上肢運動障害の作業療法

出版社： 文光堂
著者：
発行日： 2018-10-01
分野： 医療技術  >  リハビリ技術
ISBN： 9784830645716
電子書籍版： 2018-10-01 （第1版第2刷）
書籍・雑誌
≪全国送料無料でお届け≫
取寄せ目安：8～14営業日

4,180 円(税込)

購入する
電子書籍
章別単位での購入はできません
ブラウザ、アプリ閲覧

4,180 円(税込)

購入する

商品紹介

脳卒中後の麻痺手に対するCI療法を中心としたアプローチ方法を豊富な図表と科学的根拠をもとにレクチャー．実施するための具体的な評価法，実践的な課題指向型アプローチにおける課題の作成方法と膨大な数の課題一覧表を記載し，初学者でも方法論を理解できるような構成となっている．さらに，CI療法を中等度および重度の対象者に実施するための工夫や，効果を促進するための物理療法や他療法など，多くの併用療法の実際の他，行動学的手法であるTransfer packageにも触れている．多くの場面で，事例に関わるエピソードを記載しており，文字だけでなく，読者の実体験にも訴えかけ，学習が進むように工夫が凝らされている．

目次

  • I　作業療法における機能的アプローチの役割
    　1　作業療法の機能的なアプローチに対するスタンス
    　2　上肢アプローチの作業活動を用いたアプローチの台頭
    　3　脳卒中後の上肢麻痺に対する課題指向型アプローチ
    　4　脳卒中後の上肢麻痺に対する作業を用いたアプローチのエビデンス

    II　作業を用いた上肢機能アプローチを行うための基本的な評価
    　1　脳卒中後の上肢麻痺に対する特異的評価と運動学的評価の役割
    　2　「 客観的数値」を示すための脳卒中後の上肢麻痺に対する特異的な検査
    　3　運動学的評価の役割
    　4　事例を通した運動学的評価の実際

    III　運動学的評価による課題作成とアプローチ手法の決定
    　1　事例を通して運動学的評価を実践してみよう
    　2　練習課題の作成

    IV　練習課題の種類と運用方法
    　1　作業課題のバリエーション
    　2　作業課題の運用方法の実際

    V　課題指向型アプローチを効率化する手法
    　1　経頭蓋磁気・直流電気刺激
    　2　末梢電気刺激
    　3　ミラーセラピー
    　4　振動刺激
    　5　ロボット療法
    　6　ボツリヌス毒素施注

    VI　練習成果を生活環境に定着するための行動学的手法
    　1　どうして行動学的手法が必要なのか
    　2　行動学的手法であるtransfer packageとは

この書籍の参考文献

参考文献のリンクは、リンク先の都合等により正しく表示されない場合がありますので、あらかじめご了承下さい。

本参考文献は電子書籍掲載内容を元にしております。

I 作業療法における機能的アプローチの役割

P.31 掲載の参考文献
1) Schwartz KB : The history of occupational therapy. In Neistadt ME & Crepeau RB (Eds), Willard and Spackman's Occupatinal Therapy, 9th ed, Philadelphia, 854-860, 1998
 
2) Peloquin SM : Moral treatment : Contexts considered. Am J Occup Ther 43 : 537-544, 1989
PubMed
3) Spackman CS : A history of the practice of occupational therapy for restoration of physical function : 1917-1967. Am J Occup Ther 22 : 68-71, 1968
 
4) Trombly C, et al : A synthesis of the effects of occupational therapy for persons with stroke. Part I : Restoration of roles, tasks, and activities. Am J Occup Ther 56 : 250-259, 2002
PubMed
5) Smallfield S, et al : Classification of occupational therapy intervention for inpatient stroke rehabilitation. Am J Occup Ther 63 : 408-413, 2009
PubMed
6) Carr JHほか, 潮見泰蔵 (監訳) : ニューロロジカルリハビリテーション-運動パフォーマンスの最適化に向けた臨床実践 原著第2版, 医歯薬出版, 東京, 2012
 
7) Shumway-Cook A, 田中繁ほか (監訳) : モーターコントロール-研究室から臨床実践へ 原著第4版, 医歯薬出版, 東京, 2013
 
8) Winstein CJ, et al : Task-oriented training to promote upper extremity recovery. In : Stein J, et al (eds) : Stroke recovery and rehabilitation, Demos Medical Pub, New York, 267-290, 2008
 
9) Timmermans AA, et al : Influence of task-oriented training content on skilled arm-hand performance in stroke : a systematic review. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 24 : 858-870, 2010
PubMed
10) Ogden R, et al : On cerebral motor control : the recovery from experimentally produced hemiplegia. Psychobiology 1 : 33-49, 1917
 
11) Tower SS : Pyramidal lesions in the monkey. Brain 63 : 36-90, 1940
 
12) Knapp HD, et al : Movements in monkeys with deafferented forelimbs. Exp Neurol 7 : 305-315, 1963
PubMed
13) Taub E : Somatosensory deafferentation research with monkeys implications for rehabilitation medicine. Behavioral Psychology in Rehabilitation medicine, Clinical Applications : 371-401, 1980
 
14) Ostendorf CG, et al : Effect of forced use of the upper extremity of a hemiplegic patient on changes in function. A single-case desigh. Phys Ther 61 : 1022-1028, 1981
 
15) Wolf SL, et al : Forced use of hemiplegic upper extremities to reverse the effect of learned nonuse among chronic stroke and head-injured patients. Exp Neurol 104 : 125-132, 1989
PubMed
16) Taub E, et al : New treatments in neurorehabilitation founded on basic research. Nat Rev Neurosci 3 : 228-236, 2002
PubMed
17) Taub E, et al : Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 74 : 347-354, 1993
PubMed
18) Schultz W, et al : Predictive reward signal of dopamine neurons. J Neuro physiol 80 : 1-27, 1998
 
19) Uswatte G, et al : Contribution of the shaping and restraint components of Constraint-induced Movement therapy to treatment outcome. Neurorehabil 21 : 147-156, 2006
 
20) Brogardh C, et al : Shortened constraint-induced movement therapy in subacute stroke-no effect of using a restraint : a randomized controlled study with independent observers. J Rehabil Med 41 : 231-236, 2009
PubMed
21) Brogardh C, et al : Constraint-induced movement therapy in patients with stroke : a pilot study on effects of small group training and of extended mitt use. Clin Rehabil 20 : 218-227, 2006
PubMed
22) Brogardh C, et al : A 1 year follow-up after shortened constraint-induced movement therapy with and without mitt poststroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 91 : 460-464, 2010
PubMed
23) Brunner IC, et al : Is modified constraint-induced movement therapy more effective than bimanual training in improving arm motor function in the subacute phase post stroke? A randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil 26 : 1078-1086, 2012
PubMed
24) van Delden AL, et al : Unilateral and bilateral upperlimb training interventions after stroke have similar effects on bimanual coupling strength. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 29 : 255-267, 2015
PubMed
25) Morris DM, et al : Constrraint-induced movement therapy : characterizing the intervention protocol. Eura Medicophys 42 : 257-268, 2006
PubMed
26) Trombly CA, et al : Occupation : purposefulness and meaningfulnesss as therapeutic mechanisms, Am J Occup Ther 49 : 960-972, 1995
PubMed
27) Reilly M : Occupational therapy can be one of the greatest ideas of 20th century medicine. 1961 Eleanor Clarke Slagle Lecture. American Journal of Occupational Therapy 16 : 1-9, 1962
 
28) Taub E, et al : A placebo-controlled trial of constraintinduced movement therapy for upper extremity after stroke. Stroke 37 : 1045-1049, 2006
 
