医学論文執筆のための30の訓え　研究ではなく物語

出版社： 丸善出版
著者：
発行日： 2024-01-30
分野： 医学一般  >  医学情報学
ISBN： 9784621308868
電子書籍版： 2024-01-30 （電子書籍版）
書籍・雑誌
≪全国送料無料でお届け≫
取寄せ目安：4～8営業日

4,620 円(税込)

購入する
電子書籍
章別単位での購入はできません
ブラウザ、アプリ閲覧

4,620 円(税込)

購入する

商品紹介

初めて医学論文を書く人は，どう勉強すればいいのか？
医学論文執筆の修得は模倣から始まり，指導医のチェック，書き直しと体得まで試行錯誤の連続です．メンターも体系的な指導法がなく「手探り」が実情でしょう．どんなに優れた研究成果も書き方を損なえばアクセプトされません．論文執筆には「お作法」があります！　それは，読み手を意識した物語性のある論文スタイルです．
研究の成果が届かないのは，論文に物語性がないからだ！
「焚きつけるタイトル」「編集の3つのS（Story物語，Structure構造，Style文体）」など実践的なアドバイスが満載！　本書で医学論文執筆の訓え30をマスターしましょう.

目次

  • 　1章　はじめに

    第1部　物語
    　2章　問題・ギャップ・着眼点の紹介
    　3章　ギャップの示し方
    　4章　引用の技術
    　5章　方法：物語と研究が出会う場所
    　6章　質的研究における引用の効果的な使い方
    　7章　潜在能力を引き出す考察の書き方
    　8章　限界の技術
    　9章　焚きつけるタイトル
    　10章　一語一句を大切にする： 強力な研究要旨（抄録）の鍵

    第2部　技術
    　11章　文章を使いこなす
    　12章　動詞の力を引き出す
    　13章　並列構造の力
    　14章　コンマを使いこなす
    　15章　前置詞の積み重ねを避ける
    　16章　乱雑さを避ける：形容詞と副詞の賢明な使い方
    　17章　潜在的な段落構成から戦略的な段落構成へ
    　18章　一貫性：読者を脱線させない
    　19章　編集の3つの「S」：Story（物語），Structure（構造），Style（文体）
    　20章　ペース，間(ま)，沈黙：文章に強調や緊張感を生み出す
    　21章　学術的垣根表現I：論文執筆における形式調整
    　22章　学術的垣根表現II：論文執筆における礼儀作法
    　23章　無声から聞き取れる声へ： 論文執筆における音域，態度，論調の調整

    第3部　共同
    　24章　共同執筆：戦略と行動
    　25章　共同執筆：役割，著者資格，倫理
    　26章　共著論文でフィードバックを行う
    　27章　執筆コーチングI：執筆プロセスへの配慮
    　28章　執筆コーチングII：関係性とアイデンティティ
    　29章　論文執筆コミュニティの醸成
    　30章　査読プロセスを成功に導く

    エピローグ

この書籍の参考文献

参考文献のリンクは、リンク先の都合等により正しく表示されない場合がありますので、あらかじめご了承下さい。

本参考文献は電子書籍掲載内容を元にしております。

1章 はじめに

P.4 掲載の参考文献
1) De Fina, A. (2003). Identity in narrative : A study of immigrant discourse. Amsterdam : John Benjamins Publishing.
 
2) Riessman, C. K. (2008). Narrative methods for the human sciences. Thousand Oaks : Sage.
 
3) Cole, B. (2002). A visit with historian David McCullough. Humanities, 24 (3).
 

第1部 物語 : The Story

P.17 掲載の参考文献
1) Burke, K. (1974). The philosophy of literary form : Studies in symbolic action (3rd ed.). Berkeley : University of California Press.
 
2) Thomson, P., & Kamler, B. (2013). Writing for peer-reviewed journals : Strategies for getting published. London : Routledge.
 
3) Schulz, V., Crombeen, A., Marshall, D., Shadd, J., LaDonna, K., & Lingard, L. (2017). Beyond simple planning : Existential dimensions of conversations with patients at risk of dying from heart failure. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 54 (5), 637-644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2017.07.041.
 
4) Buac, S., Schadde, E., Schnitzbauer, A. A., Vogt, K., & Hernandez-Alejandro, R. (2016). The many faces of ALPPS : Surgical indications and techniques among surgeons collaborating in the international registry. HPB, 18 (5), 442-448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2016.01.547.
 
5) Cunningham, C. J. L., Weathington, B. L., & Pittenger, D. J. (2013). Understanding and conducting research in the health sciences. Hoboken : Wiley.
 
6) Plaxco, K. W. (2010). The art of writing science. Protein Science, 19 (12), 2261-2266. https://doi.org/10.1002/pro.514.
 
7) Crowley, S. (1999). The universal requirement in first-year composition. Basic Writing e-Journal, 1 (2). https://bwe.ccny.cuny.edu/Issue%201.2.html#sharon.
 
8) Hernandez-Alejandro, R. (2020). Permission to reproduce draft. Personal email communication
 
P.24 掲載の参考文献
1) Giltrow, J., Gooding, R., Burgoyne, D., & Sawatsky, M. (2014). Academic writing : An introduction (3rd ed.). Peterborough : Broadview Press.
 
2) Grimshaw, J. M., Patey, A. M., Kirkham, K. R., Hall, A., Dowling, S. K., Rodondi, N., et al. (2020). Deimplementing wisely : Developing the evidence base to reduce low-value care. BMJ Quality & Safety, 29 (5), 409-417. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2019-010060
 
P.32 掲載の参考文献
1) Giltrow, J., Gooding, R., Burgoyne, D., & Sawatsky, M. (2014). Academic writing : An introduction (3rd ed.). Peterborough : Broadview Press.
 
