運動学・神経学エビデンスと結ぶ脳卒中理学療法

出版社： 中外医学社
著者：
発行日： 2022-03-25
分野： 医療技術  >  リハビリ技術
ISBN： 9784498067363
電子書籍版： 2022-03-25 （1版1刷）
書籍・雑誌
≪全国送料無料でお届け≫
取寄せ目安：8～14営業日

5,280 円(税込)

購入する
電子書籍
章別単位での購入はできません
ブラウザ、アプリ閲覧

5,280 円(税込)

購入する

商品紹介

目に見えない神経障害に対する脳卒中の理学療法において，日々の臨床での治療や評価，どのように判断していますか？　臨床上ポイントとなる重要なエビデンスが具体的にどのような症状でみてとれるのか，どのように評価し，どのように治療に応用すればいいのか例示し，日常診療に根拠と自信をもって臨めるようになる1冊．関節運動学・動作運動学のエビデンスをもとに実践的に解説した現場で役立つ必読書．

目次

  • 第I部　運動学と脳卒中理学療法
    （1）関節運動学
    ＞1　股関節機能と脳卒中理学療法
    　　　股関節機能とは
    　　　股関節機能障害の特徴
    　　　股関節機能障害と理学療法
    　　　エビデンスと理学療法
    ＞2　膝関節運動学と脳卒中理学療法
    　　　膝関節の機能
    　　　片麻痺者の歩行における膝関節の特徴
    　　　片麻痺者の歩行における膝関節と理学療法
    　　　エビデンスと理学療法
    ＞3　足関節・足部運動学と脳卒中理学療法
    　　　足関節・足部の機能とは
    　　　足関節・足部の機能障害の特徴
    　　　足関節・足部の機能障害と理学療法
    　　　エビデンスと理学療法
    ＞4　体幹運動学と脳卒中理学療法
    　　　体幹に求められる運動機能
    　　　コアマッスルシステム
    　　　機能的身体体節
    　　　片麻痺患者の体幹運動の特徴
    　　　体幹トレーニングのエビデンスと理学療法の進め方
    　　　体幹機能を改善させる理学療法の実際
    ＞5　肩甲帯運動学と脳卒中理学療法
    　　　肩甲帯運動学
    　　　肩甲胸郭関節運動学
    　　　脳卒中後の肩甲胸郭関節の機能障害と理学療法
    　　　エビデンスと理学療法
    ＞6　肩関節運動学と脳卒中理学療法
    　　　脳血管障害片麻痺患者の肩関節について
    　　　片麻痺患者における肩関節屈曲運動障害の特徴例
    　　　片麻痺患者における肩関節屈曲運動障害と理学療法
    　　　エビデンスと理学療法
    ＞7　上肢関節運動学と脳卒中理学療法
    　　　脳卒中における上肢関節運動
    　　　脳卒中の上肢機能障害
    　　　上肢機能の評価
    　　　脳卒中後の上肢麻痺に対するアプローチ
    ＞8　手指運動学と脳卒中理学療法
    　　　手指の運動とは
    　　　手指運動学の特徴
    　　　手指運動学と理学療法
    　　　エビデンスと理学療法

    （2）動作運動学
    ＞1　臥位運動学と脳卒中理学療法
    　　　臥位とは
    　　　臥位動作の障害
    　　　臥位動作障害と理学療法
    　　　運動学と理学療法
    ＞2　起き上がり動作運動学と脳卒中理学療法
    　　　起き上がり動作の概要
    　　　脳卒中患者の起き上がり動作の特徴
    　　　起き上がり動作障害と理学療法
    　　　運動学と理学療法
    ＞3　座位バランス運動学と脳卒中理学療法
    　　　座位バランスの運動学
    　　　脳卒中患者の座位バランスの疫学
    　　　エビデンスと理学療法
    ＞4　立ち上がり動作運動学と脳卒中理学療法
    　　　立ち上がり動作とは
    　　　立ち上がり動作の特徴
    　　　立ち上がり動作と理学療法
    　　　エビデンスと理学療法
    ＞5　立位バランス運動学と脳卒中理学療法
    　　　立位バランス
    　　　静的および動的立位バランス制御と体性感覚情報
    　　　予測的姿勢制御
    　　　脳卒中患者に対する理学療法で大事なこと
    ＞6　姿勢アライメントと脳卒中理学療法
    　　　姿勢アライメントとは
    　　　身体におけるアラインメントの基本
    　　　姿勢アライメント障害の特徴
    　　　姿勢アライメント障害と脳卒中片麻痺患者の理学療法
    　　　運動学と理学療法

    第II部　神経学と脳卒中理学療法
    （3）遠心性制御システム
    ＞1　随意運動システムと脳卒中理学療法
    　　　随意運動の実現に必要不可欠な要素とは
    　　　経頭蓋磁気刺激を用いた皮質脊髄路の機能評価
    　　　皮質脊髄路の損傷と機能的予後
    　　　エビデンスと理学療法
    ＞2　バランス制御システムと脳卒中理学療法
    　　　バランス制御システム
    　　　脳卒中患者のバランス障害の特徴
    　　　バランス能力の評価とその解釈
    　　　エビデンスと理学療法
    ＞3　歩行制御システムと脳卒中理学療法
    　　　歩行の神経制御システム
    　　　歩行制御システム障害の特徴
    　　　歩行制御システム障害と理学療法
    　　　エビデンスと理学療法

    （4）求心性制御システム
    ＞1　筋感覚と脳卒中理学療法
    　　　筋に由来する感覚とは
    　　　脳卒中における固有感覚機能障害の特徴
    　　　筋感覚機能障害と運動機能の回復
    　　　エビデンスと理学療法
    ＞2　皮膚感覚と脳卒中理学療法
    　　　皮膚感覚とは
    　　　皮膚感覚障害（表在感覚障害）の特徴
    　　　皮膚感覚障害（表在感覚障害）と理学療法
    　　　エビデンスと理学療法（体性感覚の神経可塑的変化と科学的根拠）
    ＞3　荷重（重力）感覚と脳卒中理学療法
    　　　荷重感覚とは
    　　　荷重感覚障害の特徴
    　　　荷重感覚障害と理学療法
    　　　エビデンスと理学療法
    　　　荷重感覚の利用を誤解しないために
    ＞4　視覚機能と脳卒中理学療法
    　　　視覚機能とは
    　　　視覚機能障害の特徴
    　　　視覚機能障害と理学療法
    　　　エビデンスと理学療法
    ＞5　前庭感覚と脳卒中理学療法
    　　　前庭感覚とは
    　　　前庭機能障害の特徴
    　　　前庭機能障害と理学療法
    　　　エビデンスと理学療法

    （5）認知機能
    ＞1　垂直認知の障害と脳卒中理学療法
    　　　垂直認知とは
    　　　姿勢定位の背景と垂直認知の種類と評価法
    　　　垂直認知の障害と姿勢定位障害
    　　　エビデンスと理学療法
    ＞2　運動イメージと脳卒中理学療法
    　　　モータープライミング
    　　　運動イメージとは
    　　　メンタルプラクティスの適応とは
    　　　運動イメージと理学療法のエビデンス
    　　　運動イメージを用いた理学療法の可能性と展望
    ＞3　運動学習と脳卒中理学療法
    　　　運動学習と理学療法
    　　　運動学習と脳卒中理学療法

    （6）脳局所機能
    ＞1　前頭葉機能と脳卒中理学療法
    　　　前頭葉機能とは
    　　　前頭葉機能障害の特徴
    　　　前頭葉性動作障害と理学療法
    　　　エビデンスと理学療法
    ＞2　頭頂葉機能と脳卒中理学療法
    　　　頭頂葉機能とは
    　　　頭頂葉機能障害の特徴
    　　　頭頂葉機能障害と理学療法
    　　　エビデンスと理学療法
    ＞3　基底核機能と脳卒中理学療法
    　　　基底核機能とは
    　　　基底核機能障害の特徴
    　　　基底核性動作障害と理学療法
    　　　エビデンスと理学療法
    ＞4　視床機能と脳卒中理学療法
    　　　視床機能とは
    　　　視床機能の特徴
    　　　視床機能障害と理学療法
    　　　エビデンスと理学療法
    ＞5　脊髄機能と脳卒中理学療法
    　　　脊髄機能とは
    　　　脊髄機能障害の特徴
    　　　脊髄機能障害と理学療法
    　　　エビデンスと理学療法

この書籍の参考文献

参考文献のリンクは、リンク先の都合等により正しく表示されない場合がありますので、あらかじめご了承下さい。

本参考文献は電子書籍掲載内容を元にしております。

第I部 運動学と脳卒中理学療法

P.14 掲載の参考文献
1) Horak F, Nashner L. Central programming of postural movements : adaptation to altered support-surface configurations. J Neurophysiol. 1986 ; 55 : 1369-81.
PubMed
2) Juker D, et al. Quantitative intramuscular myoelectric activity of lumbar portions of psoas and the abdominal wall during a wide variety of tasks. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1998 ; 30 : 301-10.
PubMed
3) 古澤正道, 他. 脳卒中後遺症者へのボバースアプローチ 臨床編. 運動と医学の出版社. 2016. p.114-7.
 
4) Kibler WB, et al. The role of core stability in athletic function. Sports Med. 2006 ; 36 : 189-98.
PubMed
5) Kuypers HGJM. Anatomy of the descending pathways. In : Brooks VB, ed. Motor control. Sect I, vol 2, Handbook of physiology. American Physiological Society ; 1981. p.597-666.
 
6) Grillner S, Rossignol S. On the initiation of the swing phase of locomotion in chronic spinal cats. Brain Res. 1978 ; 146 : 269-77.
PubMed
7) Kriellaars DJ, et al. Mechanical entrainment of fictive locomotion in the decerebrate Cat. J Neurophysiol. 1994 ; 71 : 2074-86.
 
8) 吉尾雅春, 他. 脳卒中患者の治療用装具はありえるか. 日義肢装具会誌. 2012 ; 28 : 76-9.
 
9) Gottschall JS, Kram R. Energy cost and muscular activity required for propulsion during walking. J Appl Physiol. 2003 ; 94 : 1766-72.
 
10) 大畑光司. 正常・異常歩行運動学的理解ポイント. 理学療法. 2018 ; 35 : 109-19.
 
11) Olney SJ, Griffin MP, Monga TN, et al. Work and power in gait of stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1991 ; 72 : 309-14.
PubMed
12) Basford JR, et al. An assessment of gait and balance deficits after traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003 ; 84 : 343-9.
PubMed
13) Kim CM, Eng JJ. Magnitude and pattern of 3D knematic and kinematic and knetic gait profiles in person with stroke : relationship to warking speed. Gait Posture. 2004 ; 20 : 140-6.
 
14) Akbari A, Karimi H. The relationship between lower-extremity muscle atrength and functional performance in hemiparetic patients. J Med Sci. 2006 ; 6 : 327-31.
 
15) 中道哲朗, 他. 片脚立位, 足部機能の検討. 関西理学. 2015 ; 15 : 17-21.
Medical*Online
P.27 掲載の参考文献
1) De Quervin IA, et al. Gait pattern in the recovery period after stroke. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996 ; 78 : 1506-14.
 
2) Cooper A, et al. The relationship of lower limb muscle strength and knee joint hyperextension during the stance phase of the gait in hemiparetic stroke patients. Phishother. 2012 ; 17 : 150-6.
PubMed
3) 田中惣治, 山本澄子. 片麻痺の歩行パターンの違いによる歩行時の筋電図・運動力学的特徴. バイオメカニズム. 2016 ; 23 : 107-17.
 
4) 田中惣治, 他. 麻痺側立脚期の膝関節の動きによる片麻痺者の歩行パターン別の時間因子の分析. 理学療法学. 2012 ; 17 : 150-6
 
5) Campanini A, et al. A method to differentiate the causes of stiff-knee gait in stroke patients. Gait Posture. 2013 ; 38 : 165-9.
 
6) Perry J, Burnfield J. Gait analysis ; normal and pathologocal function, 2nd ed. Slack Inc ; 2010.
 
7) 臨床歩行分析研究会, 編. 関節モーメントによる歩行分析. 医歯薬出版 ; 1997.
 
8) Gotz-Nouman, 著. 月城慶一, 他訳. 観察による歩行分析. 医学書院 ; 2005.
 
9) 山本澄子, 他. 片麻痺者の歩行と短下肢装具. 医歯薬出版社 ; 2005.
 
10) 才藤栄一, 他. 運動学習からみた装具-麻痺疾患の歩行練習において-. 2010 ; 38 : 545-50.
 
P.36 掲載の参考文献
1) 荻原直道. ヒトの足部筋骨格構造の形態的特徴とその進化. バイオメカニズム学会誌. 2019 ; 43 : 83-8.
 
2) McKeon PO, et al. The foot core system : a new paradigm for understanding intrinsic foot muscle function. Br J Sports Med. 2015 ; 49 : 290.
PubMed
3) 小林匠. 足部・足関節の機能解剖学的特性から見た理学療法実践. 理学療法. 2020 ; 37 : 246-66.
 
4) 片寄正樹, 監修. 足部・足関節理学療法マネジメント-機能障害の原因を探るための臨床思考を紐解く. メジカルビュー社 ; 2018. p.3-53.
 
5) Neumann DA, 著. 嶋田智明, 有馬慶美, 訳. カラー版 筋骨格系のキネシオロジー. 2版. 医歯薬出版 ; 2013. p.629-86.
 
6) Farris DJ, et al. Foot stiffening during the push-off phase of human walking is linked to active muscle contraction, and not the windlass mechanism. J R Soc Interface. 2020 ; 17 : 20200208.
 