29) Hung CS, et al : The effects of Combination of robotic-assisted therapy with task-specific or impairment-oriented training on Motor Function and Quality of life in chronic stroke. PMR 8 : 721-729, 2016
PubMed
30) Huseyinsinoglu BE, et al : Bobath Concept versus constraint-induced movement therapy to improve arm function recovery in stroke patients : a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil 26 : 705-715, 2012
PubMed
31) Barzel A, et al : Home-based constraint-induced movement therapy for patients with upper limb dysfunction after stroke (HOMECIMT) : a cluster-randomized, controlled trial. Lancet Neurol 14 : 893-902, 2015
PubMed
32) Andrews K, et al : Stroke recovery : he can but dose he?. Rheumatol Rehabil 18 : 43-48, 1979
 
33) 上田敏 : WHO国際障害分類改定の経過と今後の課題-ICIDHからICFへ. 理療ジャーナル 36 : 5-11, 2002
 
34) Timmermans AA, et al : Influence of task-oriented training content on skilled arm-hand performance in stroke : a systematic review. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 24 : 858-870, 2010
PubMed
35) Shumway-Cookほか, 田中繁ほか (監訳) : モーターコントロール-研究室から臨床実践へ 原著第4版. 医歯薬出版, 東京, 2013
 
36) Roller ML, et al : Contemporary issues and theories of motor control, motor learning, and neuroplasticity. Neurological Rehabilitation, Amsterdam, 69-98, 2012
 
37) 潮見泰蔵 : Task-oriented approach. J Clin Rehabil 18 : 259-262, 2009
Medical*Online
38) Hrak FB : Assumptions underlying motor control for neurologic rehabilitation. In : Lister MJ (ed) : Contemporary Management of Motor control problems, Foundation for Physical therapy, Alexandria, 11-27, 1991
 
39) Maldonado MA, et al : Motor skill training, but not voluntary exercise, improves skilled reaching after unilateral lschemic lesions of the sensorimotor cortex in rats. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 22 : 250-261, 2008
 
40) van Vilet P, et al : An investing of the task specificity of reaching : implication for retraining. Physiother theor pract 9 : 69-76, 1993
 
41) Wu C, et al : Effects of object affordances on reaching performance in persons with and without cerebrovascular accident. Am J Occup Ther 52 : 447-456, 1998
PubMed
42) Lewis JW : Cortical networks related to human use of tools. Neuroscientist 12 : 211-231, 2006
PubMed
43) Westfall JM, et al : Practice-based research-- "Blue Highways" on the NIH roadmap. JAMA 297 : 403-406, 2007
PubMed
44) Nudo RJ, et al : Neural substrates for the effects of rehabilitative training on motor recovery after ischemic infarct. Science 272 : 1791-1794
 
45) Liepart J, et al : Tratment-inudced cortical reorganization after stroke in humans. Stroke 31 : 1210-1216, 2000
 
46) Kononen M, et al : Increased perfusion in motor areas after constraint-induced movement therapy in chronic stroke : a single-photon emission computerized tomography study. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 25 : 1668-1674, 2005
PubMed
47) Gauthier LV, et al : Remodeling the brain plastic structural brain changes produced by different motor therapies after stroke. Stroke 39 : 1520-1525, 2008
PubMed
48) Takebayashi T, et al : A one-year follow up after modified constraint-induced movement therapy for chronic stroke patients with paretic arm : a prospective case series study. Top stroke Rehabil 22 : 18-25, 2015
 
49) Takebayashi T, et al : Diffusion tensor Imaging of Association Fibers to Predict the Short-and Long-Term Benefits of Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy in Chronic Stroke Patients with Hemiparesis : A Pilot Study. Front Hum Neurosci
 
50) Rizzolatti G, et al : Two different streams form the dorsal visual system : anatomy and functions. Exp Brain Res 153 : 146-157, 2003
PubMed
51) Dayan E, et at al : Neuroplasticity subserving motor skill learning. Neuron 72 : 443-454, 2011
 
52) van der lee JH, et al : Forced use of upper extremity in chronic stroke patients : results from a single-blind randomized clinical trial. Stroke 30 : 2369-2375, 1999
 
53) Wolf SL, et al : Effect of constraint-induced movement therapy on upper extremity function 3 to 9 months after stroke : the EXCITE randomized clinical trial. JAMA 296 : 2095-2104
 
54) Wolf SL, et al : The EXCITE trial : Retention of improved upper extremity function among stroke survivors receiving CI movement therapy. Lancet Neurol 7 : 33-40, 2008
PubMed
55) Wolf SL, et al : The EXCITE stroke trial : comparing early and delayed constraint-induced movement therapy. Stroke 41 : 2309-2315, 2010
PubMed
56) Dromerick AW, et al : Very early constraint-inudced movement during stroke rehabilitation (VECTORS) : a single-center RCT. Neurology 73 : 195-201, 2009
 
57) EI-Helow MR, et al : Ef ficacy of modified constraint-induced movement therapy in acute stroke. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 51 : 371-379. 2015
 
58) Langhorne P : Motor recovery after stroke : a systematic review. Lancet Neurol 8 : 741-754, 2009
PubMed
59) JuHyung Park, et al : Effect of task-oriented training on upper extremity function and performance of daily activities in chronic stroke patients with impaired cognition. J Phys Ther Sci 28 : 316-318, 2016
PubMed
60) Fritz SL : Active finger extension predicts outcomes after constraint-induced movement therapy for individuals with hemiparesis after stroke. Stroke 36 : 1172-1177, 2005
PubMed
61) Jongbloed L : Predication of function after stroke : a critical review. Stroke 17 : 765-776, 1986
 
62) Liou LM, et al : Timing of stroke onset determines discharge-functional status but not stroke severity : a hospital-based study. Kaohsiung J Med Sci 29 : 32-36, 2013
 

II 作業を用いた上肢機能アプローチを行うための基本的な評価

P.60 掲載の参考文献
1) 天野暁 : 上肢機能の推移を捉えるアウトカムメジャー. 竹林崇編, 行動変容を導く! 上肢機能回復アプロチ-脳卒中上肢麻痺に対する基本戦略-, 医学書院, 東京, 198-200, 2017
 
2) Minimal Clinically Significant Difference http://qol.thoracic.org/sections/measurement-properties/minimal-clinically-significant-difference.html (2018年4月25日現在)
 
3) Fugl-Meyer AR, et al : The post-stroke hemiparetic patient. 1. a method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med 7 : 13-31, 1975
 
4) Amamo S, et al : Clinimetric properties of the Fugl-Meyer assessment with adapted guidelines for the assessment of arm function in hemiparetic patients after stroke. Top stroke Rehabil 2018 : 1-9, 2018
 
5) Wagner JM, et al : Reproducibility and minimal detectable change of three-dimensional kinematic analysis of reaching tasks in people with hemiparesis after stroke. Phys Ther 88 : 652-663, 2008
PubMed
6) Shelton FD, et al : Motor impairment as a predictor of functional recovery and guide to rehabilitation treatment after stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 15 : 229-237, 2001
PubMed
7) Arya KN, et al : Estimating the minimal clinically important difference of an upper extremity recovery measure in subacute stroke patients. Top Stroke Rehabil 18 : 599-610, 2011
PubMed
8) Jorgensen HS, et al : Outcome and time course of recovery in stroke. Part II : Time course of recovery. The Copenhagen Stroke Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 76 : 406-412, 1995
PubMed
9) Feys HM, et al : Effect of a therapeutic intervention for the hemiplegic upper limb in the acute phase after stroke : a single-blind, randomized, controlled multicenter trial. Stroke 29 : 785-792, 1998
PubMed
10) Page SJ, et al : Clinically important differences for the upper-extremity Fugl-Meyer Scale in people with minimal to moderate impairment due to chronic stroke. Phys Ther 92 : 791-798, 2012
 
11) Bullinger M, et al : Translating health status questionnaires and evaluating their quality : The IQOLA Project approach. J Clin Epidemiol 51 : 913-923, 1998
PubMed
12) Fukuhara S, et al : Translation, adaptation, and validation of the SF-36 Health Survey for use in Japan. J Clin Epidemiol 51 : 1037-1044, 1998
PubMed
13) Fukuhara S, et al : Psychometric and clinical tests of validity of the Japanese SF-36 Health Survey. J Clin Epidemiol 51 : 1045-1053, 1998
PubMed
14) 高橋香代子ほか : 新しい上肢運動機能評価法・日本語版Motor Activity Logの信頼性と妥当性の検討. 作業療法 28 : 628-636, 2009
Medical*Online
15) Woodbury ML, et al : Dimensionality and construct validity of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment of the upper extremity. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 88 : 715-723, 2007
 