2) University of Portsmouth. (2017). Writing about others' work : Verbs for citations. Department of Curriculum and Quality Enhancement. https://www.port.ac.uk/student-life/help-and-advice/studyskills/research-reading-referencing-and-citation/verbs-for-citations. Accessed 8 Sept 2020.
 
3) Graff, G., & Birkenstein, C. (2018). "They say/I say" : The moves that matter in academic writing (4th ed.). New York : W.W Norton.
 
P.40 掲載の参考文献
1) Kotz, D., & Cals, J. W. L. (2013). Effective writing and publishing scientific papers part IV : Methods. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 66 (8), 817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.01.003.
 
2) LaDonna, K., Hatala, R., Lingard, L., Voyer, S., & Watling, C. (2017). Staging a performance : Learners' perceptions about direct observation during residency. Medical Education, 51 (5), 498-510. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13232.
 
3) St-Onge, C., Young, M., Eva, K. W., & Hodges, B. (2017). Validity : One word with a plurality of meaning. Advances in Health Science Education, 22 (4), 853-867. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-016-9716-3.
 
4) Varpio, L., Ajjawi, R., Monrouxe, L. V., O'Brien, B. C., & Rees, C. E. (2017). Shedding the cobra effect : Problematising thematic emergence, triangulation, saturation and member checking. Medical Education, 51 (1), 40-50. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13124.
 
5) Watling, C., & LaDonna, K. (2019). Where philosophy meets culture : Exploring how coaches conceptualize their roles. Medical Education, 53 (5), 467-476. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13799.
 
P.53 掲載の参考文献
1) Tottie, G. (2016). Planning what to say : Uh and um among the pragmatic markers. In G. Kaltenbock, E. Keizer, & A. Lohmann (Eds.), Outside the clause : Form and function of extra-clausal constituents (pp. 97-122). Amsterdam : John Benjamins Publishing.
 
2) Corden, A., & Sainsbury, R. (2006). Using verbatim quotations in reporting qualitative social research : Researchers' views. York : Social Policy Research Unit.
 
3) Helmich, E., Cristancho, S., Diachun, L., & Lingard, L. (2017). 'How would you call this in English?' Being reflective about translations in international, cross-cultural qualitative research. Perspectives on Medical Education, 6 (2), 127-132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-017-032.
 
4) Goldszmidt, M., Aziz, N., & Lingard, L. (2012). Taking a detour : Positive and negative impacts of supervisor interruptions during admission case review. Academic Medicine, 87 (10), 1382-1388. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182675b08.
 
5) Morrow, S. L. (2005). Quality and trustworthiness in qualitative research in counseling psychology. Journal of Counselling Psychology, 52 (2), 250-260. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.52.2.250.
 
6) Graff, G., & Birkenstein, C. (2018). "They say/I say" : The moves that matter in academic writing (4th ed.). New York : W. W. Norton & Co. Int.
 
P.60 掲載の参考文献
1) Lingard, L., & Watling, C. (2016). It's a story, not a study : Writing an effective research manuscript. Academic Medicine, 91 (12), e12. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000001389.
 
2) Docherty, M., & Smith, R. (1999). The case for structuring the discussion of scientific papers. BMJ, 318, 1224-1225. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.318.7193.1224.
 
3) CONSORT. (2010). Checklist for reporting randomized trials. http://www.consort-statement.org/. Accessed 7 Aug 2020.
 
4) O'Brien, B. C., Harris, I. B., Beckman, T. J., Reed, D. A., & Cook, D. A. (2014). Standards for reporting qualitative research. Academic Medicine, 89 (9), 1245-1251. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000000388.
 
5) Parshuram, C., Friedrich, J., Amaral, A. C., Ferguson, N. D., Baker, G. R., Etchells, E. E., et al. (2015). Patient safety, resident wellbeing and continuity in three resident duty schedules in ICU : A randomized trial. CMAJ, 187 (5), 321-329. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.140752.
 
6) Lingard, L., Regehr, G., Espin, S., & Whyte, S. (2006). A theory-based instrument to evaluate team communication in the operating room : Balancing measurement authenticity and reliability. BMJ Quality and Safety, 15 (6), 422-426. https://doi.org/10.1136/qshc.2005.015388.
 
7) Lingard, L., Vanstone, M., Durrant, M., Fleming, C., Lowe, M., Rashotte, J., et al. (2012). Conflicting messages : Examining the dynamics of leadership on interprofessional teams. Academic Medicine, 87 (12), 1762-1767. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e318271fc82.
 
8) Skelton, J. R., & Edwards, S. J. L. (2000). The function of the discussion section in academic medical writing. BMJ, 320, 1269-1270. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.320.7244.1269.
 
P.69 掲載の参考文献
1) Ioannidis, J. P. A., Stuart, M. E., Brownlee, S., & Strite, S. A. (2017). How to survive the medical misinformation mess. European Journal of Clinical Investigation, 47 (11), 795-802. https://doi.org/10.1111/eci.12834.
 
2) Ioannidis, J. P. (2007). Limitations are not properly acknowledged in the scientific literature. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 60 (4), 324-329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.09.011.
 
3) Puhan, M. A., Aakl, E. A., Bryant, D., Xie, F., Apolone, G., & ter Riet, G. (2012). Discussing study limitations in reports of biomedical studies : The need for more transparency. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 10 (23). https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-10-23.
 
4) Apramian, T., Cristancho, S., Sener, A., & Lingard, L. (2018). How do thresholds of principle and preference influence surgeon assessments of learner performance? Annals of Surgery, 268 (2), 385-390. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000002284.
 
5) Watling, C., Driessen, E., van der Vleuten, C. P., & Lingard, L. (2014). Learning culture and feedback : An international study of medical athletes and musicians. Medical Education, 48 (7), 713-723. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.12407.
 
6) Emmerton-Coughlin, H., Schlachta, C., & Lingard, L. (2017). 'The other right' : Control strategies and the role of language use in laparoscopic training. Medical Education, 51 (12), 1269-1276. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13420.
 