7) Viseux F, et al. How can the stimulation of plantar cutaneous receptors improve postural control? Review and clinical commentary. Neurophysiol Clin. 2019 ; 49 : 263-8.
PubMed
8) Farris DJ, et al. The functional importance of human foot muscles for bipedal locomotion. Proc Nat Acad Sci U S A. 2019 ; 116 : 1645-50.
 
9) Houck JR, et al. Foot kinematics during a bilateral heel rise test in participants with stage II posterior tibial tendon dysfunction. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2009 ; 39 : 593-603.
PubMed
10) 入谷誠. 足部に関する評価と治療. 理学療法学. 2012 ; 39 : 293-6.
Medical*Online
11) 中島剛. 体性感覚信号と運動 体性感覚と歩行. Clin Neurosci. 2017 ; 35 : 178-82.
 
12) Hof AL, Duysens J. Responses of human ankle muscles to mediolateral balance perturbations during walking. Hum Mov Sci. 2018 ; 57 : 69-82.
PubMed
13) McBride S, et al. The relationship between supination resistance and the kinetics and kinematics of the foot and ankle during gait. Gait Posture. 2019 ; 73 : 239-45.
PubMed
P.47 掲載の参考文献
1) Klein-Vogelbach S. Functional observation criteria. Functional kinetics. Springer-Veralag ; 1990. p.74-80.
 
2) 松井秀治. 各種姿勢の重心位置に関する研究. 体育学研究. 1956 ; 2 : 65-76.
 
3) 冨田昌夫. 片麻痺の体幹機能. PTジャーナル. 1991 ; 25 : 88-94.
 
4) 佐藤房郎, 他. 片麻痺の体幹機能の分析-体幹運動と立位動作・ADLとの関係-. 理学療法学. 1993 ; 20 : 230-7.
 
5) 佐藤房郎, 他. 片麻痺の体幹機能と筋活動. 理学療法学. 1994 ; 21 : 464-9.
 
6) Little VL, et al. Pelvic excursion during walking post-stroke : A novel classification system. Gait Posture. 2018 ; 62 : 395-404.
PubMed
7) Nardone A, et al. Stabilometry is a predictor of gait performance in chronic hemiparetic stroke patient. Gait Posture. 2009 ; 30 : 5-10.
PubMed
8) Van Criekinge T, et al. Trunk biomechanics during hemiplegic gait after stroke : a systematic review. Gait Posture. 2017 ; 54 : 133-43.
PubMed
9) Cabanas-Valdes R, et al. Trunk training exercises approaches for improving trunk performance and functional sitting balance in patients with stroke : a systematic review. NeuroRehabilitation. 2013 ; 33 : 575-92.
PubMed
10) de Haart M, et al. Recovery of standing balance in postacute stroke patients : a rehabilitation cohort study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004 ; 85 : 886-95.
PubMed
11) Geurts N, et al. A review of standing balance recovery from stroke. Gait Posture. 2005 ; 22 : 267-81.
 
12) Kamphuis JF, et al. Is weight-bearing asymmetry associated with posturl instability after stroke? A systematic review. Stroke Res Treat. 2013 ; 2013 : 692137.
PubMed
13) Genthon N, et al. Contribution of each lower limb to upright standing in stroke patients. Stroke. 2008 ; 39 : 1793-9.
PubMed
14) Hendrickson J, et al. Relationship between asymmetry of quiet standing balance control and walking post-stroke. Gait Posture. 2014 ; 39 : 177-81.
PubMed
15) Sasaki A, et al. Evidence for existence of trunk-limb neural interaction in the corticospinal pathway. Neurosci Lett. 2018 ; 668 : 31-6.
PubMed
16) 佐藤房郎. 中枢神経疾患の理学療法とコアスタビリティトレーニング. 理学療法. 2009 ; 26 : 1219-27.
 
17) 佐藤房郎. 脳卒中片麻痺患者の上肢機能改善のための下肢・体幹機能連関の視点からのアプローチ. 理学療法. 2012 ; 29 : 1367-77.
 
18) 佐藤房郎. コアスタビリティトレーニング再考-脳卒中片麻痺患者運動療法への応用の視点から-. 理学療法. 2017 ; 34 : 887-98.
 
P.56 掲載の参考文献
1) De Baets L, et al. A systematic review of 3D scapular kinematics and muscle activity during elevation in stroke subjects and controls. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2013 ; 23 : 3-13.
PubMed
2) Ludewig PM, Reynolds JF. The association of scapular kinematics and glenohumeral joint pathologies. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2009 ; 39 : 90-104.
PubMed
3) Borsa PA, et al. Scapular-positioning patterns during humeral elevation in unimpaired shoulders. J Athl Train. 2003 ; 38 : 12-7.
 
4) Ludewig PM, Cook TM. Alterations in shoulder kinematics and associated muscle activity in people with symptoms of shoulder impingement. Phys Ther. 2000 ; 80 : 276-91.
PubMed
5) Ebaugh DD, et al. Three-dimensional scapulothoracic motion during active and passive arm elevation. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2005 ; 20 : 700-9.
PubMed
6) De Baets L, et al. Three-dimensional kinematics of the scapula and trunk, and associated scapular muscle timing in individuals with stroke. Hum Mov Sci. 2016 ; 48 : 82-90.
PubMed
7) Chae J, et al. Poststroke shoulder pain : its relationship to motor impairment, activity limitation, and quality of life. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007 ; 88 : 298-301.
PubMed
8) Lawrence ES, et al. Estimates of the prevalence of acute stroke impairments and disability in a multiethnic population. Stroke. 2001 ; 32 : 1279-84.
 
9) Persson HC, et al. Outcome and upper extremity function within 72 hours after first occasion of stroke in an unselected population at a stroke unit. A part of the SALGOT study. BMC Neurol. 2012 ; 12 : 162.
 
10) Hardwick DD, Lang CE. Scapular and humeral movement patterns of people with stroke during range-of-motion exercises. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2011 ; 35 : 18-25.
PubMed
11) Niessen M, et al. Kinematics of the contralateral and ipsilateral shoulder : a possible relationship with post-stroke shoulder pain. J Rehabil Med. 2008 ; 40 : 482-6.
 
12) Rundquist PJ, et al. Three-dimensional shoulder complex kinematics in individuals with upper extremity impairment from chronic stroke. Disabil Rehabil. 2012 ; 34 : 402-7.
PubMed
13) Hardwick DD, Lang CE. Scapula and humeral movement patterns and their relationship with pain : a preliminary investigation. Int J Ther Rehabil. 2011 ; 18 : 210-20.
 
14) De Baets L, et al. Characteristics of neuromuscular control of the scapula after stroke : a first exploration. Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 ; 8 : 933.
PubMed
15) Avila MA, et al. Bilateral impairments of shoulder abduction in chronic hemiparesis : electromyographic patterns and isokinetic muscle performance. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2013 ; 23 : 712-20.
PubMed
16) Hardwick DD, Lang CE. Scapular and humeral movement patterns of people with stroke during range-of-motion exercises. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2011 ; 35 : 18-25.
PubMed
17) Awad A, et al. Effect of shoulder girdle strengthening on trunk alignment in patients with stroke. J Phys Ther Sci. 2015 ; 27 : 2195-200.
PubMed
18) Song CS. Effects of scapular stabilization exercise on function of paretic upper extremity of chronic stroke patients. J Phys Ther Sci. 2013 ; 25 : 403-5.
 
19) Cuesta-Gomez A, et al. The use of functional electrical stimulation on the upper limb and interscapular muscles of patients with stroke for the improvement of reaching movements : a feasibility study. Front Neurol. 2017 ; 8 : 186.
PubMed
20) Kim JO, et al. Effect of scapular stabilization exercise during standing on upper limb function and gait ability of stroke patients. J Neurosci Rural Pract. 2017 ; 8 : 540-4.
PubMed
P.66 掲載の参考文献
1) Codoman EA. The Shoulder. Thomas Todd ; 1934. p.32-65.
 
2) Inman VT, Saunders JB, Abbott LC. Observations of the function of the shoulder joint. J Bone Joint Surg. 1944 ; 26 : 1-30.
 
3) 三浦雄一郎. 肩甲骨の運動分析. In : 鈴木俊明, 他編. Physical therapy for shoulder disorders-肩関節疾患と理学療法-. 第2版. アイペック ; 2017. p.102-19.
 
4) 福島秀晃, 三浦雄一郎. 肩甲上腕リズムの臨床応用を考える. 関西理学療法. 2013 ; 13 : 23-32.
Medical*Online
5) 早田荘, 他. 上肢挙上に伴う体幹機能. 関西理学療法. 2017 ; 17 : 23-32.
Medical*Online
6) 鈴木俊明. 運動障害. In : 鈴木俊明, 編. 脳血管障害片麻痺に対する理学療法評価. 改訂第2版. 神陵文庫 ; 2017. p.16-26.
 
7) 三浦雄一郎. 肩甲上腕関節の安定化. In : 鈴木俊明, 他編. Physical therapy for shoulder disorders-肩関節疾患と理学療法-. 第2版. アイペック ; 2017. p.67-84.
 
8) 福島秀晃, 他. 運動肢位の変化と肩関節周囲筋の筋活動について. 関西理学療法. 2017 ; 17 : 3-16.
Medical*Online
9) 大沼俊博, 他. 体幹研究と理学療法. 関西理学療法. 2013 ; 13 : 11-22.
Medical*Online
10) 大沼俊博, 他. 座位, 立ち上がりの評価とハンドリング. 関西理学療法. 2018 ; 18 : 11-8.
Medical*Online
11) 鈴木俊明. 運動と現象. In : 鈴木俊明, 編. 体幹と骨盤の評価と運動療法. 運動と医学の出版社 ; 2018. p.75-116.
 
12) Kido T, Itoi E, Lee SB, et al. Dynamic stabilizing function of the deltoid muscle in shoulders with anterior instability. Am J Sports Med. 2003 ; 31 : 399-403.
PubMed
13) 布谷美樹, 他. 肩関節屈曲保持における三角筋筋活動-屈曲角度と各筋線維との関係-. 関西理学療法. 2007 ; 7 : 81-4.
Medical*Online
P.79 掲載の参考文献
1) 嶋田智明, 平田総一郎, 監修. 筋骨格系のキネシオロジー. 医歯薬出版 ; 2008. p.124-38.
 
2) Nagai K, et al. Effects of trunk rotation on scapular kinematics and muscle activity during humeral elevation. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2013 ; 23 : 679-87.
PubMed
3) Jorgensen HS, et al. Neurologic and functional recovery the Copenhagen Stroke Study. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 1999 ; 10 : 887-906.
PubMed
4) Krakauer JW. Arm function after stroke : from physiology to recovery. Semin Neurol. 2005 ; 25 : 384-95.
PubMed
5) Kwakkel G, et al. Standardized measurement of sensorimotor recovery in stroke trials : consensus-based core recommendations from the Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation Roundtable. Int J Stroke. 2017 ; 12 : 451-61.
PubMed
6) Woodbury ML, et al. Dimensionality and construct validity of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment of the upper extremity. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007 ; 88 : 715-23.
 
7) Li S, et al. A unifying pathophysiological account for post-stroke spasticity and disordered motor control. Front Neurol. 2019 ; 10 : 468.
 
8) Raghavan P. Upper limb motor impairment post stroke. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2015 ; 26 : 599-610.
 
9) Cheung VC, et al. Muscle synergy patterns as physiological markers of motor cortical damage. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 ; 109 : 14652-6.
PubMed
10) Twitchell TE. The restoration of motor function following hemiplegia in man. Brain. 1951 ; 74 : 443-80.
PubMed
11) Brunnstrom S. Motor testing procedures in hemiplegia : based on sequential recovery stages. Phys Ther. 1966 ; 46 : 357-75.
PubMed
12) Roh J, et al. Evidence for altered upper extremity muscle synergies in chronic stroke survivors with mild and moderate impairment. Front Hum Neurosci. 2015 ; 9 : 6.
PubMed
13) Santisteban L, et al. Upper limb outcome measures used in stroke rehabilitation studies : a systematic literature review. PLoS One. 2016 ; 11 : e0154792.
PubMed
14) Fugl-Meyer AR, et al. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1975 ; 7 : 13-31.
PubMed
15) Amano S, et al. Clinimetric properties of the Fugl-Meyer assessment with adapted guidelines for the assessment of arm function in hemiparetic patients After Stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2018 ; 25 : 500-8.
 
16) Cirstea MC, Levin MF. Compensatory strategies for reaching instroke. Brain. 2000 ; 123 : 940-53.
 
17) Thielman GT, et al. Rehabilitation of reaching after stroke : task-related trainingversus progressive resistive exercise. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004 ; 85 : 1613-8.
PubMed
18) Roby-Brami A, et al. Reaching and grasping strategies in hemiparetic patients. Mot Control. 1997 ; 1 : 72-91.
 
19) Bang DH, et al. Effects of modified constraint-induced movement therapy with trunk restraint in early stroke patients : a single-blinded, randomized, controlled, pilot trial. NeuroRehabilitation. 2018 ; 42 : 29-35.
PubMed
20) Dean CM, Shepherd RB. Task-related training improves performance of seated reaching tasks after stroke. A randomized controlled trial. Stroke. 1997 ; 28 : 722-8.
PubMed
21) Winstein CJ, et al. Guidelines for adult stroke rehabilitation and recovery : a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2016 ; 47 : e98-169.
PubMed
22) Langhorne P, et al. Motor recovery after stroke : a systematic review. Lancet Neurol. 2009 ; 8 : 741-54.
PubMed
23) Taub E, et al. New treatments in neurorehabilitation founded on basic research. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2002 ; 3 : 228-36.
PubMed
24) Morris DM, et al. Constraint-induced movement therapy : characterizing the intervention protocol. Eura Medicophys. 2006 ; 42 : 257-68.
PubMed
25) Takebayashi T, et al. Differences in neural pathways are related to the short- or long-term benefits of constraint-induced movement therapy in patients with chronic stroke and hemiparesis : a pilot cohort study. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2018 ; 25 : 203-8.
PubMed
26) El-Helow MR, et. al. Efficacy of modified constraint-induced movement therapy in acute stroke. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2015 ; 51 : 371-9.
PubMed
27) Barzel A, et al. Home-based constraint-induced movement therapy for patients with upper limb dysfunction after stroke (HOMECIMT) : a cluster-randomized, controlled trial. Lancet Neurol. 2015 ; 14 : 893-902.
PubMed
28) 徳田和宏, 他. 脳卒中急性期上肢麻痺に対する病棟実施型CI療法の試み. OTジャーナル. 2019 ; 53 : 1009-13.
 
