniques. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2018 ; 28 : 770-773.
PubMed
31) Manciu S, Nae GA, Diaconu A, et al : Long-Term Evaluation of the Outcomes of Subtotal Laparoscopic and Robotic Splenectomy in Hereditary Spherocytosis. World J Surg 2020 ; 44 : 2220-2228.
PubMed
32) Shelby R, Kulaylat AN, Villella A, et al : A comparison of robotic-assisted splenectomy and laparoscopic splenectomy for children with hematologic disorders. J Pediatr Surg 2021 ; 56 : 1047-1050.
PubMed
33) Meehan JJ, Sandler A : Robotic repair of a Bochdalek congenital diaphragmatic hernia in a small neonate : robotic advantages and limitations. J Pediatr Surg 2007 ; 42 : 1757-1760.
 
34) Knight CG, Gidell KM, Lanning D, et al : Laparoscopic Morgagni hernia repair in children using robotic instruments. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2005 ; 15 : 482-486.
PubMed
35) Meehan JJ, Torres JE : Robotic repair of Morgagni congenital diaphragmatic hernia in an infant. J Robot Surg 2008 ; 2 : 97-99.
 
36) Slater BJ, Meehan JJ : Robotic repair of congenital diaphragmatic anomalies. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2009 ; 19 (Suppl 1) : S123-S127.
 
37) Xu PP, Chang XP, Tang ST, et al : Robot-assisted thoracoscopic plication for diaphragmatic eventration. J Pediatr Surg 2020 ; 55 : 2787-2790.
PubMed
38) Cundy TP, Marcus HJ, Clark J, et al : Robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery for pediatric solid tumors : a systematic review of feasibility and current status. Eur J Pediatr Surg 2014 ; 24 : 127-135.
PubMed
39) 家入里志, 小幡聡, 神保教広, ほか : 小児外科領域. 日コンピュータ外会誌 2015 ; 17 : 5-9.
 
40) 古賀寛之, 山高篤行 : ロボット支援下先天性胆道拡張症手術. 胆と膵 2021 ; 42 : 237-243.
Medical*Online
41) 漆原直人 : 小児外科領域における内視鏡下手術の現状と今後の展望. 医事新報 2017 ; 4880 : 57-58.
Medical*Online
42) 林祐太郎, 水野健太郎, 西尾英紀 : 小児泌尿器科の腹腔鏡手術とロボット支援手術. 現代医 2018 ; 66 : 33-40.
Medical*Online
43) 小林瑞貴, 井上高光, 奈良健平, ほか : 腎盂尿管移行部狭窄症に対するロボット支援腎盂形成術の初期経験-腹腔鏡下手術との比較検討-. 泌紀 2020 ; 66 : 1-4.
 
44) 江浦瑠美子, 中川昌之 : 小児先天性水腎症の治療方針について. 西日泌 2019 ; 81 : 582-593.
Medical*Online
45) Falkenback D, Lehane CW, Lord RV : Robot-assisted oesophageal and gastric surgery for benign disease : antireflux operations and Heller's myotomy. ANZ J Surg 2015 ; 85 : 113-120.
 
46) Wang Z, Zheng Q, Jin Z : Meta-analysis of robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication for gastrooesophageal reflux disease. ANZ J Surg 2012 ; 82 : 112-117.
PubMed
47) Georgeson KE, Inge TH, Albanese CT : Laparoscopically assisted anorectal pull-through for high imperforate anus : a new technique. J Pediatr Surg 2000 ; 35 : 927-930.
PubMed
48) Farello GA, Cerofolini A, Rebonato M, et al : Congenital choledochal cyst : video-guided laparoscopic treatment. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1995 ; 5 : 354-358.
PubMed
49) 永川裕一, 土田明彦 : 胆膵疾患のロボット手術はどこまで進歩したか. 消クリニカルアップデート 2019 ; 1 : 45-49.
 
50) Xie X, Feng L, Li K, et al : Learning curve of robot-assisted choledochal cyst excision in pediatrics : report of 60 cases. Surg Endosc 2021 ; 35 : 2690-2697.
 
51) 小島祥敬, 松岡香菜子, 星誠二, ほか : 小児泌尿器科疾患に対する最新治療-ロボット支援手術-. 日児腎誌 2018 ; 31 : 114-122.
 
52) 永川裕一, 土田明彦 : 腹腔鏡下・ロボット支援下膵切除術の現状と将来. 日臨外会誌 2020 ; 81 : 1683-1695.
 
53) 林祐太郎 : 小児泌尿器科領域におけるロボット手術の現況と問題点. 日本医事新報 2017 ; 4873 : 60-61.
Medical*Online
54) Zheng J, Wang Y, Zhang J, et al : 5G ultra-remote robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery in China. Surg Endosc 2020 ; 34 : 5172-5180.
 
P.375 掲載の参考文献
1) 日本膵・胆管合流異常研究会, 日本膵・胆管合流異常研究会診断基準検討委員会 : 先天性胆道拡張症の診断基準 2015. 胆道 2015 ; 29 : 870-873.
Medical*Online
2) 神澤輝実, 来間佐和子, 千葉和朗 : 先天性胆道拡張症と膵・胆管合流異常. 日消誌 2016 ; 113 : 1991-1997.
Medical*Online
3) Ohtsuka H, Fukase K, Yoshida H, et al : Long-term outcomes after extrahepatic excision of congenital choladocal cysts : 30 years of experience at a single center. Hepatogastroenterology 2015 ; 62 : 1-5.
 
4) Naitoh T, Morikawa T, Tanaka N, et al : Early experience of robotic surgery for type I congenital dilatation of the bile duct. J Robotic Surg 2015 ; 9 : 143-148.
PubMed
5) Koga H, Murakami H, Ochi T, et al : Comparison of robotic versus laparoscopic hepaticojejunostomy for choledochal cyst in children : a first report. Pediatr Surg Int 2019 ; 35 : 1421-1425.
PubMed
6) 矢田圭吾, 石橋広樹, 森大樹, ほか : 肝管空腸吻合-先天性胆道拡張症, 戸谷分類 IV-A型-. 胆と膵 2016 ; 37 : 215-220.
Medical*Online
7) Mizuguchi Y, Nakamura Y, Uchida E : Modified laparoscopic biliary enteric anastomosis procedure using handmade double-armed needles. Asian J Endosc Surg 2016 ; 9 : 93-96.
PubMed
8) Woo R, Le D, Albanese CT, et al : Robot-assisted laparoscopic resection of a type I choledochal cyst in a child. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2006 ; 16 : 179-183.
 