7) Helmich, E., Boerebach, B., Arah, O., & Lingard, L. (2015). Beyond limitations : Improving how we handle uncertainty in health professions education research. Medical Teacher, 37 (11), 1043-1050. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2015.1073239.
 
8) Steenhof, N., Woods, N. N., Van Gerven, P. W. M., & Mylopoulos, M. (2019). Productive failure as an instructional approach to promote future learning. Advances in Health Science Education, 24, 739-749. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-019-09895-4.
 
9) Santhosh, L., Lyons, P. G., Rojas, J. C., Ciesielski, T. M., Beach, S., Farnan, J. M., et al. (2019). Characterising ICU-ward handoffs at three academic medical centres : Process and perceptions. BMJ Quality & Safety, 28, 627-634. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2018-008328.
 
10) Ng, S. L., Mylopoulos, M., Kangasjarvi, E., Boyd, V. A., Teles, S., Orsino, A., et al. (2020). Critically reflective practice and its sources : A qualitative exploration. Medical Education, 54 (4), 312-319. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.14032.
 
P.80 掲載の参考文献
1) Strong, M. J., Busing, N., Goosney, D., Harris, K., Horsley, T., Kuzyk, A., et al. (2018). The rising challenge of training physician-scientists : Recommendations from a Canadian national consensus conference. Academic Medicine, 93 (2), 172-178. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000001857.
 
2) Tolsgaard, M. G., Kulasegaram, K. M., Woods, N., Brydges, R., Ringsted, C., & Dyre, L. (2020). The myth of ivory tower versus practice-oriented research : A systematic review of randomised studies in medical education. Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.14373.
 
3) Panagioti, M., Geraghty, K., Johnson, J., Zhou, A., Panagopoulou, E., Chew-Graham, C., et al. (2018). Association between physician burnout and patient safety, professionalism, and patient satisfaction : A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Internal Medicine, 178 (10), 1317-1331. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.3713.
 
4) Colenbrander, L., Causer, L., & Haire, B. (2020). 'If you can't make it, you're not tough enough to do medicine' : A qualitative study of Sydney-based medical students' experiences of bullying and harassment in clinical settings. BMC Medical Education, 20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02001-y.
 
5) Hodges, B. D. (2010). A tea-steeping or i-Doc model for medical education? Academic Medicine, 85 (9), S34-S44. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181f12f32.
PubMed
6) Sword, H. (2012). Stylish academic writing. Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press.
 
7) Lu, D. W., Lall, M. D., Mitzman, J., Heron, S., Pierce, A., Hartman, N. D., et al. (2020). #MeToo in EM : A multicenter survey of academic emergency medicine faculty on their experiences with gender discrimination and sexual harassment. The Western Journal of Emergency Medicine, 21 (2), 252-260. https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2019.11.44592.
 
8) Spafford, M. M., Schryer, C. F., Mian, M., & Lingard, L. (2006). Look who's talking : Teaching and learning using the genre of medical case presentations. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 20 (2), 121-158. https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651905284396.
 
9) Gornitzki, C., Larsson, A., & Fadeel, B. (2015). Freewheelin' scientists : Citing Bob Dylan in the biomedical literature. BMJ, 351. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h6505.
 
10) Watling, C. J., Kenyon, C. F., Schulz, V., Goldszmidt, M. A., Zibrowski, E., & Lingard, L. (2010). An exploration of faculty perspectives on the in-training evaluation of residents. Academic Medicine, 85 (7), 1157-1162. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181e19722.
 
11) Brabazon, T. (2020, September 11). Vlog 234 : Titles [Video]. Youtube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v1/41aw8GkKCbpU&t1/4
 
12) Tyler, P. D., Fossa, A., Joseph, J. W., et al. (2020). Later emergency provider shift hour is associated with increased risk of admission : A retrospective cohort study. BMJ Quality & Safety, 29, 465-471. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2019-009546.
 
13) Manges, K., Groves, P. S., Farag, A., Peterson, R., Harton, J., & Greysen, S. R. (2020). A mixed methods study examining teamwork shared mental models of interprofessional teams during hospital discharge. BMJ Quality & Safety, 29, 499-508. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2019- 009716.
 
14) Ginsburg, S., Eva, K., & Regehr, G. (2013). Do in-training evaluation reports deserve their bad reputations? A study of the reliability and predictive ability of ITER scores and narrative comments. Academic Medicine, 88 (10), 1539-1544. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182a36c3d.
 
15) Hartley, J. (2007). There's more to the title than meets the eye : Exploring the possibilities. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 37 (1), 95-101.
 
16) Moniz, T., Lingard, L., & Watling, C. (2017). Stories doctors tell. JAMA, 318 (2), 124-125. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2017.5518.
 
17) Espin, S., & Lingard, L. (2001). Time as a catalyst for tension in nurse-surgeon communication. AORN Journal, 74 (5), 672-682. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-2092(06)61766-3.
 
18) Watling, C. J., & Ginsburg, S. (2019). Assessment, feedback and the alchemy of learning. Medical Education, 53 (1), 76-85. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13645.
 
19) Norman, G. (2003). RCT=results confounded and trivial : The perils of grand educational experiments. Medical Education, 37 (7), 582-584. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2923.2003.01586.x.
 
20) Sagi, I., & Yechiam, E. (2008). Amusing titles in scientific journals and article citation. Journal of Information Science, 34 (5), 680-687. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551507086261.
 
21) Eva, K. (2005). What every teacher needs to know about clinical reasoning. Medical Education, 39 (1), 98-106. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.01972.x.
 
22) Editorial Board. Instructions for authors. Perspectives on Medical Education. http://www.springer.com/education+%26+language/journal/40037. Accessed 9 Mar 2016.
 