29) 徳田和宏, 他. 脳卒中後上肢麻痺における急性期傾向スコアデータプールの構築について. 作業療法. 2020 ; 39 : 673-88.
 
30) Takahashi K, et al. Efficacy of upper extremity robotic therapy in subacute poststroke hemiplegia : an exploratory randomized trial. Stroke. 2016 ; 47 : 1385-8.
PubMed
31) 石垣賢和, 他. 回復期の脳卒中患者における上肢用ロボット型運動訓練装置ReoGo(R) -Jの有用性の検討～傾向スコアマッチングを利用した探索的比較研究～. 作業療法. 2019 ; 38 : 575-84.
Medical*Online
P.91 掲載の参考文献
1) 和田善行. 脳卒中患者の上肢に対する促通反復療法 (川平法) の効果と経過. PTジャーナル. 2019 ; 53 : 671-80.
 
2) Kawahira K, et al. Effects of intensive repetition of a new facilitation technique on motor functional recovery of the hemiplegic upper limb and hand. Brain Injury. 2010 ; 24 : 1202-13.
PubMed
3) 和田善行, 他. 慢性期脳卒中片麻痺患者に対する促通反復療法の痙縮減弱効果. 理学療法科学. 2019 ; 34 : 569-74.
Medical*Online
4) 川平和美, 他. 片麻痺回復のための運動療法-促通反復療法「川平法」の理論と実際-. 第3版. 医学書院 ; 2017.
 
5) 射塲靖弘, 他. 急性期脳梗塞片麻痺患者に対する促通反復療法が上肢機能に及ぼす影響. 総合リハ. 2015 ; 43 : 563-6.
 
6) 鎌田克也, 他. 脳卒中片麻痺上肢に対する作業療法と促通反復療法の効果. 作業療法. 2004 ; 23 : 18-25.
 
7) 林田健太, 他. 促通反復療法による片麻痺上肢の機能回復について. 総合リハ. 2007 ; 35 : 809-13.
 
8) 木佐俊郎, 他. 回復期脳卒中片麻痺患者のリハビリテーションに促通反復療法を取り入れた場合の片麻痺と日常生活活動への効果. 無作為化比較対照試験による検討. Jpn J Rehabil Med. 2011 ; 48 : 709-16.
Medical*Online
9) Simodozono M, et al. Benefits of a repetitive facilitative exercise program for the upper paretic extremity after subacute stroke a randomized controlled trail. Neural Repair. 2013 ; 27 : 296-305.
 
10) 三谷俊史, 他. 回復期脳卒中片麻痺に対する促通反復療法の効果. 総合リハ. 2010 ; 38 : 165-70.
 
11) Miyasaka H, et al. A study of the training method of sub-acute stroke patients of the upper extremity : decision tree analysis. Jpn J Compr Rehabil Sci. 2014 ; 5 : 117-24.
 
12) 野間知一, 他. 慢性期の脳卒中片麻痺上肢への促通反復療法の効果. 総合リハ. 2008 ; 36 : 695-9.
 
13) 前迫篤, 他. 脳梗塞急性期における片麻痺上肢への促通反復療法と持続的低周波電気刺激法の同時併用療法による運動機能と浮腫の改善. Jpn J Rehabil Med. 2014 ; 51 : 219-27.
Medical*Online
14) 野間知一, 他. 脳卒中片麻痺上肢の痙縮筋への振動刺激痙縮抑制療法と促通反復療法との併用による麻痺と痙縮の改善効果. 総合リハ. 2009 ; 37 : 137-43.
 
15) Simodozono M, et al. Repetitive facilitative exercise under continuous electrical stimulation for severe arm impairment after sub-acute stroke : a randomized controlled pilot study. Brain Inj. 2014 ; 28 : 203-10.
 
16) 岩田勘司, 他. 慢性期上肢麻痺回復を希望した連続29症例への促通反復療法を含む複合的リハビリテーションの効果. J Clin Rehabil. 2013 ; 22 : 105-10.
Medical*Online
17) Etoh S, et al. Effects of repetitive facilitative exercise with neuromuscular electrical stimulation, vibratory stimulation and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the hemiplegic hand in choronic stroke patients. Int J Neurosci. 2016 ; 126 : 1007-12.
 
18) 林拓児, 他. 通所リハビリテーションにおける慢性期脳卒中片麻痺上肢への促通反復療法治療的電気刺激・振動刺激との併用による麻痺改善効果. 理学療法科学. 2017 ; 32 : 129-32.
 
19) 小林賢祐, 他. 脳卒中片麻痺上肢に対する併用促通反復療法 (電気・振動刺激併用) の治療開始時期と麻痺重症度と麻痺改善度との関連. 理学療法科学. 2020 ; 35 : 639-46.
 
P.101 掲載の参考文献
1) Zatsiorsky VM, 著. 鳥居 俊, 監訳. 身体動作の運動学. ナップ ; 2003.
 
2) 手塚純一, 他編. 急性期の脳卒中理学療法 (理学療法MOOK 22). 三輪書店 ; 2018.
 
3) 市橋則明, 編. 身体運動学-関節の制御機構と筋機能. メジカルビュー社 ; 2017.
 
4) 高橋正明, 編. 臨床動作分析 (標準理学療法学 専門分野). 医学書院 ; 2001.
 
5) 冨田昌夫, 他編. 臨床動作分析-PT・OTの実践に役立つ理論と技術. 三輪書店 ; 2018.
 
P.112 掲載の参考文献
1) 石井慎一郎. 動作分析 臨床活用講座 バイオメカニクスに基づく臨床推論の実践. メジカルビュー社 ; 2014.
 
2) Klein-Vogelbach S. Functional kinetics. Springer-Verlag ; 1998.
 
3) Thomas WM, 著. 板場英行, 石井慎一郎, 訳. アナトミー・トレイン徒手運動療法のための筋筋膜経線. 医学書院 ; 2012.
 
4) Diane Lee, 著. 石井美和子, 監訳. 胸郭 統合アプローチ. 医歯薬出版 ; 2020.
 
5) 石井慎一郎. 動作練習 臨床活用講座 動作メカニズムの再構築と統合. メジカルビュー社 ; 2021.
 
P.124 掲載の参考文献
1) Vialle R, et al. Radiographic analysis of the sagittal alignment and balance of the spine in asymptomatic subjects. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005 ; 87 : 260-7.
PubMed
2) O'Sullivan PB, et al. Effect of different upright sitting postures on spinal-pelvic curvature and trunk muscle activation in a pain-free population. Spine. 2006 ; 31 : E707-12.
 
3) Masani K, et al. Postural reactions of the trunk muscles to multi-directional perturbations in sitting. Clin Biomech. 2009 ; 24 : 176-82.
PubMed
4) 鈴木俊明, 他. The Center of the Body-体幹機能の謎を探る-. 第5版. アイペック ; 2013. p.101-8
 
5) Smith MT, Baer GD. Achievement of simple mobility milestones after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999 ; 80 : 442-7.
PubMed
6) Fukata K, et al. Factors influencing sitting ability during the acute post-stroke phase : a multicenter prospective cohort study in Japan. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2021 ; 30 : 105449
PubMed
7) Verheyden G, et al. Trunk performance after stroke : an eye catching predictor of functional outcome. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2006 ; 78 : 694-8.
PubMed
8) Genthon N, et al. Biomechanical assessment of the sitting posture maintenance in patients with stroke. Clin Biomech. 2007 ; 22 : 1024-9.
PubMed
9) Messier S, et al. Dynamic analysis of trunk flexion after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004 ; 85 : 1619-24.
PubMed
10) Dean CM, et al. Sitting training early after stroke improves sitting ability and quality and carries over to standing up but not to walking : a randomised controlled trial. Aust J Physiother. 2007 ; 53 : 97-102.
 
11) Verheyden G, et al. Kinematic analysis of head, trunk, and pelvis movement when people early after stroke reach sideways. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2011 ; 25 : 656-63.
PubMed
12) van Nes IJ, et al. Posturographic assessment of sitting balance recovery in the subacute phase of stroke. Gait Posture. 2008 ; 28 : 507-12.
PubMed
13) Fujino Y, et al. Does training sitting balance on a platform tilted 10°to the weak side improve trunk control in the acute phase after stroke? A randomized, controlled trial. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2016 ; 23 : 43-9.
 
14) Tessem S, et al. Weight distribution in standing and sitting positions, and weight transfer during reaching tasks, in seated stroke subjects and healthy subjects. Physiother Res Int. 2007 ; 12 : 82-94.
PubMed
15) Wiskerke E, et al. Maximum weight-shifts in sitting in non-ambulatory people with stroke are related to trunk control and balance : a cross-sectional study. Gait Posture. 2020 ; 83 : 121-6.
PubMed
16) Fukata K, et al. Effects of diagonally aligned sitting training with a tilted surface on sitting balance for low sitting performance in the early phase after stroke : a randomised controlled trial. Disabil Rehabil. 2021 ; 43 : 1973-81.
PubMed
17) Gorman SL, et al. Examining the function in sitting test for validity, responsiveness, and minimal clinically important difference in inpatient rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014 ; 95 : 2304-11.
PubMed
18) Verheyden G, et al. The Trunk Impairment Scale : a new tool to measure motor impairment of the trunk after stroke. Clin Rehabil. 2004 ; 18 : 326-34.
PubMed
P.139 掲載の参考文献
1) 小原二郎, 他. 建築・室内・人間工学. 鹿島出版会 ; 1969.
 
2) 萩原礼紀, 他. 椅子から立ち上がる動作の3つの過程. Health Behavior Sci. 2006 ; 5 : 17-25.
 
3) Caruthers EJ, et al. Muscle forces and their contributions to vertical and horizontal acceleration of the center of mass during sit-to-stand transfer in young, healthy adults. J Appl Biomech. 2016 ; 32 : 487-503.
 
4) 山本澄子. 福祉用具とバイオメカニクス. 福祉介護機器technoプラス. 2011 ; 4 : 1-5.
 
5) van der Kruk E, et al. Compensation due to age-related decline in sit-to-stand and sit-to-walk. J Biomech. 2021 ; 122 : 110411.
 
6) Scarborough DM, et al. Chair rise strategies in older adults with functional limitations. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2007 ; 44 : 33-42.
PubMed
7) 帯刀隆之, 金子誠喜. 動作スピードを変化させた立ち上がり動作における運動戦略の検証. 日保健科会誌. 2009 ; 12 : 160-6.
Medical*Online
8) Etnyre B, Thomas DQ. Event standardization of sit-to-stand movements. Phys Ther. 2007 ; 87 : 1651-66.
PubMed
9) Boukadida A, et al. Determinants of sit-to-stand tasks in individuals with hemiparesis post stroke : a review. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2015 ; 58 : 167-72.
PubMed
10) Frykberg GE, Hager CK. Movement analysis of sit-to-stand - research informing clinical practice. Phys Ther Rev. 2015 ; 20 : 156-67.
 
11) 江原義弘. 椅子からの立上がり動作の分析-歩行中のエネルギ消費量を計算するための生体力学的筋モデルの研究. 早稲田大学博士論文. 1994 : 124-7.
 
12) Kerr A, et al. Neuromechanical differences between successful and failed sit-to-stand movements and response to rehabilitation early after stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2019 ; 33 : 395-403.
PubMed
13) Liu M, et al. Effects of modified sit-to-stand training on balance control in hemiplegic stroke patients : a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2016 ; 30 : 627-36.
PubMed
14) Nam I, et al. The effect of foot position on erector spinae and gluteus maximus muscle activation during sit-to-stand performed by chronic stroke patients. J Phys Ther Sci. 2015 ; 27 : 571-3.
PubMed
15) Brunt D, et al. The effect of foot placement on sit to stand in healthy young subjects and patients with hemiplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002 ; 83 : 924-9.
PubMed
16) Duclos C, et al. Lateral trunk displacement and stability during sit-to-stand transfer in relation to foot placement in patients with hemiparesis. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008 ; 22 : 715-22.
PubMed
17) Janssen W, et al. Recovery of the sit-to-stand movement after stroke : a longitudinal cohort study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2010 ; 24 : 763-9.
PubMed
18) Dean CM, et al. Task-related circuit training improves performance of locomotor tasks in chronic stroke : a randomized, controlled pilot trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000 ; 81 : 409-17.
PubMed
19) Monger C, et al. Evaluation of a home-based exercise and training programme to improve sit-to-stand in patients with chronic stroke. Clin Rehabil. 2002 ; 16 : 361-7.
PubMed
20) Millington PJ, et al. Biomechanical analysis of the sit-to-stand motion in elderly persons. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1992 ; 73 : 609-17.
PubMed
21) 長田悠路, 渕雅子. 片麻痺患者が起立動作に失敗する運動学的・運動力学的特徴-動的バランス指標 (Xcom) を用いた分析-. 理学療法学. 2014 ; 41 : 399-406.
Medical*Online
22) 澤田明彦. ベッドと車椅子との移乗練習. In : 長澤弘. 脳卒中・片麻痺理学療法マニュアル. 第2版. 文光堂 ; 2017. p.281-92.
 