16) Brunnstrom S : Motor testing procedures in hemiplegia : Based on sequential recovery stages. Phys Ther 46 : 357-375, 1966
PubMed
17) Bohannon RW, et al : Interrater reliability of a modified Ashworth scale of muscle spasticity. Phys Ther 67 : 206-207, 1987
PubMed
18) 辻哲也ほか : 脳血管障害片麻痺患者における痙縮評価-Modified Ashworth Scle (MAS) の評価間信頼性の検討-. リハ医 39 : 409-415, 2002
 
19) Shaw L, et al : BoTULS : a multicenter randomized controlled trial to evaluate the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of treating upper limb spasticity due to stroke with botulinum toxin type A. Health Technol Assess 14 : 1-113, 2010
PubMed
20) Simpson DM, et al : Botulinum toxin type A in the treatment of upper extremity spasticity : a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Neurology 46 : 1306-1310, 1996
PubMed
21) Rosales RL, et al : Evidence-based systematic review on the efficacy and safety of botulinum toxin-A therapy in post-stroke spasticity. J Neural Transm 115 : 617-623, 2008
PubMed
22) Demeurisse G, et al : Motor evaluation in vascular hemiplegia. Eur Neurol 19 : 382-389, 1980
 
23) Carroll MD : A quantitative test of upper extremity function. J Chronic Dis 18 : 479-491, 1965
 
24) Lyle RC : A performance test for assessment of upper limb function in physical rehabilitation treatment and research. Int J Rehabil Res 4 : 483-492, 1981
PubMed
25) 安保雅博ほか : 脳卒中上肢機能評価ARATパーフェクトマニュアル. 金原出版, 東京, 2015
 
26) Lang CE, et al : Estimating minimal clinically important differences of upper-extremity measures early after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 89 : 1693-1700, 2008
PubMed
27) Van der Lee JH, et al : The intra-and interrater reliability of the action research arm test : a practical test of upper extremity function in patients with stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 82 : 14-19, 2001
 
28) Van der Lee JH, et al : Forced use of the upper extremity in chronic stroke patients : results from a single-blind randomized clinical trial. Stroke 30 : 2369-2375, 1999
 
29) Wolf SL, et al : Assessing Wolf motor function test as outcome measure for research in patients after stroke. Stroke 32 : 1635-1639, 2001
PubMed
30) 高橋香代子ほか : 新しい上肢運動機能評価法・日本語版Wolf Motor Function Testの信頼性と妥当性の検討. 総合リハ 36 : 797-803, 2008
 
31) Fritz SL, et al : Minimal detectable change score for the Wolf Motor Function Test. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 23 : 662-667, 2009
PubMed
32) Lin KC, et al : Minimal detected change and clinically important difference of the Wolf Motor Function Test in stroke patients. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 23 : 429-434, 2009
PubMed
33) 道免和久 : 脳卒中機能評価・予後予測マニュアル. 医学書院, 東京, 2013
 
34) Mathiowetz V, et al : Adult norms for the Box and Block Test of manual dexterity. Am J Occup Ther 39 : 386-391, 1985
PubMed
35) Siebers A, et al : The effect of modified constraint-induced movement therapy on spasticity and motor function of the affected arm in patients with chronic stroke. Physiother Can 62 : 388-396, 2010
 
36) Chen HM, et al : Test-retest reproducibility and smallest real difference of 5 hand function tests in patients with stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 23 : 435-440, 2009
PubMed
37) Kaneko T, et al : Development and standardization of the hand function test. Bull Allied Med Sci Kobe 6 : 49-54, 1990
 
38) Fisher AG : Assessment of Motor and Process Skills 7th ed. Three Star Press, Fort Collins, 2012
 
39) 唐松友ほか : 課題指向型訓練とTransfer packageにおける上肢機能評価と作業遂行評価の特徴. 日臨作療研 1 : 21-25, 2014
Medical*Online
40) Uswatte G, et al : Reliability and validity of the upper-extremity Motor activity Log-14 for measuring real-world arm use. Stroke 36 : 2493-2496, 2005
PubMed
41) Van der Lee JH, et al : Clinimetric properties of the motor activity log for the assessment of arm use in hemipareticc patients. Stroke 35 : 1410-1414, 2004
PubMed
42) Uswatte G, et al : The Motor Activity Log-28 : assessing daily use of the hemiparetic arm after stroke. Neurology 67 : 1189-1194, 2006
PubMed
43) Park SW, et al : The EXCITE Trial : Predicting a clinically meaningful motor activity log outcome. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 22 : 486-493, 2008
PubMed
44) Johonson A, et al : The validity and reliability of the 45-item upper extremity Motor Activity Log. J Neurl Phys Ther 27 : 172, 2003
 
45) Taub E et al. Method for enhancing real-world use of a more affected arm in chronic stroke : transfer package of constraint-induced movement therapy. Stroke 44 : 1383-1388, 2013
PubMed
46) 吉川ひろみほか : 作業療法がわかるCOPM・AMPS実践ガイド. 医学書院, 東京, 2014
 
47) Tuntland H, et al : Psychometric properties of the Canadian Occupational Per formance Measure in home-dwelling older adults. Jornal of multidisciplinary healthcare 19 : 411-423, 2016
 
48) Eyssen IC, et al : Responsiveness of the Canadian occupational performance measure. J Rehabil Res Dev 48 : 517-528, 2011
PubMed
49) Kjeken I, et al : Reliability of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. J Rheumatol 32 : 1503-1509, 2005
PubMed
50) Duncan PW, et al : The stroke impact scale version 2.0 : Evaluation of reliability, validity and sensitivity to change. Stroke 30 : 2131-2140, 1999
 
51) 越智光宏ほか : Stroke Impact Scale version 3.0の日本語版の作成および信頼性と妥当性の検討. J UOEH (産業医科大学雑誌) 39 : 215-221, 2017
 
52) Lin KC, et al : Minimal detectable change and clinically important dif ference of the Stroke impact scale in stroke patients. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 24 : 486-492, 2010
 
53) Uswatte G, et al : Ambulatory monitoring of arm movement using accelerometry : an objective measure of upper-extremity rehabilitation in persons with chronic stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 86 : 1498-1501, 2005
PubMed
54) Uswatte G, et al : Validity of accelerometry for monitoring real-world arm activity in patients with subacute stroke : evidence from the extremity constraint-induced therapy evaluation trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 87 : 1340-1345, 2006
PubMed
55) Waddell KJ, et al : Does Task-Specific Training Improve Upper Limb Performance in Daily Life Poststroke?. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 31 : 290-300, 2017
PubMed
56) 竹林崇ほか : 慢性期の脳卒中後上肢麻痺を呈した患者の麻痺手の使用頻度を定量化する試み-事例報告. 作業療法 36 : 74-80, 2017
Medical*Online
57) Kim, et al : Quality of life of Korean and Korean American older adults : A comparison. J Gerontol Nurs 35 : 28-34, 2009
PubMed
58) Ziemann U, et al : The effect of lorazepam on the motor cortical excitability in man. Exp Brain Res 109 : 127-135, 1996
PubMed
59) Liepert J, et al : Motor cortex disinhibitition in acute stroke. Clin Neurophysiol 111 : 671-676, 2000
PubMed
60) 藤原俊之ほか : 脳卒中患者における皮質内抑制, 半球間抑制. リハ医 48 : 165-169, 2011
 