9) Xie X, Li K, Wang J, et al : Comparison of pediatric choledochal cyst excisions with open procedures, laparoscopic procedures and robot-assisted procedures : a retrospective study. Surg Endosc 2020 ; 34 : 3223-3231.
PubMed
10) Chua D, Syn N, Koh YX, et al : Learning curves in minimally invasive hepatectomy : systematic review and meta-regression analysis. Br J Surg 2021 ; 108 : 351-358.
PubMed
P.385 掲載の参考文献
1) Woo R, Le D, Albanese CT, et al : Robot-assisted laparoscopic resection of a type I choledochal cyst in a child. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2006 ; 16 : 179-183.
 
2) Koga H, Okawada M, Doi T, et al : Refining the intraoperative measurement of the distal intrapancreatic part of a choledochal cyst during laparoscopic repair allows near total excision. Pediatr Surg Int 2015 ; 31 : 991-994.
PubMed
3) Yamataka A, Lane GJ, Koga H, et al : Role of laparoscopy during surgery at the porta hepatis. S Afr Med J 2014 ; 104 : 820-824.
 
4) Miyano G, Koga H, Shimotakahara A, et al : Intralaparoscopic endoscopy : its value during laparoscopic repair of choledochal cyst. Pediatr Surg Int 2011 ; 27 : 463-466.
PubMed
5) Yamataka A, Kobayashi H, Shimotakahara A, et al : Recommendations for preventing complications related to Roux-en-Y hepatico-jejunostomy performed during excision of choledochal cyst in children. J Pediatr Surg 2003 ; 38 : 1830-1832.
 
6) Koga H, Ochi T, Murakami H, et al : Everting the Jejunal Mucosa Ensures a Secure Hepaticojejunostomy Anastomosis During Laparoscopic Repair of Choledochal Cyst in Children. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2019 ; 29 : 1345-1348.
 
7) Miyano T, Yamataka A, Kato Y, et al : Choledochal cysts : special emphasis on the usefulness of intraoperative endoscopy. J Pediatr Surg 1995 ; 30 : 482-484.
PubMed
8) Takahashi T, Shimotakahara A, Okazaki T, et al : Intraoperative endoscopy during choledochal cyst excision : extended long-term follow-up compared with recent cases. J Pediatr Surg 2010 ; 45 : 379-382.
 
9) Koga H, Ochi T, Murakami H, et al : A maneuver for successful anastomosis without haptic feedback during da Vinci robotic surgery. Hepaticojejunostomy for choledochal cyst in children. J Ped Endosc Surg 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42804-021-00092-y
 
10) Koga H, Murakami H, Ochi T, et al : Comparison of robotic versus laparoscopic hepaticojejunostomy for choledochal cyst in children : a first report. Pediatr Surg Int 2019 ; 35 : 1421-1425.
PubMed
P.390 掲載の参考文献
1) 加藤悠太郎, 杉岡篤, 小島正之, ほか : 【肝疾患を取り巻くAI・技術革新】ロボット支援下肝切除術. 肝臓クリニカルアップデート 2019 ; 5 : 33-38.
 
2) Giulianotti PC, Sbrana F, Coratti A, et al : Totally robotic right hepatectomy : surgical technique and outcomes. Arch Surg 2011 ; 146 : 844-850.
PubMed
3) Boggi U, Caniglia F, Amorese G : Laparoscopic robot-assisted major hepatectomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2014 ; 21 : 3-10.
PubMed
4) Yang HY, Rho SY, Han DH, et al : Robotic major liver resections : Surgical outcomes compared with open major liver resections. Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2021 ; 25 : 8-17.
PubMed
5) Sucandy I, Ross S, Rosemurgy A : Robotic Resection of a Type IIIB Klatskin Tumor. J Gastrointest Surg 2021 ; 25 : 1939-1940.
PubMed
6) Xu Y, Wang H, Ji W, et al : Robotic radical resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma : perioperative and long-term outcomes of an initial series. Surg Endosc 2016 ; 30 : 3060-3070.
 
7) Shyr BU, Shyr BS, Chen SC, et al : Mesopancreas level 3 dissection in robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy. Surgery 2021 ; 169 : 362-368.
PubMed
8) Shyr BU, Chen SC, Shyr YM, et al : Surgical, survival, and oncological outcomes after vascular resection in robotic and open pancreaticoduodenectomy. Surg Endosc 2020 ; 34 : 377-383.
PubMed

VI. 膵臓

P.401 掲載の参考文献
1) Gagner M, Pomp A : Laparoscopic pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy. Surg Endosc 1994 ; 8 : 408-410.
PubMed
2) Cuschieri A, Jakimowicz JJ, van Spreeuwel J : Laparoscopic distal 70% pancreatectomy and splenectomy for chronic pancreatitis. Ann Surg 1996 ; 223 : 280-285.
PubMed
3) Palanivelu C, Jani K, Senthilnathan P, et al : Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy : technique and outcomes. J Am Coll Surg 2007 ; 205 : 222-230.
PubMed
4) Kendrick ML, Cusati D : Total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy : feasibility and outcome in an early experience. Arch Surg 2010 ; 145 : 19-23.
 
5) Himpens J, Leman G, Cadiere GB : Telesurgical laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 1998 ; 12 : 1091.
PubMed
6) Melvin WS, Needleman BJ, Krause KR, et al : Computer-enhanced robotic telesurgery. Initial experience in foregut surgery. Surg Endosc 2002 ; 16 : 1790-1792.
PubMed
7) Giulianotti PC, Coratti A, Angelini M, et al : Robotics in general surgery : personal experience in a large community hospital. Arch Surg 2003 ; 138 : 777-784.
 
8) Watson MD, Baimas-George MR, Thompson KJ, et al : Improved oncologic outcomes for minimally invasive left pancreatectomy : Propensity-score matched analysis of the National Cancer Database. J Surg Oncol 2020 ; 122 : 1383-1392.
PubMed
9) Kakeji Y, Takahashi A, Hasegawa H, et al : Surgical outcomes in gastroenterological surgery in Japan : Report of the National Clinical Database 2011-2018. Ann Gastroenterol Surg 2020 ; 4 : 250-274.
 