P.88 掲載の参考文献
1) Varpio, L., Amiel, J., & Richards, B. F. (2016). Writing competitive research conference abstracts : AMEE Guide No. 108. Medical Teacher, 38 (9), 863-871. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2016.1211258.
 
2) Groves, T., & Abbasi, K. (2004). Screening research papers by reading abstracts : Please get the abstract right, because we may use it alone to assess your paper. BMJ, 329, 470-471. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.329.7464.470.
 
3) Cook, D. A., & Bordage, G. (2016). Twelve tips on writing abstracts and title : How to get people to use and cite your work. Medical Teacher, 38 (11), 1100-1104. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2016.1181732.
 
4) Stupp, R., Mason, W. P., Van Den Bent, M. J., Weller, M., Fisher, B., Taphoorn, M. J., et al. (2005). Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant Temozolomide for glioblastoma. New England Journal of Medicine, 352 (10), 987-996. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa043330.
 
5) Johnson, C. E., Keating, J. L., & Molloy, E. K. (2020). Psychological safety in feedback : What does it look like and how can educators work with learners to foster it? Medical Education, 54 (6), 559-570. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.14154.
 
6) Venance, S. L., LaDonna, K. A., & Watling, C. J. (2014). Exploring frontline faculty perspectives after a curriculum change. Medical Education, 48, 998-1007. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.12529.
 
7) Schimel, J. (2012). Writing science : How to write papers that get cited, and proposals that get funded. New York : Oxford University Press USA.
 
8) Taylor, T. S., Raynard, A. L., & Lingard, L. (2019). Perseverance, faith, and stoicism : A qualitative study of medical student perspectives on managing fatigue. Medical Education, 53 (12), 1221-1229. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13998.
 

第2部 技術 : The Graft

P.90 掲載の参考文献
Leech, G. N., Cruickshank, B., & Ivanic, R. (1991). An A-Z of English grammar and usage. Walton-on-Thames : Nelson.
 
O'Conner, P. T. (2010). Woe is I : the grammarphobe's guide to better English in plain English. Updated and expanded 3rd ed., 1st Riverhead trade pbk. ed. New York : Riverhead Books.
 
Pinker, S. (2014). The sense of style : The thinking person's guide to writing in the 21st century. New York : Penguin.
 
Strunk, W., & White, E. B. (2000). The elements of style (4th ed.). New York : Longman.
 
Swan, M. (2016). Practical English usage (4th ed.). Oxford : Oxford University Press.
 
Venolia, J. G. (2001). Write right! A desktop digest of grammar, punctuation and style (4th ed.). Berkeley : Ten Speed Press.
 
P.98 掲載の参考文献
1) Fish, S. (2011). How to write a sentence and how to read one. New York : Harper.
 
2) Casagrande, J. (2010). It was the best of sentences, it was the worst of sentences : A writer's guide to crafting killer sentences. Berkeley : The Speed Press.
 
P.109 掲載の参考文献
1) Knatterud, M. E. (2002). First do no harm : Empathy and the writing of medical journal articles. New York : Routledge.
 
2) Gross, A. G. (1984). Style and arrangement in scientific prose : The rules behind the rules. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 14 (3), 241-253. https://doi.org/10.2190/WLJ2-C3LV-PVTHDYE2.
 
3) Bates, J., Konkin, J., Suddards, C., Dobson, S., & Pratt, D. (2013). Student perceptions of assessment and feedback in longitudinal integrated clerkships. Medical Education, 47 (4), 362-374. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.12087.
 
4) Sword, H. (2012, July 23). Zombie nouns. New York Times. https://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/07/23/zombie-nouns/. Accessed 8 Sept 2020.
 
5) Lanham, R. (2006). Revising prose (5th ed.). New York : Pearson Longman.
 
6) Chou, C. L., Kalet, A., Costa, M. J., Cleland, J., & Winston, K. (2019). Guidelines : The dos, don'ts and don't knows of remediation in medical education. Perspectives on Medical Education, 8, 322-338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-019-00544-5.
 
P.115 掲載の参考文献
1) King, M. L., Jr. (2008). Martin Luther King, Jr.'s "I have a dream" speech : The full text. In P. Finkelman (Ed.), Milestone documents in American history : Exploring the primary sources that shaped America. Pasadena : Salem Press. https://online-salempress-com.proxy1.lib.uwo.ca/doi/book//10.3331/mdah.
 
2) Strunk, W., & White, E. B. (1999). The elements of style/by William Strunk, Jr. ; with revisions, and introduction, and a chapter on writing by E.B. White (4th ed.). Boston : Allyn and Bacon.
 
3) Pinker, S. (2014). The sense of style. New York : Viking.
 
P.122 掲載の参考文献
1) Truss, L. (2003). Eats, shoots & leaves : The zero tolerance approach to punctuation. London : Profile Books.
 
2) Crystal, D. (2015). Making a point : The persnickety story of English punctuation. New York : St. Martin's Press.
 
3) Lanham, R. (2006). Revising prose (5th ed.). New York : Pearson Longham.
 
P.129 掲載の参考文献
1) Lingard, L., Vanstone, M., Durrant, M., Fleming-Carroll, B., Lowe, M., Rashotte, J., Sinclair, L., & Tallett, S. (2012). Conflicting messages : Examining the dynamics of leadership on interprofessional teams. Academic Medicine, 87 (12), 1762-1767. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e318271fc82.
 
2) Pinker, S. (2014). The sense of style : The thinking person's guide to writing in the 21st century! New York : Penguin.
 
3) Soobiah, C., Cooper, M., Kishimoto, V., Bhatia, R. S., Scott, T., Maloney, S., et al. (2020). Identifying optimal frameworks to implement or evaluate digital health interventions : A scoping review protocol. BMJ Open, 10, e037643. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037643.
PubMed
4) Lingard, L., & Goldszmidt, M. (2020). The rhetorical possibilities of a multi-metaphorical view of clinical supervision. In A. Bleakley (Ed.), Routledge handbook of the medical humanities (pp. 176-184). New York : Routledge.
 