23) 長谷公隆. 立位姿勢の制御. リハ医学. 2006 ; 43 : 542-53.
 
P.150 掲載の参考文献
1) 藤原勝夫, 他. 立位姿勢における足圧中心位置およびその規程要因に関する一考察. 姿勢研究. 1984 ; 4 : 9-16.
 
2) Asmussen E. The weight-carrying function of the human spine. Acta Orthop Scand. 1960 ; 29 : 276-90.
PubMed
3) Fujiwara K, et al. Relationship between quiet standing position and perceptibility of standing position in the anteroposterior direction. J Physiol Anthropol. 2010 ; 29 : 197-203.
PubMed
4) 藤原勝夫, 他. 立位姿勢の安定性と下肢筋の相対的筋負担度との関係. 筑波大学体育科学系紀要. 1985 ; 8 : 165-71.
 
5) Fujiwara K, et al. Anticipatory activation of postural muscles associated with bilateral arm flexion in subjects with different quiet standing positions. Gait Posture. 2003 ; 17 : 254-63.
PubMed
6) Clement G, et al. Adaptation of postural control to weightlessness. Exp Brain Res. 1984 ; 57 : 61-72.
PubMed
7) Fujiwara K, et al. Influences of illusionary position perception on anticipatory postural control associated with arm flexion. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2003 ; 13 : 509-17.
PubMed
8) Roll R, et al. Proprioceptive information processing in weightlessness. Exp Brain Res. 1998 ; 122 : 393-402.
PubMed
9) Schiffman HR. Sensation and perception, 3ed. John Wiley & Sons ; 1990.
 
10) 田崎義昭, 斎藤佳雄. ベッドサイドの神経の診かた. 第16版. 南山堂 ; 2004.
 
11) Ghafouri M, Lestienne FG. Contribution of reference frames for movement planning in peripersonal space representation. Exp Brain Res. 2006 ; 169 : 24-36.
PubMed
12) Le Seac'h AB, McIntyre J. Multimodal reference frame for the planning of vertical arms movements. Neurosci Lett. 2007 ; 423 : 211-5.
 
13) Viel S, et al. Postural adaptation of the spatial reference frames to microgravity : back to the egocentric reference frame. PLoS One. 2010 ; 5 : e10259.
 
14) Grigg P, et al. Joint-position sense after total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1973 ; 55 : 1016-25.
PubMed
15) Lackner JR. Some proprioceptive influences on the perceptual representation of body shape and orientation. Brain. 1988 ; 111 : 281-97.
PubMed
16) Kabbaligere R, et al. Balancing sensory inputs : sensory reweighting of ankle proprioception and vision during a bipedal posture task. Gait Posture. 2017 ; 52 : 244-50.
PubMed
P.162 掲載の参考文献
1) 中村隆一, 他. 基礎運動学. 第6版. 医歯薬出版 ; 2003. p.331-60.
 
2) Kendall FP, et al. Muscles testing and function, 5th ed. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins ; 2005. p.49-85.
 
3) 田中繁, 他監訳. モーターコントロール. 第4版. 医歯薬出版 ; 2015. p.163-83.
 
4) 日本脳卒中学会脳卒中ガイドライン委員会, 編. 脳卒中治療ガイドライン 2021. 協和企画 ; 2021.
 
5) アメリカ心臓学会 (AHA). https://professional.heart.org/professional/GuidelinesStatements/UCM_316885_Guidelines-Statements.jsp.
 
6) 増田知子. エビデンスからみた下肢装具と理学療法. 理学療法学. 2019 ; 56 ; 277-81.
 
7) 冨田昌夫. 14章 手足だけではなくて, 体幹も大切. In : 潮見泰蔵, 編. 脳卒中に対する標準的理学療法介入. 文光堂 ; 2007. p.154-69.
 

第II部 神経学と脳卒中理学療法

P.175 掲載の参考文献
1) McDonnell MN, Stinear CM. TMS measures of motor cortex function after stroke : a meta-analysis. Brain Stimul. 2017 ; 10 : 721-34.
PubMed
2) Bembenek JP, et al. The prognostic value of motor-evoked potentials in motor recovery and functional outcome after stroke-a systematic review of the literature. Funct Neurol. 2012 ; 27 : 79-84.
PubMed
3) Prabhakaran S, et al. Inter-individual variability in the capacity for motor recovery after ischemic stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008 ; 22 : 64-71.
PubMed
4) Winters C, et al. Generalizability of the proportional recovery model for the upper extremity after an ischemic stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2015 ; 29 : 614-22.
PubMed
5) Stinear CM, et al. Proportional motor recovery after stroke : implications for trial design. Stroke. 2017 ; 48 : 795-8.
PubMed
6) Smith MC, et al. Proportional recovery from lower limb motor impairment after stroke. Stroke. 2017 ; 48 : 1400-3.
PubMed
7) Stinear CM, et al. PREP2 : a biomarker-based algorithm for predicting upper limb function after stroke. Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2017 ; 4 : 811-20.
PubMed
8) 日本脳卒中学会脳卒中ガイドライン委員会, 編. 脳卒中治療ガイドライン 2015. 協和企画 ; 2015.
 
9) 日本脳卒中学会脳卒中ガイドライン委員会, 編. 脳卒中治療ガイドライン 2021. 協和企画 ; 2021.
 
10) Nudo RJ. Remodeling of cortical motor representations after stroke : implications for recovery from brain damage. Mol Psychiatry. 1997 ; 2 : 188-91.
PubMed
11) Plautz EJ, et al. Effects of repetitive motor training on movement representations in adult squirrel monkeys : role of use versus learning. Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2000 ; 74 : 27-55.
PubMed
12) Winstein CJ, et al. Guidelines for adult stroke rehabilitation and recovery : a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2016 ; 47 : e98-169.
PubMed
13) Hebert D, et al. Canadian stroke best practice recommendations : Stroke rehabilitation practice guidelines, update 2015. Int J Stroke. 2016 ; 11 : 459-84.
 
14) Beaulieu LD, Milot MH. Changes in transcranial magnetic stimulation outcome measures in response to upper-limb physical training in stroke : a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2018 ; 61 : 224-34.
PubMed
15) Chen PM, et al. Comparison of bilateral and unilateral upper limb training in people with stroke : a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2019 ; 14 : e0216357.
PubMed
16) Winstein CJ, et al. Effect of a task-oriented rehabilitation program on upper extremity recovery following motor stroke : The ICARE Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2016 ; 315 : 571-81.
PubMed
17) Grospretre S, et al. Motor imagery and cortico-spinal excitability : a review. Eur J Sport Sci. 2016 ; 16 : 317-24.
PubMed
18) Ramachandran VS, et al. Touching the phantom limb. Nature. 1995 ; 377 : 489-90.
PubMed
19) Altschuler EL, et al. Rehabilitation of hemiparesis after stroke with a mirror. Lancet. 1999 ; 353 : 2035-6.
PubMed
20) Kang YJ, et al. Facilitation of corticospinal excitability according to motor imagery and mirror therapy in healthy subjects and stroke patients. Ann Rehabil Med. 2011 ; 35 : 747-58.
PubMed
21) Thieme H, et al. Mirror therapy for improving motor function after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 ; 7 : CD008449.
PubMed
22) Morkisch N, et al. How to perform mirror therapy after stroke? Evidence from a meta-analysis. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2019 ; 37 : 421-35.
PubMed
23) Priori A, et al. Polarization of the human motor cortex through the scalp. Neuroreport. 1998 ; 9 : 2257-60.
PubMed
24) Nitsche MA, Paulus W. Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation. J Physiol. 2000 ; 527 : 633-9.
PubMed
25) Rehme AK, et al. Dynamic causal modeling of cortical activity from the acute to the chronic stage after stroke. Neuroimage. 2011 ; 55 : 1147-58.
 
26) Marquez J, et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) : does it have merit in stroke rehabilitation? A systematic review. Int J Stroke. 2015 ; 10 : 306-16.
PubMed
27) Serrada I, et al. Does sensory retraining improve sensation and sensorimotor function following stroke : a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Neurosci. 2019 ; 13 : 402.
PubMed
28) Chipchase LS, et al. Peripheral electrical stimulation to induce cortical plasticity : a systematic review of stimulus parameters. Clin Neurophysiol. 2011 ; 122 : 456-63.
PubMed
29) Yang JD, et al. Effectiveness of electrical stimulation therapy in improving arm function after stroke : a systematic review and a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Clin Rehabil. 2019 ; 33 : 1286-97.
 
30) Conforto AB, et al. Repetitive peripheral sensory stimulation and upper limb performance in stroke : a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2018 ; 32 : 863-71.
PubMed
31) Carrico C, et al. Nerve stimulation enhances task-oriented training in chronic, severe motor deficit after stroke : a randomized trial. Stroke. 2016 ; 47 : 1879-84.
PubMed
32) Terumitsu M, et al. Participation of primary motor cortex area 4a in complex sensory processing : 3.0-T fMRI study. Neuroreport. 2009 ; 20 : 679-83.
 
33) Kojima S, et al. The effects of mechanical tactile stimulation on corticospinal excitability and motor function depend on pin protrusion patterns. Sci Rep. 2019 ; 9 : 16677.
PubMed
P.188 掲載の参考文献
1) Shumway-Cook A, 他著. 田中繁, 他監訳. モーターコントロール運動制御の理論と臨床応用. 医歯薬出版 ; 1999
 
2) 内山靖. バランスと姿勢・活動. 理学療法ジャーナル. 2002 ; 36 : 223-32.
 
3) Horak FB, et al. The Balance Evaluation Systems Test (BESTest) to differentiate balance deficits. Phys Ther. 2009 ; 89 : 484-98.
PubMed
4) Jacobs JV, Horak FB. Cortical control of postural responses. J Neural Transm. 2007 ; 114 : 1339-48.
PubMed
5) Sibley KM, et al. Using the systems framework for postural control to analyze the components of balance evaluated in standardized balance measures : a scoping review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015 ; 96 : 122-32.
 
6) Duncan PW, et al. Functional reach : a new clinical measure of balance. J Gerontol. 1990 ; 45 : 192-7.
 
7) 大高恵莉, 大高洋平, 森田光生, 他. 日本語版Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test (Mini-BESTest) の妥当性の検討. Jpn J Rehabil Med. 2014 ; 51 : 673-81.
Medical*Online
8) 日本脳卒中学会脳卒中ガイドライン委員会, 編. 脳卒中治療ガイドライン 2021. 協和企画 ; 2021.
 
9) Marquer A, et al. The assessment and treatment of postural disorders in cerebellar ataxia : a systematic review. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2014 ; 57 : 67-78.
PubMed
10) An M, Shaughnessy M. The effects of exercise-based rehabilitation on balance and gait for stroke patients : a systematic review. J Neurosci Nurs. 2011 ; 43 : 298-307.
PubMed
11) 望月久. 神経系理学療法領域におけるバランスのとらえ方の今日的理解. 理学療法ジャーナル. 2018 ; 52 : 791-800.
 
12) Criekinge TV, et al. The effectiveness of trunk training on trunk control, sitting and standing balance and mobility post-stroke : a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Rehabil. 2019 ; 33 : 992-1002.
 
13) Saeys W, et al. Randomized controlled trial of truncal exercises early after stroke to improve balance and mobility. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2012 ; 26 : 231-8.
PubMed
14) Teasell R, et al. Evidence-Based Review of Stroke Rehabilitation. Canadian Partnaership for Stroke Recovery, 2020. http://www.ebrsr.com/
 
15) Verheyden G, et al. Trunk performance after stroke and the relationship with balance, gait and functional ability. Clin Rehabil. 2006 ; 20 : 451-8.
PubMed
P.199 掲載の参考文献
1) Takakusaki K. Neurophysiology of gait : from the spinal cord to the frontal lobe. Mov Disord. 2013 ; 28 : 1483-91.
 
2) 高草木薫. 大脳皮質・脳幹-脊髄による姿勢と歩行の制御機構. 脊髄外科. 2013 ; 27 : 208-15.
 
3) Kandel ER, et al. カンデル神経科学. メディカル・サイエンス・インターナショナル ; 2014. p.797-819.
 
4) 高草木薫. 歩行の安全性にかかわる神経生理機構. 理学療法ジャーナル. 2017 ; 51 : 389-96.
 
5) Della Sala S, et al. Gait apraxia after bilateral supplementary motor area lesion. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2002 ; 72 : 77-85.
PubMed
6) Kuo SH, et al. Bilateral pedunculpontine nuclei strokes presenting as freezing of gait. Mov Disord. 2008 ; 23 : 616-9.
 
7) Yoo JS, et al. Characteristics of injury of the corticospinal tract and corticoreticular pathway in hemiparetic patients with putaminal hemorrhage. BMC Neurol. 2014 ; 14 : 15-8.
 
8) Ahn YH, et al. Can stroke patients walk after complete lateral corticospinal tract injury of the affected hemisphere? Neuroreport. 2006 ; 17 : 987-90.
PubMed
9) Miyai I, et al. Middle cerebral artery stroke that includes the premotor cortex reduces mobility outcome. Stroke. 1999 ; 30 : 1380-3.
PubMed
10) Miyai I, et al. Cortical mapping of gait in humans : a near-infrared spectroscopic topography study. Neuroimage. 2001 ; 14 : 1186-92.
PubMed
11) Miyai I, et al. Longitudinal optical imaging study for locomotor recovery after stroke. Stroke. 2003 ; 34 : 2866-70.
PubMed
12) Jang SH, et al. Functional role of the corticoreticular pathway in chronic stroke patients. Stroke. 2013 ; 44 : 1099-104.
PubMed
13) Jang SH, Seo JP. The distribution of the cortical origin of the corticoreticular pathway in the human brain : a diffusion tensor imaging study. Somatosens Mot Res. 2014 ; 31 : 204-8.
 