10) Podda M, Gerardi C, Di Saverio S, et al : Robotic-assisted versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy for patients with benign and malignant periampullary disease : a systematic review and meta-analysis of short-term outcomes. Surg Endosc 2020 ; 34 : 2390-2409.
PubMed
11) Kamarajah SK, Bundred J, Marc OS, et al : Robotic versus conventional laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol 2020 ; 46 : 6-14.
PubMed
12) Mavrovounis G, Diamantis A, Perivoliotis K, et al : Laparoscopic versus Robotic Peripheral Pancreatectomy : A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J BUON 2020 ; 25 : 2456-2475.
PubMed
13) Shi Y, Jin J, Qiu W, et al : Short-term Outcomes After Robot-Assisted vs Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy After the Learning Curve. JAMA Surg 2020 ; 155 : 389-394.
PubMed
14) Cai J, Ramanathan R, Zenati MS, et al : Robotic Pancreaticoduodenectomy Is Associated with Decreased Clinically Relevant Pancreatic Fistulas : a Propensity-Matched Analysis. J Gastrointest Surg 2020 ; 24 : 1111-1118.
PubMed
15) Chan KS, Wang ZK, Syn N, et al : Learning curve of laparoscopic and robotic pancreas resections : a systematic review. Surgery 2021 ; 170 : 194-206.
PubMed
16) Shi Y, Wang W, Qiu W, et al : Learning Curve From 450 Cases of Robot-Assisted Pancreaticoduocectomy in a High-Volume Pancreatic Center : Optimization of Operative Procedure and a Retrospective Study. Ann Surg 2019 Oct 22. doi : 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003664. Online ahead of print.
 
17) 厚生労働省保険局医療課 : 特掲診療料の施設基準等及びその届出に関する手続きの取扱いについて 令和2年3月5日 保医発0305 第3号. 2020 [https://www.mhlw.go.jp/content/12400000/000603894.pdf].
 
18) 日本肝胆膵外科学会, 日本内視鏡外科学会 : ロボット支援下膵切除術導入に関する指針. 2020 [http://www.jshbps.jp/uploads/files/about/rpd_shishin.pdf].
 
19) 日本肝胆膵外科学会, 日本内視鏡外科学会 : ロボット支援下膵切除術プロクター基準. 2020 [http://www.jshbps.jp/uploads/files/about/rpd.pdf].
 
20) Asbun HJ, Moekotte AL, Vissers FL, et al : The Miami International Evidence-based Guidelines on Minimally Invasive Pancreas Resection. Ann Surg 2020 ; 271 : 1-14.
PubMed
21) Nakamura M, Wakabayashi G, Tsuchida A, et al : Precision anatomy for minimally invasive hepatobiliary pancreatic surgery : PAM-HBP Surgery Project. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2020 Dec 15. doi : 10.1002/jhbp.885. Online ahead of print.
 
22) Ban D, Garbarino GM, Ishikawa Y, et al : Surgical approaches for minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy : a systematic review. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2021 Feb 1. doi : 10.1002/jhbp.902. Online ahead of print.
 
23) Nagakawa Y, Watanabe Y, Kozono S, et al : Surgical approaches to the superior mesenteric artery during minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy : A systematic review. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2021 Feb 1. doi : 10.1002/jhbp.905. Online ahead of print.
 
24) Nakata K, Higuchi R, Ikenaga N, et al : Precision anatomy for safe approach to pancreatoduodenectomy for both open and minimally invasive procedure : a systematic review. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2021 Feb 3. doi : 10.1002/jhbp.901. Online ahead of print.
 
25) Nishino H, Zimmitti G, Ohtsuka T, et al : Precision vascular anatomy for minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy : A systematic review. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2021 Feb 1. doi : 10.1002/jhbp.903. Online ahead of print.
 
P.407 掲載の参考文献
1) Melvin WS, Needleman BJ, Krause KR, et al : Computer-enhanced robotic telesurgery. Initial experience in foregut surgery. Surg Endosc 2002 ; 16 : 1790-1792.
PubMed
2) Giulianotti PC, Coratti A, Angelini M, et al : Robotics in general surgery : personal experience in a large community hospital. Arch Surg 2003 ; 138 : 777-784.
 
3) Shakir M, Boone BA, Polanco PM, et al : The learning curve for robotic distal pancreatectomy : an analysis of outcomes of the first 100 consecutive cases at a high-volume pancreatic centre. HPB (Oxford) 2015 ; 17 : 580-586.
 
4) Napoli N, Kauffmann EF, Perrone VG, et al : The learning curve in robotic distal pancreatectomy. Updates Surg 2015 ; 67 : 257-264.
PubMed
5) Liu R, Wakabayashi G, Palanivelu C, et al : International consensus statement on robotic pancreatic surgery. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr 2019 ; 8 : 345-360.
PubMed
6) Chan KS, Wang ZK, Syn N, et al : Learning curve of laparoscopic and robotic pancreas resections : a systematic review. Surgery 2021 ; 170 : 194-206.
PubMed
7) Weng Y, Jin J, Huo Z, et al : Robotic-assisted versus open distal pancreatectomy for benign and low-grade malignant pancreatic tumors : a propensity score-matched study. Surg Endosc 2021 ; 35 : 2255-2264.
PubMed
8) Xourafas D, Ashley SW, Clancy TE : Comparison of perioperative outcomes between open, laparoscopic, and robotic distal pancreatectomy : an analysis of 1815 patients from the ACS-NSQIP procedure-targeted pancreatectomy database. J Gastrointest Surg 2017 ; 21 : 1442-1452.
PubMed
9) Magistri P, Boggi U, Esposito A, et al : Robotic vs open distal pancreatectomy : A multi-institutional matched comparison analysis. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2020 Dec 12. doi : 10.1002/jhbp.881. Online ahead of print.
 
10) Nassour I, Winters SB, Hoehn R, et al : Long-term oncologic outcomes of robotic and open pancreatectomy in a national cohort of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. J Surg Oncol 2020 ; 122 : 234-242.
 
11) Liu R, Liu Q, Zhao ZM, et al : Robotic versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy : A propensity scorematched study. J Surg Oncol 2017 ; 116 : 461-469.
 
12) Kamarajah SK, Sutandi N, Robinson SR, et al : Robotic versus conventional laparoscopic distal pancreatic resection : a systematic review and meta-analysis. HPB (Oxford) 2019 ; 21 : 1107-1118.
PubMed
13) Qu L, Zhiming Z, Xianglong T, et al : Short- and mid-term outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic distal pancreatosplenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma : A retrospective propensity score-matched study. Int J Surg 2018 ; 55 : 81-86.
 