P.135 掲載の参考文献
1) Lei, L. (2016). When science meets cluttered writing : Adjectives and adverbs in academia revisited. Scientometrics, 107, 1361-1372. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1896-3.
 
2) Hale, C. (2013). Sin and syntax : How to craft wicked good prose. New York : Three Rivers Press.
 
3) Gawande, A. A., Studdert, D. M., Orav, E. J., Brennan, T. A., & Zinner, M. J. (2003). Risk factors for retained instruments and sponges after surgery. New England Journal of Medicine, 348, 229-235. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsa021721.
 
4) Pinker, S. (2014). The sense of style. New York : Viking.
 
5) Lewis, C. S. (1960). Studies in words. London : Cambridge University Press.
 
P.141 掲載の参考文献
1) Reeves, A., & Leventhal, P. (2012). Paragraphing. Medical Writing, 21 (4), 298-304. https://doi.org/10.1179/2047480612Z.00000000043.
 
2) Dunleavy, P. (2003). Authoring a PhD. New York : Palgrave.
 
3) Fowler, H. W. (1926). Modern English usage. London : Oxford University Press.
 
4) Dunleavy, P. (2014, March 26). How to write paragraphs in research texts. Medium. https://medium.com/advice-and-help-in-authoring-a-phd-or-non-fiction/how-to-write-paragraphs80781e2f3054
 
5) Euchner, C. (2012). Sentences and paragraphs : Mastering the two most important units of writing. In The writing minis, book 8. USA : The New American Press.
 
P.150 掲載の参考文献
1) O'Conner, P. T. (1999). Words fail me : What everyone who writes should know about writing. New York : Harcourt.
 
2) Sword, H. (2012). Stylish academic writing. Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press.
 
3) Thomson, P., & Kamler, B. (2013). Writing for peer-reviewed journals : Strategies for getting published. London : Routledge.
 
4) LaDonna, K. A., Bates, J., Tait, G. R., McDougall, A., Schulz, V., & Lingard, L. (2016). 'Who is on your health-care team?' Asking individuals with heart failure about care team membership and roles. Health Expectations, 20 (2), 198-210. https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.12447.
 
5) Feak, C. B., & Swales, J. M. (2009). Telling a research story : Writing a literature review. Ann Arbor : University of Michigan Press.
 
6) Thomson, P., & Kamler, B. (2016). Detox your writing : Strategies for doctoral researchers. London : Routledge.
 
7) Pinker, S. (2014). The sense of style : The thinking person's guide to writing in the 21st century. New York : Viking.
 
8) Graff, G., & Birkenstein, C. (2014). They say, I say : The moves that matter in academic writing. New York : W.W. Norton.
 
9) Hyland, K. (2017). Metadiscourse : What is it and where is it going? Journal of Pragmatics, 113, 16-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2017.03.007.
 
P.159 掲載の参考文献
1) Bates, J., Konkin, K., Suddards, C., Dobson, S., & Pratt, D. (2013). Student perceptions of assessment and feedback in longitudinal integrated clerkships. Medical Education, 47 (4), 362-374. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.12087.
 
2) Pinker, S. (2014). The sense of style. New York : Viking.
 
3) Fish, S. (2011). How to write a sentence and how to read one. New York : Harper.
 
4) Sword, H. (n.d.). The writer's diet. http://writersdiet.com/. Accessed 24 Sept 2020.
 
5) Lanham, R. A. (2007). Revising prose. New York : Pearson Longman.
 
6) Sword, H. (2012, July 23). Zombie nouns. The New York Times. https://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/07/23/zombie-nouns/. Accessed 8 Sept 2020.
 
P.168 掲載の参考文献
1) Truss, L. (2003). Eats, shoots & leaves : The zero tolerance approach to punctuation. London : Profile Books.
 
2) Crystal, D. (2015). Making a point : The persnickety story of English punctuation. New York : St. Martin's Press.
 
3) Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar (3rd ed.). London : Arnold.
 
4) Williams, J. M. (1990). Style : Toward clarity and grace. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
 
5) Sword, H. (2012). Stylish academic writing. Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press.
 
6) Dryer, M. S. (2012). Order of subject, object and verb. In M. S. Dryer & M. Haspelmath (Eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. http://wals.info/chapter/81. Accessed 11 Sept 2020.
 
P.177 掲載の参考文献
1) Hyland, K. (1996). Writing without conviction? Hedging in science research articles. Applied Linguistics, 17 (4), 433-454. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/17.4.433.
 
2) Chen, H. (2010). Contrastive learner corpus analysis of epistemic modality and interlanguage pragmatic competence in L2 writing. Arizona Working Papers in SLA & Teaching, 17, 27-51. https://journals.uair.arizona.edu/index.php/AZSLAT/article/view/21239
 
3) Hyland, K. (1998). Boosting, hedging and the negotiation of academic knowledge. Talk and Text, 18 (3), 349-382.
 
4) Myers, G. (1989). The pragmatics of politeness in scientific articles. Applied Linguistics, 10 (1), 1-35. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/10.1.1.
 
5) Kjeldstadli, K., Tyssen, R., Finset, A., Hem, E., Gude, T., Gronvold, N. T., Ekeberg, O., et al. (2006). Life satisfaction and resilience in medical school- A six-year longitudinal, nationwide and comparative study. BMC Medical Education, 6, 48. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-6-48.
 
6) Yang, A., Zheng, S., & Ge, G. (2015). Epistemic modality in English-medium medical research articles : A systemic functional perspective. English for Specific Purposes, 38, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2014.10.005.
 
P.190 掲載の参考文献
1) Malone, D. (1948). Jefferson the Virginian. In Jefferson and his time (Vol. 1). Charlottesville : First University of Virginia Press.
 
2) Myers, G. (1989). The pragmatics of politeness in scientific articles. Applied Linguistics, 10 (1), 35. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/10.1.1.
 