14) Miyai I, et al. Premotor cortex is involved in restoration of gait in stroke. Ann Neurol. 2002 ; 52 : 188-94.
PubMed
15) Miyai I, et al. Effect of body weight support on cortical activation during gait in patients with stroke. Exp Brain Res. 2006 ; 169 : 85-91.
PubMed
16) Jang SH, Lee SJ. Corticoreticular tract in the human brain : a mini review. Front Neurol. 2019 ; 10 : 1-9.
 
17) Hinton DC, et al. Adjusting gait step-by-step : brain activation during split-belt treadmill walking. Neuroimage. 2019 ; 202 : 116095.
PubMed
18) Betschart M, et al. Repeated split-belt treadmill walking improved gait ability in individuals with chronic stroke : a pilot study. Physiother Theory Pract. 2018 ; 34 : 81-90.
PubMed
19) Kurz MJ, et al. Stride-time variability and sensorimotor cortical activation during walking. Neuroimage. 2012 ; 59 : 1602-7.
PubMed
20) Rose DK, et al. A backward walking training program to improve balance and mobility in acute stroke : a pilot randomized controlled trial. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2018 ; 42 : 12-21.
PubMed
21) Chen ZH, et al. Effectiveness of backward walking for people affected by stroke : a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Medicine. 2020 ; 99 : 1-8.
PubMed
22) 寺西正辰, 他. 後進歩行速度の違いによる大脳皮質活動の検討. 理学療法科学. 2017 ; 32 : 817-22.
Medical*Online
P.213 掲載の参考文献
1) Sherrington CS. On the proprio-ceptive system, especially in its reflex aspect. Brain. 1907 ; 29 : 467-82.
 
2) 伊藤文雄. 筋感覚. 名古屋大学出版会 ; 1994.
 
3) Stecco C, et al. Anatomy of the deep fascia of the upper limb. Second part : study of innervation. Morphologie. 2007 ; 91 : 38-43.
PubMed
4) Kandel E, et al. Principles of neural science, 5th ed. McGraw-Hill Publishing ; 2012.
 
5) 市橋則明. 運動療法学 : 障害別アプローチの理論と実際. 第2版. 文光堂 ; 2014. p.526.
 
6) 本郷利憲, 他. 標準生理学. 第5版. 医学書院 ; 2000. p.1074.
 
7) Gandevia S. Kinesthesia : roles for afferent signals and motor commands. Compr Physiol. 1996 : 128-72.
 
8) Moll L, Kuypers HG. Premotor cortical ablations in monkeys : contralateral changes in visually guided reaching behavior. Science. 1977 ; 198 : 317-9.
PubMed
9) Yekutiel M. Sensory re-education of the hand after stroke. Whurr ; 2002.
 
10) Dukelow SP, et al. Quantitative assessment of limb position sense following stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2010 ; 24 : 178-87.
PubMed
11) Semrau JA, et al. Robotic identification of kinesthetic deficits after stroke. Stroke. 2013 ; 44 : 3414-21.
PubMed
12) Roy EA, MacKenzie C. Handedness effects in kinesthetic spatial location judgements. Cortex. 1978 ; 14 : 250-8.
PubMed
13) Goble DJ, Brown SH. Upper limb asymmetries in the perception of proprioceptively determined dynamic position sense. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2010 ; 36 : 768-75.
PubMed
14) Goble DJ, et al. Upper limb asymmetries in the utilization of proprioceptive feedback. Exp Brain Res. 2006 ; 168 (1-2) : 307-11.
 
15) Goble DJ, et al. Proprioceptive target matching asymmetries in left-handed individuals. Exp Brain Res. 2009 ; 197 : 403-8.
PubMed
16) Connell LA, et al. Somatosensory impairment after stroke : frequency of different deficits and their recovery. Clin Rehabil. 2008 ; 22 : 758-67.
PubMed
17) Semrau JA, et al. Examining differences in patterns of sensory and motor recovery after stroke with robotics. Stroke. 2015 ; 46 : 3459-69.
PubMed
18) Tyson SF, et al. Sensory loss in hospital-admitted people with stroke : characteristics, associated factors, and relationship with function. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008 ; 22 : 166-72.
PubMed
19) Bassetti C, et al. Sensory syndromes in parietal stroke. Neurology. 1993 ; 43 : 1942-9.
PubMed
20) Fisher CM. Pure sensory stroke involving face, arm, and leg. Neurology. 1965 ; 15 : 76-80.
PubMed
21) Chen XY, et al. Clinical features of thalamic stroke. Curr Treat Options Neurol. 2017 ; 19 : 5.
 
22) Kenzie JM, et al. Anatomical correlates of proprioceptive impairments following acute stroke : a case series. J Neurol Sci. 2014 ; 342 (1-2) : 52-61.
 
23) Findlater SE, et al. Central perception of position sense involves a distributed neural network-evidence from lesion-behavior analyses. Cortex. 2016 ; 79 : 42-56.
PubMed
24) Kenzie JM, et al. Localization of impaired kinesthetic processing post-stroke. Front Hum Neurosci. 2016 ; 10 : 505.
PubMed
25) Findlater SE, et al. Lesion locations associated with persistent proprioceptive impairment in the upper limbs after stroke. Neuroimage Clin. 2018 ; 20 : 955-71.
PubMed
26) Pandya DN, Seltzer B. Association areas of the cerebral cortex. Trends Neurosci. 1982 ; 5 : 386-90.
 
27) Goldenberg G, Karnath HO. The neural basis of imitation is body part specific. J Neurosci. 2006 ; 26 : 6282-7.
PubMed
28) Leiguarda RC, Marsden CD. Limb apraxias : higher-order disorders of sensorimotor integration. Brain. 2000 ; 123 (Pt 5) : 860-79.
 
29) Winward CE, et al. Somatosensory recovery : a longitudinal study of the first 6 months after unilateral stroke. Disabil Rehabil. 2007 ; 29 : 293-9.
PubMed
30) Kattenstroth JC, et al. Quantitative assessment of joint position sense recovery in subacute stroke patients : a pilot study. J Rehabil Med. 2013 ; 45 : 1004-9.
PubMed
31) Meyer S, et al. How do somatosensory deficits in the arm and hand relate to upper limb impairment, activity, and participation problems after stroke? A systematic review. Phys Ther. 2014 ; 94 : 1220-31.
PubMed
32) Park SW, et al. The EXCITE Trial : predicting a clinically meaningful motor activity log outcome. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008 ; 22 : 486-93.
PubMed
33) Zandvliet SB, et al. Is recovery of somatosensory impairment conditional for upper-limb motor recovery early after stroke? Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2020 ; 34 : 403-16.
PubMed
34) Arya KN, et al. Task-based mirror therapy augmenting motor recovery in post-stroke hemiparesis : a randomized controlled trial. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2015 ; 24 : 1738-48.
PubMed
35) Thieme H, et al. Mirror therapy for improving motor function after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 ; 7 : CD008449.
PubMed
36) Kaneko F, et al. A case series clinical trial of a novel approach using augmented reality that inspires self-body cognition in patients with stroke : effects on motor function and resting-state brain functional connectivity. Front Syst Neurosci. 2019 ; 13 : 76.
PubMed
37) 金子文成. バーチャルリアリティ技術を用いたアプローチによる中枢神経損傷後の感覚運動麻痺治療の開発. バイオメカニズム学会誌. 2019 ; 43 : 29-34.
 
38) 金子文成, 川上途行. 仮想的に運動機能の拡張を体験させるアプローチ-視覚入力で誘導される運動錯覚-. Jpn J Rehabil Med. 2020 ; 57 : 821-27.
Medical*Online
39) 金子文成. VRで運動感覚をフィードバックすることによるリハビリテーションシステムの展開. 計測と制御. 2020 ; 59 : 37-40.
 
40) Kaneko F, et al. Kinesthetic illusory feeling induced by a finger movement movie effects on corticomotor excitability. Neuroscience. 2007 ; 149 : 976-84.
PubMed
41) Aoyama T, et al. The effects of kinesthetic illusory sensation induced by a visual stimulus on the corticomotor excitability of the leg muscles. Neurosci Lett. 2012 ; 514 : 106-9.
PubMed
42) Kaneko F, et al. Brain regions associated to a kinesthetic illusion evoked by watching a video of one's own moving hand. PLoS One. 2015 ; 10 : e0131970.
 
43) Kaneko F, et al. The association of motor imagery and kinesthetic illusion prolongs the effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on corticospinal tract excitability. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2016 ; 13 : 36.
PubMed
44) Shibata E, Kaneko F. Event-related desynchronization possibly discriminates the kinesthetic illusion induced by visual stimulation from movement observation. Exp Brain Res. 2019 ; 237 : 3233-40.
PubMed
45) Kaneko F, et al. Acute effect of visually induced kinesthetic illusion in patients with stroke : a preliminary report. Int J Neurorehabil. 2016 ; 3 : 1-6.
 
46) Okawada M, et al. Kinesthetic illusion induced by visual stimulation influences sensorimotor event-related desynchronization in stroke patients with severe upper-limb paralysis : a pilot study. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2020 ; 38 : 455-65.
PubMed
47) Pavlides C, et al. Projection from the sensory to the motor cortex is important in learning motor skills in the monkey. J Neurophysiol. 1993 ; 70 : 733-41.
 
48) Bornschlegl M, Asanuma H. Importance of the projection from the sensory to the motor cortex for recovery of motor function following partial thalamic lesion in the monkey. Brain Res. 1987 ; 437 : 121-30.
 
49) Nudo RJ, et al. Role of sensory deficits in motor impairments after injury to primary motor cortex. Neuropharmacology. 2000 ; 39 : 733-42.
PubMed
50) Vidoni ED, Boyd LA. Preserved motor learning after stroke is related to the degree of proprioceptive deficit. Behav Brain Funct. 2009 ; 5 : 36.
 
51) Chia FS, et al. Sensory retraining of the leg after stroke : systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Rehabil. 2019 ; 33 : 964-79.
PubMed
52) Serrada I, et al. Does sensory retraining improve sensation and sensorimotor function following stroke : a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Neurosci. 2019 ; 13 : 402.
PubMed
P.228 掲載の参考文献
1) 岩村吉晃. 神経心理学コレクション タッチ. 医学書院 ; 2001
 
2) Gauriau C, Bernard JF. Pain pathways and parabrachial circuits in the rat. Exp Physiol. 2002 ; 87 : 251-8.
PubMed
3) 加藤総夫, 高橋由香里. 痛みと負情動「有害事象に対する応答システムとしての痛み情動」試論. ペインクリニック. 2013 ; 33 : 387-94.
 
4) Reding MJ, et al. Rehabilitation outcome following initial unilateral hemispheric stroke : Life table analysis approach. Stroke. 1988 ; 19 : 1354-8.
 
5) Xerri C, et al. Plasticity of primary somatosensory cortex paralleling sensorimotor skill recovery from stroke in adult monkeys. J Neurophysiol. 1998 ; 79 : 2119-48.
PubMed
6) Pavlides C, et al. Projection from the sensory to the motor cortex is important in learning motor skills in the monkey. J Neurophysiol. 1993 ; 70 : 733-41.
 
7) Schabrun SM, et al. Evidence for the retraining of sensation after stroke : a systematic review. Clin Rehabil. 2009 ; 23 : 27-39.
PubMed
8) 日本脳卒中学会脳卒中ガイドライン委員会, 編. 脳卒中治療ガイドライン 2021. 協和企画 ; 2021.
 
9) Doyle S, et al. Interventions for sensory impairment in the upper limb after stroke (Review). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 ; 2010 : CD006331.
PubMed
10) Jang SH. Recovery mechanisms of somatosensory function in stroke patients : implications of brain imaging studies. Neurosci Bull. 2013 ; 29 : 366-72.
PubMed
11) Merzenich MM, et al. Somatosensory cortical map changes following digit amputation in adult monkeys. J Comp Neurol. 1984 ; 224 : 591-605.
PubMed
12) Allard T, et al. Reorganization of somatosensory area 3b representations in adult owl monkeys after digital syndactyly. J Neurophysiol. 1991 ; 66 : 1048-58.
PubMed
13) Jenkins WM, et al. Functional reorganization of primary somatosensory cortex in adult owl monkeys after behaviorally controlled tactile stimulation. J Neurophysiol. 1990 ; 63 : 82-104.
PubMed
14) 田邉浩文. CI療法は脳卒中片麻痺患者の日常動作の習慣化, 感覚障害の改善にも影響を及ぼす. 脳科学とリハビリテーション. 2006 ; 6 : 19-23.
Medical*Online
15) Hinkley LB, et al. Sensorimotor integration in S2, PV, and parietal rostroventral areas of the human sylvian fissure. J Neurophysiol. 2007 ; 97 : 1288-97.
PubMed
16) Romo R, et al. Neuronal correlates of decision-making in secondary somatosensory cortex. Nat Neurosci. 2002 ; 5 : 1217-25.
PubMed
17) Smania N, et al. Rehabilitation of somatic sensation and related deficit of motor control in patients with pure sensory stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003 ; 84 : 1692-702.
PubMed
18) Blakemore SJ, et al. Somatosensory activations during the observation of touch and a case of vision-touch synaesthesia. Brain. 2005 ; 128 : 1571-83.
 