14) Boone BA, Zenati M, Hogg ME, et al : Assessment of quality outcomes for robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy : Identification of the learning curve. JAMA Surg 2015 ; 150 : 416-422.
PubMed
15) Zureikat AH, Beane JD, Zenati MS, et al : 500 minimally invasive robotic pancreatoduodenectomies : One decade of optimizing performance. Ann Surg 2021 ; 273 : 966-972.
PubMed
16) Zwart MJW, Nota CLM, de Rooij T, et al : Outcomes of a multicenter training program in robotic pancreatoduodenectomy (LAELAPS-3). Ann Surg 2021 Feb 1. doi : 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004783.
 
17) van Oosten AF, Ding D, Habib JR, et al : Perioperative outcomes of robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy : a propensity-matched analysis to open and laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 2021 ; 25 : 1795-1804.
PubMed
18) Podda M, Gerardi C, Di Saverio S, et al : Robotic-assisted versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy for patients with benign and malignant periampullary disease : a systematic review and meta-analysis of short-term outcomes. Surg Endosc 2020 ; 34 : 2390-2409.
PubMed
19) Weng Y, Jiang Y, Fu N, et al : Oncological outcomes of robotic-assisted versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma : a propensity score-matched analysis. Surg Endosc 2021 ; 35 : 3437-3448.
PubMed
20) Kamarajah SK, Bundred J, Marc OS, et al : Robotic versus conventional laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol 2020 ; 46 : 6-14.
PubMed
21) Aiolfi A, Lombardo F, Bonitta G, et al : Systematic review and updated network meta-analysis comparing open, laparoscopic, and robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy. Updates Surg 2021 ; 73 : 909-922.
PubMed
22) van Hilst J, de Rooij T, Abu Hilal M, et al : Worldwide survey on opinions and use of minimally invasive pancreatic resection. HPB (Oxford) 2017 ; 19 : 190-204.
 
P.418 掲載の参考文献
1) Giulianotti PC, Mangano A, Bustos RE, et al : Operative technique in robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD) at University of Illinois at Chicago (UIC) : 17 steps standardized technique : Lessons learned since the first worldwide RPD performed in the year 2001. Surg Endosc 2018 ; 32 : 4329-4336.
PubMed
P.425 掲載の参考文献
1) 永川裕一, 小薗真吾, 瀧下智恵, ほか : ロボット支援下膵頭十二指腸切除術 東京医科大学方式. 臨外 2021 ; 76 : 310-323.
 
2) 永川裕一, 瀧下智恵, 刑部弘哲, ほか : 良性～低悪性度腫瘍に対する腹腔鏡下膵頭十二指腸切除術に必要な局所解剖. 手術 2020 ; 74 : 779-787.
 
3) Nagakawa Y, Yi SQ, Takishita C, et al : Precise anatomical resection based on structures of nerve and fibrous tissue around the superior mesenteric artery for mesopancreas dissection in pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2020 ; 27 : 342-351.
PubMed
4) Nagakawa Y, Takishita C, Hijikata Y, et al : Blumgart method using LAPRA-TY clips facilitates pancreaticojejunostomy in laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy. Medicine (Baltimore) 2020 ; 99 : e19474.
PubMed
P.432 掲載の参考文献
1) Kiguchi G, Sugioka A, Uchida Y, et al : Wrapping double-mattress anastomosis for pancreaticojejunostomy in minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy can significantly reduce postoperative pancreatic fistula rate compared with conventional pancreaticojejunostomy in open surgery : An analysis of a propensity score-matched sample. Surg Oncol 2021 ; 38 : 101577.
PubMed
2) Kiguchi G, Sugioka A, Kato Y, et al : Use of a novel semi-derotation technique for artery-first approach in laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy. Surg Oncol 2020 ; 33 : 141-142.
PubMed
P.443 掲載の参考文献
1) de Rooij T, van Hilst J, van Santvoort H, et al : Minimally Invasive Versus Open Distal Pancreatectomy (LEOPARD) : A Multicenter Patient-blinded Randomized Controlled Trial. Ann Surg 2019 ; 269 : 2-9.
 
2) Huang B, Feng L, Zhao J : Systematic review and meta-analysis of robotic versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for benign and malignant pancreatic lesions. Surg Endosc 2016 ; 30 : 4078-4085.
PubMed
3) Gavriilidis P, Lim C, Menahem B, et al : Robotic versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy - The first meta-analysis. HPB (Oxford) 2016 ; 18 : 567-574.
PubMed
4) Guerrini GP, Lauretta A, Belluco C, et al : Robotic versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy : an up-to-date meta-analysis. BMC Surg 2017 ; 17 : 105.
PubMed
5) Niu X, Yu B, Yao L, et al : Comparison of surgical outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy versus laparoscopic and open resections : A systematic review and meta-analysis. Asian J Surg 2019 ; 42 : 32-45.
PubMed
6) Watson MD, Baimas-George MR, Thompson KJ, et al : Improved oncologic outcomes for minimally invasive left pancreatectomy : Propensity-score matched analysis of the National Cancer Database. J Surg Oncol 2020 ; 122 : 1383-1392.
PubMed
7) Weber SM, Cho CS, Merchant N, et al : Laparoscopic left pancreatectomy : complication risk score correlates with morbidity and risk for pancreatic fistula. Ann Surg Oncol 2009 ; 16 : 2825-2833.
PubMed
8) Choi SH, Kang CM, Lee WJ, et al : Multimedia article. Laparoscopic modified anterior RAMPS in well-selected left-sided pancreatic cancer : technical feasibility and interim results. Surg Endosc 2011 ; 25 : 2360-2361.
PubMed
9) Lee SH, Kang CM, Hwang HK, et al : Minimally invasive RAMPS in well-selected left-sided pancreatic cancer within Yonsei criteria : long-term ( > median 3 years) oncologic outcomes. Surg Endosc 2014 ; 28 : 2848-2855.
PubMed
10) Morikawa T, Ishida M, Takadate T, et al : The superior approach with the stomach roll-up technique improves intraoperative outcomes and facilitates learning laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy : a comparative study between the superior and inferior approach. Surg Today 2020 ; 50 : 153-162.
PubMed
11) van Hilst J, de Rooij T, Klompmaker S, et al : Minimally Invasive versus Open Distal Pancreatectomy for Ductal Adenocarcinoma (DIPLOMA) : A Pan-European Propensity Score Matched Study. Ann Surg 2019 ; 269 : 10-17.
PubMed
12) Qu L, Zhiming Z, Xianglong T, et al : Short- and mid-term outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic distal pancreatosplenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma : A retrospective propensity score-matched study. Int J Surg 2018 ; 55 : 81-86.
 