3) Swales, J. M., Ahmad, U., Chang, Y., Chavez, D., Dressen, D. F., & Seymour, R. (1998). Consider this : The role of imperatives in scholarly writing. Applied Linguistics, 19 (1), 97-121. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/19.1.97.
 
4) Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness : Some universals in language usage. London : Cambridge University Press.
 
5) Regehr, G. (2010). It's NOT rocket science : Rethinking our metaphors for research in health professions education. Medical Education, 44 (1), 31-39. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03418.x.
 
6) Boyd, V. A., Whitehead, C. R., Thille, P., Ginsburg, S., Brydges, R., & Kuper, A. (2018). Competency-based medical education : The discourse of infallibility. Medical Education, 52 (1), 45-57. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13467.
 
7) Varpio, L., Ajjawi, R., Monrouxe, L. V., O'Brien, B. C., & Rees, C. E. (2017). Shedding the cobra effect : Problematising thematic emergence, triangulation, saturation and member checking. Medical Education, 51 (1), 40-50. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13124.
 
8) Hyland, K. (1998). Boosting, hedging and the negotiation of academic knowledge. Talk and Text, 18 (3), 349-382.
 
9) Hyland, K. (1996). Talking to the academy : Forms of hedging in science research articles. Written Communication, 13 (2), 251-281. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088396013002004.
 
10) Choudhury, A., & Asan, O. (2020). Role of artificial intelligence in patient safety outcomes : Systematic literature review. JMIR Medical Informatics, 8 (7), e18599.
 
11) Lingard, L. (2009). What we see and don't see when we look at 'competence' : Notes on a god term. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 14 (5), 625-628. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-009-9206-y.
 
12) Lingard, L. (2016). Paradoxical truths and persistent myths : Reframing the team competence conversation. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 36, S19-S21. https://doi.org/10.1097/CEH.0000000000000078.
 
13) Sebok-Syer, S., Chahine, S., Watling, C. J., Goldszmidt, M., Cristancho, S., & Lingard, L. (2018). Considering the interdependence of clinical performance : Implications for assessment and entrustment. Medical Education, 52 (9), 970-980. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13588.
 
14) Ginsburg, S., Van der Vleuten, C., Eva, K., & Lingard, L. (2015). Hedging to save face : A linguistic analysis of written comments on in-training evaluation reports. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 21, 175-188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-015-9622-0.
 
15) Norman, G. (2011). Chaos, complexity and complicatedness : Lessons from rocket science. Medical Education, 45 (6), 549-559. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.03945.x.
 
16) Regehr, G. (2011). Highway spotters and traffic controllers : Further reflections on complexity. Medical Education, 45 (6), 542-543. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04007.x.
 
P.202 掲載の参考文献
1) Clark, R. P. (2006). Writing tools. New York : Little, Brown, and Company.
 
2) Gray, G. (2017). Academic voice in scholarly writing. The Qualitative Report, 22 (1), 179-196. https://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol22/iss1/10.
 
3) Charmaz, K., & Mitchell, R. G. (1996). The myth of silent authorship : Self, substance, and style in ethnographic writing. Symbolic Interaction, 19 (4), 285-302. https://doi.org/10.1525/si.1996.19.4.285.
 
4) Mitchell, K. M. (2017). Academic voice : On feminism, presence, and objectivity in writing. Nursing Inquiry, 24 (4). https://doi.org/10.1111/nin.12200.
 
5) Hundt, M., & Mair, C. (1999). Agile and uptight genres : The corpus-based approach to language change in progress. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 4 (2), 221-242. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.4.2.02hun.
 
6) Sword, H. (2012). Stylish academic writing. Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press.
 
7) Olson, R. (2009). Don't be such a scientist : Talking substance in an age of style. Washington, DC : Island Press.
 
8) Hunter, P. (2016). The communications gap between scientists and public. Science & Society EMBO Reports, 17 (11), 1513-1515. https://doi.org/10.15252/embr.201643379.
 
9) Hyland, K. (2005). Stance and engagement : A model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies, 7 (2), 173-192. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605050365.
 
10) Urbach, D. R., Dimick, J. B., Haynes, A. B., & Gawande, A. A. (2019). Is WHO's surgical safety checklist being hyped? BMJ, 366, 4700. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l4700.
 
11) Panda, N., Solsky, I., Huang, E. J., Lipsitz, S., Pradarelli, J. C., Delisle, M., et al. (2020). Using smartphones to capture novel recovery metrics after cancer surgery. JAMA Surgery, 155 (2), 123-129. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2019.4702.
 
12) Charles, M. (2006). The construction of stance in reporting clauses : A cross-disciplinary study of theses. Applied Linguistics, 27 (3), 492-518. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/aml021.
 
13) Seoane, E., & Hundt, M. (2018). Voice alternation and authorial presence : Variation across disciplinary areas in academic English. Journal of English Linguistics, 46 (1), 3-22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0075424217740938.
 
14) Greenhalgh, P. (2009). Patient and public involvement in chronic illness : Beyond the expert patient. BMJ, 338, b49. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b49.
 
15) Boyd, V. A., Whitehead, C. R., Thille, P., Ginsburg, S., Brydges, R., & Kuper, A. (2018). Competency-based medical education : The discourse of infallibility. Medical Education, 52 (1), 45-57. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13467.
 
16) Ilgen, J., Eva, K., de Bruin, A., Cook, D., & Regehr, G. (2019). Comfort with uncertainty : Reframing our conceptions of how clinicians navigate complex clinical situations. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 24 (4), 797-809. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-018-9859-5.
 

第3部 共同 : The Community

P.212 掲載の参考文献
1) Bennett, L.M., Gadlin, H., & Levine-Finley, S. (2010). Team science and collaboration : A field guide. National Institutes of Health. https://www.cancer.gov/about-nci/organization/crs/researchinitiatives/team-science-field-guide/collaboration-team-science-guide.pdf. Accessed 19 Sept 2020.
 