61) Ziemann U, et al : Modulation of plasticity in human motor cortex after forearm ischemic nerve block. J Neurosci 18 : 1115-1123, 1998
PubMed
62) Harris-Love ML, et al : Mechanisms of short-term training-induced reaching improvement in severely hemiparetic stroke patients : a TMS study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 25 : 398-411, 2011
PubMed
63) Wittenberg GF, et al : Constraint-induced movement therapy in stroke ; magnetic stimulation motor maps and cerebral activation. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 17 : 48-57, 2003
PubMed
64) Hamzei F, et al : Two different reorganization patterns after rehabilitative therapy : An exploratory study with fMRI and TMS. Neuroimage 31 : 710-720, 2006
PubMed
65) Taub E, et al : Constraint-induced movement therapy combined with conventional neurorehabilitation techniques in chronic stroke patients with plegic hands : a case series. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 94 : 86-94, 2013
 
66) Bonifer NM, et al : Constraint-induced movement therapy after stroke : efficacy for patients with minimal upper-extremity motor ability. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 86 : 1867-1873, 2005
PubMed
67) Shin HK, et al : Cortical effect and functional recovery by the electromyography-triggered neuromuscular stimulation in chronic stroke patients. Neurosci Lett 442 : 174-179, 2008
PubMed
68) Takebayashi T, et al : Therapeutic synergism in the treatment of post-stroke arm paresis utilizing botulinum toxin, robotic therapy, and constraint-induced movement therapy. PM R6 : 1054-1058, 2014
 
69) 竹林崇ほか : 重度から中等度上肢麻痺を呈した慢性期脳卒中患者に対する多角的介入におけるロボット療法の実際. 作業療法 36 : 148-158, 2017
Medical*Online
70) Robbin-Thomason S, et al : A case of combined anterior and posterior interosseous nerve palsy. Eur J Plast Surg 15 : 144-145, 1992
 
71) 佐藤篤史ほか : 脳卒中後亜急性期にカペナースプリントを使用して麻痺手の実生活における使用を促した一例. 作業療法, 投稿中 (2018年4月27日現在)
 

III 運動学的評価による課題作成とアプローチ手法の決定

P.95 掲載の参考文献
1) Morris DM, et al : Constraint-induced movement therapy : characterizing the intervention protocol. Eura Medicophys 42 : 257-268, 2006
PubMed
2) UAB CI therapy research group : University of Alabama, Birmingham (UAB), 2011
 
3) Trombly CA : Occupation ; purposefullness and meaningfulness as therapeutic mechanisms. Am J Occup Ther 49 : 960-972, 1995
 
4) 吉川ひろみ : 学びたい世界の作業療法Catherine A. Trombly Occupation : Purposefulness and meaningfulness as therapeutic mechanisms 作業 : 治療メカニズムとしての目的性と意味性. 作療ジャーナル 38 : 144-147, 2004
 
5) Cristea MC, et al : Compensatory strategies for reaching in stroke. Brain 123 : 940-953, 2000
 
6) Hoffmann G : Effect of sensory feedback from the proximal upper limb on voluntary isometric finger flexion and extension in hemiparetic stroke subjects. J Neurophysiol 106 : 2546-2556, 2011
PubMed
7) Tardo DT, et al : Rotator cuff muscles perform different functional roles during shoulder external rotation exercises. Clin Anat 26 : 236-243, 2013
PubMed
8) Namdari S, et al : Outcomes of tendon fractional lengthenings to improve shoulder function in patients with spastic hemiparesis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 21 : 691-698, 2012
PubMed
9) 庄本康治編 : 脳卒中後の弛緩性片麻痺症例の肩関節亜脱臼に対する電気療法. 最新物理療法の臨床適応. 文光堂, 東京. 42-53, 2012
 
10) 庄本康治 : 物理療法のグローバルスタンダードの理解と展望. 理学療法学 40 : 583-588, 2013
 
11) Lee JH, et al : Effectiveness of neuromuscular electrical stimulation for management of shoulder subluxation post-stroke : a systematic review with meta-analysis. Clin Rehabil 31 : 1431-1444, 2017
PubMed
12) Lin Z, et al : Long-term effectiveness of neuromuscular electrical stimulation for promoting motor recovery of the upper extremity after stroke. J Rehabil Med 43 : 506-510, 2011
 
13) Hsu SS, et al : Dose-response relation between neuromuscular electrical stimulation and upper-extremity function in patients with stroke. Stroke 41 : 821-824, 2010
PubMed
14) Shimodozono M, et al : Benefits of a repetitive facilitative exercise program for the upper paretic extremity after subacute stroke : a randomized controlled trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 27 : 296-305, 2013
PubMed
15) Shimodozono M, et al : Repetitive facilitative exercise under continuous electrical stimulation for severe arm impairment after sub-acute stroke : a randomized controlled pilot study. Brain Inj 28 : 203-210, 2014
PubMed
16) Langhorne P, et al : Stroke rehabilitation. Lancet 377 : 1693-1702, 2011
PubMed
17) Winstein CJ, et al : Guidelines for adult stroke rehabilitation and recovery : a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 47 : 98-169, 2016
 
18) Takahashi K, et al : Efficacy of upper extremity robotic therapy in subacute poststroke hemiplegia : an exploratory randomized trial. Stroke 47 : 1385-1388, 2016
PubMed
19) Takebayashi T, et al : Therapeutic synergism in the treatment of post-stroke arm paresis utilizing botulinum toxin, robotic therapy, and constraint-induced movement therapy. PM R6 : 1054-1058, 2014
 
20) Taub E, Uswatte G, et al : Constraint-induced movement therapy combined with conventional neurorehabilitation techniques in chronic stroke patients with plegic hands : a case series. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 94 : 86-94, 2013
 
21) Bonifer NM, et al : Constraint-induced movement therapy after stroke : efficacy for patients with minimal upper-extremity motor ability. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 86 : 1867-1873, 2005
PubMed
22) Farrell JF, et al : Orthotic aided training of the paretic upper limbs in chronic stroke results of a phase 1 trial. Neurorehabil 22 : 99-103, 2007
 
23) Kim EH, et al : The effect of a hand stretching device during the management of spasticity in chronic hemiparetic stroke patients. Ann Rehabil Med 37 : 235-240, 2013
 
24) Jo HM, et al : Improvements in spasticity and motor function using a static stretching device for people with chronic hemiparesis following stroke. Neuro-Rehabilitation 32 : 369-375, 2013
PubMed
25) Fujiwara T et al : Electrophysiological and clinical assessment of a simple wrist-hand splint for patients with chronic spastic hemiparesis secondary to stroke. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol 44 : 423-429, 2004
PubMed
26) Taub E, et al : Method for enhancing real-world use of a more affected arm in chronic stroke : transfer package of constraint-induced movement therapy. Stroke 44 : 1383-1388, 2013
PubMed
27) Hikosaka O, et al : Basal ganglia orient eyes to reward. J Neurophysiol 95 : 567-584, 2006
PubMed
28) Montague PR, et al : Imaging valuation models in human choice. Annu Rev Neurosci 29 : 417-448, 2006
PubMed
29) Rangel AC, et al : A framework for studying the neurobiology of value-based decision making. Nat Rev Neurosci 9 : 545-556, 2008
 
30) Schultz W : Predictive reward signal of dopamine neurons. Nat Rev Neurosci 80 : 1-27, 1998
 
31) Morgan RJ, et al : The protective action encoding of serotonin transients in the human brain. Neuropsychopharmacology 43 : 1425-1435, 2018
 
32) 森岡周 : リハビリテーションのための神経生物学入門. 協同医書出版社, 東京, 2013
 
33) Kurniawan IT, et al : Dopamine and effort-based decision making. Front Neur sci 21 : 81, 2011
 
34) Samejima K, et al : Representation of action-specific reward values in the striatum. Science 310 : 1337-1334, 2005
PubMed
35) Rushworth MF, et al : Contrasting roles for cingulate and orbitofrontal cortex in decisions and social behavior. Trends Cogn Sci 11 : 168-176, 2007
PubMed
36) Takebayashi T, et al : Differences in neural pathways are related to the short- or long-term benefits of constraint-induced movement therapy in patients with chronic stroke and hemiparesis : a pilot cohort study. Top Stroke Rehabil 25 : 203-208, 2018
PubMed
37) Friedman M, et al : Type A behavior and your heart. Alfred A. Knopf, New York, 1974
 