13) Raoof M, Ituarte PHG, Woo Y, et al : Propensity score-matched comparison of oncological outcomes between laparoscopic and open distal pancreatic resection. Br J Surg 2018 ; 105 : 578-586.
PubMed
P.452 掲載の参考文献
1) Noshiro H, Ikeda O, Urata M : Robotically-enhanced surgical anatomy enables surgeons to perform distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer using electric cautery devices alone. Surg Endosc 2014 ; 28 : 1180-1187.
PubMed
2) 井手貴雄, 與田幸恵, 能城浩和 : 消化器外科のロボット支援下手術. LiSA 2018 ; 25 : 870-873.
 
3) Noshiro H, Nomura A, Akashi M, et al : Pure robotic surgery for intraluminally growing gastrointestinal stromal tumors around the esophagogastric junction or pyloric ring. Hepatogastroenterology 2015 ; 62 : 629-634.
PubMed
4) 能城浩和, 與田幸恵, 岩崎寛智 : 手術支援ロボットを用いた食道癌根治術. 手術 2017 ; 71 : 735-741.
 
5) 與田幸恵, 能城浩和 : ロボット支援下食道切除術. 臨外 2019 ; 74 : 298-302.
 
6) 井手貴雄, 能城浩和 : ロボット支援下膵体尾部切除術 佐賀大学方式. 臨外 2021 ; 76 : 340-344.
 
7) 井手貴雄, 江川紀幸, 田中智和, ほか : ロボット支援下尾側膵切除術における手術手技. 手術 2021 ; 75 : 1025-1030.
 
8) Ecker BL, McMillan MT, Allegrini V, et al : Risk factors and mitigation strategies for pancratic fistula after distal pancreatectomy. Analysis of 2026 resections from the international, multi-institutional distal pancreatectomy study group. Ann Surg 2019 ; 269 : 143-149.
 
9) Ratnayake CBB, Wells C, Hammond J, et al : Network meta-analysis comparing techniques and outcomes of stump closure after distal pancreatectomy. Br J Surg 2019 ; 106 : 1580-1589.
PubMed

VII. 麻酔

P.464 掲載の参考文献
1) Grifflin SM, Shaw IH, Dresner SM : Early complications after Ivor Lewis subtotal esophagectomy with two field lymphadenectomy : risk factors and management. J Am Coll Surg 2002 ; 194 : 285-297.
 
2) Hulscher JB, van Sandick JW, de Boer AGEM, et al : Extended transthoracic resection compared with limited transhiatal resection for adenocartinoma of the esophagus. N Engl J Med 2002 ; 347 : 1662-1669.
 
3) 中村廣重 : ロボット手術の歴史. ロボット手術マニュアル. メジカルビュー, 2012 ; 20-24.
 
4) Suda K, Ishida Y, Kawamura Y, et al : Robot-assisted thoracoscopic lymphadenectomy along the left recurrent laryngeal nerve for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in the prone position : technical report and short-term outcomes. World J Surg 2012 ; 36 : 1608-1616.
PubMed
5) van Hillegersberg R, Boone J, Draaisma WA, et al : First experience with robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagolymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer. Surg Endosc 2006 ; 20 : 1435-1439.
PubMed
6) Noshiro H, Miyake S : Thoracoscopic esophagectomy using Prone positioning. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013 ; 19 : 399-408.
 
7) Ruurda JP, van der Sluis PC, van der Horst S, et al : Robot-assisted minimaliy invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer : a systematic review. J Surg Oncol 2015 ; 112 : 257-265.
PubMed
8) van der Sluis PC, van der Horst S, May AM, et al : Robot-assisted minimally invasive thoracolaparoscopic esophagectomy versus open transthoracic esophagectomy for resectable esophageal cancer. A randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 2019 ; 269 : 621-630.
PubMed
9) Harbison GJ, Vossler JD, Yim NH, et al : Outcomes of robotic versus non-robotic minimally-invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer : an American College of Surgeons NSQIP database analysis. Am Surg 2019 ; 218 : 1223-1228.
PubMed
10) Gronkjar M, Eliasen M, Skov-Ettrup LS, et al : Preoperative smoking status and postoperative complications : a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 2014 ; 259 : 52-71.
 
11) 工藤明, 高瀬肇, 片貝宏 : アルコール多飲者はICUでせん妄状態を起こしやすいのか? 日集中医誌 2011 ; 18 : 355-362.
 
12) Ely EW, Shintani A, Truman B, et al : Delirium as a predictor of mortality in mechanically ventilated patients in the intensive care unit. JAMA 2004 ; 291 : 1753-1762.
PubMed
13) Akutsu Y, Matsubara H : Perioperative management for the prevention of postoperative pneumonia with esophageal surgery. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2009 ; 15 : 280-285.
PubMed
14) Soutome S, Yanamoto S, Funahara M, et al : Effect of perioperative oral care on prevention of postoperative pneumonia associated with esophageal cancer surgery : a multicenter case-control study with propensity score matching analysis. Medicine 2017 ; 96 : e7436.
 
15) 能城浩和, 森田茂樹, 宮崎耕治 : da Vinci Surgical Systemにも対応できる内視鏡外科手術に特化した専用手術室. 消外 2014 ; 37 : 1473-1479.
 
16) Jaeger JM, Colins SR, Blank RS : Anesthetic management for esophageal resection. Anesthesiol Clin 2012 ; 30 : 731-747.
 
17) Ng JM : Perioperative anesthetic management for esophagectomy. Anesthesiol Clin 2008 ; 26 : 293-304.
PubMed
18) Michelet P, Roch A, D'Journo XB, et al : Effect of thoracic epidural analgesia on gastric blood flow after oesophagectomy. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2007 ; 51 : 587-594.
 
19) Holte K, Sharrock NE, Kehlet H : Pathophysiology and clinical implications of perioperative fluid excess. Br J Anaesth 2002 ; 89 : 622-632.
PubMed
20) Durkin C, Schisler T, Lohser J : Current trends in anesthesia for esophagectomy. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2017 ; 30 : 30-35.
PubMed
21) Veelo DP, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Ouwehand KS, et al : Effect of goal-directed therapy on outcome after esophageal surgery : A quality improvement study. PLoS One 2017 ; 12 : e0172806.
 