2) Berndt, A. E. (2011). Developing collaborative research agreements. Journal of Emergency Nursing, 37 (5), 497-498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jen.2011.04.010.
 
3) Lowry, P. B., Curtis, A., & Lowry, M. R. (2004). Building a taxonomy and nomenclature of collaborative writing to improve interdisciplinary research and practice. The Journal of Business Communication, 41 (1), 66-99. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021943603259363.
 
4) Ede, L., & Lunsford, A. (1990). Singular texts/plural authors : Perspectives on collaborative writing. Carbondale : Southern Illinois University Press.
 
5) Larsen-Ledet, I., & Korsgaard, H. (2019). Territorial functioning in collaborative writing : Fragmented exchanges and common outcomes. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 28, 391-433. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-019-09359-8.
 
P.220 掲載の参考文献
1) Gadlin, H., & Bennett, L. M. (2012). Dear doc : Advice for collaborators. Translational Behavioral Medicine, 2 (4), 495-503. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13142-012-0156-1.
 
2) Frassl, M. A., Hamilton, D. P., Denfeld, B. A., de Eyto, E., Hampton, S. E., Keller, P. S., et al. (2018). Ten simple rules for collaboratively writing a multi-authored paper. PLoS Computational Biology, 14 (11), e1006508. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006508.
 
3) Babor, T., Morisano, D., & Noel, J. (2017). Coin of the realm : Practical procedures for determining authorship. In T. F. Babor, K. Stenius, R. Pates, M. Miovsky, J. O'Reilly, & P. Candon (Eds.), Publishing addiction science : A guide for the perplexed (pp. 207-227). London : Ubiquity Press.
 
4) Brand, A., Allen, L., Altman, M., Hlava, M., & Scott, J. (2015). Beyond authorship : Attribution, contribution, collaboration, and credit. Learned Publishing, 28 (2), 151-155. https://doi.org/10.1087/20150211.
 
5) Lariviere, V., Desrochers, N., Macaluso, B., Mongeon, P., Paul-Hus, A., & Sugimoto, C. R. (2016). Contributorship and division of labor in knowledge production. Social Studies of Science, 46 (3), 417-435. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312716650046.
 
6) McFarlane, B. (2017). The ethics of multiple authorship : Power, performativity and the gift economy. Studies in Higher Education, 42 (7), 1194-1210. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1085009.
 
7) Kwok, L. S. (2005). The white bull effect : Abusive coauthorship and publication parasitism. Journal of Medical Ethics, 31, 554-556. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2004.010553.
 
8) Ioannidis, J. P. A., Klavans, R., & Boyack, K. W. (2018). Thousands of scientists publish a paper every five days. Nature, 561, 167-169. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-018-06185-8.
 
9) Uijtdehaage, S., Mavis, B., & Durning, S. J. (2018). Whose paper is it anyway? Authorship criteria according to established scholars in health professions education. Academic Medicine, 93 (8), 1171-1175. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000002144
 
10) Maggio, L., Dong, T., Driessen, E., & Artino, A., Jr. (2019b). Factors associated with scientific misconduct and questionable research practices in health professions education. Perspectives on Medical Education, 8, 74-82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-019-0501-x.
 
11) International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. (2018). Recommendations for the conduct, reporting, editing, and publication of scholarly work in medical journals. http://www.icmje.org/icmjerecommendations.pdf. Accessed 14 Nov 2019.
 
12) Smith, E., Williams-Jones, B., Master, Z., Lariviere, V., Sugimoto, C. R., Paul-Hus, A., et al. (2019). Researchers' perceptions of ethical authorship distribution in collaborative research teams. Science and Engineering Ethics, 26 (4), 1995-2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-019-00113-3.
 
13) Dance, A. (2012). Authorship : Who's on first? Nature, 489, 591-593. https://doi.org/10.1038/nj7417-591a.
 
14) Garfield, E. (1982, July 26). More on the ethics of scientific publication : Abuses of authorship attribution and citation amnesia undermine the reward system of science. Essays of an information scientist (Vol. 5). http://www.garfield.library.upenn.edu/essays/v5p621y1981-82.pdf. Accessed 16 Sept 2020.
 
15) Smith, R. (1997). Authorship : Time for a paradigm shift? BMJ, 314, 992. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.314.7086.992.
 
16) Martinson, B. C., Anderson, M. S., & de Vries, R. (2005). Scientists behaving badly. Nature, 435, 737-738. https://doi.org/10.1038/435737a.
 
17) Strange, K. (2008). Authorship : Why not just toss a coin? American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology, 295 (3), C567-C575. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpcell.00208.2008.
PubMed
18) Maggio, L. A., Artino, A. R., Jr., Watling, C. J., Driessen, E. W., & O'Brien, B. C. (2019a). Exploring researchers' perspectives on authorship decision making. Medical Education, 53, 1253-1262. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13950.
 
19) PLoS One. (n.d.). Authorship. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/authorship. Accessed 5 Feb 2020.
 
P.226 掲載の参考文献
1) Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance : A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119 (2), 254-284. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.254.
 
2) Sargeant, J., Mann, K., Sinclair, D., van der Vleuten, C., & Metsemakers, J. (2008). Understanding the influence of emotions and reflection upon multi-source feedback acceptance and use. Advances in Health Science Education, 13, 275-288. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-006-9039-x.
 
3) Lefroy, J., Watling, C., Teunissen, P. W., & Brand, P. (2015). Guidelines on feedback for clinical education : The dos, don'ts, and don't knows of feedback for clinical education. Perspectives on Medical Education, 4 (6), 284-299. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-015-0231-7.
 
4) Molloy, E., & Bearman, M. (2019). Embracing the tension between vulnerability and credibility : 'Intellectual candour' in health professions education. Medical Education, 53 (1), 32-41. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13649.
 