38) 前田聰ほか : 行動パターン評価のための簡易質問紙法「A型傾向判定表」. 特集 日本におけるタイプAの判定法. タイプA 2 : 33-40, 1991
 
39) Rizzolatti G, et al : Two different streams form the dorsal visual system : anatomy and function. Exp Brain Res 153 : 146-157, 2003
PubMed
40) Orban GA, et al : The neural basis of human tool use. Front Psychol 5 : 310, 2014
PubMed
41) Imamizu H, et al : Multiple representations for visuomotor learning in the cerebellum : A functional MRI study. Neuroimage 7 : S819, 1999
 
42) Imamizu H, et al : Modular organization of internal models of tools in the human cerebellum. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100 : 5461-5466, 2003
PubMed
43) Higuchi S, et al : Cerebellar activity evoked by common tool-use execution and imagery tasks : an fMRI study. Cortex 43 : 350-358, 2007
PubMed
44) Wu CY, et al : Brain reorganization after bilateral arm training and distributed constraint-induced therapy in stroke patients : a preliminary functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Chang Gung Med J 33 : 628-638, 2010
PubMed
45) Whitall J, et al : Bilateral and unilateral arm training improve motor function through differing neuroplastic mechanisms : a single-blinded randomized controlled trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 25 : 118-129, 2011
PubMed
46) Varela F, et al : The brainweb : phase synchronization and large-scale integration. Nat Rev Neurosci 2 : 229-239, 2001
PubMed
47) Grefkes C, et al : Cortical connectivity after subcortical stroke assessed with functional magnetic resonance imaging. Ann Neurol 63 : 236-246, 2008
PubMed
48) Halsband U, et al : The role of premotor cortex and the supplementary motor area in the temporal control in man. Brain 116 : 243-266, 1993
PubMed
49) Laplane D, et al : Clinical consequences of corticectomies involving the supplementary motor area in man. J Neurol Sci 34 ; 301-314, 1977
 
50) Franz EA, et al : The effect of callosotomy on novel versus familiar bimanual actions : a neural dissociation between controlled and automatic processes?. Phychol Sci 11 : 82-85, 2000
PubMed
51) Semrau JA, et al : Relationship between visuospatial neglect and kinesthetic deficits after stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 29 : 318-328, 2015
PubMed
52) Schaefer SY, et al : Ipsilesional motor deficits following stroke reflect hemispheric specializations for movement control. Brain 130 : 2146-2158, 2007
PubMed
53) Sunderland A : Recovery of ipsilateral dexterity after stroke. Stroke 31 : 430-433, 2000
PubMed

IV 練習課題の種類と運用方法

P.139 掲載の参考文献
1) Morris DM, et al : Constraint-induced movement therapy : characterizing the intervention protocol. Eura Medicophys 42 : 257-268, 2006
PubMed
2) Izuma K, et al : Processing of social and monetary rewards in the human striatum. Neuron 58 : 284-294, 2008
PubMed
3) Jiang Y, et al : Effects of reward contingencies on brain activation during feedback processing. Front Hum Neuroscci 8 : 656, 2014
PubMed
4) Page SJ, et al : Modiffied constraint-induced therapy combined with mental practice : thinking through better motor outcomers. Stroke 40 : 551-554, 2009
 
5) Dahl AE, et al : Short-and long-term outcome of constraint-induced movement therapy after stroke : a randomized controlled feasibility trial. Clin Rehabil 22 : 436-447, 2008
 
6) Wolf SL, et al : Effect of constraint-induced movement therapy on upper extremity function 3 to 9 months after stroke : the EXCITE randomised clinical trial. JAMA 296 : 2095-2104, 2006
 
7) Wolf SL, et al : Retention of upper limb function in stroke survivors who have received constraint-induced movement therapy : the EXCITE randomized trial. Lancet Neurol 7 : 33-40, 2008
PubMed
8) Peurala, et al : Effectiveness of constraint-induced movement therapy on activity and participation after stroke : a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clin Rehabil 26 : 209-223, 2011
 
9) Sterr A, et al : Longer versus shorter daily constraint-induced movement therapy of chronic hemiparesis : an exploratory study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 83 : 1374-1377, 2002
PubMed
10) Baddeley AD, et al : The influence of length and frequency of training session on the rate of learning to type. Ergonomics 21 : 627-635, 1978
 
11) Han CE, et al : Stroke rehabilitation reaches a threshold. PloS Comput Biol 4 : e1000133, 2008
PubMed
12) Dromerick AW, et al : Very early constraint-induced movement during stroke rehabilitation (VECTORS) : A single-center RCT. Neurology 73 : 195-201, 2009
PubMed
13) Humm JL, et al : Use-dependent exaggeration of brain injury : is glutamate involved?. Exp Neurol 157 : 349-358, 1999
PubMed
14) El-Helow MR, et al : Efficacy of modified constraint-induced movement therapy in acute stroke. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 51 : 371-379, 2015
PubMed
15) Swayne OB, et al : Stages of motor output reorganization after hemispheric stroke suggested by longitudinal studies of cortical physiology. Cerebral Cortex 18 : 1909-1922, 2008
PubMed
16) 川人光男 : 脳の計算理論, 産業図書, 東京, 1996
 
17) Imamizu H, et al : Multiple representations for visuomotor learning in the cerebellum : A functional MRI study. Neuroimage 7 : S819, 1998
 
18) Aflame TN, et al : Possible origins of the complex topographic organization of motor cortex : reducetion of a multidimensional space into a two-dimensional array. J Neurosci 26 : 6288-6297, 2006
 
19) Barzel A, et al : Home-based constraint-induced movement therapy for patients with upper limb dysfunction after stroke (HOMECIMT) : a cluster-randomised, controlled trial. The Lancet Neurology 14, 893-902, 2015
PubMed
20) 山本勝仁ほか : 脳卒中亜急性期での家族仲介型CI療法によりADL・上肢機能に改善を認めた1例. 作業療法ジャーナル 51 : 615-619, 2017
 
21) 原田朋美ほか : 家族参加型の上肢集中練習により希望であった麻痺手での作業を達成できた一症例. 作業療法 36 : 437-443, 2017
Medical*Online
22) 西村翔太ほか : 回復期リハビリテーション病棟入院中の脳卒中患者に対する病棟実施型CI療法の試み : ケースシリーズスタディ. 作業療法 37 : 96-103, 2018
Medical*Online

V 課題指向型アプローチを効率化する手法

P.159 掲載の参考文献
1) Hatem SM, et al : Rehabilitation of motor function after stroke : a multiple systematic review focused on thechniques to stimulate upper extremity recovery. Front Hum Neurosci 13 : 442, 2016
 
2) Chang WH, et al : Long-term effects of rTMS on motor recovery in patients after subacute stroke. J Rehabil Med 42 : 758-764, 2010
PubMed
3) Kim DY, et al : Effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on motor recovery in patients with subacute stroke. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 89 : 879-886, 2010
PubMed
4) Winstein CJ, et al : Guideline for adult stroke rehalitation and vecovery : a guideline for healthcare professionals from the amerian heart association/American stroke association. strok 47 : e98-169, 2016
 