22) Furguson ND, Fan E, Camporota L, et al : The Berlin definition of ARDS : an expanded rationale, justification, and supplementary material. Intensive Care Med 2012 ; 38 : 1573-1582.
 
23) Amato MB, Meade MO, Slutsky AS, et al : Driving pressure and survival in the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 2015 ; 372 : 747-755.
PubMed
24) Ostberg E, Thorisson A, Enlund M, et al : Positive End-expiratory Pressure Alone Minimizes Atelectasis Formation in Nonabdominal Surgery : A Randomized Controlled Trial. Anesthesiology 2018 ; 128 : 1117-1124.
PubMed
25) Chua MT, Khan FA, Ng WM, et al : Pre- and Apnoeic high flow oxygenation for Rapid sequence intubation in The Emergency department (Pre-AeRATE) : study protocol for a multicentre, randomized controlled trial. Trials 2019 ; 20 : 195.
PubMed
26) Reeb J, Falcoz PE, Santelmo N, et al : Double Lumen Bi-Cava Cannula for Veno-Venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation as Bridge to Lung Transplantation in Non-Intubated Patient. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2012 ; 14 : 125-127.
PubMed
27) Fabian T, Martin J, Katigbak M, et al : Thoracoscopic esophageal mobilization during minimally invasive esophagectomy : a head-to-head comparison of prone versus decubitus positions. Surg Endosc 2008 ; 22 : 2485-2491.
PubMed
28) Noshiro H, Iwasaki H, Kobayashi K, et al : Lymphadenectomy along the left recurrent laryngeal nerve by a minimally invasive esophagectomy in the prone position for thoracic esophageal cancer. Surg Endosc 2010 ; 24 : 2965-2973.
PubMed
29) Kanekiyo S, Takeda S, Tsutsui M, et al : Low invasiveness of thoracoscopic esophagectomy in the prone position for esophageal cancer : a propensity score-matched comparison of operative approaches between thoracoscopic and open esophagectomy. Surg Endosc 2018 ; 32 : 1945-1953.
PubMed
30) Seesing MFJ, Goense L, Ruurda JP, et al : Minimally invasive esophagectomy : a propensity scorematched analysis of semiprone versus prone position. Surg Endosc 2018 ; 32 : 2758-2765.
 
31) Cai L, Li Y, Sun Li, et al : Better perioperative outcomes in thoracoscopic-esophagectomy with two-lung ventilation in semi-prone position. J Thorac Dis 2017 ; 9 : 117-122.
PubMed
32) Usami J, Hirota K, Horikawa H, et al : Comparison of Anesthetic Management of Complete Thoracoscopic Esophagectomy in the Prone Position and Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Esophagectomy with Minithoracotomy in the Left Lateral Position. The Journal of Japan Society for Clinical Anesthesia 2016 ; 36 : 399-403.
 
33) Saikawa D, Okushiba S, Kawata M, et al : Efficacy and safety of artificial pneumothorax under two-lung ventilation in thoracoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer in the prone position. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2014 ; 62 : 163-170.
PubMed
34) Tanigawa T, Nakamura K, Yamashita T, et al : Changes in respiratory mechanics of artificial pneumothorax two-lung ventilation in video-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy in prone position. Sci Rep 2021 ; 11 : 6978.
 
35) Young CC, Harris EM, Vacchiano C, et al : Lung-protective ventilation for the surgical patient : international expert panel-based consensus recommendations. Br J Anaesth 2019 ; 123 : 898-913.
 
36) 澤田敦史 : 麻酔・手術時の低体温 : その悪影響. 山蔭道明編, 周術期の体温管理 第1版, 克誠堂出版, 2011 ; 66-80.
 
37) Schweickert WD, Pohlman MC, Pohlman AS, et al : Early physical and occupational therapy in mechanically ventilated, critically ill patients : a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2009 ; 373 : 1874-1882.
PubMed
38) Kita T, Mammoto T, Kishi Y : Fluid management and postoperative respiratory disturbances in patients with transthoracic esophagectomy for carcinoma. J Clin Anesth 2002 ; 14 : 252-256.
PubMed
39) McClave SA, Taylor BE, Martindale RG, et al : Guidelines for the Provision and Assessment of Nutrition Support Therapy in the Adult Critically Ill Patient : Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM) and American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (A.S.P.E.N.). JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 2016 ; 40 : 159-211.
 
40) Takagi K, Yamamori H, Toyoda Y, et al : Modulating effects of the feeding route on stress response and endotoxin translocation in severely stressed patients receiving thoracic esophagectomy. Nutrition 2000 ; 16 : 355-360.
PubMed
P.471 掲載の参考文献
1) Son T, Hyung WJ : Robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer. J Surg Oncol 2015 ; 112 : 271-278.
PubMed
2) 日本ペインクリニック学会・日本麻酔科学会・日本区域麻酔学会合同 抗血栓療法中の区域麻酔・神経ブロックガイドライン作成ワーキンググループ編 : 抗血栓療法中の区域麻酔・神経ブロックガイドライン. 2016. https://www.jspc.gr.jp/Contents/public/kaiin_guideline01.html (参照 2021年7月10日)
 
3) Bruintjes MH, van Helden EV, Braat AE, et al : Deep neuromuscular block to optimize surgical space conditions during laparoscopic surgery : a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth 2017 ; 118 : 834-842.
PubMed
4) Choi BM, Ki SH, Lee YH, et al : Effects of depth of neuromuscular block on postoperative pain during laparoscopic gastrectomy : A randomised controlled trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2019 ; 36 : 863-870.
PubMed
5) Kotake Y, Ochiai R, Suzuki T, et al : Reversal with sugammadex in the absence of monitoring did not preclude residual neuromuscular block. Anesth Analg 2013 ; 117 : 345-351.
 
6) Baraka A, Jabbour S, Hammoud R, et al : End-tidal carbon dioxide tension during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Correlation with the baseline value prior to carbon dioxide insufflation. Anaesthesia 1994 ; 49 : 304-306.
PubMed
7) Ellis DB, Albrecht MA : 71. Anesthesia for Robotic Surgery. Gropper MA, Miller's Anesthesia 9th Edition. Elsevier, Inc., Canada, 2020 ; 2236-2250.
 
8) Sharma KC, Brandstetter RD, Brensilver JM, et al : Cardiopulmonary physiology and pathophysiology as a consequence of laparoscopic surgery. Chest 1996 ; 110 : 810-815.
PubMed
9) Odeberg-Wernerman S : Laparoscopic surgery-effects on circulatory and respiratory physiology : an overview. Eur J Surg 2000 ; Suppl 585 : 4-11.
 