19) Schaefer M, et al. Dynamic modulation of the primary somatosensory cortex during seeing and feeling a touched hand. Neuroimage. 2006 ; 29 : 587-92.
PubMed
20) Taylor-Clarke M, et al. Persistence of visual-tactile enhancement in humans. Neurosci Lett. 2004 ; 354 : 22-5.
PubMed
21) Zhou YD, et al. Visuo-tactile cross-modal associations in cortical somatosensory cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 ; 97 : 9777-82.
PubMed
22) Kennett S, et al. Noninformative vision improves the spatial resolution of touch in humans. Curr Biol. 2001 ; 11 : 1188-91.
PubMed
23) Ramachandran VS, et al. Touching the phantom limb. Nature. 1995 ; 377 : 489-90.
PubMed
24) Sathian K. Intermanual referral of sensation to anesthetic hands. Neurology. 2000 ; 54 : 1866-8.
PubMed
25) 高杉潤, 他. 体性感覚障害に対するミラーセラピーの予備的研究-体性感覚脱失が一過性に改善した被殻出血2例の検討. 脳科学とリハビリテーション. 2000 ; 9 : 29-34.
 
26) Takasugi J, et al. Referred sensations induced by a mirror box in healthy subjects. Psychol Res. 2011 ; 75 : 54-60.
PubMed
27) Cambier DC, et al. Treating sensory impairments in the post-stroke upper limb with intermittent pneumatic compression. Results of a preliminary trial. Clin Rehabil. 2003 ; 17 : 14-20.
PubMed
28) Chen JC, et al. Facilitation of sensory and motor recovery by thermal intervention for the hemiplegic upper limb in acute stroke patients : a single-blind randomized clinical trial. Stroke. 2005 ; 36 : 2665-9.
PubMed
29) Kattenstroth JC, et al. Long-term sensory stimulation therapy improves hand function and restores cortical responsiveness in patients with chronic cerebral lesions. Three single case studies. Front Hum Neurosci. 2012 ; 6 : 244.
PubMed
30) Ragert P, et al. Improvement of tactile perception and enhancement of cortical excitability through intermittent theta burst rTMS over human primary somatosensory cortex. Exp Brain Res. 2008 ; 184 : 1-11.
PubMed
31) Fujimoto S. et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation over the primary and secondary somatosensory cortices transiently improves tactile spatial discrimination in stroke patients. Front Neurosci. 2016 ; 10 : 128.
PubMed
P.239 掲載の参考文献
1) 上林清孝. 歩行時の体性感覚の影響 : 皮質脊髄路興奮性に与える影響. 国リハ研紀. 2009 ; 30 : 15-21.
 
2) オリバー・サックス, 金沢泰子, 訳. 左足をとりもどすまで. 晶文社 ; 1994. p.165-82.
 
3) 宮本省三. 片麻痺の新しい病態解釈. In : 片麻痺 バビンスキーからペルフェッティへ. 協同医書出版社 ; 2014. p.249-307.
 
4) 森岡周. 自己意識とディシジョンメイキング. 高次脳機能の神経科学とニューロリハビリテーション. 協同医書出版社 ; 2020. p.157-225.
 
5) McKeon PO, et al. The foot core system : a new paradigm for understanding intrinsic foot muscle function. Br J Sports Med. 2015 ; 49 : 290
PubMed
6) 寺田茂, 他. 脳卒中片麻痺患者における患側筋出力特性と感覚障害が筋力に対して及ぼす影響-筋収縮様式による差異と患側下肢荷重率からの検討. 理学療法ジャーナル. 1997 ; 31 : 69-73.
 
7) Chia FS, et al. Sensory retraining of the leg after stroke : systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Rehabil. 2019 ; 33 : 964-79.
PubMed
8) 政二慶. 平衡機能と運動スキル. 体育の科学. 2013 ; 63 : 104-10.
 
9) Lord SR, et al. Physiological factors associated with falls in an elderly population. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1991 ; 39 : 1194-200.
 
10) 浅井仁, 藤原勝夫. 足底各部位を冷却した場合の姿勢調節の変化. 体力科学. 1995 ; 44 : 503-11.
 
11) 大久保仁, 他. 足蹠圧受容体が重心動揺に及ぼす影響について. 耳鼻臨床. 1979 ; 72 : 1553-62.
 
12) Morioka S, Yagi F. Effects of perceptual learning exercises on standing balance using a hardness discrimination task in hemiplegic patients following stroke : a randomized controlled pilot trial. Clin Rehabil. 2003 ; 17 : 600-7.
PubMed
13) Kavounoudias A, et al. Foot sole and ankle muscle inputs contribute jointly to human erect posture regulation. J Physiol. 2001 ; 532 : 869-78.
PubMed
14) 沖田学, 他. 足部の認知運動課題により立位姿勢バランスに改善が認められた症例. 理学療法科学. 2007 ; 22 : 541-5.
Medical*Online
15) Alfuth M, Rosenbaum D. Effects of changes in plantar sensory feedback on human gait characteristics : a systematic review. Footwear Sci. 2012 ; 4 : 1-22.
 
16) Palluel E, et al. Do spike insoles enhance postural stability and plantar-surface cutaneous sensitivity in elderly? Age. 2008 ; 30 : 53-61.
PubMed
17) Lynch E, et al. Sensory retraining of the lower limb after acute stroke : a randomized controlled pilot trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007 ; 88 : 1101-7.
PubMed
18) 芳賀信彦. 感覚と運動の統合. In : 太田順, 他編. 身体性システムとリハビリテーションの科学 1. 運動制御. 東京大学出版会 ; 2018. p.29-41.
 
19) 河島則天. 歩行運動における脊髄神経回路の役割. 国リハ研紀. 2009 ; 30 : 9-14.
 
20) Zehr EP, Duysens J. Regulation of arm and leg movement during human locomotion. Neuroscientist. 2004 ; 10 : 347-61.
PubMed
P.249 掲載の参考文献
1) Ono S, Mustari MJ. Information processing in MST parafoveal neurons during smooth pursuit adaptation. Soc Neurosci Abstr. 2012 ; 374 : 2.
 
2) Rowe FJ, et al. High incidence and prevalence of visual problems after acute stroke : an epidemiology study with implications for service delivery. PLoS One. 2019 ; 14 : e0213035.
PubMed
3) 坂田英夫. 視覚系の情報処理. Clin Neurosci. 2000 ; 18 : 1372-7.
 
4) Sand KM, et al. Vision problems in ischaemic stroke patients : effects on life quality and disability. Eur J Neurol. 2016 ; 23 Suppl 1 : 1-7.
PubMed
5) Rowe F, et al. Reading difficulty after stroke : ocular and non ocular causes. Int J Stroke. 2011 ; 6 : 404-11.
PubMed
6) Fisk GD, et al. Vision, attention, and self reported driving behaviors in community dwelling stroke survivors. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002 ; 83 : 469-77.
PubMed
7) Sand KM, et al. Visual field defect after ischemic stroke-impact on mortality. Acta Neurol Scand. 2018 ; 137 : 293-8.
PubMed
8) Hanna KL, et al. Screening methods for post-stroke visual impairment : a systematic review. Disabil Rehabil. 2017 ; 39 : 2531-43.
PubMed
9) 積山薫. 視覚-運動協応の可塑性. 光学. 2001 ; 30 : 311-5.
 
10) Lishman JR, Lee DN. The autonomy of visual kinaesthesis. Perception. 1973 ; 2 : 287-94.
PubMed
11) Pollock A, et al. Interventions for visual field defects in people with stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 ; 5 : CD008388.
PubMed
12) Hayes A, et al. Functional improvements following the use of the NVT Vision Rehabilitation program for patients with hemianopia following stroke. NeuroRehabilitation. 2012 ; 31 : 19-30.
 
13) Wolpert DM, et al. Maintaining internal representations : the role of the human superior parietal lobe. Nature neuroscience. 1998 ; 1 : 529-33.
PubMed
14) Botvinick M, Cohen J. Rubber hands'feel'touch that eyes see. Nature. 1998 ; 391 : 756.
PubMed
15) Graziano MS, et al. Coding the locations of objects in the dark. Science. 1997 ; 277 : 239-41.
PubMed
16) Herter TM, et al. Vision does not always help stroke survivors compensate for impaired limb position sense. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2019 ; 16 : 129.
 
P.257 掲載の参考文献
1) 切替一郎, 原著, 野村恭也, 加我君孝, 編著. 新耳鼻咽喉科学. 南山堂 ; 2004. p.39-48.
 
2) 高倉大匡. 近赤外線分光法を用いた感覚混乱時の直立姿勢制御に関する大脳皮質血流応答の解析-前庭リハビリテーションへの応用-. Equilibrium Res. 2020 ; 79 : 189-97.
 
3) 加藤巧, 伏木宏彰. 米国における前庭系リハビリテーションと理学療法士との関わり. Equilibrium Res. 2017 ; 76 : 79-83.
 
4) McDonnell MN, Hillier SL. Vestibular rehabilitation for unilateral peripheral vestibular dysfunction. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 ; 1 : CD005397.
PubMed
5) Mitsutake T, et al. Effects of vestibular rehabilitation on gait performance in post-stroke patients : a pilot randomized controlled trial. Int J Rehabil Res. 2017 ; 40 : 240-5.
 
6) Mitsutake T, et al. The effects of vestibular rehabilitation on gait performance in patients with stroke : a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2020 ; 29 : 105214.
PubMed
7) Rambold H, et al. Partial ablations of the flocculus and ventral paraflocculus in monkeys cause linked deficits in smooth pursuit eye movements and adaptive modification of the VOR. J Neurophysiol. 2002 ; 87 : 912-24.
PubMed
8) Katoh A, et al. Dynamic characteristics and adaptability of mouse vestibulo-ocular and optokinetic response eye movements and the role of the flocculo-olivary system revealed by chemical lesions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 ; 95 : 7705-10.
PubMed
9) Giray M, et al. Short-term effects of vestibular rehabilitation in patients with chronic unilateral vestibular dysfunction : a randomized controlled study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009 ; 90 : 1325-31.
PubMed
10) Balci BD, et al. Vestibular rehabilitation in acute central vestibulopathy : a randomized controlled trial. J Vestib Res. 2013 ; 23 : 259-67.
PubMed
11) Morimoto H, et al. Effect of gaze stability exercises on postural stability and dynamic visual acuity in healthy young adults. Gait Posture. 2011 ; 33 : 600-3.
PubMed
12) Dai CY, et al. Effects of primary caregiver participation in vestibular rehabilitation for unilateral neglect patients with right hemispheric stroke : a randomized controlled trial. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2013 ; 9 : 477-84.
PubMed
13) Cohen H. Vestibular rehabilitation reduces functional disability. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1992 ; 107 : 638-43.
PubMed
14) Thomke F, et al. A topodiagnostic investigation on body lateropulsion in medullary infarcts. Neurology. 2005 ; 64 : 716-8.
PubMed
15) Eggers C, et al. Correlation of anatomy and function in medulla oblongata infarction. Eur J Neurol. 2009 ; 16 : 201-4.
PubMed
P.270 掲載の参考文献
1) 政二慶. 歩行と視覚. 日本バイオメカニクス研究. 1999 ; 3 : 300-7.
 
2) 和田佳郎. 眼球運動から見た耳石器のはたらき-耳石器動眼反射研究の紹介-. Equilibrium Res. 2010 ; 69 : 152-60.
 
3) Perennou DA, et al. Lateropulsion, pushing and verticality perception in hemisphere stroke : a causal relationship? Brain. 2008 ; 131 : 2401-13.
PubMed
4) Yelnik AP, et al. Perception of verticality after recent cerebral hemispheric stroke. Stroke. 2002 ; 33 : 2247-53.
PubMed
5) Karnath HO, et al. The origin of contraversive pushing : evidence for a second graviceptive system in humans. Neurology. 2000 ; 55 : 1298-304.
PubMed
6) Karnath HO. Pusher syndrome-a frequent but little-known disturbance of body orientation perception. J Neurol. 2007 ; 254 : 415-24.
PubMed
7) Abe H, et al. Prevalence and length of recovery of pusher syndrome based on cerebral hemispheric lesion side in patients with acute stroke. Stroke. 2012 ; 43 : 1654-6
PubMed
8) Davies PM, 著. 冨田昌夫, 訳. ステップス・トゥ・フォロー. シュプリンガー・フェアラーク東京 ; 1987. p.285-304.
 
9) 阿部浩明. contraversive pushingと脳画像情報. PTジャーナル. 2010 ; 44 : 749-56.
 
10) 阿部浩明. Contraversive pushingの評価と背景因子を踏まえた介入. 理学療法研究. 2011 ; 28 : 10-20.
Medical*Online
11) Karnath HO, Broetz D. Understanding and treating "pusher syndrome". Phys Ther. 2003 ; 83 : 1119-25.
PubMed
12) 辻本直秀, 他. 脳卒中後のpusher syndromeの重症度およびその改善経過とsubject visual verticalityの偏倚との関連. 理学療法学. 2017 ; 44 : 340-47.
Medical*Online
13) Baccini M, et al. The scale for contraversive pushing : a reliability and validity study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2006 ; 20 : 468-72.
PubMed
14) Baccini M, et al. Scale for contraversive pushing : cutoff scores for diagnosing "pusher behavior" and construct validity. Phys Ther. 2008 ; 88 : 947-55.
PubMed
15) Broetz D, Karnath HO. New aspects for the physiotherapy of pushing behaviour. NeuroRehabilitation. 2005 ; 20 : 133-8.
PubMed
16) Maeda K, et al. Lateropulsion due to a lesion of the dorsal spinocerebellar tract. Intern Med. 2005 ; 44 : 1295-7.
PubMed
17) Arai M. Ipsilateral axial lateropulsion as an initial symptom of vertebral artery occlusion. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2004 ; 75 : 1648.
PubMed
18) 阿部浩明. 脳機能を考慮した理学療法思考プロセス-Isolated lateropulsionを呈した症例-. 脳科学とリハビリテーション. 2011 ; 11 : 11-21.
Medical*Online
19) Dieterich M, Brandt T. Wallenberg's syndrome : lateropulsion, cyclorotation, and subjective visual vertical in thirty-six patients. Ann Neurol. 1992 ; 31 : 399-408.
 