5) 伊良皆啓治 : 脳神経刺激 (tDCS, TMS, DBS) の現状と展望. 計測と制御 54 : 82-86, 2015
 
6) 井上雄吉 : 反復経頭蓋磁気刺激 (rTMS) 療法. 神経治療 33 : 228-233, 2016
Medical*Online
7) Oberman L, et al : Safety of theta burst transcranial magnetic stimulation : a systematic review of the literature. J Clin Neurophysiol 28 : 67-74, 2011
PubMed
8) Kapur N : Paradoxical functional facilitation in brain-behaviour research. A critical review. Brain 119 : 1775-1790, 1996
PubMed
9) 原貴敏ほか : 脳卒中後上肢麻痺に対する低頻度反復性経頭蓋磁気刺激と集中的作業療法の併用療法が脳血流に及ぼす影響について. Jpn J Rehabil Med 50 : 36-42, 2013
Medical*Online
10) 角田亘ほか : 脳卒中後上肢麻痺に対する低頻度反復性経頭蓋磁気刺激と集中的作業療法の併用療法-1,000人超の患者に対する治療経験. 脳卒中 35 : 274-280, 2013
Medical*Online
11) Nair DG, et al : Optimizing recovery potential through simultaneous occupational therapy and non-invasive brain-stimulation using tDCS. Restor Neurol Neurosci 29 : 411-420, 2011
PubMed
12) Bolognini N, et al : Neurophysiological and behavioral effects of tDCS combined with constraint-induced movement therapy in poststroke patients. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 25 : 819-829, 2011
PubMed
13) Nitsche MA, et al : Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation. J Physiol 15 : 633-639, 2000
 
14) Nitsche MA, et al : Sustained excitability elevations induced by transcranial DC motor cortex stimulation in humans. Neurology 57 : 1899-1901, 2001
PubMed
15) English C, et al : Loss of skeletal muscle mass after stroke : a systematic review. Int J Stroke 5 : 395-402, 2010
PubMed
16) Nozoe M, et al : Changes in quadriceps muscle thickness in acute non-ambulatory stroke survivors. Top in stroke Rehabil 23 : 8-14, 2016
PubMed
17) Nozoe M, et al : Efficacy of neuromuscular electrical stimulation for preventing quadriceps muscle wasting in patients with moderate or severe acute stroke : A pilot study. Neuro Rehabilitaiton 41 : 143-149, 2017
PubMed
18) Hirose T, et al : The effect of electrical muscle stimulation on the prevention of disuse muscle atrophy in patients with consciousness disturbance in the intensive care unit. J Crit Care 28 : 536, e1-7, 2013
 
19) Kern H, et al : Electrical stimulation counteracts muscle decline in seniors. Front Aging Neurosci 6 : 189, 2014
PubMed
20) Lin Z, et al : Long-term effectiveness of neuromuscular electrical stimulation for promoting motor recovery of the upper extremity after stroke. J Rehabil Med 43 : 506-510, 2011
 
21) Ikuno K, et al : Effects of peripheral sensory nerve stimulation plus task-oriented training on upper extremity function in patients with subacute stroke : a pilot randomized crossover trial. Clin Rehabil 26 : 999-1009, 2012
PubMed
22) Shin HK, et al : Cortical effect and functional recovery by the electromyography-triggered neuromuscular stimulation in chronic stroke patients. Neurosci Lett 442 : 174-179, 2008
PubMed
23) Khaslavskaia S, et al : Motor cortex excitability following repetitive electrical stimulation of the common peroneal nerve depends on the voluntary drive. Exp Brain Res 162 : 497-502, 2005
PubMed
24) Uy J, et al : Increased cortical excitability induced by transcranial DC and peripheral nerve stimulation. J Neuroscience Methods 127 : 193-197, 2003
 
25) Satow T, et al : Combination of transcranial direct current stimulation and neuromuscular electrical stimulation improves gait ability in a patient in chronic stage of stroke. Case Rep Neurol 8 : 39-46, 2016
 
26) Celnik P, et al : Effects of combined peripheral nerve stimulation and brain polarization on performance of a motor sequence task after chronic stroke. Stroke 40 : 1764-1771, 2009
PubMed
27) Sattler V, et al : Anodal tDCS combined with radial nerve stimulation promotes hand motor recovery in the acute phase after ischemic stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 29 : 743-754, 2015
PubMed
28) Takebayashi T, et al : Improvement of upper extremity deficit after constraint-induced movement therapy combined with and without preconditioning stimulation using dual-hemisphere transcranial direct current stimulation and peripheral neuromuscular stimulation in chronic stroke patients : a pilot randomized controlled trial. Front Neurol 8 : 568, 2017
PubMed
29) Yoshida Y, et al : Comparison of the effect of sensory-level and conventional motor-level neuromuscular electrical stimulations on quadriceps strength after total knee arthroplasty : a prospective randomized single-blind trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 98 : 2364-2370, 2017
PubMed
30) Alfieri V : Electrical treatment of spasticity. Reflex tonic activity in hemiplegic patients and selected specific electrostimulation. Scand J Rehabil Med 14 : 177-182, 1982
PubMed
31) Daly JJ, et al : Therapeutic neural effects of electrical stimulation. IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng 4 : 218-230, 1996
PubMed
33) Cameron MH編 : EBM物理療法 第2版, 医歯薬出版, 東京, 242, 2006
 
33) 中村潤二 : 痙縮に対する電気刺激療法. 庄本康治編 : 最新物理療法の臨床適応, 文光堂, 東京, 18-40, 2012
 
34) 嶋田智明ほか : 物理療法マニュアル. 医歯薬出版, 東京, 236-237, 1996
 
35) Ramachandran VS, et al : Touching the phantom limb. Nature 377 : 489-490, 1995
PubMed
36) Altschuler EL, et al : Rehabilitation of hemiparesis after stroke with a mirror. Lacet 353 : 2035-2036, 1999
 
37) Thieme H, et al : Mirror therapy for improving motor function after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 14 : CD008449, 2012
PubMed
38) Michielsen ME, et al : Motor recovery and cortical reorganization after mirror therapy in chronic stroke patients : a phase II randomized controlled trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 25 : 223-233, 2011
PubMed
39) Dohle C, et al : Mirror therapy promotes recovery from severe hemiparesis : a randomized controlled trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 23 : 209-217, 2009
PubMed
40) Garry MI, et al : Mirror, mirror on the wall : viewing a mirror reflection of unilateral hand movements facilitates ipsilateral M1 excitability. Exp Brain Res 163 : 118-122, 2005
PubMed
41) Fukumura K, et al : Influence of mirror therapy on human motor cortex. Int J of Neursci 117 : 1039-1048, 2007
 
42) Shinoura N, et al : Mirror therapy activates outside of cerebellum and ipsilateral M1. NeuroRehabilitation 23 : 245-252, 2008
PubMed
43) Matthys K, et al : Mirror-induced visual illusion hand movements : a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 90 : 675-681, 2009
PubMed
44) Bartur G, et al : Electrophysiological manifestations of mirror visual feedback during manual movement. Brain Res 1606 : 113-124, 2015
PubMed
45) Michielsen ME, et al : The neuronal correlates of mirror therapy : an fMRI study on mirror induced visual illusions in patients with stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 82 : 393-398, 2011
 
46) Rossiter HE, et al : Cortiacl mechanisms of mirror therapy after stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 29 : 444-452, 2015
PubMed
47) Hamzei F, et al : Functional plasticity induced by mirror training : the mirror as the element connecting both hands to one hemisphere. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 26 : 484-496, 2012
 
48) Cavanna AE, et al : The precuneus : a review of its functional anatomy and behavioural correlates. Brain 129 : 564-583, 2006
PubMed
49) Yoon JA, et al : Effect of constraint-induced movement therapy and mirror therapy for patients with subacute stroke. Ann Rehabil Med 38 : 458-466, 2014
PubMed
50) Page SJ, et al : Modified constraint-induced therapy combined with mental practice : thinking through better motor outcomes. Stroke 40 : 551-554, 2009
PubMed
51) 埴岡他 : 急性期よりCI療法やミラーセラピーをはじめてした多角的なアプローチを提供した一例. 投稿中.
 