10) Demyttenaere S, Feldman LS, Fried GM : Effect of pneumoperitoneum on renal perfusion and function : a systematic review. Surg Endosc 2007 ; 21 : 152-160.
PubMed
11) Ott DE : Subcutaneous Emphysema-Beyond the Pneumoperitoneum. JSLS 2014 ; 18 : 1-7.
PubMed
12) 謝宗安 : 腹腔鏡下手術とガス塞栓. 臨外 2005 ; 60 : 355-362.
 
P.477 掲載の参考文献
1) Corcione A, Angelini P, Bencini L, et al : Joint consensus on abdominal robotic surgery and anesthesia from a task force of the SIAARTI and SIC. Minerva Anestesiol 2018 ; 84 : 1189-1208.
PubMed
2) Gan TJ, Belani KG, Bergese S, et al : Fourth Consensus Guidelines for the Management of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting. Anesth Analg 2020 ; 131 : 411-448.
PubMed
3) Fuchs-Buder T, Claudius C, Skovgaard LT, et al : Good clinical research practice in pharmacodynamic studies of neuromuscular blocking agents II : the Stockholm revision. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2007 ; 51 : 789-808.
PubMed
P.489 掲載の参考文献
1) Blasi A : Coagulopathy in liver disease : lack of an assessment tool. World J Gastroenterol 2015 ; 21 : 10062-10071.
PubMed
2) Kato A, Nakamoto Y, Ishimori T, et al : Predictability of 99mTc-galactosyl human serum albumin scintigraphy for posthepatectomy liver failure. Am J Roentgenol 2018 ; 210 : 158-165.
 
3) 山田哲 : Gd-EOB-DTPA 造影MRIによる肝機能評価. 日磁医誌 2019 ; 39 : 137-144.
 
4) Powell-Jackson P, Greenway B, Williams R : Adverse effects of exploratory laparotomy in patients with unsuspected liver disease. Br J Surg 1982 ; 69 : 449-451.
PubMed
5) Pugh RNH, Murray-Lyon IM, Dawson JL, et al : Transection of the esophagus in bleeding oesophageal varices. Br J Surg 1973 ; 60 : 648-652.
 
6) Kamath PS, Wiesner RH, Malinchoc M, et al : A model to predict survival in patients with end-stage liver disease. Hepatology 2001 ; 33 : 464-470
 
7) Northup PG, Wanamaker RC, Lee VD, et al : Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) predicts non-transplant surgical mortality in patients with cirrhosis. Ann Surg 2005 ; 242 : 244-251.
 
8) Teh SH, Christein J, Donohue J, et al : Hepatic resection of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis : Model of End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score predicts perioperative mortality. J Gastrointest Surg 2005 ; 9 : 1207-1215.
PubMed
9) Hanje AJ, Patel T : Preoperative evaluation of patients with liver disease. Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol 2007 ; 4 : 266-276.
PubMed
10) Kozek-Langenecker SA, Afshari A, Albaladejo P, et al : Management of severe perioperative bleeding : guidelines from the European Society of Anaesthesiology. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2013 ; 30 : 270-382.
PubMed
11) Bovill JG : Inhalation anaesthesia : from diethyl ether to xenon. Handb Exp Pharmacol 2008 ; 182 : 121-145.
PubMed
12) Devlin JW, Roberts RJ : Pharmacology of commonly used analgesics and sedatives in the ICU : benzodiazepines, propofol, and opioids. Anesthesiol Clin 2011 ; 29 : 567-585.
PubMed
13) Hughes MA, Glass PS, Jacobs JR : Context-sensitive half-time in multicompartment pharmacokinetics models for intravenous anesthetic drugs. Anesthesiology 199 ; 76 : 334-341.
 
14) Zhang Y, Liu M, Yang Y, et al : Dexmedetomidine exerts a protective effect on ischemia-reperfusion injury after hepatectomy. A prostpective randomized controlled study. J Clin Anesth 2020 ; 61 : 109631.
 
15) Kilpatrick GJ, McIntyre MS, Cox RF, et al : CNS 7056 : a novel ultra-short-acting Benzodiazepine. Anesthesiology 2007 ; 107 : 60-66
 
16) アネレム(R) 静注用50mg 添付文書. https://www.info.pmda.go.jp/go/pack/11194A1F1029_1_02/11194A1F1029_1_02?view=body&lang=ja
 
17) Haberer JP, Schoeffler P, Couderc E, et al : Fentanyl pharmacokinetics in anaesthetized patients with cirrhosis. Br J Anaesth 1982 ; 54 : 1267-1270.
PubMed
18) Pitsiu M, Wilmer A, Bodenham A, et al : Pharmacokinetics of remifentanil and its major metabolite, remifentanil acid, in ICU patients with renal impairment. Br J Anaesth 2004 ; 92 : 493-503.
PubMed
19) Kiamanesh D, Rumley J, Moitra V : Monitoring and managing hepatic disease in anesthesia. Br J Anaesth 2013 ; 111 suppl1 : i50-i61
 
20) Fujita A, Ishibe N, Yoshihara T, et al : Rapid reversal of neuromuscular blockade by sugammadex after continuous infusion of rocuronium in patients with liver dysfunction undergoing hepatic surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwan 2014 ; 52 : 54-58.
PubMed
21) Eleveld DJ, Kuizenga K, Proost JH, Wierda JM : A temporary decrease in twitch response during reversal of rocuronium-induced muscle relaxation with a small dose of sugammadex. Anesth Analg 2007 ; 104 : 582-584.
PubMed
22) Vandermeulen EP, Van Aken H, Vermylen J : Anticoagulants and spinal-epidural anesthesia. Anesth Analg 1994 ; 79 : 1165-1177.
PubMed
23) 日本ペインクリニック学会・日本麻酔科学会・日本区域麻酔学会 合同 抗血栓療法中の区域麻酔・神経ブロックガイドライン作成ワーキンググループ : ガイドラインにおける, 抗血栓薬取り扱いの問題点と考え方. 2016 ; 18-24.
 