20) Morioka S, et al. Effects of perceptual learning exercises on standing balance using a hardness discrimination task in hemiplegic patients following stroke : a randomized controlled pilot trial. Clin Rehabil. 2003 ; 17 : 600-7.
PubMed
P.280 掲載の参考文献
1) 杉原隆. 運動指導の心理学. 大修館書店 ; 2003. p.101-2.
 
2) 内藤栄一. 随意運動の制御. In : 西平賀昭, 大築立志, 編. 運動と高次神経機能-運動の脳脳内機能を探検する-. 杏林書院 ; 2005. p.7-13.
 
3) Stoykov ME, Madhavan S. Motor priming in neurorehabilitation. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2015 ; 39 : 33-42.
PubMed
4) Vidoni ED, Boyd LA. Achieving enlightenment : what do we know about the implicit learning system and its interaction with explicit knowledge? J Neurol Phys Ther. 2007 ; 31 : 145-54.
PubMed
5) Hauptmann B, Karni A. From primed to learn : the saturation of repetition priming and the induction of long term memory. Cog Brain Res. 2002 ; 13 : 313-22.
 
6) Mohoney MJ, Avener M. Psychology of the elite athlete : an exploratory study. Cognit Ther Res. 1977 ; 2 : 135-41.
 
7) Jeannrod M. The representing brain : neural correlates of motor intention and imagery. Behav Brain Sci. 1994 ; 17 : 187-245.
 
8) 内藤栄一. 運動実行と運動感覚を内的にシミュレートする運動イメージ. 認知運動療法研究. 2001 ; 1 : 10-31.
 
9) Ruby P, Decety J. Effect of subjective perspective taking during simulation of action : a PET investigation of agency. Nat Neurosci. 2001 ; 4 : 546-50.
 
10) Guillot A, et al. Functional neuroanatomical networks associated with expertise in motor imagery. Neuroimage. 2008 ; 41 : 1471-83.
PubMed
11) Iseki K, et al. Neural mechanisms involved in mental imagery and observation of gait. Neuroimage. 2008 ; 41 : 1021-31.
PubMed
12) 門馬博. 理学療法における運動イメージの活用法 運動イメージ能力の評価法. 理学療法. 2015 ; 32 : 797-803.
 
13) 門馬博. 属性の異なる運動イメージ能力評価法の相互関係性に関する検討. 理学療法科学. 2014 ; 29 : 45-50.
Medical*Online
14) Malouin F, et al. Towards the integration of mental practice in rehabilitation programs. A critical review. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 ; 7 : 576.
PubMed
15) Malouin F, et al. The kinesthetic and visual imagery questionnaire for assessing motor imagery ability after stroke : a reliability and construct validity study. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2007 ; 31 : 20-9.
 
16) Gregg M, et al. The MIQ-RS : a suitable option for exerming movement imagery ability. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2010 ; 7 : 249-57.
 
17) Hall EG, Erffmeyer ES. The effect of visuo-motor behavior rehearsal with videotaped modeling on free throw accuracy of intercollegiate female basketball players. J Sport Psychol. 1983 ; 5 : 343-6.
 
18) Driskell JE, et al. Does mental practice enhance performance? J Appl Psychol. 1994 ; 79 : 481-92.
 
19) Hall JC. Imagery practice and the development of surgical skills. Am J Surg. 2002 ; 184 : 465-70.
PubMed
20) 八田武志. イメージ処理過程の神経心理学的メカニズム. In : 菱谷晋介, 編. イメージの世界 イメージ研究の最前線. ナカニシヤ出版 ; 2001. p.97-112.
 
21) Ingvar DH, Phillipson L. Distribution of cerebral blood flow in the dominant hemisphere during motor ideation and motor performance. Ann Neurol. 1977 ; 2 : 230-7.
 
22) Pante F. 認知運動療法講義. 協同医書出版 ; 2004, p.67-79.
 
23) Barclay RE, et al. Mental practice for treating upper extremity deficits in individuals with hemiparesis after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 ; 5 : CD005950.
PubMed
24) Silva S, et al. Motor imagery for gait rehabilitation after stroke. Cochrane Data-base Syst Rev. 2020 ; 9 : CD013019.
PubMed
25) Driskell JE, et al. Does mental practice enhance performance? J Appl Psychol. 1994 ; 79 : 481-92.
 
26) Page SJ, et al. Retention of the spacing effect with mental practice in hemiparetic stroke. Exp Brain Res. 2016 ; 234 : 2841-7.
PubMed
27) Nilsen DM, et al. Use of mental practice to improve upper-limb recovery after stroke : a systematic review. Am J Occup Ther. 2010 ; 64 : 695-708.
PubMed
28) Page SJ, et al. A randomized efficacy and feasibility study of imagery in acute stroke. Clin Rehabil. 2001 ; 15 : 233-40.
PubMed
29) Morioka S, et al. Motor-imagery ability and function of hemiplegic upper limb in stroke patients. Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2019 ; 6 : 596-604.
PubMed
30) Timmermans AAA, et al. Effect of mental practice on the improvement of function and daily activity performance of the upper extremity in patients with subacute stroke : a randomized clinical trial. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2013 ; 14 : 204-12.
 
P.289 掲載の参考文献
1) 運動学習 : 概念と方法. In : リチャード・A・シュミット, 著. 調枝孝治, 監訳. 運動学習とパフォーマンス. 大修館書店 ; 1994. p.153-72.
 
2) Doya K. Complementary roles of basal ganglia and cerebellum in learning and motor control. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2000 ; 10 : 732-9.
PubMed
3) 小池康晴. 脳計算論における運動学習理論. In : 道免和久, 編. ニューロリハビリテーション. 医学書院 ; 2015. p.72-91.
 
4) Schultz W. Behavioral dopamine signals. Trends Neurosci. 2007 ; 30 : 203-10.
PubMed
5) Ogawa T, et al. Short-term effects of goal-setting focusing on the life goal concept on subjective well-being and treatment engagement in subacute inpatients : a quasi-randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2016 ; 30 : 909-20.
PubMed
6) Lenze EJ, et al. Enhanced medical rehabilitation increases therapy intensity and engagement and improves functional outcomes in postacute rehabilitation of older adults : a randomized-controlled trial. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2012 ; 13 : 708-12.
PubMed
7) Lohse KR, et al. Engaging environments enhance motor skill learning in a computer gaming task. J Mot Behav. 2016 ; 48 : 172-82.
 
8) 虫明元. 器用さの学習のメカニズム-ニューロン活動の働きから. In : 久保田競, 他編. 学習と脳. サイエンス社 ; 2007. p.13-64.
 
9) 林拓志, 野崎大地. 運動の制御と学習におけるオンライン修正とオフライン修正の役割. In : 大築立志, 他編. 運動学習の脳・神経科学-その基礎から臨床まで-. 市村出版 ; 2020. p.142-56
 
10) Hornby TG, et al. Influence of skill and exercise training parameters on locomotor recovery during stroke rehabilitation. Curr Opin Neurol. 2016 ; 29 : 677-83.
PubMed
11) Chia FS, et al. Sensory retraining of the leg after stroke : systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Rehabil. 2019 ; 33 : 964-79.
PubMed
12) Morioka S, Yagi F. Effects of perceptual learning exercises on standing balance using a hardness discrimination task in hemiplegic patients following stroke : a randomized controlled pilot trial. Clin Rehabil. 2003 ; 17 : 600-7.
PubMed
13) Hornby TG, et al. Feasibility of focused stepping practice during inpatient rehabilitation poststroke and potential contributions to mobility outcomes. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2015 ; 29 : 923-32.
PubMed
14) French B, et al. Repetitive task training for improving functional ability after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 ; 11 : CD006073.
PubMed
15) Krishnan C, et al. Learning new gait patterns is enhanced by specificity of training rather than progression of task difficulty. J Biomech. 2019 ; 88 : 33-7.
PubMed
16) Krishnan C, et al. Learning new gait patterns : age-related differences in skill acquisition and interlimb transfer. Exp Gerontol. 2018 ; 111 : 45-52.
PubMed
17) Nikamp CD, et al. Six-month effects of early or delayed provision of an ankle-foot orthosis in patients with (sub) acute stroke : a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2017 ; 31 : 1616-24.
PubMed
18) Johnson L, et al. Internal and external focus of attention during gait re-education : an observational study of physical therapist practice in stroke rehabilitation. Phys Ther. 2013 ; 93 : 957-66.
PubMed
19) Kal E, et al. Are the effects of internal focus instructions different from external focus instructions given during balance training in stroke patients? A double-blind randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2019 ; 33 : 207-21.
PubMed
20) Kal E, et al. How physical therapists instruct patients with stroke : an observational study on attentional focus during gait rehabilitation after stroke. Disabil Rehabil. 2018 ; 40 : 1154-65.
PubMed
P.300 掲載の参考文献
1) Moll L, Kuypers HG. Premotor cortical ablations in monkeys : contralateral changes in visually guided reaching behavior. Science. 1977 ; 198 : 317-9.
PubMed
2) Kurata K, Wise SP. Premotor cortex of rhesus monkeys : set-related activity during two conditional motor tasks. Exp Brain Res. 1988 ; 69 : 327-43.
PubMed
3) 崎原ことえ, 他. シークエンス運動に伴う局所的脳律動変化の脳磁図解析 : 習熟運動と非習熟運動の違い. 脳波・筋電図の臨床. 2007 ; 49 : 497-500.
 
4) Rizzolatti G. Functional organization of inferior area 6 in the macaque monkey. II. Area F5 and the control of distal movements. Exp Brain Res. 1988 ; 71 : 491-507.
PubMed
5) Rizzolatti G, et al. Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions. B Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 1996 ; 3 : 131-41.
 
6) Ertelt D, et al. Action observation has a positive impact on rehabilitation of motor deficits after stroke. Neuroimage. 2007 ; 36 : 164-73.
 
7) 大内田裕, 他. リハビリテーションにおけるミラーニューロンの臨床応用. 神経研究の進歩. 2014 ; 6 : 655-63.
 
8) Fuchigami T, et al. Differences in cortical activation between observing one's own gait and the gait of others : a functional near-infrared spectroscopy study. Neuroreport. 2015 ; 26 : 192-6.
 
9) Brinkman C. Lesions in supplementary motor area interfere with a monkey's performance of a bimanual coordination task. Neurosci Lett. 1981 ; 27 : 267-70.
PubMed
10) Brinkman C. Supplementary motor area of the monkey's cerebral cortex : short- and long-term deficits after unilateral ablation and the effects of subsequent callosal section. J Neurosci. 1984 ; 4 : 918-29.
 
11) 中嶋理帆, 他. 上前頭回, 中前頭回, 帯状回, 脳梁を含む領域の脳腫瘍摘出術と補足運動野の梗塞により手指に限局する特徴的な運動症状を認めた1例. 高次脳機能研究. 2015 ; 35 : 363-9.
 
12) 豊倉 穣, 他. 両手動作時における感覚運動野と補足運動野の活性化に関する研究-機能的MRIによる分析. リハビリテーション医学. 1997 ; 34 : 677-85.
 
P.314 掲載の参考文献
1) Mesulam MM. Spatial attention and neglect : parietal, frontal and cingulate contributions to the mental representation and attentional targeting of salient extrapersonal events. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1999 ; 354 : 1325-46.
 
2) Weintraub S, Mesulam MM. Right cerebral dominance in spatial attention. Further evidence based on ipsilateral neglect. Arch Neurol. 1987 ; 44 : 621-5.
PubMed
3) Corbetta M, et al. The reorienting system of the human brain : from environment to theory of mind. Neuron. 2008 ; 58 : 306-24.
PubMed
4) Corbetta M, Shulman GL. Spatial neglect and attention networks. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2011 ; 34 : 569-99.
PubMed
5) Kinsbourne M. Hemi-neglect and hemisphere rivalry. Adv Neurol. 1977 ; 18 : 41-9.
PubMed
6) Kortte K, Hillis AE. Recent advances in the understanding of neglect and anosognosia following right hemisphere stroke. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2009 ; 9 : 459-65.
PubMed
7) BIT行動性無視検査 日本版-Behavioural inattention test-. 1999.
 
8) 渡辺学. 半側空間無視に対する理学療法. In : 阿部浩明. 高次脳機能障害に対する理学療法. 文光堂 ; 2016. p.71-121.
 
9) Umeonwuka C, et al. Current trends in the treatment of patients with post-stroke unilateral spatial neglect : a scoping review. Disabil Rehabil. 2020 ; 25 : 1-28.
 
10) Vaes N, et al. Rehabilitation of visuospatial neglect by prism adaptation : effects of a mild treatment regime. A randomised controlled trial. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2018 ; 28 : 899-918.
PubMed
11) Saj A, et al. Prism adaptation enhances activity of intact fronto-parietal areas in both hemispheres in neglect patients. Cortex. 2013 ; 49 : 107-19.
PubMed
12) Tsujimoto K, et al. Prism adaptation changes resting-state functional connectivity in the dorsal stream of visual attention networks in healthy adults : A fMRI study. Cortex. 2018 ; 119 : 594-605.
PubMed
13) Gossmann A, et al. Prism adaptation improves ego-centered but not allocentric neglect in early rehabilitation patients. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2013 ; 27 : 534-41.
 