52) Kim H, et al : The effects of mental practice combined with modified constraint-induced therapy on corticospinal excitability, movement quality, function, and activities of daily living in persons with stroke. Disabil Rehabil 9 : 1-9, 2017
 
53) Yumi Ju, et al : The effects of modified constraint-induced movement therapy and mirror therapy on upper extremity function and its influence on activities of daily living. J Phys Ther Sci 30 : 77-81, 2018
PubMed
54) Yi X, et al : A blink restoration system with contralateral EMG triggered stimulation and real-time artifact blanking. IEEE Trans Biomed Circuits Syst 7 : 140-148, 2013
PubMed
55) Knutson JS, et al : Contralaterally controlled functional electrical stimulation for stroke rehabilitation. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Bill Soc : 314-137, 2012
 
56) Schmidt MW, et al : Long-lasting contralateral motor cortex excitability is increased by unilateral hand movement that triggers electrical stimulation of opposite homologous muscles. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 25 : 521-530, 2011
PubMed
57) Knutson JS, et al : Contralaterally controlled functional electrical stimulation improves hand dexterity in chronic hemiparesis : a randomized trial. Stroke 47 : 2596-2602, 2016
PubMed
58) Hagbarth KE, et al : Tonic vibration reflexes (TVR) in spasticity.Brain Res 2 : 201-203, 1966
PubMed
59) Noma T, et al : Anti-spastic effects of the direct application of vibratory stimuli to the spastic muscles of hemiplegic limbs in post-stroke patients. Brain Inj 23 : 623-631, 2009
 
60) Kawahira K, et al : New functional vibratory stimulation device for extremities in patients with stroke. Int J Rehabil Res 27 : 335-337, 2004
PubMed
61) 松元秀次 : 最新のリハビリテーション-痙縮のマネジメント-. Jpn J Rehabil Med 45 : 591-597, 2008
Medical*Online
62) 松元秀次 : 最近の脳卒中リハビリテーション技術 : 痙縮に対する治療法. 総合リハビリテーション 35 : 1441-1448, 2007
 
63) Caliandro P, et al : Focal muscle vibration in the treatment of upper limb spasticity : a pilot randomized controlled trial in patients with chronic stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 93 : 1656-1961, 2012
PubMed
64) Kaut O, et al : A randomized pilot study of stochastic vibration therapy in spinocerebellar ataxia. Cerebellum 13 : 237-242, 2014
PubMed
65) Miyai I, et al : Cerebellar ataxia rehabilitation trial in degenerative cerebellar diseases. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 26 : 515-522, 2012
PubMed
66) Doyon J, et al : Reorganization and plasticity in the adult brain during learning of motor skills. Curr Opin Neurobiol 15 : 161-167, 2005
PubMed
67) Hsieh YW, et al : Dose-response relationship of robot-assisted stroke motor rehabilitation. the impact of initial motor status. Stroke 43 : 2729-2734, 2012
PubMed
68) Takahashi K, et al : Efficacy of upper extremity robotic therapy in subacute poststroke hemiplegia : an exploratory randomized trial. Stroke 47 : 1385-1388, 2016
PubMed
69) Kwakkel G, et al : Effects of robot-assisted therapy on upper limb recovery after stroke : a systematic review. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 22 : 111-121, 2008
 
70) Takebayashi T, et al : Therapeutic synergism in the treatment of post-stroke arm paresis utilizing botulinum toxin, robotic therapy, and constraint-induced movement therapy. PMR 6 : 1054-1058, 2014
 
71) 竹林崇ほか : 重度から中等度上肢麻痺を呈した慢性期脳卒中患者に対する多角的介入におけるロボット療法の実際. 作業療法 36 : 148-158, 2017
Medical*Online
72) 庵本直矢ほか : 脳卒中後上肢麻痺に対するReoGo-Jを使用した回復期における自主訓練の安全性および有用性の検討. 作業療法 37 : 153-160, 2018
 
73) Lo AC, et al : Robot-assisted therapy for long-term upper-limb impairment after stroke. N Engl J Med 362 : 1772-1783, 2010
PubMed
74) Hesse S, et al : Computerized arm training improves the motor control of the severely affected arm after stroke : a single-blinded randomized trial in two centers. Stroke 36 : 1960-1966, 2005
PubMed
75) Kernan WN, et al : Guidelines for the prevention of stroke in patients with stroke and transient ischemic attack : a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke45 : 2160-2236, 2014
PubMed
76) Moura RC, et al : Predictive factors for spasticity among ischemic stroke patients. Arq Neuro-Psiquiatr 67 : 1029-1036, 2009
 
77) Urban PP, et al : Occurence and clinical predictors of spasticity after ischemic stroke. Stroke 41 : 2016-2020, 2010
PubMed
78) Wissel J, et al : Early development of spasticity following stroke : a prospective, observational trial. J Neurol 257 : 1067-1072, 2010
 
79) Brainin M, et al : Poststroke chronic disease management : towards improved identification and interventions for poststroke spasticity-related complications. Int J Stroke 6 : 42-46, 2011
PubMed
80) Shackley P, et al : Cost-effectiveness of treating upper limb spasticity due to stroke with botulinum toxin type A : results from the botulinum toxin for the upper limb after stroke (BoTULS) trial. Toxins (Basel) 4 : 1415-1426, 2012
PubMed
81) Shaw LC, et al : Botulinum Toxin for the Upper Limb after Stroke (BoTULS) Trial : effect on impairment, activity limitation, and pain. Stroke 42 : 1371-1379, 2011
PubMed
82) Wolf SL, et al : Further assessment to determine the additive effect of botulinum toxin type A on an upper extremity exercise program to enhance function among individuals with chronic stroke but extensor capability. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 93 : 578-587, 2012
 
83) Sun SF, et al : Combined botulinum toxin type A with modified constraint-induced movement therapy for chronic stroke patients with upper extremity spasticity : a randomized controlled study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 24 : 34-41, 2010
PubMed
84) Frascarelli F, et al : Robot-mediated and clinical scales evaluation after upper limb botulinum toxin type a injection in children with hemiplegia. J Rehabil Med 41 : 988-994, 2009
PubMed
85) Amano S, et al : Constraint-induced movement therapy after injection of botulinum toxin type A for a patient with chronic stroke : One-year follow-up case report. Phys Ther 95 : 1039-1045, 2015
PubMed
86) 蜂須賀明子, 他 : 上下肢痙縮に対するボツリヌス療法と機能改善. 脳卒中 38 : 363-368, 2016
Medical*Online
87) Winter J, et al : Hand-on therapy inter vention for upper limb motor dysfunction following stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 15 : CD006609, 2011
 

VI 練習成果を生活環境に定着するための行動学的手法

P.199 掲載の参考文献
1) Young NL, et al : The context of measuring disability : does it matter whether capability or performance is measured?. J Clin Epidemiol 49 : 1097-1101, 1996
PubMed
2) Bailey RR, et al : Quantifying real-world upper limb activity in nondisabled adults and adults with chronic stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 29 : 969-978, 2015
PubMed
3) 天野暁ほか : 脳卒中後に影響を受けた上肢に対する評価手段. J Clin Rehabilitation 26 : 19-26, 2017
Medical*Online
4) Jette AM : Toward a common language for function, disability, and health. Phys Ther 86 : 726-734, 2006
 
5) Hartman-Maeir A, et al : Activities, participation and satisfaction one-year post stroke. Disabil Rehabil 29 : 559-566, 2007
PubMed
6) Huseyinsinoglu BE, et al : Bobath Concept versus constraint-induced movement therapy to improve arm function recovery in stroke patients : a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil 26 : 705-715, 2012
PubMed
7) Barzel A, et al : Home-based constraint-induced movement therapy for patients with upper limb dysfunction after stroke (HOMECIMT) : a cluster-randomised, controlled trial. Lancet Neurol 14 : 893-902, 2015
PubMed
8) van Delden AL, et al : Match and mismatch between objective and subjective improvements in upper limb function after stroke. Disabil Rehabil 35 : 1961-1967, 2013
PubMed
9) Fleming MK, et al : Self-perceived utilization of the paretic arm in chronic stroke requires high upper limb functional ability. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 95 : 918-924, 2014
PubMed
10) Winstein CJ, et al : Effect of a task-oriented rehabilitation program on upper extremity recovery following motor stroke. JAMA 315 : 571-581, 2016
PubMed
11) French B, et al : Repetitive task training for improving functional ability after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 17 : CD006073, 2016
PubMed
12) Waddell KJ, et al : Does task-specific training improve upper limb performance in daily life poststroke?. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 31 : 290-300, 2017
PubMed
13) Morris DM, et al : Constraint-induced movement therapy : characterizing the intervention protocol. Eura Medicophys 42 : 257-268, 2006
PubMed
14) Kwakkel G, et al : Constraint-induced movement therapy after stroke. Lancet Neurol 14 : 224-234, 2015
PubMed
15) Taub E, et al : An operant approach to rehabilitation medicine : overcoming learned nonuse by shaping. J Exp Anal Behav 61 : 281-293, 1994
PubMed
16) van der lee JH, et al : Forced use of upper extremity in chronic stroke patients : results from a single-blind randomized clinical trial. Stroke 30 : 2369-2375, 1999
 