24) Jokinen MJ, Neuvonen PJ, Lindgren L, et al : Pharmacokinetics of ropivacaine in patients with chronic end-stage liver disease. Anesthesiology 2007 ; 106 : 43-55.
PubMed
25) Central venous pressure and its effect on blood loss during liver resection. Jones RM, Moulton CE, Hardy KJ. Br J Surg 1998 ; 85 : 1058-1060.
PubMed
26) Gurusamy KS, Li J, Vaughan J, et al : Cardiopulmonary interventions to decrease blood loss and blood transfusion requirements for liver resection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 May 16 ; 2012 (5) : CD007338.
PubMed
27) Hughes MJ, Ventham NT, Harrison EM, et al : Central venous pressure and liver resection : a systematic review and meta-analysis. HPB (Oxford). 2015 ; 17 : 863-871.
PubMed
28) Moggia E, Rouse B, Simillis C, et al : Methods to decrease blood loss during liver resection : a network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016 ; 10 : CD010683.
PubMed
29) Yu L, Sun H, Jin H, Tan H : The effect of low central venous pressure on hepatic surgical field bleeding and serum lactate in patients undergoing partial hepatectomy : a prospective randomized controlled trial. BMC Surg 2020 ; 20 : 25.
PubMed
30) De Ledinghen V, Heresbach D, Fourdan O, et al : Anti-inflammatory drugs and variceal bleeding : a case-control study. Gut 1999 ; 44 : 270-273.
PubMed
31) Hayward K, Powell E, Irvine K, et al : Can paracetamol (acetaminophen) be administered to patients with liver impairment? Brit J Clin Pharmaco 2016 ; 81 : 210-222.
 
32) 中村智之, 西田修. 人工肝臓. 人工臓器 2014 ; 3 : 179-184.
 
33) Lin CS, Lin SY, Chang CC, et al : Postoperative adverse outcomes after nonhepatic surgery in patients with liver cirrhosis. Br J Surg 2013 ; 100 : 1784-1790.
 
34) Salerno F, Gerbes A, Gines P, et al : Diagnosis, prevention and treatment of hepatorenal syn- drome in cirrhosis. Gut 2007 ; 56 : 1310-1318.
 
35) Jaques DA, Spahr L, Berra G, et al : Biomarkers for acute kidney injury in decompensated cirrhosis : A prospective study. Nephrology (Carlton) 2019 ; 24 : 170-180.
PubMed
36) Salerno F, Navickis RJ, Wilkes MM. Albumin treatment regimen for type 1 hepatorenal syndrome : a dose-response meta-analysis. BMC Gastroenterol 2015 ; 15 : 167.
PubMed
37) Merli M, Lucidi C, Di Gregorio V, et al : An empirical broad spectrum antibiotic therapy in health-care-associated infections improves survival in patients with cirrhosis : A randomized trial. Hepatology 2016 ; 63 : 1632-1639.
PubMed
P.495 掲載の参考文献
1) 西村欣也, 片岡久実 : 内視鏡下手術の麻酔～低侵襲性への挑戦～. 臨麻 2019 ; 43 : 815-828.
Medical*Online
P.502 掲載の参考文献
1) 石田善敬, 宇山一朗, 金谷誠一郎 : 胃癌に対するロボット手術. 外科治療 2009 ; 101 : 15-9.
Medical*Online
2) Melvin WS, Needleman BJ, Krause KR, et al : Computer-enhanced robotic telesurgery. Initial experience in foregut surgery. Surg Endosc 2002 ; 16 : 1790-1792.
PubMed
3) Giulianotti PC, Coratti A, Angelini M, et al : Robotics in general surgery : personal experience in a large community hospital. Arch Surg 2003 ; 138 : 777-784.
 
4) Hoehn RS, Nassour I, Adam MA, et al : National Trends in Robotic Pancreas Surgery. J Gastrointest Surg 2021 ; 25 : 983-790.
PubMed
5) Madsen MV, Staehr-Rye AK, Gatke MR, et al : Neuromuscular blockade for optimising surgical conditions during abdominal and gynaecological surgery : a systematic review. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2015 ; 59 : 1-16.
PubMed
6) Madsen MV, Gatke MR, Springborg HH, et al : Optimising abdominal space with deep neuromuscular blockade in gynaecologic laparoscopy--a randomised, blinded crossover study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2015 ; 59 : 441-447.
PubMed
7) Martini CH, Boon M, Bevers RF, et al : Evaluation of surgical conditions during laparoscopic surgery in patients with moderate vs deep neuromuscular block. Br J Anaesth 2014 ; 112 : 498-505.
PubMed
8) Sessler DI, Bloomstone JA, Aronson S, et al : Perioperative Quality Initiative consensus statement on intraoperative blood pressure, risk and outcomes for elective surgery. Br J Anaesth 2019 ; 122 : 563-574.
PubMed
9) Maheshwari K, Turan A, Mao G, et al : The association of hypotension during non-cardiac surgery, before and after skin incision, with postoperative acute kidney injury : a retrospective cohort analysis. Anaesthesia 2018 ; 73 : 1223-1228.
PubMed
10) Bijker JB, Persoon S, Peelen LM, et al : Intraoperative hypotension and perioperative ischemic stroke after general surgery : a nested case-control study. Anesthesiology 2012 ; 116 : 658-664.
PubMed
11) Sellden E, Branstrom R, Brundin T : Preoperative infusion of amino acids prevents postoperative hypothermia. Br J Anaesth 1996 ; 76 : 227-234.
PubMed
12) Ryu JH, Kang MH, Park KS, et al : Effects of magnesium sulphate on intraoperative anaesthetic requirements and postoperative analgesia in gynaecology patients receiving total intravenous anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth 2008 ; 100 : 397-403.
PubMed
13) Catheline JM, Capelluto E, Gaillard JL, et al : Thromboembolism prophylaxis and incidence of thromboembolic complications after laparoscopic surgery. Int J Surg Investig 2000 ; 2 : 41-47.
PubMed
14) Kelkar KV : Post-operative Pulmonary Complications After Non-Cardiothoracic Surgery. Indian J Anaesth 2015 ; 59 : 599-605.
PubMed
15) Breivik H : Postoperative pain management : why is it difficult to show that it improves outcome? Eur J Anaesthesiol 1998 ; 15 : 748-751.
PubMed
16) Carr DB, Goudas LC : Acute pain. Lancet 1999 ; 353 : 2051-2058.
PubMed
17) Joshi GP, Ogunnaike BO : Consequences of inadequate postoperative pain relief and chronic persistent postoperative pain. Anesthesiol Clin North Am 2005 ; 23 : 21-36.
PubMed
18) Kehlet H : Multimodal approach to control postoperative pathophysiology and rehabilitation. Br J Anaesth 1997 ; 78 : 606-617.
PubMed

書評

最近チェックした商品履歴

Loading...