14) Jacquin-Courtois S. Hemi-spatial neglect rehabilitation using non-invasive brain stimulation : or how to modulate the disconnection syndrome? Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2015 ; 58 : 251-8.
PubMed
15) Dominguez-Borras J, et al. Emotional processing and its impact on unilateral neglect and extinction. Neuropsychologia. 2012 ; 50 : 1054-71.
PubMed
16) Malhotra PA, et al. Reward modulates spatial neglect. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2013 ; 84 : 366-9.
PubMed
17) Bisiach E, et al. Unawareness of disease following lesions of the right hemisphere : anosognosia for hemiplegia and anosognosia for hemianopia. Neuropsychologia. 1986 ; 24 : 471-82.
PubMed
18) Fotopoulou A, et al. Mirror-view reverses somatoparaphrenia : dissociation between first- and third-person perspectives on body ownership. Neuropsychologia. 2011 ; 49 : 3946-55.
PubMed
19) Jenkinson PM, et al. Body ownership and attention in the mirror : insights from somatoparaphrenia and the rubber hand illusion. Neuropsychologia. 2013 ; 51 : 1453-62.
PubMed
20) Fotopoulou A, et al. The role of motor intention in motor awareness : an experimental study on anosognosia for hemiplegia. Brain. 2008 ; 131 : 3432-42.
 
21) Garbarini F, et al'. Moving'a paralysed hand : bimanual coupling effect in patients with anosognosia for hemiplegia. Brain. 2012 ; 135 : 1486-97.
PubMed
22) Pia L, et al. Temporal coupling due to illusory movements in bimanual actions : evidence from anosognosia for hemiplegia. Cortex. 2013 ; 49 : 1694-703.
PubMed
23) Berti A, et al. Anosognosia for hemiplegia, neglect dyslexia, and drawing neglect : clinical findings and theoretical considerations. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 1996 ; 2 : 426-40.
PubMed
24) Feinberg TE, et al. Illusory limb movements in anosognosia for hemiplegia. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2000 ; 68 : 511-3.
PubMed
25) Fotopoulou A, et al. Self-observation reinstates motor awareness in anosognosia for hemiplegia. Neuropsychologia. 2009 ; 47 : 1256-60.
PubMed
26) Besharati S, et al. Another perspective on anosognosia : self-observation in video replay improves motor awareness. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2015 ; 25 : 319-52.
PubMed
27) 信迫悟志. 失行に対する理学療法. In : 阿部浩明. 高次脳機能障害に対する理学療法. 文光堂 ; 2016. p.123-98.
 
28) 信迫悟志. 失行. In : 吉尾雅春. 標準理学療法学 神経理学療法学. 第2版. 医学書院 ; 2018. p.173-83.
 
29) 日本高次脳機能障害学会 (旧日本失語症学会), 編. 日本高次脳機能障害学会 (旧日本失語症学会), Brain Function Test委員会, 著. SPTA標準高次動作性検査 改訂版-失行症を中心として-. 新興医学出版社 ; 2003.
 
30) van Heugten CM, et al. Outcome of strategy training in stroke patients with apraxia : a phase II study. Clin Rehabil. 1998 ; 12 : 294-303.
PubMed
31) Donkervoort M, et al. Efficacy of strategy training in left hemisphere stroke patients with apraxia : a randomized clinical trial. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2001 ; 11 : 549-66.
 
32) Geusgens CAV, et al. Transfer effects of a cognitive strategy training for stroke patients with apraxia. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2007 ; 29 : 831-41.
 
33) Goldenberg G, et al. Therapy of activities of daily living in patients with apraxia. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 1998 ; 8 : 123-41.
 
34) Goldenberg G, et al. Assessment and therapy of complex activities of daily living in apraxia. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2001 ; 11 : 147-69.
 
35) Smania N, et al. The rehabilitation of limb apraxia : a study in left-brain-damaged patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000 ; 81 : 379-88.
PubMed
36) Smania N, et al. Rehabilitation of limb apraxia improves daily life activities in patients with stroke. Neurology. 2006 ; 67 : 2050-2.
PubMed
37) Bolognini N, et al. Improving ideomotor limb apraxia by electrical stimulation of the left posterior parietal cortex. Brain. 2015 ; 138 : 428-39.
PubMed
38) Bianchi M, et al. Left parietal cortex transcranial direct current stimulation enhances gesture processing in corticobasal syndrome. Eur J Neurol. 2015 ; 22 : 1317-22.
PubMed
P.329 掲載の参考文献
1) Nambu A, et al. Excitatory cortical inputs to pallidal neurons via the subthalamic nucleus in the monkey. J Neurophysiol. 2000 ; 84 : 289-300.
PubMed
2) Park J. Movement disorders following cerebrovascular lesion in the basal ganglia circuit. J Mov disord. 2016 ; 9 : 71.
PubMed
3) Ghika-Schmid F, et al. Hyperkinetic movement disorders during and after acute stroke : the Lausanne Stroke Registry. J Neurol Sci. 1997 ; 146 : 109-16.
PubMed
4) Bansil S, et al. Movement disorders after stroke in adults : a review. Tremor Other Hyperkinet Mov. 2012 ; 2 : tre-02-42-195-1.
 
5) Ng TH, et al. Neuromagnetic brain activity associated with anticipatory postural adjustments for bimanual load lifting. Neuroimage. 2013 ; 66 : 343-52.
PubMed
6) Yiou E, Schneider C. Coordination of pointing and stepping : do postural phenomena result from the juxtaposition of the dynamics of each task? Neurosci Lett. 2007 ; 425 : 63-8.
PubMed
7) Yiou E, Do MC. Effects of medio-lateral postural perturbation induced by voluntary arm raising on the biomechanical organization of rapid step initiation. Motor Control. 2011 ; 15 : 507-24.
PubMed
8) 太田順, 他編. 身体性システムとリハビリテーションの科学 1, 運動制御. 東京大学出版会 ; 2018. p.124.
 
9) Sherman D, et al. Anatomical location of the mesencephalic locomotor region and its possible role in locomotion, posture, cataplexy, and parkinsonism. Front Neurol. 2015 ; 6 : 140.
PubMed
10) 西山和利. 金子厚. VII. 脳血管障害性パーキンソニズムの新しい診断法と治療. 日内会誌. 2015 : 104 ; 1585-90.
 
11) Coslett HB, et al. Dissociable neural systems for timing : evidence from subjects with basal ganglia lesions. PLoS One. 2010 ; 5 : e10324.
PubMed
12) Aparicio P, et al. Effects of focal basal ganglia lesions on timing and force control. Brain Cogn. 2005 ; 58 : 62-74.
PubMed
13) Stolze H, et al. Comparative analysis of the gait disorder of normal pressure hydrocephalus and Parkinson's disorder. J Neurol Psychiatry. 2001 ; 70 : 289-97.
 
14) Hollands KL, et al. Interventions for coordination of walking following stroke : systematic review. Gait Posture. 2012 ; 35 : 349-59.
PubMed
15) Malcolm MP, et al. Rhythmic auditory-motor entrainment improves hemiparetic arm kinematics during reaching movements : a pilot study. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2009 ; 16 : 69-79.
PubMed
16) 日本正常圧水頭症学会, 編. 特発性正常圧水頭症ガイドライン 第3版. メディカルビュー社 ; 2020. p.26-36.
 
17) Hikosaka O, et al. Parallel basal ganglia circuits for decision making. J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2018 ; 125 : 515-29.
PubMed
18) Yttri EA, et al. Opponent and bidirectional control of movement velocity in the basal ganglia. Nature. 2016 ; 533 : 402-6.
PubMed
19) Sawada M, et al. Function of nucleus accumbens in motor control during recovery after spinal cord injury. Science. 2015 ; 350 : 98-101.
PubMed
20) Masihuzzaman AM, et al. Effect of low dose levodopa on motor outcome of different types of stroke. Mymensingh Med J. 2011 ; 20 : 689-93.
PubMed
21) Boyd LA, et al. Explicit information interferes with implicit motor learning of both continuous and discrete movement tasks after stroke. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2006 ; 30 : 46-57.
 
P.343 掲載の参考文献
1) Kumral E, et al. Thalamic hemorrhage. Stroke. 1995 ; 26 : 964-70.
PubMed
2) Schmahmann JD. Vascular syndromes of the thalamus. Stroke. 2003 ; 34 : 2264-78.
PubMed
3) Carrera E, et al. Anteromedian, central, and posterolateral infarcts of the thalamus : three variant types. Stroke. 2004 ; 35 : 2826-31.
PubMed
4) Karnath HO, et al. Posterior thalamic hemorrhage induces "pusher syndrome". Neurology. 2005 ; 64 : 1014-9.
PubMed
5) Johannsen L, et al. "Pusher syndrome" following cortical lesions that spare the thalamus. J Neurol. 2006 ; 253 : 455-63.
 
6) Ghika J, et al. The "jerky dystonic unsteady hand" : a delayed motor syndrome in posterior thalamic infarctions. J Neurol. 1994 ; 241 : 537-42.
 
7) Kim JM. Delayed onset mixed involuntary movements after thalamic stroke : clinical, radiological and pathophysiological findings. Brain. 2001 ; 124 : 299-309.
 
8) Karnath HO, et al. The subcortical anatomy of human spatial neglect : putamen, caudate nucleus and pulvinar. Brain. 2002 ; 125 : 350-60.
PubMed
9) 高草木薫. 大脳基底核の機能 : パーキンソン病との関連において. 日生誌. 2003 ; 65 : 113-29.
 
10) 佐藤正之. 前頭葉の機能解剖と神経心理検査 : 脳賦活化実験の結果から. 高次脳機能研究 (旧 失語症研究). 2012 ; 32 : 227-36.
 
11) Bogousslavsky J, et al. Thalamic infarcts : clinical syndromes, etiology, and prognosis. Neurology. 1988 ; 38 : 837-48.
PubMed
12) Bourlon C, et al. Cortico-thalamic disconnection in a patient with supernumerary phantom limb. Exp Brain Res. 2017 ; 235 : 3163-74.
 
13) Serrada I, et al. Does sensory retraining improve sensation and sensorimotor function following stroke : a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Neurosci. 2019 ; 13 : 402.
PubMed
14) Broderick P, et al. Mirror therapy for improving lower limb motor function and mobility after stroke : a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gait Posture. 2018 ; 63 : 208-20.
PubMed
15) Kaneko F, et al. Brain regions associated to a kinesthetic illusion evoked by watching a video of one's own moving hand. PloS One. 2015 ; 10 : e0131970.
 
16) Aoyama T, et al. The effects of kinesthetic illusory sensation induced by a visual stimulus on the corticomotor excitability of the leg muscles. Neurosci Lett. 2012 ; 514 : 106-9.
PubMed
17) Karnath HO. Pusher syndrome-a frequent but little-known disturbance of body orientation perception. J Neurol. 2007 ; 254 : 415-24.
PubMed
18) 体軸のずれ (押す人症候群Pusher Syndrome). In : Davies PM, 著. 冨田昌夫, 訳. ステップ・トゥ・フォロー. シュプリンガー・フェアクラーク東京 ; 1987. p.285-304.
 
19) Pedersen PM, et al. Ipsilateral pushing in stroke : incidence, relation to neuropsychological symptoms, and impact on rehabilitation. The Copenhagen Stroke Study. Arch Physi med Rehabil. 1996 ; 77 : 25-8.
 
20) Baccini M, et al. The scale for contraversive pushing : a reliability and validity study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2006 ; 20 : 468-72.
PubMed
21) D'Aquila MA, et al. Validation of a lateropulsion scale for patients recovering from stroke. Clin Rehabil. 2004 ; 18 : 102-9.
 
22) Karnath HO, Broetz D. Pusher syndrome-a frequent but little-known disturbance of body orientation perception. J Neurol. 2007 ; 254 : 415-24.
 
23) Fujino Y, et al. Prone positioning reduces severe pushing behavior : three case studies. J Phys Ther Sci. 2016 ; 28 : 2690-3.
PubMed
P.354 掲載の参考文献
1) Bayev KV, et al. Convergence of cortico-and rubrospinal influence on interneurons of cat cervical spinal cord. Brain Res. 1973 ; 52 : 159-71.
 
2) 杉内友理子, 他. 運動制御にかかわる脊髄神経機構 (1) 脊髄の機能構成. 脊椎脊髄. 1993 ; 6 : 287-91.
 
3) Lance JW. Symposium synopsis. In : Feldman RG, et al, ed. Spasticity : disordered motor control. Year Book Medical Publisher ; 1980. p.485-94.
 
4) Kuypers HGJM. Anatomy of descending pathways to the spinal cord, their anatomy and function. In : JC Eccles, et al, ed. Progress in brain res. Organization of the spinal cord, vol II. Elsevier ; 1964. p.178-200.
 
5) 鈴木俊明. 脳血管障害片麻痺患者の痙縮の病態生理と持続的筋身長を用いた治療効果に関する筋電図学的検討. 藤田学園医学会誌. 2002 ; 21 (増刊) : 269-90.
 
6) 黒部正孝, 他. 異なる頻度の周期的な母指対立運動後の脊髄前角細胞の興奮性変化-最大頻度と50%頻度の比較-. 臨床神経生理学. 2020 ; 48 : 639-44.
Medical*Online
7) 鈴木俊明, 他. 非麻痺側手指伸展運動と同時の麻痺側手指伸展の運動イメージが効果を認めた脳血管障害片麻痺患者の1症例-F波を用いた検討-. 脊髄機能診断学. 2020 ; 41 : 34-7.
 
8) 鈴木俊明, 他監修. 神経疾患の評価と理学療法. アイペック ; 2015. p.180.
 
9) 鈴木俊明, 監修. 脳血管障害片麻痺に対する理学療法評価. 改訂第2版. 神陵文庫 ; 2017. p.19.
 

書評

最近チェックした商品履歴

Loading...