P.232 掲載の参考文献
1) Baldwin, C., & Chandler, G. (2002). Improving faculty publication output : The role of a writing coach. Journal of Professional Nursing, 18 (1), 8-15. https://doi.org/10.1053/jpnu.2002.30896.
 
2) Cole, B. (2002). A visit with historian David McCullough. Humanities, 24 (3).
 
3) Gardiner, M., & Kearns, H. (2012). The ABCDE of writing : Coaching high-quality high-quantity writing. International Coaching Psychology Review, 7 (2), 247-259.
 
4) Sword, H. (2017). Air and light and time and space : How successful academics write. Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press.
 
P.239 掲載の参考文献
1) McGrath, L., Negretti, R., & Nicholls, K. (2019). Hidden expectations : Scaffolding subject specialists' genre knowledge of the assignments they set. Higher Education, 78, 835-853. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-019-00373-9.
 
2) Aitchison, C. (2018). Writing an identity into being. In S. Carter & D. Laurs (Eds.), Developing research writing : A handbook for supervisors and advisors (pp. 193-197). London : Routledge.
 
3) Molloy, E., & Bearman, M. (2019). Embracing the tension between vulnerability and credibility : "Intellectual candour" in health professions education. Medical Education, 53 (1), 32-41. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13649.
 
4) Wellington, J. (2010). More than a matter of cognition : An exploration of affective writing problems of post-graduate students and their possible solutions. Teaching in Higher Education, 15 (2), 135-150. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562511003619961.
 
5) Vanstone, M. (2017). Writing and the role of your supervisor. http://www.meredithvanstone.com/assets/mv-grad_school_tips-writing_feedback.pdf. Accessed 28 Apr 2020.
 
6) Watling, C. J., & LaDonna, K. A. (2019). Where philosophy meets culture : Exploring how coaches conceptualise their roles. Medical Education, 53 (5), 467-476. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13799.
 
7) Lamott, A. (1994). Bird by bird : Some instructions on writing and life. New York : Pantheon Books.
 
8) Apramian, T., Cristancho, S., Watling, C., Ott, M., & Lingard, L. (2015). Thresholds of principle and preference : Exploring procedural variation in postgraduate surgical education. Academic Medicine, 90 (11), S70-S76. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000000909.
 
P.247 掲載の参考文献
1) Murray, R., Steckley, L., & MacLeod, I. (2012). Research leadership in writing for publication : A theoretical framework. British Educational Research Journal, 38 (5), 765-778. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411926.2011.580049.
 
2) Lee, A., & Boud, D. (2003). Writing groups, change and academic identity : Research development as local practice. Studies in Higher Education, 28 (2), 187-200. https://doi.org/10.1080/0307507032000058109.
 
3) Aitchison, C. (2009). Writing groups for doctoral education. Studies in Higher Education, 4 (8), 905-916. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070902785580.
 
4) Murray, R. (2012). Developing a community of research practice. British Educational Research Journal, 38 (5), 783-800. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411926.2011.583635.
 
5) Roulston, K., Teitelbaum, D., Chang, B., & Butchart, R. (2016). Strategies for developing a writing community for doctoral students. International Journal for Researcher Development, 7 (2), 198-210. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJRD-02-2016-0003.
 
6) Lillis, T. (2009). Bringing writers' voices to writing research : Talk around research. In S. Parker, A. Carter, & T. Lillis (Eds.), Why writing matters : Issues of identity in writing research and pedagogy (Vol. 12, pp. 169-188). Amsterdam : John Benjamins Publishing.
 
7) Farnsworth, V., Kleanthous, I., & Wenger-Trayner, E. (2016). Communities of practice as a social theory of learning : A conversation with Etienne Wenger. British Journal of Educational Studies, 64 (2), 139-160. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071005.2015.1133799.
 
P.259 掲載の参考文献
1) Tite, L., & Schroter, S. (2007). Why do peer reviewers decline to review? A survey. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 61 (1), 9-12. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2006.049817.
 
2) Le Sueur, H., Dagliati, A., Buchan, I., Whetton, A. D., Martin, G. P., Dornan, T., et al. (2020). Pride and prejudice- What can we learn from peer review? Medical Teacher, 42 (9), 1012-1018. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2020.1774527
 
3) Hyland, K., & Jiang, F. K. (2020). "This work is antithetical to the spirit of research" : An anatomy of harsh peer reviews. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 46, 100867.
 
4) Ellaway, R., Tolsgaard, M., & Norman, G. (2020). Peer review is not a lottery : AHSE's fast track. Advances in Health Science Education, 25, 519-521. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-020-09981-y.
PubMed
5) Thomson, P., & Kamler, B. (2013). Writing for peer-reviewed journals : Strategies for getting published. London : Routledge.
 
6) Shit my reviewers say. (n.d.). Tumblr. https://shitmyreviewerssay.tumblr.com/. Accessed 4 Sept 2020.
 
7) Peterson, D. A. M. (2020). Dear reviewer 2 : Go F' yourself. Social Science Quarterly, 101 (4), 1648-1652. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12824.
 
8) Silbiger, N. J., & Stubler, A. D. (2019). Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm underrepresented groups in STEM. Peer Journal : Life & Environment, 7, e8247. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.8247.
 
9) Silvia, P. J. (2019). How to write a lot : A guide to productive academic writing (2nd ed.). Washington, DC : American Psychological Association.
 
10) Swales, J. (1990). Genre analysis : English in academic and research settings. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
 
11) AM Rounds : Beyond the pages of Academic Medicine. (2019, September 13). Addressing reviewer comments recap : Key takeaways and additional resources. http://academicmedicineblog.org/addressing-reviewer-comments-recap-key-takeaways-and-additional-resources/. Accessed 9 Sept 2020.
 

書評

最近チェックした商品履歴

Loading...