17) Takebayashi T, et al : A 6-month follow-up after constraint-induced movement therapy with and without transfer package for patients with hemiparesis after stroke : a pilot quasi-randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil 27 : 418-426, 2013
PubMed
18) Taub E, et al : Method for enhancing real-world use of a more affected arm in chronic stroke : transfer package of constraint-induced movement therapy. Stroke 44 : 1383-1388, 2013
PubMed
19) Taub E, et al : New treatments in neurorehabilitation founded on basic research. Nat Rev Neurosci 3 : 228-236, 2002
PubMed
20) Sanes JN, et al : Rapid reorganization of adult rat motor cortex somatic representation pattern after motor nerve injury. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85 : 2003-2007, 1988
PubMed
21) Liepert J, et al : Changes of cortical motor area size during immobilization. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl 97 : 382-386 : 382-6, 1995
 
22) Rosenstock IM, et al : Social learning theory and the Health Belief Model. Health Educ Q 15 : 175-183, 1988
PubMed
23) Rimer BK, et al : Theory at a glance : a guide for health promotion practice. http://sbccimplementationkits.org/demandrmnch/ikitresources/theory-ata-glance-a-guide-for-health-promotion-practicesecond-edition/ (平成29年5月10日現在)
 
24) Bandura A : Self-efficacy : Toward a unifying theory if behavioral change. Psychol rev 84 : 191-215, 1977
 
25) Dominick KL, et al : Adherence to physical activity. In : Bosworth HB, Oddone EZ, Weinberger M, editors patient treatment adherence : concepts, interventions, and measurement. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New Jersey, 2006
 
26) Kripalani S, et al : Interventions to enhance medication adherence in chronic medical conditions. a systematic review. Arch Intern Med 167 : 540-550, 2007
PubMed
27) Dishman RK : Determinants and inter ventions for physical activity and exercise. In : Bourchard C, Shepard RJ, Stephens T, Sutton JR, McPherson BD, editors. Physical activity, fitness and health : International proceedings and consensus statement. Champaign IL : Human Kinetics : 214-238, 1994
 
28) 高橋香代子ほか : 新しい上肢運動機能評価法・日本語版Motor Activity Logの信頼性と妥当性の検討. 作業療法 28 : 628-636, 2009
Medical*Online
29) Uswatte G, et al : Reliability and validity of the upper-extremity Motor Activity Log-14 for measuring real-world arm use. Stroke 36 : 2493-2496, 2005
PubMed
30) Uswatte G, et al : Contribution of the shaping and restraint components of Constraint-induced Movement therapy to treatment outcome. NeuroRehabilitation 21 : 147-156, 2006
PubMed
31) Uswatte G, et al : The motor activity log-28 : assessing daily use of the hemiparetic arm after stroke. Neurology 67 : 1189-1195, 2006
PubMed
32) 竹林崇 : Transfer packageについて, 道免和久編, ニューロリハビリテーション, 医学書院, 東京, 2016
 
33) UAB CI therapy research group : University of Alabama, Birmingham (UAB), 2011
 
34) Allport GW : The use of personal documents in psychological science, Social Science Research Council, New York, 1942
 
35) エリオット・フリードソン : 医療と専門家支配, 進藤雄三ほか訳, 恒星社厚生閣, 東京, 118-148, 1992
 
36) 上村貞美 : 患者の権利-インフォームド・コンセントを中心に-. 虫明満編, 人のいのちと法-生命倫理と法-, 法律文化社, 京都, 58, 1996
 
37) Beachamp TL, et al : Principles of biomedical ethics. 6th edition, Oxford university press, New York, 114-115, 2009
 
38) Charles C, et al : Shared decision-making in the medical encounter : what does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango). Soc Sci Med 44 : 681-692, 1997
 
39) Kagawa S, et al : Effects of constraint-induced movement therapy on spasticity in patients with hemiparesis after stroke. J Stroke and Cerebrovasc Dis 22 : 364-370, 2013
 
40) Strull WM, et al : Do patients want to participate in medical decision making?. JAMA 252 : 2990-2994, 1984
PubMed
41) Garrison M, et al : The law of bioethics, individual autonomy and social regulation. West Academic, St Paul : 112-122, 2003
 
42) van Roosmalen MS, et al : Randomized trial of a shared decision-making intervention consisting of trade-offs and individualized treatment information for BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. J Clin Oncol 22 : 3293-3301, 2004
PubMed
43) Morgan MW, et al : Randomized, controlled trial of an interactive videodisc decision aid for patients with ischemic heart disease. J Gen Intern Med 15 : 685-693, 2000
PubMed
44) Malm U, et al : Integrated care in schizophrenia : a 2-year randomized controlled study of two community-based treatment programs. Acta Psychiatr Scand 107 : 415-423, 2003
PubMed
45) Von Korff M, et al : Effect on disability outcomes of a depression relapse prevention program. Psychossom Med 65 : 938-943, 2003
PubMed
46) 仲田洋美 : Informed consentとshared decision-making. 腫瘍内科 10 : 268-273, 2012
 
47) Model of human occupation theory and application. http://www.cade.uic.edu/moho/productDetails.aspx?aid=41 (平成29年5月10日現在)
 
48) Stacey D, et al : Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 28 : CD001431, 2014
 
49) Joosten EA, et al : Systematic review of the effects of shared decision-making on patient satisfaction, treatment adherence and health status. Psychther Psychosom 77 : 219-226, 2008
PubMed
50) Tomori K, et al : Utilization of the iPad application : Aid for Decision-making in Occupation Choice. Occup Ther Int 19 : 88-97, 2012
 
51) Ohno K, et al : Development of a tool to facilitate real life activity retraining in hand and arm therapy. British J Occup Ther 80 : 311-318, 2017
 
52) 大谷愛ほか : Aid for decision-making in occupation choice for hand (ADOC-H) 紙面版のCI療法における試用. 作業療法ジャーナル 49 : 1141-1145, 2015
 
53) Berns GS, et al : Predictability modulates human brain response to reward. J Neurosci 21 : 2793-2798, 2001
PubMed
54) Brogardh C, et al : A 1 year followed after shortened constraint-induced movement therapy with and without mitt poststroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 91 : 460-464, 2010
PubMed
55) Krawczyk M, et al : Effects of sling and voluntary constraint during constraint-induced movement therapy for the arm after stroke : a randomized, prospective, single-centre, blinded obser ver rated study. Clin Rehabil 26 : 990-998, 2012
 
56) 原田朋美ほか : 家族参加型の上肢集中練習により希望であった麻痺手での作業を達成できた一症例. 作業療法 36 : 437-443, 2017
Medical*Online
57) 西村翔太ほか : 回復期リハビリテーション病棟入院中の脳卒中患者に対する病棟実施型CI療法の試み. 作業療法 37 : 96-103, 2018
Medical*Online
58) 竹林崇ほか : CI療法. リハビリナース 9 : 320-324, 2016
Medical*Online
59) 石垣賢和ほか : 回復期における簡略化したTransfer Packageを追加したHybrid Assistive Neuromuscular Dynamic Stimulation Therapy (HANDS療法) が麻痺手の使用に与える影響について. (印刷中)
 

書評

最近チェックした商品履歴

Loading...